Home » Broadband Speed »Competition »Consumer News »Frontier »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

Frontier Urgently Trying to Restructure $17 Billion Debt as Chapter 11 Looms

Phillip Dampier September 23, 2019 Broadband Speed, Competition, Consumer News, Frontier, Public Policy & Gov't, Rural Broadband 11 Comments

Frontier Communications is preparing a detailed plan for bondholders explaining how the company hopes to cut its $17 billion in debt before it faces the possibility of bankruptcy.

The Wall Street Journal reports Frontier is ready to begin formal negotiations with those holding its debt to create a new payback plan before it faces the first of several repayment deadlines for bonds running into the billions, starting in 2022. But the strategy is risky because if any of the company’s major bondholders disagree, it could put Frontier on a fast track to Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.

Frontier’s debt problems are a consequence of its decision to expand its wireline footprint through acquisitions of castoff copper landline networks being sold primarily by Verizon Communications and AT&T. Critics have repeatedly called out Frontier for bungling network transitions with extended service outages, billing problems, and other customer service-related failures that left customers and some state regulators frustrated and alienated. The company is still facing regulatory review in states like Connecticut, where it failed to properly manage a customer cutover from AT&T’s systems to its own, and in Utah, West Virginia, California, and Florida where similar cutovers from Verizon Communications left more than a few customers without service and months of billing problems.

As a result, Frontier lost many of the customers it acquired, with many unwilling to consider doing business with the phone company ever again.

Although Frontier’s latest acquisitions of Verizon landline customers in California, Texas, and Florida included large Verizon FiOS fiber to the home territories, Frontier customers continue to disconnect service at a greater pace than the phone company’s chief cable competitors — Comcast and Charter Spectrum. Customer defections are even worse in large sections of Frontier’s stagnant “legacy” markets — service areas that have been managed by Frontier or its predecessor Citizens Communications for decades. That is because almost all of those legacy markets are still serviced by decades-old copper wire networks, many capable only of providing low speed DSL internet access.

Frontier’s large debt load is cited as the principal reason the company cannot embark on upgrade efforts to replace existing copper wiring with optical fiber. In fact, virtually all of Frontier’s fiber service areas have been acquired from AT&T or Verizon. Frontier executives have attempted to placate shareholders by promising to aggressively manage costs. But promises of dramatic savings have proved elusive and frequent media reports have emerged covering extensive service outages, poor network maintenance, ongoing billing and customer service issues, and inadequate staffing to address a growing number of service outages and problems. In several states, repeated 911 outages have triggered regulator investigations with the prospect of stiff fines.

Three Frontier insiders have privately shared their insights with Stop the Cap! about ongoing frustrations with the company and the most recent developments.

“Upper management has no comprehension that in many of our markets, customers have choices and they abandon us when all we can sell is DSL service at speeds often less than 12 Mbps,” one senior regional executive told us. “Our retention efforts are so poor these days, representatives are not really expected to rescue accounts because in most cases there is no legitimate reason to do business with us. In some states where there are high mandated surcharges, we cost more than our cable competitors.”

Another mid-level executive in one of Frontier’s largest legacy markets — Rochester, N.Y., said morale is low and a growing number of colleagues believe the days to bankruptcy are short.

Frontier Communications debt load.

“Our loyal customers are literally dying off, as their adult children disconnect decades-old landline accounts,” said an executive who wished to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to speak with the media. “The customer numbers have been ugly for a long time and are getting worse. Our recently retired customers who have had DSL and voice service with us since the 1990s are disconnecting because some have gone with Spectrum and others are moving out of the area. Some of these customers hate Spectrum and won’t do business with them no matter the price, but we are losing their business anyway when they move out of state.”

The Rochester executive noted Frontier has an impossible job trying to sell its internet and voice products against Charter Spectrum.

“Their offers are $40 a month for 100 Mbps internet and $10 for unlimited local and long-distance calls,” the executive noted. “Ours costs nearly $30 just for the phone line after taxes and fees, and how can you sell someone DSL that delivers less than 6 Mbps to many parts of a market still served by copper trunk lines to a central office several miles away? They also find out they have to lease our modem at an additional fee and there are other fees in the contract many customers have learned to look for. Answer: you can’t.”

A Frontier executive in Ohio shared a similar story.

“We hold our own in our rural markets where we can offer a customer better than dial-up internet, and our service is very good if you live in an area where we expanded broadband thanks to FCC subsidies. Some of these new areas are even served by fiber,” the executive explained. “The problem with this is fewer people live in rural areas and these places cost a lot more to maintain when we dispatch service crews or have to run new cable. For Frontier to be truly successful, we have to get better internet service into our larger older markets, but that means pulling copper off poles and putting up fiber and there is just no interest from the higher ups to spend the money to do this. So instead the company bought new territories to keep revenue numbers up, but we are also quickly losing many of those customers to cable too. I really don’t know what we will do when wireless companies offer 5G internet.”

Some Frontier bondholders recognize Frontier must reduce its debt to have the financial resources to expand fiber service. Others want the company to shed its legacy copper service areas (while keeping FiOS/U-verse enabled markets) either to regional companies willing to invest in upgrades or to hedge funds that would likely ring whatever remaining value still exists out of these abandoned service areas. Some suspect these hedge funds would also load up the spinoff companies with even greater debt to facilitate dividend payouts and other investor-friendly rewards.

It will be up to state and federal regulators to protect Frontier’s customers as the two emerging groups of conflicting bondholders angle to protect their investments, perhaps at the risk of reliable phone and internet service.

The Wall Street Journal:

One, including Elliott Management and Franklin Resources, pushed for an exchange of their bonds at a discount to their face value for new secured debt that would be paid before unsecured debt in a potential bankruptcy.

Still, bondholders including GoldenTree Asset Management have warned the company against doing such a swap since 2018, arguing it violated the terms of their bonds.

The company this week reached out to Houlihan Lokey, which represents a group of bondholders that includes GoldenTree—as well as JPMorgan Chase & Co., Oaktree Capital Management and Brigade Capital Management—to sign up to view a confidential restructuring proposal, a person familiar with the matter said. That group has yet to gather enough holders to form a majority, people familiar with the matter said.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David
David
10 months ago

I am not surprised. Given how little upgrading was done locally, Frontier is only offering 24/25 Meg. This area, in the greater Wausau,WI is legacy copper, going back to GTE many moons ago. Charter is much faster locally.
I believe that Frontier will be facing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy shortly.. I highly doubt they will get enough bondholders on board to go along with with their reorganization plan.

Eddie B
Eddie B
10 months ago

Same situation for me in Durham, NC, too. A lousy 3 Mbps in a fairly new area (~17-18 years) that’s only 2-3 miles from RTP. Thankfully, AT&T overbuilt fiber here. I can’t understand why anyone would sign up for Frontier here when you can get much faster speeds from AT&T or Spectrum.

Lee
Lee
10 months ago

There are areas where the speed has dropped because they put as many ports of the line as they can sell customers, and they will not increase the line capacity. Adding DSL repeaters will not solve your slow speed when the number of ports limits the amount of data you can get when every port is active with streaming or gaming.

Doug
Doug
10 months ago

At what point do regulatory bodies need to step back and take a look at the communications landscape. The land-line has been replaced with the cell phone. Old infrastructure for POTS is reaching end-of-life, and there aren’t enough customers still using it to generate enough income to maintain it, let alone upgrade it. Is it time to charge a “Universal Connection Fee” for cell phone / internet plans in order to fund infrastructure improvements in geographical areas left behind because of ROI?

Dylan
Dylan
10 months ago

*Cue Tom Rutledge (CEO of Charter) laughing in the background at Frontiers inability to compete*

Bobby
Bobby
10 months ago

Speaking as a Frontier employee I can tell you the degradation of internal processes such as provisioning, engineering, sales, even dispatch, are what most of us talk about to each other. Some days I can hear the old Benny Hill theme playing in my head as I try to figure out what is happening. Incompetence has permeated every level of the organization. There is no vision or hope for the future growth. Most everyone believes it’s only a matter of time til we’re all working somewhere else. It’s become a sad story to tell.

Jason
Jason
9 months ago
Reply to  Bobby

After 15 years with Verizon and to Frontier for the merger, i left, because the incompetence is running ramped in the company. Employees are chastised for everything. The company has forced employees to not care anymore. It’s a matter of time before bankruptcy comes.

Quentin L. Ledford
Quentin L. Ledford
8 months ago

This is what happens when a company is too busy lining the pockets of its executives to bother upgrading its services and building its infrastructure. In the BIGGEST, most idiotic boondoggle one can imagine, they actually bought a landline network from Verizon communications instead. These morons should go to jail for the fraud they’ve imposed on their customers through false Federal reporting. After years of paying through the nose for degrading service and increased costs, I was finally able to pay Verizon for internet service that actually works (albeit at $500.00 per month for LIMITED data). I’ll do everything within… Read more »

Quentin L. Ledford
Quentin L. Ledford
8 months ago

Frontier has made promise after promise saying that they were ‘improving’ service, but EVERYONE I know from every part of Cumberland county has experienced the same thing over the past 20 years, namely DECLINING service and ESCALATING costs. I run a business and I cannot run it without internet service. For years I paid these thieves nearly $500.00 per month for three lines and business DSL (which CONTRACTUALLY required that they FIX their services within 24 hours). Not only did they routinely let me go FIVE days or more without ANY service,. when their service did work it NEVER got… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Arnold: Not going to happen. I want Cox to make a deal on TWC. Google is in a different industry. That is going to ruin competition considering Google compete...
  • Mashfique Khan: Hi Phillip, Do you have the names of the street in Pasadena and Bellaire where the GigaPower is actually available. I've searching street by street b...
  • Kwame: You are obviously not a student of history, of the current state of African geopolitics. Stick to what you know - which seems to be telecommunications...
  • Milan In Austin: Phillip, what are your thoughts on petitioning Google to consider making an offer on TWC if the merger is blocked?...
  • speeds suck: That's still terrible speeds compared to fiber like Google or Verizon. 15mbps up! Lol my cell phone days speeds are faster than that....
  • MTA Victim #1210213: Great! Now we just need MTA to be abolished and Alaska will have good internet at last!...
  • ppppp: Verizon and Comcast, A match made in hell...
  • dancer: I'm against Verizon reducing their FiOS coverage by getting rid of highest FiOS based areas in Southern California where Verizon sells FiOS, Northern ...
  • Bonnie: I agree...
  • Bonnie: That's probably why the tennants at 1919 east Spruce st. #A Seattle Wa. 98122 are getting the cable service from this company for free. They just have...
  • Bernie B: Used the twitter method and was able to secure a reduction of $12.50 a month and got a speed up on internet from 5 up 50 down to 10 up 100 down. I li...
  • Phillip Dampier: Zimbabwe is one of the fastest growing African countries with respect to Internet access. Approximately 40 percent (5.2 million) of Zimbabwe's populat...

Your Account:

138
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Stop the Cap!