Home » Competition »Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

ATSC 3.0 TV Standard Will Launch in Multiple Cities by End of 2020; You’ll Need a New TV or Converter to Watch

Phillip Dampier April 9, 2019 Competition, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't 13 Comments

A new standard in over-the-air TV broadcasting could arrive as early as this year in more than 40 U.S. cities, bringing better reception and more TV channels and features to those willing to buy a new television or converter box to watch.

ATSC 3.0 comes just a decade after full power television stations in the United States ceased analog broadcasting. The ‘upgrade’ is a significant improvement over ATSC 1.0, the digital over-the-air television standard now in use in the U.S.

At the National Association of Broadcasters convention in Las Vegas, Sinclair, Fox Television Stations, Nexstar, and NBCUniversal (and a consortium group of stations owned by SpectrumCo and Pearl TV) this week announced 40 U.S. television markets would see ATSC 3.0 stations launched by the end of 2020, starting in these cities:

  • Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX
  • Houston, TX
  • San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA
  • Phoenix, AZ*
  • Seattle-Tacoma, WA
  • Detroit, MI
  • Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, FL
  • Portland, OR
  • Pittsburgh, PA
  • Raleigh-Durham, NC*
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Nashville, TN
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • San Antonio, TX
  • Kansas City, KS-MO
  • Columbus, OH
  • West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce, FL
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Austin, TX

To help the transition, ATSC 3.0 stations in these cities will switch off their ATSC 1.0 channels and relocate programming to one or more other local stations’ digital subchannels, allowing viewers with older sets to continue watching until a 5-year transition period ends.

The second, and likely larger wave of stations to switch on ATSC 3.0 will come in these cities:

  • New York, NY
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Chicago, IL
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Washington, DC
  • Boston, MA
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Tampa-St.Petersburg-Sarasota, FL
  • Minneapolis – St. Paul, MN
  • Miami – Ft. Lauderdale, FL
  • Denver, CO
  • Cleveland-Akron, OH*
  • Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, CA
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Indianapolis, IN
  • San Diego, CA
  • Hartford-New Haven, CT
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Milwaukee, WI
  • Greenville-Spartanburg, SC – Asheville, NC

The third wave of stations, still expected to complete a transition to ATSC 3.0 by the end of next year, are located in:

  • Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA
  • Oklahoma City, OK
  • Albuquerque – Santa Fe, NM
  • Grand Rapids – Kalamazoo, MI
  • Memphis, TN
  • Buffalo, NY
  • Providence – New Bedford, RI
  • Little Rock – Pine Bluff, AR
  • Mobile, AL – Pensacola, FL
  • Albany-Schenectady – Troy, NY
  • Flint-Saginaw – Bay City, MI
  • Omaha, NE
  • Charleston – Huntington, WV
  • Springfield, MO
  • Rochester, NY
  • Syracuse, NY
  • Chattanooga, TN
  • Charleston, SC
  • Burlington, VT – Plattsburgh, NY
  • Davenport, IA – Moline, IL
  • Santa Barbara – Santa Maria – San Luis Obispo, CA

*ATSC 3.0 is already running on one or more stations in these markets.

A faster transition to ATSC 3.0 may be possible in cities where station owners like Sinclair own more than one full power local station. It will make it easier for programming on one station to be temporarily shared on another, without complicated carriage contract negotiations. There is no forced transition to ATSC 3.0, so consumers can make their own choices about whether they want to invest in new televisions or converters. Broadcasters understand that, and many are planning to launch a host of new channels and networks that could benefit cord-cutters and convince them to upgrade.

Over the air viewers will need to get in the habit of remembering how to “rescan” their local channel lineup as stations occasionally disappear as they move to different channels as a result of an unrelated ongoing channel repack or from shifting around to accommodate ATSC 3.0. Some secondary networks like Retro TV, MeTV, Comet, and others may temporarily disappear in some markets if that channel space is temporarily needed for channel-sharing arrangements.

Cable, telco-TV, streaming and satellite customers should not notice a thing because any changes will be managed by your television provider. But those watching over-the-air will need to prepare for the transition either with a forthcoming TV converter or preparing to buy new television sets with ATSC 3.0 tuners. Details on both are sketchy, but free TV viewers may want to start saving money now for new equipment spending starting either late this year or more likely early next.

ATSC 3.0 promises better, more robust reception, with error correction and the capability of downgrading video quality in marginal reception areas to preserve a stable viewing experience. It also supports 4K Ultra-HD and better sound, mobile viewing on smartphones and other devices, and local features including hyper-local weather warnings, targeted advertising and some data applications.

13
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Mark BratcherBenPhillip DampierJoeBob Lee Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Josh
Guest
Josh

I’m sort of excited by ATSC 3.0, but also worried about what we’ll be left with. Whether it really requires the internet.

And whether TiVo is going to have a 3.0 model…

Bob Lee
Guest

Yep, and I have never bought into the internet, it is, in fact, a mega time waster, and, worst of all, the most crippling dream-breaker for our youth. The current atsc system is great. In this rural area we have one on air, that really belts the signal over parts of three states (WLFG), which includes eight (8) channels that make cord-cutting easier. The others struggle with “…half an old and half a used atsc trnsmttr” to dish out 2 or 3 channels, one having lost a major network affliation, tho the owner is a nice guy….

Joe
Guest
Joe

You never bought into it, yet here you are posting comments via the Internet.

Ben
Guest
Ben

Lol

Mark Bratcher
Guest
Mark Bratcher

See https://www.cordcuttersnews.com/will-3-0-ota-need-internet-work-answer-question/.

“In short yes 3.0 OTA TV can use the internet but NO you do not need internet to watch 3.0 OTA TV.”

Nick
Guest
Nick

Hopefully broadcasters won’t try to force people to connect their TVs to the internet. It will be interesting on how it turns out.

I do think the concerns of OTA TV becoming pay walled are a bit overblown as I doubt much of the OTA crowd would be willing to start paying a monthly fee on what was previously free.

Time will tell.

Ben
Guest
Ben

Youre probably right.

Ken
Guest
Ken

Two comments to a rather terse bit that should have been expanded upon:
“promises better, more robust reception, with error correction and the capability of downgrading video quality in marginal reception areas”

1) Like this is a new idea — it SHOULD have been part of ATSC 1.0!
and
2) It “promises”. ATSC 1.0 ‘promised’ superior quality HD at lower power levels too. How did THAT work out?

I’m hopeful, but I’ll believe it when I see it. And are there any ATSC 3.0 converter boxes out there for consumers yet?

Lou
Guest
Lou

ATSC 1.0 was as good as was possible with mid-90s technology. Two decades later, things have improved a bit, although not as much as we’re led to believe. Broadcasters may start with 4k streams, but they stand to make more money by lowering video quality and squeezing more channels in. That’s the real motivation for the FCC ramming this through… they’re addicted to auctioning off TV spectrum to cellular companies for big bucks, and hope to do it again in a few years.

Radioguy
Guest
Radioguy

Was it really? COFDM vs 8VSB was debated and both were ‘available’ in the 90s but we got the NIH silliness and ‘promises’ that 8VSB would provide better weak signal performance. It didn’t and now 3.0 promises a lot that I won’t believe until I see it. Particularly with ‘channel bonding’ and 4K promises which just (to me) imply that those of us with fringe reception will be even further abandoned.

Have there been any ‘real world ‘ tests done for ‘pure’ OTA performance? Don’t talk about how good theory says–show me the tests with real consumer grade equipment. Sigh.

RonaldRobles
Guest
RonaldRobles

Not yet don’t worry I’ll you know when they become available my email is [email protected] contact me anytime 24/7

Radioguy
Guest
Radioguy

It’s been a half year and the silence about consumer gear is deafening! Any news?

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • T.B.Told: After Frontier dumped yet again 10 more channels Starz/Encore we decided our contract was null& void. We were promised a credit which we never saw...
  • Debz: Thank Goodness I am not on autopay. Spectrum has double charged me on my statement and they refuse to remove it, but they can't tell me why I have a...
  • Randy: i can understand how you feel. If your in Central Florida conact us if not find a good local alarm contractor to provide your security. Always best to...
  • Randy Rickard: It seems so wrong for a company to just pull the plug most alarm companies that decide to call it quits assigns the systems to another company so I am...
  • SGB: My bill reflects a Broadcast TV Surcarge of $13.50. Outrageous!...
  • Scarlet: #stephanieisastupidfatbitch...
  • Ryan: Why pay twice as much for something as you have to? I can afford to pay $200 a month for cable. But why would I when they let me pay less? Would you g...
  • Michael Gibbons: Please go out of business FRONTIER... i had got rid of them in JAN, T-MOBILE has a data cap at 22gig but anything then had to fight frontier with the ...
  • Angela Cimo: I have requested this 9 times I get dupes of everything and they kept sending mail slightly changing the format unbelievable how bad this company is f...
  • Jason Lindig: After multiple years of getting 200 mbit+ from Time Warner and eventually Spectrum, one day my internet speeds dropped to around 80-100 mbit. The tech...
  • Bob sandburg: Does frontier and their ridiculous commercials realize that a “speed freak” is a person that does crystal meth or speed frequently? Idiots in the adve...
  • Craig: They told me I would only lose the monitoring which I can work around. They assured me that the phone app would still work. Surprise, the login is dea...

Your Account: