Home » Charter Spectrum »Competition »Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »WiredWest » Currently Reading:

Corruption? Massachusetts Giving Preferential Treatment, Taxpayer Dollars to Charter/Spectrum

The head of a state-funded group with direct ties to the Massachusetts governor’s office told local officials in New Marlborough that the Massachusetts Broadband Institute (MBI) “believes in cable companies” and is favoring one — Charter Communications, with an exclusive offer to invest millions in taxpayer dollars to entice Charter to bring its Spectrum cable service to town, while telling would-be competitors the money is only available to Charter Communications.

MBI was created in 2008, originally tasked with investing $50 million in state funds to help resolve the digital divide between eastern and western Massachusetts. MBI also manages the publicly owned, middle mile fiber optic network that towns in western Massachusetts are depending on as part of their plans to connect local residents to the internet.

In 2015, MBI suddenly yanked support for WiredWest, the region’s most robust and credible player in connecting residential homes and businesses. The group had spent several years organizing and educating some two dozen largely rural communities, and was well on its way to constructing a public broadband network for the towns that agreed to sign on to the project. Since 2015, a series of political disputes, bureaucracy, and confusion has stalled broadband expansion.

Peter Larkin, MBI’s board chairman, has been roundly criticized in many western Massachusetts communities for continuing MBI’s slow and cumbersome bureaucracy, frequent policy shifts, and most recently playing favorites with cable companies. Ignoring his own organization’s systemic failures and bureaucratic roadblocks, Larkin has recently leveraged community frustration with the slow pace of progress as an excuse to hand two of the nation’s largest cable operators public taxpayer dollars to complete a project MBI was directly responsible for stalling.


Under the latest proposal, outlined last Friday, Charter Communications would receive $3.1 million to expand Spectrum cable service to at least 96% of the community of New Marlborough. Originally, the town was responsible for $1.44 million in cost sharing with the state, a substantial sum for a community with a population just over 1,500 residents. Larkin last week offered to split the cost to the town, with the town’s share reduced to $720,000 — payable directly to Charter.

“The state is willing to cut the gap in half to make this project go,” Larkin said.

But that deal appears to be good only if the town selects Charter Communications. Over the last year, MBI has been allocating public taxpayer dollars towards private cable and phone companies, especially Comcast and Charter, to get the companies to agree to expand their cable systems in areas both have ignored for decades. WiredWest’s proposal made towns partners in the project. Larkin’s offer suggests taxpayers should pay up to 50% of the expansion costs, while Charter keeps 100% of the revenue and profits.

In the past, MBI’s financial carrots have been enough to get the two cable companies to expand using state matching funds alone, but as the town’s Broadband Committee Chairman Richard Long told the Berkshire Eagle after the meeting, he thinks this is the first time an unserved town in central or western Massachusetts will have to contribute local taxpayer funds as well just to get service from a cable company.

Larkin’s hard sell for Charter raised eyebrows among some in the town, especially after Larkin offered to use state funds to also finance their $720,000 portion of the deal over as much as a decade. Larkin claimed he wanted to get the project done and wanted to be helpful.

“The state may spend moneys or engage in other activities that benefit or incentivize private businesses in order to promote such [economic] development and it may authorize or partner with its cities and towns to do likewise,” Larkin recently wrote in a letter to towns offering to help them get negotiations going with the cable companies.

Town resident Dave Travis called Larkin’s offer something else.

“Call me a whistleblower, concerned citizen, activist for fairness, justice and democracy, but for Massachusetts Broadband Institute to show such blatant preferential treatment [to Charter] when there are qualified, experienced local options feels like corruption, and it needs some serious daylight,” Travis wrote.

WiredWest’s Tim Newman exposed just how far Larkin was willing to go to bat for Charter.

“Is the generosity you’re presenting to our town on behalf of Charter the same generosity if the town were to build its own network?” he asked Larkin.

“We do believe in the cable companies … we think it’s a value worth leaning in a little bit harder for,” he said, suggesting Charter has the financial ability to complete the project.

“So, the short answer is ‘no’ — the $720,000 would not be available?” Newman pressed.

“No,” Larkin answered.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
L. Nova
L. Nova
2 years ago

Charter bribed this guy Larkin.

2 years ago

I left Massachusetts 4 years ago for Florida. Hearing about corruption in my home state is nothing new. Recently, a letter showed up at a family members house back in Boston, a house I haven’t lived in in 12 years. It said that unless I take a “safe driving class”, my license would be suspended. I looked closer, and not only had I done this over 12 years earlier, but the date of offense was in 2003, and the date of “conviction” was 2018. Obviously they are trying to scam some money into their coffers, but believe me, this is… Read more »

Search This Site:


Recent Comments:

  • Sherika: What about the fact they're favoring businesses with free unlimited internet access with no data caps? They punish all of us who are residential ,a...
  • Sherika: We're being taken over without being able to have a chance to fight back because they're buying up everything to stop anyone from building their own i...
  • Andy: Screw time warner. If another service was available in my area I'd switch to them in a heartbeat. They're refusing to work with me to fix my low s...
  • todd: Say I buy a modem that meets the DOCSIS2 standard. Which (if any) of TWC's service levels would work for me? Then the same question for DOCSIS3. ...
  • todd: Which site? I'm reading this one. https://www.timewarnercable.com/en/support/internet/topics/modems.html It doesn't say any of the things you mention...
  • Scott: The margin's aren't that off, it's not that hard to figure out when you see their SEC reports, when you listen in on their earnings calls, when you se...
  • marco: the 90% margins you quote is misleading as you are probably just referring to gross margins. However, most of the costs are due to the SG&A and ca...
  • Loons In June!: There is a D2 standard and a D3 Standard. That's it and it is pointed out on the site. Powerboost is not active with a D3 modem due to channel bond...
  • Scott: So the Cable Co's new idea of "fairness" is penalizing and wringing massive profits out of 98% of their customers using data caps meant to cause users...
  • Scott: Funny, if there company wasn't so butthurt about an employee outsourcing his own job before they outsourced him, they probably would have promoted him...
  • ben: I can't believe he didn't realize they would see this. He could have easily set up a proxy at his house (with a few hundred grand a year, he could ha...
  • todd: "You cant compare a modem to a hard drive." I know the difference between a cable modem and a hard drive. You're missing the point. If TWC are goin...

Your Account:

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
Stop the Cap!