Home » Data Caps »Frontier » Currently Reading:

Frontier Website: Cap Language Revised, But Inconsistencies Remain

Phillip Dampier August 6, 2008 Data Caps, Frontier 9 Comments

Frontier’s webmasters have been working overtime today apparently doing some damage control, as well as issuing some clarifications about their new usage caps.   But like much of the mixed and muddied message customer service representatives are sending customers, the website now contains several inconsistencies and contradictions between the product description page and the Acceptable Use Policy.

Because of the changing story, we’ve decided to begin capturing and saving select pages from Frontier’s website and will be adding them to a new Reference Library under construction.   From there, you can download and save Adobe PDF versions of captured web pages, dated for your convenience.   Unfortunately, with the shifting positions of Frontier, what may be on the website today may be gone tomorrow.   If engaged in an effort to cancel service, it may be useful to have some of these pages available to reference, because customer service representatives may not be able to locate them.

Let’s breakdown what has changed in the last 24 hours.

First, it’s obvious readers are making a difference.   Frontier realizes they have a public relations problem on their hands of their own making.   The complaint calls and cancellation requests have clearly made an appropriate impact on the company, although not to the point of shelving the idea of a usage cap.   The company has instead decided to try and manage the story more carefully in hopes of controlling the message.   Unfortunately for them, as long as they want to impose caps on customers, we will be here to debunk the fictional excuses, expose the inconsistencies, and educate consumers about why they should not be convinced that less equals more.

Second, the original Acceptable Use Policy dated July 23, 2008 for residential customers remains in place:

Customers must comply with all Frontier network, bandwidth, data storage and usage limitations. Frontier may suspend, terminate or apply additional charges to the Service if such usage exceeds a reasonable amount of usage. A reasonable amount of usage is defined as 5GB combined upload and download consumption during the course of a 30-day billing period.

This is now in direct contradiction with a new section attached to the product information page for the residential DSL product, which includes this new language:

If I hit 5GB will my service be interrupted?
No. Your service will not be interrupted at 5Gb. You will continue to use our High Speed Internet service without disruption.

Does Frontier plan to limit my use of the Internet?
No, there are no plans to limit customer usage. On average a Frontier High-Speed Internet customer uses less than 1.5GB per month. Frontier residential High-Speed Internet service comes with 5G per month (about 5,000 Megabytes), which is more than double the monthly consumption of most of our subscribers.

We appreciate the company’s apparent new policy not to suspend or terminate accounts for exceeding their 5GB usage cap, but their Acceptable Use Policy requires immediate revision to ensure consistency.

Third, the newest promotional page includes this laugh-out-loud passage.   If you are seriously considering imposing a draconian usage cap of 5GB, which is obviously so unacceptable to a significant number of your customers that are calling to complain and cancel service, maybe this passage  is just pushing things a little too far:

We all love the Internet, and Frontier is committed to offering you all the bandwidth you need and want to take full advantage of the Web! Our basic residential Internet packages offers 5GB usage — that’s the equivalent of 500,000 basic text e-mails, 2,500 Photos, 40,000 Web Pages, over 300 Hours of Online Game Time, 1,250 downloaded songs, or a mixture of the above!

This kind of writing convinces me the folks in Frontier’s Marketing Department have finally joined the party.   Welcome aboard, but remember, if customers were upset enough to protest a 5GB usage cap, rubbing it in their face by telling them you love the Internet and are committed to offering all the bandwidth “you need” (if the year is 1988 and you have a 1200bps dial-up modem) will be seen as fighting words.   Telling customers 5GB a month lets you take full advantage of the Web is fine, if you never do anything except browse low density web pages.   Maybe we can Gopher and Telnet some things as well.   Somehow I doubt the marketing people will understand the irony of either.

The rest doesn’t get much better.   If Frontier wants to learn more about The Internets, they can use The Google to read about average customer reactions to broadband user caps and exactly what defines a “power user.”   Someone who exceeds 5GB a month hardly qualifies.   Also, another inconsistency:  If Frontier has not implemented a usage cap plan, then why does the language implementing it remain in the Residential Acceptable Use Policy?

What are “bandwidth caps” and what does it mean for Internet users?
“Caps” are thresholds where Internet Service Providers could deem usage in excess of “normal” usage. For the majority of our users, bandwidth caps will not be reached. However, some users have multiple servers or computers or download huge files that demand large amounts of available bandwidth. In response to these “power users,” the industry is moving toward “tiered usage” plans that would be applicable when consumption reaches certain bandwidth levels. This type of plan would result in heavy users paying for their fair share of usage and will make sure that average users do not subsidize high-usage consumers. Other Internet Service Providers like Comcast and Time Warner are testing these tiered usage plans. Frontier has not implemented tiered usage plans and will continue to evaluate if and when they would be necessary. If and when Frontier implements a tiered usage plan pricing and usage information will be communicated to all High-Speed customers.

Before we go, let me add there is a bit of good news from Frontier today, which is to their credit, assuming they publish this policy in the form of a written guarantee to customers, which amend their term contracts to assure them this language will remain in place regardless of if it appears on the website or not.   Until a written assurance is in hand, a promotional  blurb on a product description page is  insufficient to make me withdraw my recommendation to cancel service within the 30 day opt-out window:

If Frontier rolls out tiered usage plans, will my Pricing / Plan change if I am on a Frontier Price Protection Plan?
Pricing for customers on Frontier’s Price Protection Plan will not change during your initial term commitment if we roll out tiered usage plans.

This language should be slightly modified to state that any overage fees for bandwidth in excess of 5GB do not apply to Frontier Price Protection Plan customers, and that no penalty or disruption in service will occur if a customer exceeds the 5GB usage cap planned for more  formal implementation in the near future.   Assuming that language is in place, it means that customers on a 12-36 term commitment will not have to worry about any usage caps and they will not apply to them for the remainder of their contract. But, again, an inconsistency remains here as well.   The Acceptable Use Policy clearly states the 5GB limit is in place right now.   Further reference to this should also be included on the Terms & Conditions page, which also contains the opt-out clause, to clarify that usage caps do not apply to customers with a contract that does not specifically include them.

Stop the Cap! continues to call on Frontier to discard the usage cap limitation altogether.   Next week, we’ll have some better ideas for Frontier to consider that will not alienate their customer base and positions them to begin competing more effectively in their service areas.

This article was updated at 11:58pm, August 6, 2008 and replaces language from an article entitled “Breaking News” posted earlier this evening.

Currently there are 9 comments on this Article:

  1. Stephen says:

    As of 9:00pm, they have actually updated and added info to the site. It looks like they are trying to post info and not remove it. There is something seriously secretive going on at this company. They are obviously getting hit hard with this.

  2. Dave says:

    Looks like the 5GB language is still there to me.

  3. Steve says:

    as of 10:25 pm CDT…. It’s still there…..

    Bye-Bye Frontier….. After 25 years with you, I’m outta here….

  4. A really good service for doing this is at http://www.changedetection.com/


  5. hank delong says:

    Today, August 07- 2008
    I received an e-mail from [email protected]

    Which reads
    Dear Valued Customer,

    In the interest of protecting our Frontier customers, as well as securing
    the integrity of our Frontier network, beginning Tuesday, August 12, 2008 we will be requiring all customers to identify themselves when sending mail

    To find out if this change will impact you, or any of the computer users in
    your home or business, please visit us at:


    If you’re unable to send mail on or after Tuesday, August 12, 2008, please
    click on the link above or contact us at (800) 374-9669, 24 hours a day, 7
    days a week.


    The Frontier Support Team

    What exactly does: We
    will be requiring all customers to identify themselves when sending mail through our outgoing mail servers.??????

    How will this effect my gmail account?

    What exactly is: securing the integrity of our Frontier network??? I thought it was already secure. Is this an AT&T con job for when the NSA, through an act of congress can illegally snoop?

  6. phil says:

    This sounds like they are locking down the SMTP server for anonymous outbound e-mail. If this is the case, it’s not as bad as it sounds. Anonymous access to outgoing mail servers tends to often be insecure and can be abused by spammers who aren’t customers, or spammers who become customers in order to send their junk. This change makes it more difficult for non-customers to spam as well as those who are customers from engaging in naughtiness.

    This isn’t an effort to spy on you.

    My personal recommendation is cut ties with any ISP for e-mail, get yourself your own personal domain name for about $7 a year from 1&1 or GoDaddy, and then your e-mail address belongs totally to you no matter what ISP you use. No more address changes.

    I use Gmail as my central depository for all of my e-mail these days. Their spam filtering is great, and I actually wash all of my Road Runner and personal domain e-mail through Gmail first. It all sits conveniently online for me to access. If you need help with any of this, drop me a Comment with your e-mail address.

    I used to use Eudora (Outlook Express before that). I still use the former for very long term archival of e-mails – I have a government-like stance on e-mail. If it’s not spam or some newsletter, I never delete it. In both reporting and doing some project managing, I have repeatedly found old e-mail to be useful if a question gets raised down the road. Gmail is a bit different because they like labels and not folders, and it takes getting used to the one giant Inbox. But now I don’t care because I just use the Search utility to find things.

    BTW, you should be noticing your available storage space in Gmail increasing by small amounts just about every day or week. I think I started with up to 3 gigs of capacity and now it’s just passed 7, even though I am only consuming about 400 megabytes of storage currently.

    The only thing I hate about Gmail is the progress bar when you first arrive. I can definitely slow things down, at least using Internet Explorer.

  7. Hank, use gmail instead of your ISP’s mail. If you have a frontiernet.net address, you’re tied to your ISP, and more vulnerable when they do crazy stuff like a 5 GB cap. You’re going to have to cut the cord someday, might as well be now.

  8. William says:

    I think they should hire me for thier marketing department.

    For instance, instead of –

    “We all love the Internet, and Frontier is committed to offering you all the bandwidth you need and want to take full advantage of the Web! Our basic residential Internet packages offers 5GB usage — that’s the equivalent of 500,000 basic text e-mails, 2,500 Photos, 40,000 Web Pages, over 300 Hours of Online Game Time, 1,250 downloaded songs, or a mixture of the above!”

    I would write –

    “We all love the Internet, and Frontier is committed to offering you all the bandwidth you need and want to take full advantage of the Web! Our basic residential Internet packages offers 5GB usage — For our customers lucky enough to get 6Mbps service that equals almost 2 hours of download per month. (Thats almost 0.003% of a month!!!)

    But wait, it gets even better. For our less served customers at 3Mbps and 1 Mbps you get almost 4 to 12 hours per month, all for the same great price!!! And we promise, We’ll keep you at those rates or below for as long as you live.

    Thank you for choosing Frontier.”

    * Results Calculated from http://www.dslreports.com/calculator

    I spoke with my regional director today. (He’ll pick up the phone and actually try to help, About the only good thing about the company out here.)

    All he could say was that they are not implementing the cap at this time. Also, that since there has been so many inquiries, they will be mailing out the new terms with the Sept billing.

    They have a gag order and won’t discuss anything without going through PR first. But he is concerned because this was just recently thrown in his lap and agreed that published numbers and actual numbers don’t match.

Search This Site:


Recent Comments:

  • Jane Grenon: I ordered my live wave antenna on Jan 24 and just received it today on March 22. I had gotten through to customer service 2 weeks ago and they said it...
  • Wilhelm Elmore: Even cellular Internet can be problematic in these areas. I routinely drive through areas in upstate NY where there are cellular "black holes", basica...
  • Susan: I have also ordered the live wave antenna on Feb 2 and I have yet to receive it...
  • Louis DiMeglio: Umm. No it isn't. Sling is owned by Dish. DirecTV competes with their DirecTV Now product....
  • William Thompson: This is absolutely worthless. Poor rural communities and households where this is desperately needed aren't served in anyway. Major ISP's need to be...
  • Greg Cioffi: Get on with chat and tell them you want to cancel. They'll give you the loyalty phone number and a pin. I called simply saying the price was too much...
  • John Lodge: Eddie, Don't bother with all of those Antenna "DEALS" most of them are total JUNK. Secondly there is no such thing as a "DIGITAL" antenna, most anten...
  • Jose Rivera: If he send you the websites he used will u please send it to me as well...
  • Jose Rivera: I would love to know which site u went to check cause since i have 5 bedrooms thank God I read all the comments b4 ordering cause trust me i would ca...
  • Phillip Dampier: If you have another family member willing to put service in their name for a year, you can take everything back a Spectrum store and cancel service. T...
  • Phillip Dampier: Your promotion ended and your rate reset to the outrageous regular price....
  • Phillip Dampier: That is insane. I'd pack up all their equipment, take it to the cable store, cancel service, and then if another family member lives with you, use you...

Your Account: