Home » Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Online Video » Currently Reading:

Netflix Restores Concurrent Video Streams: Now Back to Two Per Customer

Phillip Dampier September 7, 2011 Consumer News, Editorial & Site News, Online Video 7 Comments

In what Netflix is characterizing as a technical fault, those who experienced a limit of one-stream-per-“Unlimited Streaming”-Account can now watch at least two streams at the same time once again.

Stop the Cap! broke the story on Netflix’s streaming crash diet on Labor Day after being contacted by several readers reporting the apparent new limitations.  Stop the Cap! confirmed them ourselves several times over the past three days, and so did Mashable‘s Ben Parr, who ran into the same error message we did after trying to stream multiple movies at the same time (although he had no trouble watching one movie and one television show concurrently.)

Netflix’s spokesman Steve Swasey called it a big misunderstanding this morning, telling us “no Netflix member is limited to less than two concurrent streams. A few Netflix members have heard differently from us, which is an error that we are correcting.”

Perhaps, but the errors continued straight through until early this afternoon, when we were finally able to confirm the launch of two concurrent streams without an error message.

Netflix has always maintained streaming limitations in their terms of service and in their Frequently Asked Questions.  The company, to this day, still proclaims “you may watch [Netflix streaming on] only one device at a time” if you are a stream-only customer.  Their terms of service emphasize this point in all-capital letters:

YOU WILL BE ALLOWED TO INSTANTLY WATCH SIMULTANEOUSLY ON ONLY ONE SUCH DEVICE AT ANY GIVEN TIME. For certain membership plans in the United States, you may instantly watch simultaneously on more than one Netflix ready device within your household. Click here to view the number of devices on which you may simultaneously view movies & TV shows that are associated with your plan. The number of devices and concurrent streams may change without notice to you. For certain limited membership plans in the United States, your available Netflix ready device may be limited to personal computers.

While those clearly are the policies of Netflix, the reality has been customers could easily stream two or more concurrent shows over their Netflix streaming account from different devices without provoking an error message.  But that changed this past weekend, when we began to receive news tips from frustrated customers.

Some consumers never realized they could watch multiple streams at the same time, and were unconcerned with Netflix potentially limiting this feature.  For them, it was tantamount to abusing their Netflix account.  It is a fact some customers have shared their accounts with friends and family members, something that streaming restrictions would go a long way to discourage.  But there are legitimate uses as well, especially in large families with different viewing habits.

We feel it’s important for Netflix to convey exactly what their policy is regarding concurrent video streaming.  If Steve Swasey wants customers to feel assured they can watch two streams concurrently, their FAQ and terms of service should be updated to reflect that.  It’s clear Netflix reserves the right to change the number of devices and concurrent streams without notice, something our readers obviously feel very strongly about.

Whether this was truly a technical fault or a trial balloon that came crashing down under negative customer reaction, the message is clear: most customers are very glad to have concurrent streaming back, and hope it remains a part of the Netflix experience.

Currently there are 7 comments on this Article:

  1. Simon says:

    Oh look. It’s back. How wonderful.

  2. Scott says:

    Oh look Netflix stock is now at $77/share from it’s high of $300.. Keep up the good job Hastings!

  3. Rimtu says:

    Nope, this whether an “error” or a trial is stll not fixed. In fact I wasn’t affected, until yesterday the 25th of October. Now when my sis watches on TV and I watch on my tablet, I get the 1 movies at a time error talking about limit of my membership. Netflix is screwing up the loyalty they’ve worked so hard to earn.

    • I see the error message about 1 stream at a time, even when streaming two things concurrently and trying to launch a third, so I think there is an error with the error message.

      AFAIK, they are still allowing two streams these days. I agree with you, however, when you share they are alienating customers. Nearly one million have left as a result.

  4. Graham Barr says:

    We share a single account in our house and have never seen this issue. We stream to 2 iPads all the time.

    That was until last night. We are now unable to concurrently stream 2 TV shows.

    I notice in the TOS now that they have placed in upper case

    YOU MAY INSTANTLY WATCH ON UP TO SIX UNIQUE AUTHORIZED NETFLIX READY DEVICES. YOU WILL BE ALLOWED TO INSTANTLY WATCH SIMULTANEOUSLY ON ONLY ONE SUCH DEVICE AT ANY GIVEN TIME

    The TOS has always had the text that you can only watch one at a time even though they allowed two.

    So either the glitch is back, or Netflix has chosen the new year to enforce the rule.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Lori Palmer: I just called time warner/spectrum and was specifically told $69.99 is the lowest tier package available. I live in NYS. They did confirm you only nee...
  • L Nova: Verizon is waiting for Frontier to recover from the bungled CTF acquisition to sell off the remaining unwanted wireline in the remaining states the te...
  • Paul Houle: Upstate NY has cities that are too far apart for everyone to be covered, but close enough that the stations argue over who has what turf. Utica is l...
  • Willie: Yep. I was just thinking. Thanks Google, for screwing over Buffalo, Syracuse and Rochester. The other streaming services seemed to be ignoring upstate...
  • FredH: So - what's the matter with New York state?...
  • xnappo: Man. Really starting to wish we hadn't complained about Comcast buying TWC. Charter/Spectrum are so so so much worse....
  • L. Nova: That's the point. Verizon & AT&T want OUT of the landline business by 2020. That's why they are waiting for Frontier to recover from the mass...
  • BobInIllinois: This incident goes to show that even Manhattan hipsters cannot get Verizon to care about fixing POTS/DSL/Copper problems....
  • L Nova: Frontier's stock has remained stable the last few weeks since their 15-to-1 reverse stock split. I see another wireline buyout from Verizon coming in ...
  • Shaun: I think it is more like, "Are they going to expand Fios?" Here, they just plainly flat out refused to do it, so, velocity said, if they won't, we will...
  • Phillip Dampier: From the looks of it, they vastly oversell their broadband service and lack adequate capacity to support their advertised speeds. So you buy 150Mbps w...
  • Phillip Dampier: Can you imagine an outage like this lasting nearly three weeks in the 70s or 80s. Yes you can... if you lived in Ghana....

Your Account:

%d bloggers like this: