Recent Articles:

T-Mobile Prepaid Deal Brings Down Online Ordering System As Customers Beat Down the Doors

Phillip Dampier September 20, 2011 AT&T, Competition, Consumer News, T-Mobile, Wireless Broadband Comments Off on T-Mobile Prepaid Deal Brings Down Online Ordering System As Customers Beat Down the Doors

LG Optimus T

Some analysts would have you believe nobody wants to keep doing business with T-Mobile, but when the price is right, it can bring the company’s online ordering system to its knees.

T-Mobile’s prepaid division ran a sale this morning on a refurbished LG Optimus T, an entry-level Android v2.2 smartphone, for just $82.49.  In addition to free ground shipping, the phone also included $30 in airtime credit (as all of their $50+ prepaid phones currently include).

T-Mobile exhausted its supply within hours, but not without some frustration from customers who found completing the order difficult when the website began to fail from all of the traffic.

“This is an amazing deal, especially when combined with some “cashback” programs run by websites like Fatwallet, which knocked another $7.50 off the price,” writes Stop the Cap! reader Jenny Truro.  “T-Mobile’s prepaid service is actually a good deal when you top up once for $100, because all subsequent refills in any amount won’t expire for an entire year.”

Truro doesn’t use a cell phone enough to justify a standard two-year contract plan, and hated dealing with AT&T’s GoPhone prepaid plan because minutes were costly and expired quickly.

“AT&T lets you keep minutes up to a year when you spend $100, but you have to keep renewing at $100 every year if you want to hang on to last year’s minutes,” Truro says. “T-Mobile doesn’t stick you with that, and some of the other providers charge way too much per minute.”

Truro says the LG Optimus T she purchased this morning will be her introduction to smartphones.

“If I find I don’t use it enough to justify paying for prepaid data plans and other features, it was not an expensive experiment.”

The LG Optimus T can also be unlocked by T-Mobile by calling customer service 60 days after activating the phone on their network.  That allows the phone to be used on other providers’ networks with an appropriate SIM card.

Since AT&T announced its intention to merge with T-Mobile, analysts have declared T-Mobile a white elephant — one that postpaid customers are increasingly leaving.  But T-Mobile’s innovative, often-aggressive pricing proves that for the right price, customers will not only stick with the carrier, they’ll be joined by thousands of others willing to sign up.

“Shaw Kept Me On Hold for Three Hours and Then Hung Up On Me,” Says Outraged Alberta Customer

Phillip Dampier September 19, 2011 Canada, Consumer News, Shaw Comments Off on “Shaw Kept Me On Hold for Three Hours and Then Hung Up On Me,” Says Outraged Alberta Customer

Julia Chastin is old enough to know that life sometimes makes you wait, but three hours is ridiculous.

Chastin (her maiden name, to protect her privacy), is a customer of Shaw Cable in Fort Macleod, Alb.  Her Internet service went down last weekend when the neighbor’s overzealous application of a “weed whacker” went awry and damaged her cable connection.  Chastin called Shaw Cable to report the problem, and there began her life in call queue hell.

“Usually companies who make you wait will tell you if their lines are especially busy, which is fine because I can just set the telephone on the speakerphone and go about my business until someone answers, but this turned a phone call into an afternoon adventure,” Chastin says.

In total, it was two hours, fifty-three minutes before a human being finally came on the phone, but only briefly.

“I heard this fumbling sound like someone’s headset was coming off, some mumbling and laughter, and then the line disconnected,” Chastin reports.  “I was furious.”

Chastin is not alone.

“Shaw’s hold times are legendary here in the west,” says Rob Kelvey, a Shaw customer near Vancouver.  “You can easily wait on hold an hour or two before someone answers, and that is day or night.”

Kelvey reports Shaw teases customers with an option inviting customers to accept a call back from a Shaw representative instead of waiting on hold, but it doesn’t work.

“I have used this option at least three times in the past year or so and it has never worked once.”

The problem isn’t just noticed by customers.  A recent polite editorial in the Grand Forks (B.C.) Gazette called out Shaw’s ridiculous hold times and poor customer service:

There are probably many people out there who have had to call the cable company when a TV or Internet-related problem arises only to be put on hold and not just recently.

It is not unusual to be put in a phone queue, especially when it comes to customer service, but the sometimes extraordinarily long wait times can even test those with the greatest of patience.

“Three hours isn’t patience, it’s perseverance,” retorts Chastin.

Customer Service Scoreboard bottom-rated Shaw, based on several hundred responses from customers.  More than 300 were critical of Shaw; only 17 people shared positive experiences with the company’s representatives.   The website rated Shaw Cable a dismal 29 out of 200, putting them firmly in the “terrible” category.

“Sometimes it really is faster to walk to a local Shaw Cable office to report problems instead of calling them on the phone, an ironic fact for a telecommunications company,” says Kelvey.

Shaw officials will occasionally tweet apologies for extended hold times and suggest customers use their online chat customer support feature or their Facebook page for assistance.  But some customers found Shaw’s online chat had “hold times” as well, sometimes as long as 40 minutes.

“Fort Macleod doesn’t offer a lot of options for Internet access, so waiting for Shaw is unfortunately the best option, but when I finally did manage to get someone on the phone, they heard from me good and I received a $20 service credit as an olive branch, which I appreciated,” Chastin says.

“I’d appreciate more not having to wait my life away on hold for hours even more.”

Netflix CEO: “I Messed Up,” On Price Changes, But Gives Customers New Reasons to QUITster

Phillip Dampier September 19, 2011 Consumer News, Online Video, Video 1 Comment

Get ready for Qwikster

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings apologized this morning on the company’s blog for the perceived lack of “respect and humility in the way we announced the separation of DVD and streaming, and the price changes,” imposed on customers this month.

Many members love our DVD service, as I do, because nearly every movie ever made is published on DVD, plus lots of TV series. We want to advertise the breadth of our incredible DVD offering so that as many people as possible know it still exists, and it is a great option for those who want the huge and comprehensive selection on DVD. DVD by mail may not last forever, but we want it to last as long as possible.

I also love our streaming service because it is integrated into my TV, and I can watch anytime I want. The benefits of our streaming service are really quite different from the benefits of DVD by mail. We feel we need to focus on rapid improvement as streaming technology and the market evolve, without having to maintain compatibility with our DVD by mail service.

So we realized that streaming and DVD by mail are becoming two quite different businesses, with very different cost structures, different benefits that need to be marketed differently, and we need to let each grow and operate independently. It’s hard for me to write this after over 10 years of mailing DVDs with pride, but we think it is necessary and best: In a few weeks, we will rename our DVD by mail service to “Qwikster”.

We chose the name Qwikster because it refers to quick delivery. We will keep the name “Netflix” for streaming.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/YouTube An explanation and some reflections 9-19-11.flv[/flv]

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings apologizes and explains the company’s new mailed DVD service Qwikster.  (3 minutes)

Hastings promises little will change with Netflix’s DVD-rental business except the name.  But is that enough to erase the perceived price and policy changes customers are complaining about?  Some of our readers say no, and most of the 10,000+ comments on Netflix’s blog as of this afternoon were also very hostile.

“He’s re-arranging the deck chairs and calling them lounge seats, but they are really the same deck chairs,” shares reader Tom Defrancisco in Austin, who shared the story with us.  “The ship is still taking on water, and that will only get worse when the rest of Hollywood gets their piece.”

Defrancisco is referring to ongoing content contract renewals Netflix is pursuing to keep, and expand, its online video streaming.  With the potential forthcoming loss of content from Starz, which could take a significant amount of current movie titles offline, subscribers may not be willing to pay more for less content to stream.

“It’s inevitable Netflix will have to raise streaming prices in the next six months when some of their content deals are renewed, and I am asking myself if it is worth $10-12 a month to stream old documentaries, TV shows, and movies I barely care about when current movies are simply not available online,” Defrancisco adds.

[flv]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CNBC Netflix Quixster Equals Quitster 9-19-11.flv[/flv]

CNBC investors and analysts are calling Netflix’s announcement they are splitting up their streaming and DVD rental business a “the third strike” for the company and are telling investors to get out before it’s too late.  “Qwikster=QUITster,” says Michael Pachter, Wedbush Securities, who thinks customers are once again the big losers.  “In the last three months, customers have seen prices rise, the quality of streaming content decline, and they just made the service a lot more complicated.”  (4 minutes)

Several of our readers miss Netflix’s 1-out-DVD/streaming companion plan, which used to offer unlimited streaming and one DVD rental at a time for $9.99 a month.

“I don’t care if they call it Netflix or Qwikster or MasterWatch,” says our reader Kyle. “It’s the same thing at the same high price called something else.  Who are they trying to fool?  I think it’s very telling Mr. Hastings doesn’t even directly own shares in his own company, and has sold off tens of millions in indirect shares he controls.”

The company’s new YouTube channel is also being pelted with negative views of Netflix’s latest business moves.

VoiceOreezn:

You guys just don’t get it. You don’t care what your subscribers want, and now are trying to justify your actions. Your streaming service sucks, and the pickings are very slim. I cancelled my account. It’s not about price, it’s about greed. You started off with a good concept, (but not enough streaming movies). Now, you’re just another greedy corporation. Want people back? Give them MORE, not less. I’d be very afraid of Amazon if I were you.

Netflix stock has lost nearly 50 percent of its value since the company first announced its price increase and plan changes on July 12.  Last week, Netflix admitted it was adding fewer new subscribers than forecast since raising prices nearly 60 percent on combination streaming-DVD plans.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Bloomberg Cory Johnson Discusses Netflix Subscriptions 9-16-11.flv[/flv]

Bloomberg talks with Cory Johnson about the outlook for Netflix Inc., after the company cut its U.S. subscribers forecast following a price increase.  Netflix has some surprise expenses coming up.   (2 minutes)

Some analysts, including Gabelli & Co analyst Brett Harriss don’t think today’s developments will make much of a difference, telling Reuters Hastings has talked repeatedly about separating the businesses in the past.

But one thing Qwikster will bring that Netflix never had: video game rentals for Wii, Playstation 3 and XBox 360 owners.

Seven States Sue AT&T Over T-Mobile Merger; Seek Protection for Wireless Consumers

Phillip Dampier September 19, 2011 AT&T, Competition, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Rural Broadband, T-Mobile, Video, Wireless Broadband Comments Off on Seven States Sue AT&T Over T-Mobile Merger; Seek Protection for Wireless Consumers

At least seven states including New York, California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Washington and Ohio have announced they are joining the Justice Department lawsuit to stop AT&T’s attempted buyout of T-Mobile USA.

The merger has been heavily criticized by consumer groups for its potential to reduce wireless competition and stifle the marketplace with just two dominant carriers — AT&T and Verizon Mobile.  Now several Attorneys General have joined the voices of opposition to the merger.

“This proposed merger would stifle competition in markets that are crucial to New York’s consumers and businesses, while reducing access to low-cost options and the newest broadband-based technologies,” New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman said in a statement.

Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna said the deal would “result in less competition, fewer choices and higher prices for Washington state consumers.”

“The proposed merger would create highly concentrated markets in Massachusetts and could lead to higher prices and poorer service.” Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said.

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said the deal would “substantially lessen competition for mobile wireless telecommunications services in Illinois and across the United States.”

“Blocking this acquisition protects consumers and businesses against fewer choices, higher prices, less innovation, and lower quality service,” Madigan added.

“Our review of the proposed merger between AT&T and T-Mobile has led me to conclude that it would hinder competition and reduce consumer choice,” California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris said. “Enforcement of antitrust law is the responsibility of the Attorney General and is vital to protecting our state’s economic strength and tradition of innovation for the betterment of all Californians.”

Shuler

Although the level of opposition to the transaction continues to grow, AT&T itself claims to remain confident it can push the merger through.

“It is not unusual for state attorneys general to participate in DOJ merger review proceedings or court filings,” AT&T representative Michael Balmoris said.

Several Democratic lawmakers, most of whom receive substantial campaign contributions from AT&T, would seem to underline the company has the support of at least some in Congress.

Rep. Heath Shuler (D-North Carolina), joined 14 Democratic co-signers in a letter sent Thursday to President Barack Obama encouraging him to support the merger deal.

“By settling the proposed merger of AT&T and T-Mobile USA we can put thousands of Americans back to work and promote economic development across the country,” Shuler said. “I urge the President to strongly consider the vast benefits this merger will have on job creation and the economy and quickly resolve any concerns the Administration may have with the proposal.”

Among the co-signers: Rep. John Barrow, Rep. Mike Ross, Rep. Dan Boren, Rep. Dennis Cardoza, Rep. Joe Baca, Rep. Leonard Boswell, Rep. Ben Chandler, Rep. Jim Costa, Rep. Henry Cuellar, Rep. Mike McIntyre, Rep. Mike Michaud, Rep. Collin Peterson, Rep. Loretta Sanchez, and Rep. David Scott.

AT&T currently also has support for their deal from 11 states, many which receive very little service directly from T-Mobile: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.

A court hearing is scheduled for Sept. 21 to discuss settlement options.

[flv width=”480″ height=”290″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/KFOR Oklahoma City ATT T Mobile Merger 9-19-11.mp4[/flv]

KFOR in Oklahoma City explores the latest developments in the T-Mobile/AT&T merger case.  (2 minutes)

Richmond, Va. Cable Franchise Money Mystery: Where Did All the Money Go?

Phillip Dampier September 19, 2011 Comcast/Xfinity, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Verizon, Video Comments Off on Richmond, Va. Cable Franchise Money Mystery: Where Did All the Money Go?

Richmond's public access channels operate from offices like these in city hall. (Courtesy: WTVR)

City officials in Richmond, Va. are facing questions about where the tens of thousands of dollars in fees collected every year from cable TV customers in the city ultimately go.

WTVR-TV in Richmond received an anonymous tip suggesting most of the money collected isn’t being spent according to plan.

Ordinance 2007-32-44 requires that part of the city’s franchise fee collected from providers like Verizon and Comcast “will be used to support public, educational and government (PEG) programming.”

But a WTVR investigation found that most of the money collected since 2007 — nearly $1.2 million — was instead parked in a Richmond city bank account.

The city has only spent around $70,000 dollars of franchise funds on a new camera, microphones, some lighting and a video editing system; but only for government channel 17, the one showing the mayor and city council at work, according to the station.

That means local politicians look fine on government access channels even as public access and educational programming languishes.  In fact, nothing tells that story better than a look at the makeshift offices in place to support Public Access programming — one the size of a broom closet located inside City Hall.

[flv width=”480″ height=”290″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WTVR Richmond Cable TV money and the city of Richmond 9-14-11.mp4[/flv]

WTVR in Richmond investigates where cable franchise fees collected by the city of Richmond are being spent.  (3 minutes)

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!