Additional details about Time Warner Cable’s new TV Essentials package, which provides a more limited cable TV lineup to viewers are making their way to Stop the Cap!
So far, Wall Street appears generally unimpressed with Time Warner’s efforts to retain customers planning to depart the cable company over cost issues. Richard Greenfield of BTIG says consumers have to give up too much to subscribe to a package that deletes many of America’s most popular basic cable networks and delivers no HD programming.
The package seems to alienate every age group. Stop the Cap! confirmed Time Warner Cable made most of the decisions about the channel lineup themselves, and although some networks are insistent about not being excluded from such packages, many of the decisions about what channels to leave out were made by the cable company. For example, younger viewers will miss Comedy Central despite the fact the network is hardly the most expensive basic cable channel around, and nothing prevented them from carrying it. We’ve also learned the Essentials package deletes several more channels some consumers will consider deal-breakers to lose. We’ve confirmed in Ohio, customers will have to give up Food Network and The Weather Channel. No Ms. Palin’s Alaska either — TLC is also off the channel lineup.
We’ve learned from a few of our readers in Akron and Cleveland who inquired about the new package that Time Warner told them they cannot continue to get phone or Internet service with the Essentials package on their account. We earlier heard customers were supposed to be excluded from promotional deals for these services, not banned from buying them at any price. We’re trying to get a confirmation from Time Warner’s northeast Ohio division about this, and suspect there might be some mis-communication going on here.
Greenfield adds Time Warner is offering a lousy deal to budget-minded consumers.
“Cable subscribers looking to save money have already defected to Dish Network’s $40 package called America’s Top 120, which is better than TV Essentials,” he noted.
Meanwhile, residents in upstate New York — watch out. Time Warner Cable is finalizing its decisions about 2011 rate increases which are likely to be announced in mailers sent just after the holidays. A source tells Stop the Cap! the rate increases will echo the ones in North Carolina. The biggest rate increases will hit customers only getting one or two services from the cable company. Video customers can expect the largest increases. Phone rates will likely remain unchanged for most.
Customers will be encouraged to avoid the rate increases by bundling services. Time Warner Cable raised rates on western New York customers three times in 2010 for different services. This rate increase, likely effective in February, will be similar in percentage to the one announced last winter. The company will blame programming costs and also use the introduction of several new services, including Primetime on Demand, Look Back, and Remote DVR as justification for the rate hikes.
We’ll have much more coverage on this in late December.
You can preview the excuses for forthcoming rate hikes from Time Warner Cable by listening to a company representative in North Carolina deliver them to customers there, who will see their rates increase Dec. 3rd (from WFMY-TV Greensboro). (2 minutes)
Don’t want blazing fast fiber optic broadband speeds? Unhappy with fiber optic quality video and want to go back to putting a satellite dish on your roof? If the answer to either question is “yes,” Frontier Communications has good news for you.
The phone company, which assumed control of a handful of communities formerly served by Verizon’s fiber-to-the-home FiOS network, has announced it will begin marketing DSL and satellite TV services to its fiber customers.
Frontier CEO Maggie Wilderotter told investors on a third quarter results conference call that FiOS broadband could be too expensive.
Wilderotter noted Verizon would not allow customers in a FiOS neighborhood to buy DSL service, which leaves budget-minded customers behind.
“Now, FiOS starts at like 50Mbps and it’s very expensive. It’s like $50 a month for a customer. So they left a whole host of customers behind from an affordability perspective who didn’t need that kind of capability on broadband.” Wilderotter explained. “We have just over the last 30 to 60 days opened up DSL in all of the FiOS markets to give the customer choice. So the customer can choose whether they want FiOS broadband or they want high-speed Internet service, typically, and in those markets we’re offering around 6 to 7Mbps.”
Time Warner Cable occasionally runs promotions helping customers break free from Frontier's multi-year service contracts.
Of course, Frontier FiOS starts at 15Mbps — not 50, and that costs $50 a month for standalone service. For $99, ($89 in Verizon FiOS areas), customers can get broadband, cable TV and unlimited phone service. Frontier’s “Turbo” DSL service is priced at $40 a month for up to 7.1Mbps service.
Wilderotter also noted their FiOS customers can also choose to skip fiber video and go with DirecTV.
“We think that customers should be able to choose what kind of video they want,” she said. “We have aggressive offers in the market for both DirecTV and for FiOS video, but in our vernacular, what we care about is keeping the customer, getting the customer to take more products and services from us and making sure the customer is happy with the choice.”
Wilderotter said Frontier is prepared to tolerate more congestion on its DSL circuits than Verizon permitted, which opens the door to potential traffic slow-downs down the road.
“We’ve opened up in many of these locations the opportunity to sell high-speed service up to 95% capacity on the equipment that we have out in the field. Verizon had set a parameter at 75%,” Wilderotter said.
The company continues to study whether Frontier FiOS is worth maintaining or expanding outside of the Verizon territories where it was originally constructed.
“We are still evaluating it from a financial perspective and a customer perspective, and from a cost perspective and a revenue perspective,” Wilderotter told investors. “In terms of what that does for us overall, what it does for churn, how much does it really cost to extend this capability in the markets that we’re in today — we think that analysis and evaluation will go on through the first quarter [of 2011] and then we’ll be able to make some [decisions] in terms of what we want to do with FiOS from an expansion perspective or a maintenance perspective.”
Frontier Communications CEO Maggie Wilderotter answered questions about broadband expansion and the impact of the fall elections on telecommunications policy in Washington. (11 minutes)
You must remain on this page to hear the clip, or you can download the clip and listen later.
<
p style=”text-align: center;”>
Frontier's largely rural service areas provide a captive audience for the company's DSL broadband service.
In the near term Frontier has several plans to get more aggressive in the marketplace to meet its target goal of losing only 8 percent of their customers per year — a goal that illustrates legacy phone companies are still on a trajectory towards fewer and fewer customers:
Don Shassian, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Frontier reports expansion of DSL remains a top priority for Frontier. The company is on track to deliver access to 300,000 additional homes by the end of the year. Verizon delivered access to 64 percent of Frontier’s acquired territories. Frontier wants to get that number up to 85 percent. But part of that target is not just expanding service to unserved areas. It’s also trying to win back customers lost to other providers through promotions and incentives.
Frontier plans to resume aggressive promotions in the coming weeks and months, including its “free Netbook” promotion, which provides a Netbook computer to new customers signing up for several packages of services, committing to remain with Frontier for at least two years.
Frontier intends to push “price protection agreements” on as many customers as possible. Their “Peace of Mind” program locks customers into multi-year contracts with stiff cancellation penalties. Wilderotter noted: “I think, as you know, in our legacy markets, 96% of all of our sales are on a price protection plan and we have close to 60% of our residential customers on a one-, two- or three-year price protection plans. That number is below 15% in the acquired markets. So we’re also driving for price protection plans with every sale that we’re doing in these new markets as well.” Such contracts dramatically discourage a customer from disconnecting Frontier, because fees for doing so can exceed $300 in some cases. Frontier has been heavily criticized by some customers and State Attorneys General for deceptive business practices regarding contracts.
Frontier continues to enjoy a lack of solid cable competition in its largely rural service areas. Shassian reports Comcast competes with Frontier in only about 32% of homes in some areas, Time Warner Cable in about 23%, and Charter below 15%. With reduced competition, Frontier often represents the only broadband option in town.
Frontier is also spending an increased amount of time coping with copper thefts, especially in West Virginia where the company is warning would-be thieves it will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.
“Damage to our facilities can affect communications access in an emergency, increase company costs and consumer rates, and disrupt community phone and broadband connections,” said Lynne Monaco, Frontier’s Director of Security. “When network connections are severed by copper thieves, it endangers customers and emergency responders and poses significant risks of personal injury and property damage.”
Just last week, West Virginia state police solved another copper caper that disrupted service for some customers.
The Charleston Daily Mail reports:
Stephanie Burdette of Charleston was arrested in connection with a copper wire theft.
Trooper A.B. Ward from the South Charleston detachment went to the Fishers Branch area of Sissonville last Thursday afternoon when a Frontier worker discovered a section of the communications line missing. The worker found that 300-feet of the 400-pair line, valued at about $5,000, was missing, according to a complaint filed in Kanawha Magistrate Court.
A trooper who had worked on a similar investigation told Ward to check the home of Ervin “Tubby” Page, 49, where troopers had previously found evidence of wire burning. Ward went to Page’s home, described as a Goose Neck travel trailer parked next to the Guthrie Agricultural Center in Sissonville, and found three burn barrels about 50 feet in front of the trailer. One of them was on fire.
Page’s girlfriend Stephanie Marie Burdette, 25, of Cross Lanes, was at the scene when the trooper arrived. Ward spoke to her then checked out the barrels where he found aluminum wrap, which is used to cover the copper communications wiring, and pieces of copper cabling, the complaint said.
Frontier customers are encouraged to report any suspicious activity around telecommunications equipment and facilities by calling the company’s toll free security line 1-800-590-6605. Anyone witnessing a theft in progress should not confront the suspects but should immediately call 911 and then call Frontier. Vehicle and suspect descriptions are very useful. This is a community safety problem, and the cooperation of the public is critical.
Up to 60 percent of callers to America’s big telecom companies experience rage when their calls go unanswered, their problems go unresolved, or they literally cannot get past the language barrier of today’s outsourced customer service agents working half a world away.
Cable and phone companies are among the worst at delivering quality customer service, with Comcast in particular causing enough frustration to bring a Virginia woman into a local Comcast office armed with a hammer, smashing company computers to get attention.
Only credit card companies have a worse reputation.
A compilation of six different “Peggy” Ads from Discover Card lampoon poor customer service among many credit card companies (2 minutes)
Unconscious Comcast employee
“When we call, what we want is ‘yes’ — that’s it,” says Emily Yellin, author of the book Your Call Is (not that) Important to Us, chronicling corporate America’s quest for cheaper customer service, usually alienating customers along the way.
Too often, American hear “no” or nothing at all, thanks to customer service representatives that lack the authority to solve problems or simply don’t care.
For many years, customers either took it or left. But the Internet has changed everything, allowing customers to take their complaints to a wider audience, often embarrassing bad acting companies and creating tremendous damage to corporate reputations along the way.
An infamous example was the case of the Comcast employee who literally fell asleep waiting more than an hour to talk to co-workers about a customer’s problem. A video of the sleeping worker became an online sensation.
Women like Mona Shaw, dubbed the Comcast Hammer Lady, also come away as folk heroes when customers can relate to the level of frustration she experienced from a company that only cared if she was a few days late paying her cable bill.
[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CBS News Combating Poor Customer Service 11-14-10.flv[/flv]
CBS News took an in-depth look into the customer service crisis — starting with Comcast. (8 minutes)
Phillip DampierNovember 16, 2010Consumer News, VideoComments Off on Copper Thieves Cost Taxpayers Money When Emergency Services Are Impacted
Copper thieves looking for quick cash, typically to finance drug habits, continue to plague telecommunications companies who find their networks literally stripped as brazen thieves rip utility lines right off phone poles. Although these thefts eventually cost cable, phone, and electric utility customers money in the form of higher bills, taxpayers are increasingly paying the price for copper thefts affecting wireless communications networks.
That’s because emergency responders are increasingly placing communications equipment at existing commercial cell sites and radio communications centers, and when those networks go down communities pick up the tab and argue about the bill later.
[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WSOC Charlotte – Copper Thefts Costing Taxpayers 11-16-10.flv[/flv]
WSOC-TV in Charlotte visits Rock Hill to see how copper thefts are costing area taxpayers plenty. (2 minutes)
Scrap copper wire - as good as gold
In Charlotte, N.C., copper thieves are targeting copper plates that can weigh up to 70 pounds used to ground cell and radio towers to protect them from lightning strikes.
Without them, towers and the equipment used to deliver service can be seriously damaged, leading to the loss of cell phone service and a county’s emergency radio system. That can leave dispatchers unable to talk to police and firefighters.
Because of the importance of these communications systems, when plates go missing, York County taxpayers pick up the tab for replacing them. That costs several thousand dollars every time the plates have to be replaced.
WSOC-TV in Charlotte noted while working on a story about the thefts, just one day after plates were replaced from one tower, they were stolen again.
New legislation designed to crack down on illicitly-obtained copper sold to recycling firms should have curtailed the ability for thieves to turn tons of copper into stacks of cash. But despite new laws in states like California, legislation is only effective when it is enforced. In northern California, budget cuts eliminated the one officer that devoted time and energy to stopping copper thefts in the Sacramento area. A local television station went undercover and discovered the state might as well not even have a law, because they were able to obtain quick cash for copper… no questions, or ID, asked.
[flv]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/KOVR Sacamento Copper Wire Rules Not Followed 11-16-10.flv[/flv]
KOVR-TV in Sacramento went undercover and discovered the futility of copper theft legislation that is not enforced. (5 minutes)
Time Warner Cable customers in North Carolina are getting rate hike letters from the cable company that foreshadows what other Time Warner Cable customers around the country can expect in the coming months.
For residents in Charlotte and the Triad region, Time Warner is boosting prices for unbundled customers an average of six percent, which will impact customers not on promotional plans or who are not locked into a “price protection agreement.”
The rate increases particularly target standalone service customers. Those with the fewest services will pay the biggest increases. Those who subscribe to cable, phone, and broadband service from the company will suffer the least.
A Time Warner Cable spokesman claimed the company is just passing on the cost of programming.
WXII-TV in Greensboro reported that for many customers already struggling with their bills, they don’t want to hear anything about a price hike.
“I think it’s ridiculous at this time with the economy — it’s hard to make it as it is,” one customer told the station.
“I wish there was a better option out there, but it’s about the only thing you can get,” said another viewer.
Time Warner has been developing pricing models that increasingly push customers towards bundled packages of services. Standalone broadband service saw dramatic price increases in many areas in 2010, and the company’s most aggressive new customer promotions encourage customers to take all three of its services.
But broadband customers need not expose themselves to inflated broadband prices for standalone service. Most Time Warner Cable franchises offer Earthlink broadband at comparable speeds at prices as low as $29.95 per month for the first six months. When the promotion expires, customers can switch back to Road Runner at Time Warner’s promotional price.
Time Warner does face competition in some areas of North Carolina from AT&T U-verse, which offers attractive promotional pricing for new customers. But the phone company’s broadband speeds come up short after Time Warner boosted speeds across much of the state. The cable company now delivers Road Runner at speeds of up to 50/5Mbps. AT&T tops out at 24Mbps, and not in every area.
When a competitor can’t deliver the fastest speeds, they inevitably claim consumers don’t want or care about super-fast broadband.
“We are focused on offering the broadband speeds that our customers need, at a price that they can afford,” said AT&T spokeswoman Gretchen Schultz.
Greenlight promotes its local connection to Wilson residents
Some North Carolina consumers are watching AT&T’s slower speeds and Time Warner’s price hikes from the sidelines, because they are signed up with municipal competitors.
Residents in Wilson with Greenlight service from the city don’t have to sign a contract to get the best prices and obtain service run and maintained by Wilson-area employees. The provider has embarked on a campaign to remind residents that money spent on the city-owned provider stays in the city.
In Salisbury, Fibrant is making headway against incumbent Time Warner as it works through a waiting list for customers anxious to cut Time Warner’s cable for good. Fibrant customers are assured they’ll always get the fastest possible service in town on a network capable of delivering up to 1Gbps to businesses -and- residents.
MI-Connection, the rebuilt former Adelphia cable system now owned by a group of local municipalities is managing to keep up with Time Warner with its own top broadband speeds of 20/2Mbps. The system is comparable to a traditional cable operator and does not provide fiber to the home service. Its 15,000 customers in Mooresville, Cornelius and Davidson are likely to stay with the system, but it is vulnerable to Time Warner’s bragging rights made possible from DOCSIS 3 upgrades. Since Time Warner does not provide service in most of MI-Connection’s service area, city officials don’t face an exodus of departing customers.
But that could eventually change. Some MI-Connection customers have reported to Stop the Cap! they have begun to receive promotional literature from Time Warner Cable for the first time, and there are growing questions whether the cable company may plan to invade some of MI-Connection’s more affluent service areas. Cable companies generally refuse to compete with each other, but all bets are off when that cable company is owned by a local municipality.
For most North Carolina residents, AT&T will likely be the first wired competitor, with its U-verse system. To date, U-verse has drawn mixed reviews from North Carolina consumers. Many appreciate AT&T’s broadband network is currently less congested than Road Runner, and speeds promised are closer to reality on U-verse compared with Road Runner during the early evening. But some AT&T customers are not thrilled being nickle-and-dimed for HD channels Time Warner bundles with its digital cable service at no additional charge. And for households with a lot of users, AT&T can run short on bandwidth.
“We have five kids — three now teenagers, and between my husband’s Internet usage and me recording a whole bunch of shows to watch later, we have run into messages on U-verse telling us we are trying to do too much and certain TV sets won’t work until we reduce our usage,” writes Angela. “AT&T doesn’t tell you that you all share a preset amount of bandwidth which gets divided up and if you use it up, services stop working.”
Angela says when she called AT&T, the company gave her a $15 credit for her inconvenience, and the company claims it is working on ways to eliminate these limits in particularly active households. For now, the family is sticking with U-verse because the broadband works better in the evenings and she loves the DVR which records more shows at once than Time Warner offers. Their U-verse new customer promotional offer saves them $35 a month over Time Warner, at least until it expires.
“From reading about Fibrant and Greenlight on your site, my husband still wishes we lived in Salisbury or Wilson because nothing beats fiber, but at least what we have is better than what we used to have,” she adds.
Be Sure to Read Part One: Astroturf Overload — Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group for an important introduction to what this super-sized industry front group is all about. Members of Broadband for America Red: A company or group actively engaging in anti-consumer lobbying, opposes Net Neutrality, supports Internet Overcharging, belongs to […]
Astroturf: One of the underhanded tactics increasingly being used by telecom companies is “Astroturf lobbying” – creating front groups that try to mimic true grassroots, but that are all about corporate money, not citizen power. Astroturf lobbying is hardly a new approach. Senator Lloyd Bentsen is credited with coining the term in the 1980s to […]
Hong Kong remains bullish on broadband. Despite the economic downturn, City Telecom continues to invest millions in constructing one of Hong Kong’s largest fiber optic broadband networks, providing fiber to the home connections to residents. City Telecom’s HK Broadband service relies on an all-fiber optic network, and has been dubbed “the Verizon FiOS of Hong […]
BendBroadband, a small provider serving central Oregon, breathlessly announced the imminent launch of new higher speed broadband service for its customers after completing an upgrade to DOCSIS 3. Along with the launch announcement came a new logo of a sprinting dog the company attaches its new tagline to: “We’re the local dog. We better be […]
Stop the Cap! reader Rick has been educating me about some of the new-found aggression by Shaw Communications, one of western Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, in expanding its business reach across Canada. Woe to those who get in the way. Novus Entertainment is already familiar with this story. As Stop the Cap! reported previously, Shaw […]
The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, may be forced to consider American broadband policy before defining Net Neutrality and its role in Canadian broadband, according to an article published today in The Globe & Mail. [FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s] proposal – to codify and enforce some […]
In March 2000, two cable magnates sat down for the cable industry equivalent of My Dinner With Andre. Fine wine, beautiful table linens, an exquisite meal, and a Monopoly board with pieces swapped back and forth representing hundreds of thousands of Canadian consumers. Ted Rogers and Jim Shaw drew a line on the western Ontario […]
Just like FairPoint Communications, the Towering Inferno of phone companies haunting New England, Frontier Communications is making a whole lot of promises to state regulators and consumers, if they’ll only support the deal to transfer ownership of phone service from Verizon to them. This time, Frontier is issuing a self-serving press release touting their investment […]
I see it took all of five minutes for George Ou and his friends at Digital Society to be swayed by the tunnel vision myopia of last week’s latest effort to justify Internet Overcharging schemes. Until recently, I’ve always rationalized my distain for smaller usage caps by ignoring the fact that I’m being subsidized by […]
In 2007, we took our first major trip away from western New York in 20 years and spent two weeks an hour away from Calgary, Alberta. After two weeks in Kananaskis Country, Banff, Calgary, and other spots all over southern Alberta, we came away with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Good Alberta […]
A federal appeals court in Washington has struck down, for a second time, a rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission to limit the size of the nation’s largest cable operators to 30% of the nation’s pay television marketplace, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.” The 30% rule, designed to keep no single company from controlling […]
Less than half of Americans surveyed by PC Magazine report they are very satisfied with the broadband speed delivered by their Internet service provider. PC Magazine released a comprehensive study this month on speed, provider satisfaction, and consumer opinions about the state of broadband in their community. The publisher sampled more than 17,000 participants, checking […]