Stop the Cap! reader Bones sends word the FCC needs volunteers to help keep America’s broadband providers honest about their speed claims. But the agency warns heavily usage capped consumers they probably shouldn’t apply, and anyone consuming over 30 GB per month is disqualified.
The FCC SamKnows Broadband Community aims to gather and report statistical data on the performance of America’s broadband providers. Thus far, most of the earlier speed results being studied by public officials come from data aggregated from voluntary visits to speed test websites. But the data is subject to considerable variation depending on the speed test site chosen, traffic and capacity issues that only impact the route to the test site, and what else a consumer may doing with their connection during the test. Many also conduct speed tests when a technical problem is apparent, using the speed test site to verify their suspicions.
The FCC will send 10,000 volunteers a free router that will hook up to one’s broadband connection and quietly test it several times daily. Comprehensive measurements to be taken include latency, packet loss, DNS query times and failures, web page loading times, as well as the obligatory suite of speed tests. The testing is done in the background and the results are uploaded to SamKnows for review. The FCC can use the data from all of the volunteers to identify the true performance of national and regional Internet Service Providers. Do their speed claims actually match reality? Do they suffer from congestion problems and at what times of day?
One group of ISPs the agency will have trouble measuring are those that heavily limit their customers’ use. In fact, the Test My ISP website warns off customers with low data caps because the project is expected to send and receive about 4 gigabytes of data in full over the course of each month. While the program designers felt that much data was so insignificant it would not create a problem, some greedy ISPs out there beg to differ. With some providers offering usage allowances at 5 or fewer gigabytes per month, the FCC quickly learned it doesn’t want to be responsible for spiking consumer broadband bills with any overlimit fees.
As a result, they’ve asked those usage capped consumers to think twice about applying for the traditional testing program:
Our units download approximately 2GB per month and upload around 2GB. If you’re on a product with a low usage cap then we’d advise against signing up, or at least informing us beforehand so that we can apply a different testing profile.
The FCC also isn’t interested in sending test units to customers they designate as “heavy downloaders”:
We’d classify anything above 30GB per month as being too heavy for us to gather useful results.
With the increasing use of multimedia content and other high bandwidth applications being released to the Internet masses, we beg to differ with the arbitrary definition that 30 GB constitutes “heavy downloading.” We understand the agency doesn’t want other online usage to create an issue for the accuracy of its speed tests, but they should take better care with their language. One could use a file backup service and easily consume more then 30 GB uploading and never download more than a gigabyte.
A screenshot of the types of data SamKnows will be collecting and measuring (click to enlarge)
Other restrictions:
You have a fixed line broadband Internet connection to your residence. This is not for WISPs, mobile broadband, or other wireless broadband services.
You use a standalone device to connect to your broadband service – i.e not a USB ADSL modem.
You have a stable broadband connection (i.e. it doesn’t disconnect frequently). Note that this is just referring to the connection – not the speed.
You have a spare power socket near your existing router (or wherever you plan to connect the unit. Keep in mind that a network cable must run between the unit and your router though! We supply a 1m cable).
You need to be on one of the ISPs that we’re measuring.
You are not an employee or a family member of an employee of one of the ISPs being monitored.
Also, you must agree to the following:
Not to unplug the unit or your ISP’s router unless I’m away for an extended period of time.
Not attempt to reverse engineer or alter the unit.
To notify Samknows if and when I choose to change ISPs.
To return the unit to Samknows should I no longer wish to be involved (Samknows to pay reasonable postage costs).
To connect the unit in the way described in the documentation.
To keep Samknows updated with valid contact details (i.e. email and postal address).
SamKnows is a British company hired by the FCC to conduct the speed test project. SamKnows is already familiar to British broadband consumers for its comprehensive broadband availability checker showing all of the broadband choices available based on the address where service is to be installed.
The company also reports on broadband news, mostly impacting Europe.
And before the paranoid start suggesting this is Obama’s Internet Spy Box, SamKnows offers this:
However, the unit simply acts as a standard switch or standard router and does not look at any of the packets flowing across your network. It only monitors traffic volumes for the purposes of deciding when to run (or not to run!) the tests and to measure consumption.
Testing information uploaded from the unit to our servers contains no information about you whatsoever. Furthermore, all such communications are encrypted, ensuring that results cannot be tampered with en-route.
Your individual unit’s test results will be available to you alone. Your unit’s results will also be aggregated with others from the same ISP to form a larger average set of results that can be viewed publicly.
We have absolutely no intention of doing anything that may adversely affect your privacy or security.
[flv width=”512″ height=”308″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/ITN News Ofcom report says broadband is not up to speed 7-28-09.flv[/flv]
The implications for the FCC’s national speed test program could mimic Great Britain’s, where providers were held to account for wide variations between speeds promised and those actually delivered. Meaningful broadband reform in the States could include a requirement that providers’ marketing claims be provable, compelling at least some to perform competitive upgrades instead of delivering broken promises. This ITN News report from last summer illustrates what happened when UK provider speed claims were put to the test. (3 minutes)
Walt Mossberg (left) discusses the current state of American broadband with FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski (right)
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowki told attendees at the D: All Things Digital conference America scores dead last in a study measuring the rate of change in broadband innovation. American broadband is stuck in neutral while every other ranked nation is moving forward faster in understanding the importance of deploying fast, reliable, and universal broadband. Genachowski directly ties broadband to improving local economies, propelling growth in jobs, and improving education and health care.
Unfortunately the American duopoly most Americans cope with maintains a stranglehold on efforts to bring America literally up to speed with competing nations. Worse, there is no end in sight as long as America relies entirely on incumbent providers to get the job done.
Americans pay some of the highest prices in the world for mediocre broadband, and it’s only getting worse with the introduction of usage limiting schemes like data caps and so-called consumption billing.
Genachowski is attempting to facilitate improved broadband across the United States, but is hampered by private industry undermining the FCC’s authority to help push improvements forward. Recent industry-driven court challenges to the FCC’s authority have led to the agency seeking a different path to regain its regulatory footing.
The FCC chairman sees the biggest challenges coming in wireless broadband, where a spectrum shortage is limiting potential capacity and available bandwidth. Genachowski seeks an accommodation with the nation’s television stations to relinquish UHF spectrum where possible to bolster wireless networks.
Conference host Walt Mossberg challenged Genachowski on why more isn’t getting done and why accepting the current state of the marketplace is acceptable. He also criticized providers for charging high prices for slow service and attacked Comcast for its set top box, claiming if there was an open market for these things, no one would buy it, that it would be the worst thing on the shelf.
[flv width=”512″ height=”308″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/All Things Digital Genachowski 6-2-10.flv[/flv]
Excerpts from FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s visit with Walt Mossberg at the June 2nd D: All Things Digital conference. (6 minutes)
As expected, Steve Jobs introduced America to the new Apple iPhone 4 today at Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference in San Francisco. Karl Bode at Broadband Reports did a great summary on what’s new, so I won’t reinvent the wheel:
As everyone had expected, Apple just announced the long-awaited iPhone 4. According to his Jobsness, the phone is 24% thinner than the iPhone 3GS and as expected has a more powerful primary 5MP camera with flash — and a new camera on the front that will be used primarily for video chat. The phone’s stainless steel frame (sandwiched by glass) is being partially used as an antenna, something that may prove helpful for connectivity issues.
Other specs: Dual mics, 802.11n WiFi, GPS, compass, accelerometer, Quad band HSDPA (7.2Mbps), gyroscope (perfect for gaming, insists Jobs). The company says they’ve also improved the device’s battery. It can now handle 7 hours of 3G talk, 6 hours of 3G browsing, 10 hours of Wi-Fi browsing, 10 hours of video, or 40 hours of music. The phone also records HD video (720p at 30fps, insists Steve), and the new flash will stay on during video recording.
Amusingly, Apple ran into network connectivity issues while trying to demonstrate the phone’s higher resolution screen (join the club, Jobs). According to Apple, the phone comes in white or black, with the 16GB version costing $199 and the 32GB version costing $299. The phone will be available on June 24, with pre-orders beginning on June 15.
Karl also notes, as others have confirmed with us, AT&T is so eager to get this new phone into your hands (along with a new two-year contract), they are waiving the usual two-year waiting period before customers can upgrade their phones. If your contract expires anytime this year, you can obtain the phone at the subsidized price.
But should you?
For many, the iPhone 4 will represent an incremental upgrade, especially if you aren’t a power user. In this economy, is it worth $200-300 for a new phone and a new service commitment?
The upgrade for current customers, who can keep their unlimited data plan, may make sense -if- you receive tolerable service from AT&T and feel the latest phone would directly benefit you. You should consider, however, that signing a new contract will lock you into another two year marriage with the company that drove more Americans crazy with bad service, dropped calls, slow data, and irritating customer service than any other. A divorce will cost you up to $325 per phone. Their 3G coverage isn’t all that, either.
It also gives the company that loves to cap more of your money.
Unfortunately, waiting for the iPhone to arrive at Verizon Wireless is increasingly less likely to be a panacea for AT&T’s Internet Overchargitis. That’s because AT&T and Verizon are the Mary Had a Little Lamb of big telecom:
Everywhere that AT&T went,
AT&T went, AT&T went,
Everywhere that AT&T went
Verizon was sure to go.
It’s a safe bet that by the time Verizon brings forth the coveted iPhone, it will have an Internet Overcharging scheme matching AT&T’s.
If you are seeking to upgrade to a smartphone, it’s increasingly likely you’ll find a better deal with Sprint or T-Mobile, both of which have no plans for AT&T’s pricing schemes.
The best way to get a company like Verizon or AT&T to pay attention is to avoid their products when they charge too much. A dramatic reduction in demand for AT&T’s iPhone among new customers, for example, would send a clear message to Wall Street that their love of usage caps is hurting shareholder value in a big way. They follow the money. If existing customers hang on to their $30 unlimited plans while other customers head elsewhere to avoid AT&T’s Internet rationing, you’ll see an overnight conversion among many industry players suddenly demanding a return to the unlimited buffet.
Or better yet, how about giving every customer a choice of both types of plans — pay less for limited service or pay today’s prices for unlimited.
Apple proclaims the arrival of iPhone 4, calling it a revolutionary upgrade. Apple released this video showcasing iPhone 4’s video capabilities that AT&T has now effectively hobbled with a wireless Internet rationing plan that punishes customers who try to use the phone’s new features. (6 minutes)
S1209 would have sailed through the North Carolina Senate 39-5 this afternoon had it not been for Sen. Joe Sam Queen who objected to the third reading of the bill. Senator David Rouzer (R-Johnston, Wayne) also changed his vote from “no” to “yes” which would have ultimately left the count at 40 for and 4 against. After that, the Senate adjourned and will take up the bill once again on Monday. What a job well done… for the cable and phone companies.
Brian Bowman reports that none of the Wake County senators opposed the bill or asked that the moratorium be removed.
Out of the entire North Carolina Senate, there are just four good guys?:
Senator Joe Sam Queen (Haywood, Yancy, Avery, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell) [email protected]
Senator Steve Goss (D-Alexander, Ashe, Watauga, Wilkes) [email protected]
Senator James Forrester (R-Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln) [email protected]
Senator John Snow (D-Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Jackson, Macon, Swain, Transylvania) [email protected]
Be sure to send all four of these folks your enormous thanks for doing the right thing. Apparently that is becoming more and more difficult these days.
For those who forgot why this fight matters, here’s a reminder. Watch it.
[flv width=”480″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Martha Abraham, Mars Hill NC.mp4[/flv]
The people in Mars Hill, N.C. cannot afford to forget.
Now let’s talk reality for a moment. I’ve been involved in legislative battles on issues regarding telecommunications policy all the way back to the late 1980s when I was fighting for home satellite dish-owner rights. Back then it was a struggle against big cable, too. It took several tries, but we eventually won that one. Along the way, a lot of the same legislative trickery involved in S1209 reminded me of similar experiences back then. We shouldn’t make the same mistake twice. Let’s take a look:
The revised S1209 establishes a subcommittee to study municipal broadband funding issues while buying the industry a one year reprieve from any other cities or town going their own way. The members on this fact-finding endeavor are specifically defined:
A cable service provider.
A wireless telecommunications service provider.
A local exchange provider that is not a wireless telecommunications service provider.
A local exchange provider that is a wireless telecommunications service provider.
A city that operates a cable system and an electric power system as a public enterprise.
A city that operates a cable system as a public enterprise and does not operate an electric power system as a public enterprise.
A city that is a member of a joint agency established under G.S. 160A-462 for the operation of a cable system as a public enterprise.
The North Carolina League of Municipalities.
Now, can anyone reading tell me who is -not- on the list? Have you guessed?
-You- are missing from this list!
Everyone else is in the back room — cable and phone companies, cities, and a lobbying group representing cities. But not one North Carolina consumer who lives with broadband challenges day in and day out has a place at that table. What do they know anyway?
Brooks Townes in Weaverville doesn’t have a seat at the table, either.
How ironic that everyone holding a seat claims their interests coincide with ordinary citizens like you and I. After all, we’re supposed to be what this fight is all about. Sometimes, our interests will meet. Other times, especially when it comes to legislative strategies, they might not.
An Uncomfortable Revelation Caught On An Open Mike
Thanks to WUNC’s Laura Leslie, you can listen yourself as Senator Clodfelter, not realizing his mike was on, tells Senator Blue, “Now I’ll tell you that the … what I call the crazies who circulate around this issue are not going to like this [S1209 revision with a moratorium], but the municipalities are all on board. They negotiated it, they negotiated it so it’s not possible….” Blue asks Clodfelter how long he’s been talking with the groups representing municipalities. Clodfelter’s response: “We’ve been meeting daily — twice daily, so they’re all on board with this precise text.” The recording ends with Clodfelter presumably tapping his mike. Is this thing on? You bet it is. (June 2, 2010) (50 seconds)
You must remain on this page to hear the clip, or you can download the clip and listen later.
We already know what Senator Clodfelter feels about the people who are appalled at yet another embarrassing year of legislators falling all over themselves to do big cable and phone companies another favor. In his mind, we’re the “crazies” — the indignant citizens fed up with the time, money, and effort not spent building 21st century broadband networks, but instead devising strategies to prevent building them.
Corning has a plant in North Carolina that manufacturers endless miles of fiber optic cable that 40 members of the North Carolina Legislature just said they don’t need. Send it somewhere else.
Those 40 senators just told citizens — who are still using dial-up Internet access in the Appalachians, or who can’t afford the asking price for service in Spring Creek, or who only get excuses from AT&T why certain homes in Alamance County can have broadband, but they cannot — they really don’t care. What AT&T, Time Warner Cable, and Embarq wants is much more important.
[flv width=”480″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Layten Davis Spring Creek NC.mp4[/flv]
…More important than the needs of folks like those in Spring Creek.
So while they propose to hold a debate over the merits of the free market vs. community’s doing-for-themselves when the free market fails them, countless thousands of North Carolina’s residents go without or are still hearing modem tones as they connect at speeds dozens of times slower than everyone else.
With a legislature hellbent on stalling or stopping projects that ameliorate this serious problem, no wonder North Carolina’s broadband rankings are falling fast. In 2007, the Census Bureau ranked North Carolina 35th in broadband adoption. A year later, the state was down to 41st. At least you can be proud you’re not West Virginia, right?
But then again, there are eight more positions to drop, so there is still room to make things even worse.
Now I ask myself, what could have possibly happened to deliver 40 votes into the hands of big cable and phone company interests.
Could it have been the time honored trick of dividing and conquering the opposition? For cities who want to deliver service, the threat of “either/or” seemed particularly effective. Either take our one year moratorium -or- face the ludicrous original legislation that required a community-wide referendum if Mrs. Nickels over on Fairfax Drive needs a new cable installed at her home to get a better picture. Either way, because certain folks didn’t say no way to either choice, it’s a victory party for Time Warner Cable, with no need to BYOB — they’ll provide it themselves. Besides, say the bill’s supporters, we’re offering a chance to hear your voice and views on our stall-tactic fact-finding subcommittee. Senator Clodfelter even thanks you for being reasonable and adult about all this.
AT&T thanks you as well.
Just keep those “crazies” out of the room.
Cable and phone companies get seats, so they can continue to deliver their talking points that don’t actually deliver broadband to any underserved area of North Carolina. Haven’t they said enough already? As Senator Queen asked, where is the broadband service for my communities?
In the end, the fact finding mission (cough) will deliver a watered-down report that will find its way into the nearest recycling bin. The cities’ strong views on municipal broadband will be diluted because they’ll have four competing voices from private industry saying the exact opposite. Besides, after yesterday’s performance in the Senate Finance Committee, does anyone really believe members like Senator Hoyle care what the subcommittee will have to say? He can just make it up as he goes along, just as he did when supposedly quoting the mayor of Salisbury.
After all the years spent watching negotiations over legislation, allow me to share this one piece of advice — collaborate and compromise with interests that seek to bury you at your own risk. Big money interests will call you every name in the book for standing and fighting for your principles (and a few legislators too), but if you make it known it’s time for the other side to start compromising — by actually delivering service and charging a reasonable price for it, there wouldn’t have been a need to engage in this battle in the first place.
That’s why this “crazy” website didn’t back down when Time Warner Cable brought its “new and improved” Internet Overcharging scheme to the table after consumers rebelled against the original plan. The cable company promised a listening tour, to take advice from reasonable consumers, and to modify its plans accordingly. Some folks played the game on their field — debating numbers back and forth about what an appropriate amount of rape and pillaging of our wallets was tolerable. Time Warner changed a few numbers and blessed us with a counteroffer that would have only tripled broadband prices for the same level of service. Couldn’t we be reasonable and take their offer?
We said no and stood by it, even if it meant going down with a fight. By not backing down, we won the battle knowing full well the war wasn’t actually over yet. But you can’t win a battle, much less a war, if you surrender and refuse to fight.
In the end, we were right and they were wrong. We even proved they were never really interested in listening in the first place.
The correct way forward is to remain 100 percent committed to opposing S1209, so long as it stalls, bans, slows, or sets onerous conditions on providing broadband relief. That means calling every senator between now and Monday and then doing the same in the House.
The three words you need to remember are real simple:
Kill this bill.
If you are spending time negotiating over who gets to sit in what chair on the subcommittee, you are not paying attention.
Kill this bill.
If you are trying to split the difference over how long the moratorium is going to last, you do not understand.
Kill this bill.
If you are trying to extract some extra concessions to reduce the rape and pillaging of your citizens, stand up, take a deep breath, go outside, and then tell the first person you see to call their representatives and tell them to:
Kill this bill.
If you are a consumer, you’re probably already upset. In a polite, persuasive, and persistent way, tell your elected officials you understand S1209 has been modified thanks to a compromise, but nobody bothered to compromise with you. You aren’t interested in this bill in any form, and you know that legislator is going to do the right thing and vote no to:
Kill this bill.
If they vote yes, all they’ve managed to kill is your faith in them as your elected representative. That’s something that can be taken care of at the next election.
Maybe people like me are crazy to dare to presume that our elected officials work first and foremost for “we the people” and not for the phone and cable company. Maybe it’s nuts to spend so much time and energy fighting legislation that is so obviously written by and for the industry that cuts a check to the first representative willing to put their name on it and introduce it. We’ve seen the merits of those who tried the same thing last year. Only one of them is no longer with the state legislature, brought down on ethics charges. How surprising. This year’s fight is lead by a retiring senator who will never endure the satisfaction voters might get disconnecting him from the legislature for selling them down Telecom River. That is not too surprising either.
Senator Hoyle turns his back on consumers and reads from his industry-provided talking points to stop municipal broadband
[Phillip Dampier co-authored this piece.]
North Carolina communities seeking to provide Internet access to their residents would have to wait a year while legislators argue over their terms of entry under a revised bill that swept through the Senate Finance Committee yesterday on a voice vote.
S1209, originally a poison pill bill that would effectively kill municipal broadband projects, was revised into a demand for further study, accompanied by a one-year moratorium for any city contemplating its own broadband project.
That concerns officials in several cities across the state, especially Greensboro, who wants to preserve the option of municipal broadband should Time Warner Cable revisit an Internet Overcharging experiment attempted in 2009 which would have drastically limited broadband usage for its customers.
The bill’s passage with a calling of the “yeas and nays” made it impossible for members of the public to know who voted for and who voted against the compromise measure. But an accidentally open microphone allowed many to get a real sense of how much one member of the Committee disliked consumers fighting back against telecom special interests pulling all the strings.
Senator Daniel Clodfelter (D-Mecklenburg) nearly raised a toast to his fellow members during the session praising them for doing the “grown-up” thing and agreeing to his manufactured compromise that phone and cable companies are celebrating as a victory today:
“This is not, I would say to you, a peace treaty. It is an armistice. And what the bill does is provide an armistice so that the shooting war stops and a conversation will occur among those people who’ve been meeting with each other in those conference rooms for the past week,” Clodfelter said. “Thank you all, because you did the grown-up thing, and I really appreciate it.”
Clodfelter’s seemingly-sincere comments might have gone off better had the audience not heard Clodfelter’s private remarks to Senator Dan Blue (D-Wake) a few minutes earlier, inadvertently captured by a live microphone:
“The — what I call the crazies that circulate around this issue are not gonna like this,” Clodfelter told Blue.
Observed WUNC reporter Laura Leslie: “I’m sure Clodfelter isn’t the first lawmaker to think so, but most of them cover the microphone before they say it out loud.”
The bill’s author, Senator David Hoyle (D-Gaston), who spent the day mangling the words “fiber optic,” condescendingly lectured his colleagues and communities about their opposition to his bill. Mistakenly called a Republican in the pages of the Greensboro News-Record, Hoyle complained cities don’t belong in the broadband business. He doesn’t want government competing with private industry, which might explain why the newspaper switched his party affiliation. But considering the amount of telecom special interest money that has flowed into the retiring senator’s campaign coffers, there may be much more to this than a philosophical debate.
Hoyle has gone all out in the North Carolina media on behalf of his telecom industry benefactors.
Money makes legislators do strange things... like disrespect their constituents with obvious industry-backed protectionist legislation
Delivering a series of eyebrow-raising one-liners, Hoyle is hardly ingratiating himself with cities and towns across the state. He inferred most city and town leaders were naive, telling ENC Today he expects all of the attention on municipal broadband will only cause more municipalities to get into the business.
“There are a whole lot of cities that can’t wait to jump on the bandwagon — monkey see, monkey do,” Hoyle said, using language that some have since called inappropriate.
Hoyle argues these systems are destined to fail. Once again he called out the cities of Davidson and Mooresville completing required upgrades to an old Adelphia cable system the community acquired nearly three years ago.
“There’s a couple of cities in this business that they should sure wish the heck they were not into, and that’s Davidson and Mooresville,” Hoyle said.
That came as news to MI-Connection, the municipal provider providing service to the two communities, whose revenues for the quarter that ended March 31st were up 9.4 percent from a year earlier.
Davidson resident and MI-Connection board member John Venzon told the Davidson News he’s worried that the legislation could “unlevel the playing field” for MI-Connection and make it harder to compete.
MI-Connection General Manager Alan Hall also told the News the entire board has concerns about these kinds of bills.
Hoyle and his telecommunications industry friends may wish the communities weren’t in the business, but MI-Connection believes otherwise.
As Stop the Cap! has reported on several occasions, MI-Connection’s challenges have hardly been unique to Davidson and Mooresville. Time Warner Cable ditched over 125 Adelphia systems it purchased, and the company is still coping with legacy equipment left in place at the former Adelphia system it now runs in Calabasas, California. The cost of upgrades for the old Adelphia systems kept by both Time Warner Cable and Comcast ran well into the millions.
Another messy misstep for the state senator has been what one could charitably call “stretching the truth.”
Mayor Susan Kluttz, representing the people of Salisbury, N.C., was called a "gentleman" and "he" by an out of touch David Hoyle
“I got a call from a gentleman yesterday, Mayor Kluttz from Salisbury, and I mean he laid me out. He called me dumb. I had no idea,” Hoyle complained to other members on the Senate Finance Committee.
One person who was not amused by that story was Salisbury Mayor Susan Kluttz, who was seated directly in front of Hoyle. She had no idea what Hoyle was talking about. I later spoke with a representative of the city who told me no one from their staff called Hoyle. With a mistake like that, maybe that phantom caller was onto something after all. Listening to Hoyle, the self-appointed expert on municipal fiber projects, refer to them as “fiber opticals,” “fiber opt,” “fiber install and do all the things they’re going to do,” and “totally fiber project any city,” did not inspire confidence.
At the heart of Hoyle’s opposition is the idea that local municipalities should not be involved in the private sector… ever. In his mind, broadband service is a luxury, and the private marketplace is best equipped to decide who gets it, and who does not. Hoyle brings no answers to the table for communities bypassed by the duopoly of providers who are increasingly focusing their time, attention, and resources on larger cities where average revenue per customer can be higher than in rural areas. If the local cable or phone company doesn’t provide the service, that’s just too bad.
Mirroring the attitude of the state’s telecommunications companies, Hoyle believes municipalities or even private providers that seek broadband stimulus money represent unfair competition, even in cases where existing providers refuse to offer service.
That is the ultimate dilemma. If you believe broadband is not becoming an essential component of most American lives and is simply a nice thing to have, it’s not insane to agree with Hoyle. But hundreds of thousands of North Carolina residents don’t believe that. Parents of children in broadband-disadvantaged schools quickly learn their kids fall behind their peers in larger, wired communities. Businesses will not locate in areas where inadequate broadband exists. Digital economy entrepreneurs cannot start new businesses without good broadband either. Even senior citizens, who are among the most resistant to broadband adoption, often complain about the inherent inequity of being forced to rely on dial-up service.
Senator Purcell
Some of the same arguments about disparity of access went on during the early 1900s in rural North Carolina, deprived of electricity and telephone service by private providers. Once President Roosevelt effectively declared these types of services as essential utilities, where private providers didn’t go, municipalities and co-ops did. In North Carolina, keeping the brakes on an expansion-minded state government came even before Roosevelt was president, with the passage of the 1929 Umstead Act — a law that prohibits the state from directly competing with private enterprise.
The Umstead Act has been seized on by the telecommunications industry, arguing municipal broadband violates the spirit of the law, even though it never applied to local municipalities. Besides, the law has been amended since 1929 because, free market theory notwithstanding, free enterprise doesn’t have every answer and cannot meet every need. Just ask BP.
Only Ayn Rand could appreciate that Hoyle and his allies support an entrenched duopoly that embraces its profitable urban customers while they fight for restraining orders like S1209, blocking efforts by others to deliver service the duopoly won’t provide. We call that corporate welfare and protectionism. But some in the state legislature can’t see that because of the blizzard of cash being dropped in front of them by that duopoly, just to leave things entirely in their hands.
Hoyle noted nobody, including himself, liked the final bill. In Hoyle’s eyes, that adds up to a “good bill.”
Other members on the Committee had different views to share.
Senator William Purcell (D-Anson, Richmond, Scotland, Stanly) is the former mayor of Laurinburg — the same city from the 2005 court victory in BellSouth/AT&T v. Laurinburg, which paved the way for municipal broadband in the state. He asked pointedly, “What assurances do we have that the private companies are going to provide [service] to smaller areas?”
Senator Queen
Hoyle answered by pulling out his talking points generously provided by the cable and phone companies and delivered a non-answer, finally stating, “we are not going to get broadband to everyone in the state.” Perhaps Hoyle is foreshadowing his next job after he retires from the Senate — working for the same telecom companies he seems to represent now.
Senator Joe Sam Queen (D-Avery, Haywood, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Yancey) delivered the most passionate presentation of the day on behalf of his constituents, among the least likely to have broadband service available to them. As Hoyle disrespectfully rolled his eyes and winked at the cable industry lobbyists in the audience, Queen blasted the industry’s record of performance in his district, which covers the High Country — the rural Appalachian mountain counties in the western half of the state.
“We don’t have last mile access in the mountains,” Queen told the Committee. “[My constituents are] frustrated that it’s not getting done by the cable companies, the network companies, whoever’s doing it. They’re just cherry-picking and leaving off so many of our citizens, and that’s just unacceptable.”
Queen noted the private industry that refuses to serve many of his areas also refuses to allow others to provide that service.
“The private sector is not getting it done fast enough,” he added. “We have electricity to everybody, we have water to everybody. We should have Internet to everybody in the 21st century. In my counties, we are still struggling to make that happen. Our children don’t have the virtual broadband educational opportunities that they have in the urban areas. Our business owners don’t have the access to markets that our urban citizens have.”
Senator McKissick
One senator had a question about the year-long moratorium. Senator Floyd B. McKissick, Jr. (D-Durham) asked if no action was taken by the end of the 2011 session, would the moratorium expire automatically? Although provisions in S1209 do provide for a firm sunset date, Paul Myer from the North Carolina League of Municipalities told me nothing precludes the Senate from quietly extending the moratorium, or removing the sunset provision altogether, effectively making the ban permanent.
Meanwhile, communities contemplating such projects would have to give 15-days written notice to every private provider potentially impacted, providing more than two weeks for a fear-based opposition propaganda campaign. And we know where they’ll get the money to pay for it, too.
The only good news out of all this:
Cities already providing or constructing broadband projects may continue;
A Google Fiber city in North Carolina gets a pass;
Federal broadband grant recipients may proceed, although many of those grants are going to existing providers anyway;
The bill is headed next to the House, where we have a new opportunity to derail it.
Recognizing the spirit of this entire proceeding which left consumer interests out in the cold, no public comments were heard and no recorded vote was taken.
Needless to say, the revised S1209 is only slightly less loathsome than the original, and must be opposed. But more on that coming shortly.
We couldn’t close this piece without recognizing that when all the talk was over and vote was taken, it was rest and relaxation time for selected senators, brought to you by Electricities who picked up the tab for a fabulous spread of food and drink. WUNC reporter Laura Leslie wrote about what she called an Irony Supplement.
The S1209 compromise also won the grudging support of Senator David “Business-Friendly” Hoyle (D-Gaston).
After telling Senate Finance that “Somebody, maybe a lot of bodies, needs to stand up for our free enterprise system,” Hoyle went on to knock the state’s biggest public utility co-op: “If anybody thinks that the experiment with Electricities was a resounding success, I’d like for you to raise your hand.”
No one did.
But after session today, quite a few of the Hons found their way across the street for free food and drinks provided by – wait for it – Electricities.
As one House Republican told me tonight, “If you can’t bash them and then eat their hors d’oeurves, you’re in the wrong business.”
No, sir, I’m not. But I’m thinking you might be.
Senate Finance Committee deliberations on a revised S1209, a bill to establish a one year moratorium on municipal broadband projects. (June 2, 2010) (34 minutes)
You must remain on this page to hear the clip, or you can download the clip and listen later.
Be Sure to Read Part One: Astroturf Overload — Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group for an important introduction to what this super-sized industry front group is all about. Members of Broadband for America Red: A company or group actively engaging in anti-consumer lobbying, opposes Net Neutrality, supports Internet Overcharging, belongs to […]
Astroturf: One of the underhanded tactics increasingly being used by telecom companies is “Astroturf lobbying” – creating front groups that try to mimic true grassroots, but that are all about corporate money, not citizen power. Astroturf lobbying is hardly a new approach. Senator Lloyd Bentsen is credited with coining the term in the 1980s to […]
Hong Kong remains bullish on broadband. Despite the economic downturn, City Telecom continues to invest millions in constructing one of Hong Kong’s largest fiber optic broadband networks, providing fiber to the home connections to residents. City Telecom’s HK Broadband service relies on an all-fiber optic network, and has been dubbed “the Verizon FiOS of Hong […]
BendBroadband, a small provider serving central Oregon, breathlessly announced the imminent launch of new higher speed broadband service for its customers after completing an upgrade to DOCSIS 3. Along with the launch announcement came a new logo of a sprinting dog the company attaches its new tagline to: “We’re the local dog. We better be […]
Stop the Cap! reader Rick has been educating me about some of the new-found aggression by Shaw Communications, one of western Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, in expanding its business reach across Canada. Woe to those who get in the way. Novus Entertainment is already familiar with this story. As Stop the Cap! reported previously, Shaw […]
The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, may be forced to consider American broadband policy before defining Net Neutrality and its role in Canadian broadband, according to an article published today in The Globe & Mail. [FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s] proposal – to codify and enforce some […]
In March 2000, two cable magnates sat down for the cable industry equivalent of My Dinner With Andre. Fine wine, beautiful table linens, an exquisite meal, and a Monopoly board with pieces swapped back and forth representing hundreds of thousands of Canadian consumers. Ted Rogers and Jim Shaw drew a line on the western Ontario […]
Just like FairPoint Communications, the Towering Inferno of phone companies haunting New England, Frontier Communications is making a whole lot of promises to state regulators and consumers, if they’ll only support the deal to transfer ownership of phone service from Verizon to them. This time, Frontier is issuing a self-serving press release touting their investment […]
I see it took all of five minutes for George Ou and his friends at Digital Society to be swayed by the tunnel vision myopia of last week’s latest effort to justify Internet Overcharging schemes. Until recently, I’ve always rationalized my distain for smaller usage caps by ignoring the fact that I’m being subsidized by […]
In 2007, we took our first major trip away from western New York in 20 years and spent two weeks an hour away from Calgary, Alberta. After two weeks in Kananaskis Country, Banff, Calgary, and other spots all over southern Alberta, we came away with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Good Alberta […]
A federal appeals court in Washington has struck down, for a second time, a rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission to limit the size of the nation’s largest cable operators to 30% of the nation’s pay television marketplace, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.” The 30% rule, designed to keep no single company from controlling […]
Less than half of Americans surveyed by PC Magazine report they are very satisfied with the broadband speed delivered by their Internet service provider. PC Magazine released a comprehensive study this month on speed, provider satisfaction, and consumer opinions about the state of broadband in their community. The publisher sampled more than 17,000 participants, checking […]