Home » Broadband Speed »Charter Spectrum »Competition »Consumer News » Currently Reading:

Charter Spectrum CEO Says Company Using Tax Breaks to Buy Back Its Own Stock

Phillip Dampier December 5, 2018 Broadband Speed, Charter Spectrum, Competition, Consumer News 7 Comments

Rutledge

Charter Communications is using the benefits of the Republican-promoted tax cut to buy back its own stock, because the only other option under consideration was using the money to buy up other cable operators.

“From a [mergers and acquisitions] perspective, I think cable is a great business. If there were assets for sale that we could do more of, we would do that,” said Charter Communications CEO Thomas Rutledge at this week’s UBS Global Media & Communications Conference. “We’ve been buying a lot of our own stock back. Why? Because we think the cable business is a great business and we haven’t been able to buy other cable assets.”

Charter is not using the company’s lower tax rate to benefit Spectrum customers with lower bills or more extravagant upgrades. Instead, it is accelerating efforts to please shareholders and executives with efforts to boost its share price — something key to top executives’ performance bonuses.

With digital and broadband upgrades nearly complete in areas formerly served by Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks — the cable companies Charter acquired in 2016 — Rutledge told investors he can initiate additional upgrades without spending huge sums on infrastructure buildouts.

Gigabit speed is now available in most markets, and the company has doubled its lowest internet download speeds in areas where it faces significant competition from AT&T from 100 to 200 Mbps, boosting sales of Spectrum broadband service, according to Rutledge.

Today, about 60% of Spectrum customers are offered 100 Mbps, while the other 40% — mostly in AT&T service areas — are getting 200 Mbps.

Rutledge told investors he does not see much threat from Verizon FiOS or its newly launched 5G offerings, and has no immediate plans to upgrade service in Verizon service areas because neither offering seems that compelling.

“I saw that Verizon had some passings that they could do 800 Mbps in,” Rutledge said. “We have 51 million passings that we can do 1 gigabit in and we can go to 10 gigabits relatively inexpensively and I think we will because I think the world will go to 10 gigabits.”

Analysts are uncertain whether Rutledge’s comments are naïve or brave.

“We see 5G fixed wireless broadband [like that offered by Verizon] as the largest existential threat to broadband providers, by far,” wrote analysts at Cowen. Until now, most broadband competition for cable operators came from phone companies pitching DSL. Verizon retrenched on its FiOS offering several years ago. But AT&T has been more aggressive upgrading urban areas to fiber service, which has forced Charter to respond with higher speeds and better promotions.

Rutledge does not see Verizon’s 5G being a significant competitive threat for several years, and suspects Wall Street may once again punish Verizon for spending money on a wireless network less capable than what the cable industry offers today. Shareholders may also dislike watching Verizon distracted by the home broadband market when portable wireless revenues are much more important to the company.

Verizon officials claim about half of those signing up for its 5G service plan were not current Verizon customers. But the company would not say whether their new fixed wireless customers were coming largely from cable or DSL disconnects, which would prove marketplace disruption.

7
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Armando TrevinoPissedoffSAMUELIan S LittmanEJ Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Dylan
Guest
Dylan

While I don’t really mind these tax cuts being used for the purpose of buying back shares, which you kind have to as one of these companies, I do wish that I could see the 200 meg upgrade come soon to non competitive markets. I do understand why 40 percent of areas do have it while the other 60 does not (competition) but I wish they would just extend it to everyone. It would not really add any cost to Charter. I do appreciate though all the upgrades Charter has done. As long as upgrades are happening, and service stays… Read more »

Gary
Guest
Gary

Spectrums service is horrific . Look at all the complaints on their Facebook page. Omg . I think they are giving mega bit speed. Not mega bite speed. Big difference.
And they cant pay their workers the contracted health benefits and pension plan . While last year SPECTRUM CEO made 99 million.
I think I’ll pass and this “service”.

EJ
Guest
EJ

How about investing in some CAPEX. Identify and fix problem areas. O wait Spectrum don’t need to do that. If I had to guess my bottom dollar I would bet they have connection issues and the like in areas where they have no real competitors. Areas with real competitors are maintained and competitive. REGULATE, REGULATE and enforce monopoly rules and/or strengthen monopoly rules. This is the only thing that will fix these type of companies. until competition is real we can’t just think a company is going to do the right thing for it customers.

Ian S Littman
Guest
Ian S Littman

Are you in an area that can even get Spectrum service?

Because in areas where they actually have to compete, they’re actually pretty decent now. Yes, they got gigabit significantly later than a lot of Comcast markets, but I’ve had gigabit for a year now and it works fine. No caps or modem charges either. Would I jump at something better? Yes. Was having to fight them for months to get service installed in my new place annoying? Yes. Has the service been reliable since installed? Also yes.

SAMUEL
Guest
SAMUEL

Let me say that the CEO of Charter Spectrum should be afraid of Verizon. Verizon’s Fiber cable is way superb than Spectrum Time Warner Cable. I know, I have been a Tech for Time Warner for 25 plus years. When paragon cable started building the plant in NYC and installing fiber, the future looked great. As Time Warner came in and management changed hands the system started falling apart. The company was installing cable converters that didn’t work, Cable modems not working properly because the more customers jumped on Broadband the cable speeds slowed. Then management realized they had to… Read more »

Pissedoff
Guest
Pissedoff

Ya, not investing in it’s employees and at the same time he took away their pay raises. Shame shame!!

Armando Trevino
Guest
Armando Trevino

Sir, your company is not focused on customer service. Rude people. I keep receiving documents in Spanish even though I am an American Veteran who only speaks English. Your marketing team is racist!

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Noemi Najera: I would LOVE to join any class action suit against Spectrum....
  • Tommy: Directv has just joined my group of the worst companies in the US. That includes ComCast and Capitol 1. Awful customer service and can't get anything ...
  • jeff: As an average consumer, I don't understand the technical aspect of your answer. Can you explain in simple terms how I can improve the wifi coverage an...
  • Lee: Only useful if you have cable. 13 houses in 0.6 miles from where cable stops to my house. Comcast shows no interest in extending the cable....
  • Peter: Call Spectrum. They will tell you the $9.99 is a "mailing fee" for ordering their equipment, not an installation fee. In a calm voice tell them you ne...
  • Michael Gibbons: it would just be nice if the stupid FRONTIER telephone company would just go out of business once and for all.. THEY ARE JUST ABOUT WORTHLESS. Like yo...
  • HatinComcast: Agreed, I’m in a huge fight with them about this issue....
  • Doug: Grandfathered in does not mean not subject to price increases. It means you will be able to stay on the plan at whatever the prevailing price is as l...
  • Sum: What kind of internet for low income is it, DSL or Wireless internet?...
  • Janessa: Shame on you Spectrum. Grandfathered in means grandfathered in. That should be honored at the price committed to on the contract signed. It clearly st...
  • James R Curry: Most of the ISPs have now done this. AT&T and Comcast are the biggest offenders and have. So, the ISPs argued that data caps were necessary beca...
  • Ian L: Add Comcast to the list for wireline providers, and maybe Cox? T-Mobile and Sprint have suspended caps on their mobile service, for folks who even ha...

Your Account: