Home » Broadband Speed »Competition »Consumer News »Frontier »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »Verizon »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Fla. Utility Says Negotiations With Verizon Make It Clear Verizon Will Exit the Wireline Business Within 10 Years

FPL_logo_PMS2925A Florida utility company has told federal regulators it is certain Verizon has a plan to exit its landline and wired broadband businesses within the next ten years to become an all-wireless service provider.

Florida Power & Light argued in a regulatory filing with the Federal Communications Commission it was clear Verizon had plans to exit its wireline business after the phone company suddenly informed regulated utilities like FP&L it no longer seemed interested in fighting over pole attachment fees and pole ownership and use issues. FP&L suggests that is a radical change of heart for a company that has fought tooth and nail over issues like pole attachment fees for years.

“Verizon has made it clear it intends to be out of the wireline business within the next ten years, conveying this clear intent to regulated utilities in negotiations over joint use issues and explaining that Verizon no longer wants to be a pole owner,” FP&L wrote to federal regulators. “Indeed, the current proposed [$10.54 billion sale of Verizon facilities in Florida, Texas and California] proves this point.”

Verizon has fought repeatedly with the Florida power company over the fees it pays FP&L to attach copper and fiber cables to the power company’s poles. Verizon Florida has repeatedly accused FP&L of charging unjust fees and at one point withheld payments to the utility worth millions.

In February, the FCC dismissed Verizon’s complaint for lack of evidence in the first-ever decision in a pole attachment complaint case involving an incumbent telephone company under a joint use agreement with an electric utility. The power company accused Verizon of lying when it promised concrete benefits to consumers if the FCC reduced joint use pole attachment rates. Suddenly, Verizon no longer seems to be interested in the issue.

verizon“Verizon has not increased its efforts to deploy wireline broadband in the last three years; and there is no evidence that Verizon has used the capital saved on joint use rates for the expansion of wireline broadband,” FP&L officials write. “Indeed, all of the evidence shows that Verizon is abandoning its efforts to build out wireline broadband.”

The power company is not about to just wave goodbye to Verizon. It filed remarks opposing the sale, claiming the benefits will end up in the pockets of executives and shareholders while customers get little or nothing. FP&L wants the FCC to enforce concrete conditions that guarantee Frontier will invest in upgrades to Verizon’s network, especially in non-FiOS service areas.

FP&L added it supports forward technological progress for the benefit of consumers, but the price of that progress should not be the abandonment of wireline customers, contractual obligations, and past promises to the FCC. The utility wrote it is not opposed to Verizon becoming a fully wireless company, but it should only be allowed to do so after it ensures that “its wireline house is in order.”

As things stand today, the utility argues Verizon is looking to abdicate on its obligation to deliver universal service and is no longer interested in maintaining its wired networks. FP&L points to Verizon’s efforts in 2013 to discard damaged wired facilities in favor of Voice Link, Verizon’s wireless landline replacement, in states including New York, New Jersey, and Florida.

“There should be no doubt that Verizon’s strategy to abandon wireline service in favor of wireless service extends beyond New York and Florida and beyond storm damaged and rural areas,” argues FP&L.

The utility points to Verizon’s successful effort to relieve itself of obligations to build a statewide fiber network in New Jersey that was supposed to be complete by 2010.

“Verizon, quite simply, has failed to build out wireline broadband in New Jersey because Verizon has no interest in doing so,” said FP&L. “As the sale of wireline facilities in Florida, Texas, and California […] clearly demonstrates, Verizon obviously is no longer interested in the wireline broadband business and sees its financial future in the wireless industry.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dancer
Dancer
8 years ago

I agree with you 100%, Verizon should be in trouble by federal government as they decided to give up on FiOS and wireline business for no apparent reason. Verizon CEO should be in jail, or they can split into 2 companies so he can become all wireless company and let Verizon wireline do expansion of FiOS, frontier should be expanding FiOS and increasing FiOS speeds to service areas Verizon originally sold to them in 2009. Time to start up a internet company as Verizon decided to sell off wireline assets to other companies like frontier as they plan to give… Read more »

Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  Dancer

You sound like a little kid squeeling on his older brother. ‘i’m gonna tell Mom om you and get you in trouble”.

Dave Burstein
Dave Burstein
8 years ago

Phil

Good and important story. Verizon & AT&T’s plan to abandon rural landlines is probably the most important reason 5M American homes can’t get half-decent broadband. But I think the original filing is off-base saying that Verizon wants to abandon all the fiber lines as well as the copper. FiOS is highly profitable.

THanks for going with this that is credited in the article I have out for factchecking.

Ralph Chastain
8 years ago

Verizon is going to the grave with this stuff. Wireless is not a good alternative for Wired yet.

Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  Ralph Chastain

Oh really now. Aren’t you the same guy that said the internal combustion engine wasn’t as good as horses were back in the day?

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!