Home » Astroturf »Broadband "Shortage" »Competition »Data Caps »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

Cable Industry That Makes 90%+ Margin on Broadband Now Says Caps Are About ‘Fairness’

They are in the money.

Follow the money to the real root of this argument.

After conclusive evidence that cable broadband upgrades have eliminated any congestion problems, the cable industry has finally admitted usage caps are not about “congestion relief,” but are, in their view, “about fairness.”

Reports of the Internet data exaflood, tsunami, brownouts, or even blackouts are highly exaggerated and always have been. But we knew that from the first day Stop the Cap! got started.

In the summer of 2008, Frontier Communications attempted to define a top limit on their residential DSL accounts at a staggeringly small 5GB per month. Time Warner Cable initially thought 40-60GB a month was more than fair when it tried to ram its own Internet Overcharging scheme down the throats of customers in New York, North Carolina, and Texas in April 2009. Comcast said using more than 250GB a month could create congestion problems on their network and be unfair to other customers. To this day, AT&T, one of the nation’s largest telecommunications companies, claims that anything more than 150GB on their DSL service or 250GB on U-verse could bring their entire network to its knees.

The Holy Grail of Wall Street economics for broadband is to monetize its usage, creating an endless money party for what is today a utility service. Millions have been spent lobbying anyone who will listen that usage caps and consumption billing were essential to promote investment, upgrades, and to expand broadband service into rural America. Since those arguments have been made, broadband rates have increased, investment has decreased on a per customer and often real basis, and the government is now trying to chip in public taxpayer dollars to get providers to wire areas that will never pass demanding return on investment formulas.

The second prong of selling this meme is the creation of an Internet boogeyman — the “data hog,” a largely fictional creature that supposedly cares only about consuming every possible bit of bandwidth and slowing your web browsing to a crawl. Shouldn’t he pay more, you are asked, at the same time these same companies continue to raise your rates and now attempt to limit your use of a service that should cost less.

This week, Michael Powell, former FCC chairman turned head of the nation’s largest cable lobby — the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, capitulated on the “congestion” myth to an audience at the Minority Media and Telecommunications Association.

Asked by MMTC president David Honig to weigh in on data caps, Powell said that while a lot of people had tried to label the cable industry’s interest in the issue as about congestion management. “That’s wrong,” he said. “Our principal purpose is how to fairly monetize a high fixed cost.”

He said bandwidth management was part of it, though a more serious issue with wireless.

But he pointed out that the cable industry had to spend a bunch of money on its network before the first customer was signed. So, for a business that requires “enormously high” fixed costs — digging up the streets, put the wires in — and operational expense, “it is a completely rational and acceptable process to figure out how to fairly allocate those costs among your consumers who are choosing the service and will pay you to recover those costs.”

When will Washington regulators and lawmakers stop drinking the Kool-Aid handed them by high-paid lobbyists?

When will Washington regulators and lawmakers stop drinking the Kool-Aid handed them by high-paid lobbyists?

But our readers know Powell’s arguments are based on nothing more than the same empty rhetoric that declared the Internet exaflood was at hand.

Cable broadband was introduced as an ancillary service in the late 1990s utilizing cable television infrastructure that was constructed and paid off years earlier. Introducing broadband required only incremental investment and that remains true to this day. Cable operators more than cover their costs with sky high prices for service delivering some operators as high as 95% gross margin on broadband. Capital investments have broadly declined for years as have the costs to deliver the service on a per customer basis.

Suddenlink president and CEO Jerry Kent admitted the days of expensive system upgrades were over and it was now time to rake in profits.

“I think one of the things people don’t realize [relates to] the question of capital intensity and having to keep spending to keep up with capacity,” Kent said. “Those days are basically over, and you are seeing significant free cash flow generated from the cable operators as our capital expenditures continue to come down.”

Powell’s arguments ironically may apply partly to Verizon’s FiOS fiber network, which requires the retirement of copper wire infrastructure around since Alexander Graham Bell, but even Verizon covered much of its costs winning permission to raise rates years earlier to cover fiber upgrades. Much of that money was diverted to their wireless business instead. Today, Verizon FiOS manages just fine with no usage limits at all.

In fact, the only argument about fairness that should be open for debate regards the current cost of broadband service in the United States when compared against operators’ enormous profit margins. The lack of competition has allowed providers to increase prices and introduce “creative pricing” that always guarantees protection for the incredibly high average revenue per customer already earned.

Too often, Washington regulators and lawmakers drink the Kool-Aid handed them by an industry with an incentive to distort the truth. That incentive is the billions at stake in this fight.

Powell has even shelved the notion of the Cheetos-eating data hog burning up the Internet in his parent’s basement and has elected to try class warfare instead, claiming the most capacity is used “by a high end elite subsidized by the rest.” The real high-end elite are the telecom company executives cleaning up overcharging customers for a service that has become a necessity. Arguing for usage caps as a way to offer “lower prices” for those who cannot afford the ridiculously high prices the industry charges today only creates a new digital divide – the have’s and the have only so much.

Either way, providers laugh all the way to the bank.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Scott
Guest
Scott

So the Cable Co’s new idea of “fairness” is penalizing and wringing massive profits out of 98% of their customers using data caps meant to cause users to exceed them when using new emerging data and video services so that they’re forced to pay excessive overages fees back to the Cable Co? All this because of a few users that actually use all the bandwidth and services they’ve paid $100+/mo for that are now called elitists instead of data hogs? These users have no significant impact across a massive network or even neighborhoods when averaged out with all the normal… Read more »

marco
Guest
marco

the 90% margins you quote is misleading as you are probably just referring to gross margins. However, most of the costs are due to the SG&A and capital investments involved, which are also shared with the TV and phone services. Thus, if people cut the cord on tv and phone, you will only have broadband to support the entire network. in this situation, the cable operators would have to raise broadband prices on everyone to earn their cost of capital…or they will have to go to usage based pricing.

usage based pricing WILL happen. it is only a matter of when.

Scott
Guest
Scott

The margin’s aren’t that off, it’s not that hard to figure out when you see their SEC reports, when you listen in on their earnings calls, when you see statements by the CEO’s… Then when you see various Cable Co’s charging $1.00 – $5.00 per Gb on overages for metered plans which you ALREADY pay $50-100/mo for that would already cover any and all usage costs if it was unlimited. They only pay a couple cents per Gigabye, $1+ and metering is robbery. The majority of their costs are content for licensing channels on the TV side of their business,… Read more »

marco
Guest
marco

I was referring to the costs of the broadband only. Yeah, overall….the cost of content is very large.

The infrastructure goes through a cycle….at some point they will upgrade the network again, which will require massive investment…perhaps for ftth.

Scott
Guest
Scott

You mean the same cycle of upgrades we’ve gone through over the last decade plus? Cablo CO’s and ISP’s never had any issues getting beyond the analog dialup over POTs to more DSL varieties than you can count on your hand, to analog and digital cable plus DOCIS 1, 2, and 3. All those upgrades in the backoffice with their respective management infrastructure of software and plant equipment were paid by Unlimited Internet users while still returning good profits to the companies. In most cases costs were shouldered by customers to had to pay extra higher fee’s to ‘rent’ their… Read more »

Sherika
Guest
Sherika

We’re being taken over without being able to have a chance to fight back because they’re buying up everything to stop anyone from building their own internet! Is that fairness? Is this really fairness for open internet? This goes against the people of USA, and what we have invested our time ,and money in. What happen to the fact we all signed on for Net Neutrality to keep the unlimited universal access. Don’t the customers who have invested in these companies have a right to fight back? Hello is anyone awake? This is ridiculous to have data caps ,and nobody… Read more »

Sherika
Guest
Sherika

What about the fact they’re favoring businesses with free unlimited internet access with no data caps?

They punish all of us who are residential ,and favor all businesses.

Sherika
Guest
Sherika

FIRE THE HEADS OF THESE CORPORATIONS NOW AND SAVE OUR UNLIMITED INTERNET!

Sherika
Guest
Sherika

THIS IS LEGALIZED EXTORTION SOLD TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
PUT DOWN YOUR TOYS AND FIGHT FOR UNLIMITED!

jr
Guest
jr

“fairness” means punishing consumers while having the money to pay 8 figure CEO salaries and the funds to buy other cable companies

AP
Guest
AP

DATA CAPS ARE NOT ABOUT FAIRNESS YOU STUPID SACK OF S###! IT’S ABOUT PROTECTING YOUR DEAD TV BUSINESS, PERIOD! What has cable TV giving us over the past several years? 1000+channels of TRASH! Seems like when I flick through the channels, it is nothing but cheap fake reality TV shows, biased news, sitcoms that are BORING! Not like the classic comedy shows from the ’60s and ’70s, and even washed down cartoons. When did you see Tom getting whacked by an anvil in Tom and Jerry? when did you see Elmer Fudd get shot in the face just for laughs… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • roben l anderson: Here in middle Tenn, they are awful in the last few months the internet doesn't work at all I changed last week no more frontier....
  • Virginia Turnbull: I’m tired of being out of phone service for several weeks at a time and then being billed as if my phone was working during those outages. That’s ste...
  • Darla Kello: I'm loosing customers because of you been without internet on 8th day so far. I'm hoping customers don't cancel thier orders now. Frontier...
  • Lisa: I have been very unhappy...
  • Lisa: If I had another choice for internet I would disconnect. I have been a costumer since 2012. The last 4 years have been awful. Hopefully the restructur...
  • Billy Palkovic: They have no phone number...
  • John: When Frontier came to ATT to buy the Connecticut ( SNET) area they had people working with the locals to check various methods used to support and ope...
  • Ray: It will not work if they will replace your xfi router..just buy google mesh it has a good review and works the same as xfi pods,....
  • Diana Mugrage: Makes sense, my service from Frontier suxs, has for a long time too! Very unhappy customer!...
  • Tom: Internet service and Crappy Telephone service for $140 a month,, They need to step aside and let someone else take over, There's no residentual servic...
  • Michael Ware: I know this is a old comment I don't even know what you're talking about because when I had charter I didn't pay a lot of money and I never had any is...
  • Jean Grubbs: They don't know how to fix the problem know more...

Your Account: