Home » Canada »Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rogers »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Rogers Relents: Company Starts to Give on Controversial Backyard Cell Towers in PQ

Phillip Dampier May 31, 2012 Canada, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Rogers, Wireless Broadband 1 Comment

This monopole cell tower antenna just showed up one day in the backyard of this Kirkland, PQ resident.

Kirkland, Que. residents are encouraged by news Rogers Communications has begun to relent on installing nearly-15 meter-high monopole cell towers in residential neighborhoods after the company agreed to relocate a similar antenna in Dorval.

Neighbors in both communities are upset Rogers has located new antennas that tower over homes and trees in residential areas, often in the backyards of residents who permit their presence in return for a monthly check.

The Dorval tower was particularly obtrusive to residents, installed in a city right-of-way adjacent to Morris Avenue. Residents there complained about possible health effects of the nearby tower, and called it an eyesore.

Rogers has now agreed to relocate the antenna to the nearby Sarto Desnoyers Community Centre at company expense.

When the new towers suddenly appear, nearby neighbors feel sandbagged. One Kirkland resident told The Gazette the towers are monstrosities. But Rogers is within the law if it keeps the towers below the 15 meter mark, and the company does not require advance zoning or government approval.

Rogers defends the towers, claiming the unprecedented demand for cellular service requires the company to get creative in finding new places to fill in coverage gaps. Unfortunately, with a shrinking number of suitable commercial or industrial locations, the company has been forced to consider residential installations.

Stop the Cap! has been following the Kirkland tower saga for several weeks. The Gazette reports no immediate progress has been made to get Rogers to relocate that specific antenna, but the company’s responsiveness in Dorval gives local officials and residents optimism an agreement can be reached in Kirkland as well.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian L
Ian L
11 years ago

So, if Rogers can’t put the towers in residential areas, where they give everyone in the area fast speeds and perfect service, where do cellular users propose they be placed?

Maybe I’m an anomaly, but I wouldn’t mind a 15-meter monopole nearby if I got perfect cell service from the provider I was using.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!