Time Warner Cable is among the first cable companies in the country to recognize there is still a Great Recession for many of their middle class customers. After major cable companies lost more video subscribers than they gained for the last two quarters in a row — a first — the nation’s second largest cable operator has developed a budget-minded basic package to meet new economic realities.
Time Warner Cable’s TV Essentials Package will deliver about 50 channels of basic networks and local broadcasters to subscribers in two test markets starting Monday — New York City and northeastern Ohio around the cities of Akron and Cleveland. New York residents will pay $39.95 for the package, $29.95 in Ohio. But both packages will be sold to customers for only one year as a special promotion and are missing many popular networks. Despite that, Time Warner Cable spokeswoman Maureen Huff says the packages represent significant savings for consumers. The retail value of the package is $50 per month. Several cable analysts suspect the package is revenue neutral for Time Warner, which hopes to hold onto customers and put them back on traditional cable packages as economic conditions improve.
But for those contemplating Essentials, compromising over the likely loss of several networks is required. Sports fans in particular will need to look elsewhere — all of the expensive basic cable sports networks, including ESPN and MSG are not included. News junkies will have to live with several C-SPAN networks, CNN and Headline News. Fox News and MSNBC are excluded. Several Viacom-owned cable networks are also not covered, notably Comedy Central. TNT isn’t either.
In fact, no HD networks of any kind are provided, free video on demand is not included, and customers will be banned from obtaining DVR equipment to record shows for later viewing. Also, customers participating in this promotion are prohibited from receiving any other discounts from the cable company for broadband or phone service, so it is narrowly tailored to appear only to current analog basic/standard service customers.
Although Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt said, “the public would like to have more choice and have the option of paying for less programming,” it’s clear the cable company has also developed the package in a way to protect its more expensive Standard Service from being cannibalized by customers looking to save money. The lack of HD programming and DVR availability, in particular, will deliver a clear message to many subscribers the package involves uncomfortable sacrifices.
Some of the networks dropped from the Essentials package are not even that costly to Time Warner Cable. Comedy Central and MSNBC are much cheaper than other networks in the package. The loss of the former is likely to keep younger households unhappy, and Time Warner would likely have been accused of bias had it included MSNBC’s left leaning nighttime lineup while excluding right-wing Fox News (which is more expensive than CNN and MSNBC combined).
Everything about the Essentials package screams “retention offer” — marketed quietly to customers intending to depart from the cable company for economic reasons. With 2011 rate increases forthcoming, it is logical this type of package will be offered as a last resort. But don’t expect Time Warner to heavily advertise it to current customers, where it could trigger a downgrade avalanche.
Don’t want blazing fast fiber optic broadband speeds? Unhappy with fiber optic quality video and want to go back to putting a satellite dish on your roof? If the answer to either question is “yes,” Frontier Communications has good news for you.
The phone company, which assumed control of a handful of communities formerly served by Verizon’s fiber-to-the-home FiOS network, has announced it will begin marketing DSL and satellite TV services to its fiber customers.
Frontier CEO Maggie Wilderotter told investors on a third quarter results conference call that FiOS broadband could be too expensive.
Wilderotter noted Verizon would not allow customers in a FiOS neighborhood to buy DSL service, which leaves budget-minded customers behind.
“Now, FiOS starts at like 50Mbps and it’s very expensive. It’s like $50 a month for a customer. So they left a whole host of customers behind from an affordability perspective who didn’t need that kind of capability on broadband.” Wilderotter explained. “We have just over the last 30 to 60 days opened up DSL in all of the FiOS markets to give the customer choice. So the customer can choose whether they want FiOS broadband or they want high-speed Internet service, typically, and in those markets we’re offering around 6 to 7Mbps.”
Time Warner Cable occasionally runs promotions helping customers break free from Frontier's multi-year service contracts.
Of course, Frontier FiOS starts at 15Mbps — not 50, and that costs $50 a month for standalone service. For $99, ($89 in Verizon FiOS areas), customers can get broadband, cable TV and unlimited phone service. Frontier’s “Turbo” DSL service is priced at $40 a month for up to 7.1Mbps service.
Wilderotter also noted their FiOS customers can also choose to skip fiber video and go with DirecTV.
“We think that customers should be able to choose what kind of video they want,” she said. “We have aggressive offers in the market for both DirecTV and for FiOS video, but in our vernacular, what we care about is keeping the customer, getting the customer to take more products and services from us and making sure the customer is happy with the choice.”
Wilderotter said Frontier is prepared to tolerate more congestion on its DSL circuits than Verizon permitted, which opens the door to potential traffic slow-downs down the road.
“We’ve opened up in many of these locations the opportunity to sell high-speed service up to 95% capacity on the equipment that we have out in the field. Verizon had set a parameter at 75%,” Wilderotter said.
The company continues to study whether Frontier FiOS is worth maintaining or expanding outside of the Verizon territories where it was originally constructed.
“We are still evaluating it from a financial perspective and a customer perspective, and from a cost perspective and a revenue perspective,” Wilderotter told investors. “In terms of what that does for us overall, what it does for churn, how much does it really cost to extend this capability in the markets that we’re in today — we think that analysis and evaluation will go on through the first quarter [of 2011] and then we’ll be able to make some [decisions] in terms of what we want to do with FiOS from an expansion perspective or a maintenance perspective.”
Frontier Communications CEO Maggie Wilderotter answered questions about broadband expansion and the impact of the fall elections on telecommunications policy in Washington. (11 minutes)
You must remain on this page to hear the clip, or you can download the clip and listen later.
<
p style=”text-align: center;”>
Frontier's largely rural service areas provide a captive audience for the company's DSL broadband service.
In the near term Frontier has several plans to get more aggressive in the marketplace to meet its target goal of losing only 8 percent of their customers per year — a goal that illustrates legacy phone companies are still on a trajectory towards fewer and fewer customers:
Don Shassian, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Frontier reports expansion of DSL remains a top priority for Frontier. The company is on track to deliver access to 300,000 additional homes by the end of the year. Verizon delivered access to 64 percent of Frontier’s acquired territories. Frontier wants to get that number up to 85 percent. But part of that target is not just expanding service to unserved areas. It’s also trying to win back customers lost to other providers through promotions and incentives.
Frontier plans to resume aggressive promotions in the coming weeks and months, including its “free Netbook” promotion, which provides a Netbook computer to new customers signing up for several packages of services, committing to remain with Frontier for at least two years.
Frontier intends to push “price protection agreements” on as many customers as possible. Their “Peace of Mind” program locks customers into multi-year contracts with stiff cancellation penalties. Wilderotter noted: “I think, as you know, in our legacy markets, 96% of all of our sales are on a price protection plan and we have close to 60% of our residential customers on a one-, two- or three-year price protection plans. That number is below 15% in the acquired markets. So we’re also driving for price protection plans with every sale that we’re doing in these new markets as well.” Such contracts dramatically discourage a customer from disconnecting Frontier, because fees for doing so can exceed $300 in some cases. Frontier has been heavily criticized by some customers and State Attorneys General for deceptive business practices regarding contracts.
Frontier continues to enjoy a lack of solid cable competition in its largely rural service areas. Shassian reports Comcast competes with Frontier in only about 32% of homes in some areas, Time Warner Cable in about 23%, and Charter below 15%. With reduced competition, Frontier often represents the only broadband option in town.
Frontier is also spending an increased amount of time coping with copper thefts, especially in West Virginia where the company is warning would-be thieves it will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.
“Damage to our facilities can affect communications access in an emergency, increase company costs and consumer rates, and disrupt community phone and broadband connections,” said Lynne Monaco, Frontier’s Director of Security. “When network connections are severed by copper thieves, it endangers customers and emergency responders and poses significant risks of personal injury and property damage.”
Just last week, West Virginia state police solved another copper caper that disrupted service for some customers.
The Charleston Daily Mail reports:
Stephanie Burdette of Charleston was arrested in connection with a copper wire theft.
Trooper A.B. Ward from the South Charleston detachment went to the Fishers Branch area of Sissonville last Thursday afternoon when a Frontier worker discovered a section of the communications line missing. The worker found that 300-feet of the 400-pair line, valued at about $5,000, was missing, according to a complaint filed in Kanawha Magistrate Court.
A trooper who had worked on a similar investigation told Ward to check the home of Ervin “Tubby” Page, 49, where troopers had previously found evidence of wire burning. Ward went to Page’s home, described as a Goose Neck travel trailer parked next to the Guthrie Agricultural Center in Sissonville, and found three burn barrels about 50 feet in front of the trailer. One of them was on fire.
Page’s girlfriend Stephanie Marie Burdette, 25, of Cross Lanes, was at the scene when the trooper arrived. Ward spoke to her then checked out the barrels where he found aluminum wrap, which is used to cover the copper communications wiring, and pieces of copper cabling, the complaint said.
Frontier customers are encouraged to report any suspicious activity around telecommunications equipment and facilities by calling the company’s toll free security line 1-800-590-6605. Anyone witnessing a theft in progress should not confront the suspects but should immediately call 911 and then call Frontier. Vehicle and suspect descriptions are very useful. This is a community safety problem, and the cooperation of the public is critical.
Phillip DampierNovember 18, 2010Online VideoComments Off on FilmOn Yanks British Networks – Most BBC, ITV Networks Now Gone
BBC and ITV are out the door on FilmOn
FilmOn, the controversial online video service has quietly pulled most major British networks from their streaming service, creating a significant, and unexplained, gap in their service.
The company’s constantly-changing lineup has been a major source of frustration for many would-be subscribers. What you see today may not be what you can still see tomorrow, and the loss of nearly 10 networks from the company’s $10 monthly service will no doubt anger paying customers.
No explanation was given about the sudden departure of the channels.
FilmOn has also been devoting time and attention to promoting new viewing options for iPad users and other owners of portable viewing devices.
But potential subscribers still face a very confusing assortment of packages which are not easily found on the website, and are not well explained — in many cases no description of what comes included with different packages is provided.
FilmOn continues to face lawsuits from broadcasters upset about being included on the service without their permission.
Up to 60 percent of callers to America’s big telecom companies experience rage when their calls go unanswered, their problems go unresolved, or they literally cannot get past the language barrier of today’s outsourced customer service agents working half a world away.
Cable and phone companies are among the worst at delivering quality customer service, with Comcast in particular causing enough frustration to bring a Virginia woman into a local Comcast office armed with a hammer, smashing company computers to get attention.
Only credit card companies have a worse reputation.
A compilation of six different “Peggy” Ads from Discover Card lampoon poor customer service among many credit card companies (2 minutes)
Unconscious Comcast employee
“When we call, what we want is ‘yes’ — that’s it,” says Emily Yellin, author of the book Your Call Is (not that) Important to Us, chronicling corporate America’s quest for cheaper customer service, usually alienating customers along the way.
Too often, American hear “no” or nothing at all, thanks to customer service representatives that lack the authority to solve problems or simply don’t care.
For many years, customers either took it or left. But the Internet has changed everything, allowing customers to take their complaints to a wider audience, often embarrassing bad acting companies and creating tremendous damage to corporate reputations along the way.
An infamous example was the case of the Comcast employee who literally fell asleep waiting more than an hour to talk to co-workers about a customer’s problem. A video of the sleeping worker became an online sensation.
Women like Mona Shaw, dubbed the Comcast Hammer Lady, also come away as folk heroes when customers can relate to the level of frustration she experienced from a company that only cared if she was a few days late paying her cable bill.
[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CBS News Combating Poor Customer Service 11-14-10.flv[/flv]
CBS News took an in-depth look into the customer service crisis — starting with Comcast. (8 minutes)
Vinh Pham had enough trying to deal with Comcast’s impenetrable thicket of customer service confusion trying to get his broadband service from the cable company up and running again after it suddenly stopped working this past March.
I called Comcast and they gave me a really hard time. I was trying to figure out why my Internet was down, and they told me that I did not have Internet. They said my account only has TV, and that’s all I am being charged for.
This annoyed me because I ordered Internet + TV on a promotion price, not just TV, and I had called them to fix this mix up before.
The guy on the phone kept insisting that I was wrong and that I needed to upgrade to the “Triple Play” for $120. That annoyed me even more. I do not want your freaking Triple Play. Who the hell still uses landlines, let alone buy landlines through their cable company. Stop trying to sell me [something] I don’t want.
According to Pham, the Comcast representative accused him of stealing Internet service, which was the last straw for the California customer. He asked to cancel all of his services. Pham repeated his story to a customer retention agent and offered to share a copy of the Comcast technician’s installation work order, which showed he ordered and received Xfinity broadband service.
Evidently, Comcast did not correctly provision Pham’s account with the promotion he signed up for, and miles of red tape ensued trying to get his account updated accurately. Each time the changes did not “take,” Pham’s Internet service would eventually stop working.
Customers using Pham's technique need to have a work order ID and account number to activate service
Pham then discovered Comcast customers could activate Xfinity broadband service themselves because the cable company provided open access to a web page intended for technicians installing service. Pham simply entered his account number, the work order number from his receipt, and the MAC address on his cable modem, and his broadband service was back without navigating argumentative customer service agents.
Now, months after the article was published, Comcast contacted the company that hosts Pham’s blog and demanded the entire blog be censored, accusing Pham of telling people how to steal Internet service.
Admittedly, Pham’s use of the phrase “free Comcast Internet” probably did not help, but a review of his technique makes it impossible for non-paying customers to simply activate service for nothing — a customer account number and work order number are required, and presumably Comcast won’t simply accept made-up numbers.
More importantly, Comcast’s efforts to censor one of their customers calls the cable company out for its “shoot customers first, ask questions later” policies.
It’s further evidence the cable giant cannot be trusted when it claims it will observe voluntary Net Neutrality protections against censoring Internet content.
The blowback from Comcast’s actions have provided the company a lesson in “the Streisand effect,” where companies trying to remove information from the Internet only draw bigger attention to the information they are desperate to remove. Comcast’s censorship efforts have been made futile by hundreds of Internet users who learned of the company’s efforts. They have republished the information from Pham’s blog, which currently remains intact. Had the company simply (and quietly) password-protected their technician portal, nobody would have given it a second thought. Now Comcast is in a bigger PR mess than they started with.
When cable giants like Comcast trample all over free speech (and their paying customers), it teaches a valuable lesson why giving them a chance to grow even larger through a merger with NBC-Universal is a dangerous mistake.
Be Sure to Read Part One: Astroturf Overload — Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group for an important introduction to what this super-sized industry front group is all about. Members of Broadband for America Red: A company or group actively engaging in anti-consumer lobbying, opposes Net Neutrality, supports Internet Overcharging, belongs to […]
Astroturf: One of the underhanded tactics increasingly being used by telecom companies is “Astroturf lobbying” – creating front groups that try to mimic true grassroots, but that are all about corporate money, not citizen power. Astroturf lobbying is hardly a new approach. Senator Lloyd Bentsen is credited with coining the term in the 1980s to […]
Hong Kong remains bullish on broadband. Despite the economic downturn, City Telecom continues to invest millions in constructing one of Hong Kong’s largest fiber optic broadband networks, providing fiber to the home connections to residents. City Telecom’s HK Broadband service relies on an all-fiber optic network, and has been dubbed “the Verizon FiOS of Hong […]
BendBroadband, a small provider serving central Oregon, breathlessly announced the imminent launch of new higher speed broadband service for its customers after completing an upgrade to DOCSIS 3. Along with the launch announcement came a new logo of a sprinting dog the company attaches its new tagline to: “We’re the local dog. We better be […]
Stop the Cap! reader Rick has been educating me about some of the new-found aggression by Shaw Communications, one of western Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, in expanding its business reach across Canada. Woe to those who get in the way. Novus Entertainment is already familiar with this story. As Stop the Cap! reported previously, Shaw […]
The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, may be forced to consider American broadband policy before defining Net Neutrality and its role in Canadian broadband, according to an article published today in The Globe & Mail. [FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s] proposal – to codify and enforce some […]
In March 2000, two cable magnates sat down for the cable industry equivalent of My Dinner With Andre. Fine wine, beautiful table linens, an exquisite meal, and a Monopoly board with pieces swapped back and forth representing hundreds of thousands of Canadian consumers. Ted Rogers and Jim Shaw drew a line on the western Ontario […]
Just like FairPoint Communications, the Towering Inferno of phone companies haunting New England, Frontier Communications is making a whole lot of promises to state regulators and consumers, if they’ll only support the deal to transfer ownership of phone service from Verizon to them. This time, Frontier is issuing a self-serving press release touting their investment […]
I see it took all of five minutes for George Ou and his friends at Digital Society to be swayed by the tunnel vision myopia of last week’s latest effort to justify Internet Overcharging schemes. Until recently, I’ve always rationalized my distain for smaller usage caps by ignoring the fact that I’m being subsidized by […]
In 2007, we took our first major trip away from western New York in 20 years and spent two weeks an hour away from Calgary, Alberta. After two weeks in Kananaskis Country, Banff, Calgary, and other spots all over southern Alberta, we came away with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Good Alberta […]
A federal appeals court in Washington has struck down, for a second time, a rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission to limit the size of the nation’s largest cable operators to 30% of the nation’s pay television marketplace, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.” The 30% rule, designed to keep no single company from controlling […]
Less than half of Americans surveyed by PC Magazine report they are very satisfied with the broadband speed delivered by their Internet service provider. PC Magazine released a comprehensive study this month on speed, provider satisfaction, and consumer opinions about the state of broadband in their community. The publisher sampled more than 17,000 participants, checking […]