Home » Issues » Currently Reading:

‘The Business Insider’ Predicts Capped Road Runner Customers Could See Monthly Bills “Over $200 for Internet Access”

Phillip Dampier April 2, 2009 Issues 9 Comments

Time-Warner Road Runner customers face staggering increases in their monthly Internet access bills, according to a report published yesterday in The Business Insider.

Reporter Dan Frommer analyzed the impact of Road Runner’s new usage caps on customers who use their connection for streaming video or other data intensive applications like online backup and file downloads.

What does this mean for you? If you watch about 7 hours a week of standard-def video, or 2.5 hours a week of hi-def Web video, you could easily pass even the 40 GB/$54 a month plan cap. After that, each iTunes movie rental — or Netflix (NFLX) stream, or whatever — could cost $1 to $4 more. Or Hulu episodes could cost $0.30 to $0.50. That doesn’t even include your other Web usage, such as downloading music, using the Web, etc.

Although some Internet users spend their time doing little more than casual web browsing and checking electronic mail, an increasing number of users have found catching up with TV shows online to be easy and convenient, and soon to be potentially very expensive under Road Runner’s new rationed Internet plans.  Customers used to flat rate service will now be forced to contemplate the impact of everything from spam in their e-mail to bug fixes from Microsoft to online file backup, downloading software, and even using the Internet to make and receive telephone calls.  And with usage caps as low as 5GB per month on the economy plan, that’s less data than can be stored on the average portable memory stick.  Just one high definition movie easily will exceed that cap.

We’ll see if Time Warner Cable is able to expand this into more, bigger markets. If it works — and Web video fanatics don’t mind spending $200 per month on Internet service — that’s good news for Internet providers.

But if subscribers bolt in big numbers for competitors like Verizon (VZ), which doesn’t currently cap bandwidth, it could be a disaster. (More likely: It will have to bump caps up to a more reasonable 150 GB or more when customers revolt at $100-plus cable modem bills.)

0 0 votes
Article Rating
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim
Jim
15 years ago

What influence if any do our local government agencies have on this I wonder. Obviously with no regulation to stop them, Time Warner will win this battle. Monopoly power always has the power to rule when there is no true competition.

Adam Schreiber
Adam Schreiber
15 years ago

I sent an email to Chris Lee (my Congressman) and would urge others to do the same. If enough people care about an issue, Congress has no choice but to at least take note of what’s going on.

Dan
Dan
15 years ago

“Web video fanatics”? Seriously? Who the fuck wrote this? Watching web video makes you a fanatic? Someone ought to teach Dan Frommer the real definition of a fanatic.

Dan
Dan
15 years ago

fair enough – still at high anger level over this stuff i guess

Larry
Larry
15 years ago

Capping usage is a deal breaker for online backup services. Customers should boycott a company that caps internet access.

Andrew
Andrew
15 years ago

The form letter I got from Time Warner when I complained to them about first removing newsgroups and now capping bandwidth. Guess they truly are not going to honor their contract we both signed. Guess I missed some super fine print: Dear Mr. ********, Thank you for contacting Time Warner Cable Email Support. I understand that you are not happy with the recent rate increase on internet service. I apologize for the inconvenience. I will be glad to assist you. Time Warner Cable understands and embraces the evolution of the importance of the way people are now consuming Internet content.… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!