Home » AT&T »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

AT&T Exempts Its Own MicroCell Product From DSL/U-verse Usage Cap; Everything Else Counts

Phillip Dampier January 14, 2013 AT&T, Editorial & Site News, Internet Overcharging, Wireless Broadband 1 Comment
AT&T 3G MicroCell

AT&T 3G MicroCell

One of the core principles of Net Neutrality is that all Internet traffic is treated equally — nothing favored, nothing penalized.

AT&T does not seem interested in following that principle, as our regular reader James found out when reviewing the terms and conditions of AT&T’s Internet Overcharging scheme that limits DSL customers to 150GB of usage per month and 250GB for U-verse customers.

AT&T Wireless customers with the company’s 3G MicroCell that covers for AT&T’s network shortcomings are given special treatment if they also subscribe to the company’s wired broadband services: use of the MicroCell is exempt from the wired usage cap.

The MicroCell creates a mini “cell-tower” within the home for wireless devices that do not receive adequate indoor reception, powered by your home or office broadband connection. Customers with smartphones or other wireless devices can use the MicroCell to browse web pages, use apps, make and receive calls, or send and receive text messages without ever worrying about exceeding their DSL or U-verse broadband usage allowance. Want to access that content on your home computer? That does count against your cap.

“So data from another AT&T service which is sent over the same Internet connection as any other data traffic is excluded from the cap?  That sounds like a clear Net Neutrality violation to me,” says James.

att_logoFrom AT&T’s own FAQ:

“I have an AT&T 3G MicroCell. Since that utilizes my home broadband network to boost my wireless data signal, does that mean my wireless usage also counts against my wired broadband monthly data plan?

No, the wireless traffic from your AT&T 3G MicroCell does not count toward your monthly home broadband plan. Please register your AT&T 3G MicroCell account and your residential AT&T Internet account at www.att.com/internet-usage-MicroCell to help ensure accurate Internet usage billing. If you have broadband service with another provider, you do not need to register your account.”

The usage cap “free pass” does not extend to your wireless service plan, however. Despite using your home broadband connection, the use of the MicroCell still consumes monthly plan minutes and megabytes, unless you purchase extra add-ons. AT&T would argue it already charged you for your wireless usage, so it would not be fair to charge you again through your home broadband plan. But if you are not an AT&T broadband customer, that is exactly what happens if your local cable operator also has usage billing.

AT&T’s logic for implementing usage caps in the first place:

AT&T has experienced a dramatic increase in the amount of data that is sent and received over its wireline broadband networks. This dramatic increase is driven primarily by a small fraction of our customers. In fact, the top 2% of customers use about 20% of the total capacity on our network. A single high-traffic user can utilize the same amount of data capacity as 19 typical households. Lopsided usage patterns can cause congestion at certain points in the network, which can slow Internet speeds and interfere with other customers’ access to and use of the network.

Customers that blow through their allowance receive one warning and then a higher bill: a $10 overlimit penalty will apply and extends your usage allowance by 50GB. AT&T’s cost per gigabyte is estimated to be in the pennies.

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. Elfonblog says:

    Yep, they’re already quite capable of exempting traffic that stays on-network… as long as it’s only their TV and phone services. If I happen to bittorrent only to other ATT customers, I still get billed for the shizzle.

    My brain is also having fun with the careful wording of ATT’s usage cap pretense. After dealing with the manipulative and sketchy wi-fi company called Fon for several years (which I used to blog about as a fan), I simply cannot look at such a block of corporate purring and be sure that those words mean the same thing to them that they do to me.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Stephen Sherry: Slowed progress for the pockets of investors who speak of trickle down, but keep the profits for themselves to creating a class of super rich exploite...
  • Eugene Powers: Thank you so much I will try it....
  • Donald Trump: Then why refer to them as "Time Warner Cable" in the same sentence? See the WSJ article "Sir…Sir! You Need to Call the ‘Other’ Time Warner" if you thi...
  • Phillip Dampier: Our readers are aware of the difference and discern the shorthand. When we write about Time Warner, Inc., it is referred to as Time Warner (Enterta...
  • Phillip Dampier: Call them back and talk to someone else. I just negotiated this deal for someone else last Friday, and anyone should be able to get it by naming it: ...
  • Joe V.: Scumbag crooks....
  • Eugene Powers: OMG!!!!! The most stupid conversation in my life I just had with customer rep Natalia from Time Warner!!! I called to reduce the price that was just i...
  • Eugene Powers: Just tried what article said and it didn't work at all. I was given $20 coupon which made my total still much higher than competition ATT for much les...
  • Donald Trump: "now confirmed as genuine by Time Warner," Time Warner and Time Warner Cable are entirely separate companies...
  • Matt K: No, not Cox!...
  • Len G: I personally believe taking money, even $1 in exchange for a vote or political movement of any kind, is tantamount to treason. Until we start demandi...
  • Len G: The idea of local governments being overruled by what is tantamount to "Comcast with eminent domain power" isn't just ridiculous, it's insulting. I d...

Your Account: