Cricket, the regional wireless carrier that claims to offer “unlimited” data plans that really are not, has jacked up prices on its wireless broadband plans and reduced wireless data usage allowances.
Cricket used to charge $40 a month for 5GB of monthly usage, $60 for 10GB. No more.
Now the company wants you to pay more for less:
2.5GB for $40, 5GB for $50, and 7.5GB for $60 is hardly "respeKting" your wallet
Thankfully, existing Cricket customers are grandfathered into their existing $40 for 5GB plan, so they do not face the price hike and allowance cut.
Cricket’s claimed speeds up to 1.4Mbps are fiction — in our own tests we found service never exceeding 650kbps, and often averages 500kbps or less in the Rochester, N.Y. area. When Cricket cell sites become congested, as they have in the southeastern part of the city, speeds can drop to 56kbps or less, making the service completely unusable. While web page browsing and audio streaming are acceptable using Cricket, video streaming is not. YouTube and other video multimedia was too painful to watch.
Cricket’s best advantage in the wireless broadband market was its pricing. Customers accepted dramatically reduced coverage areas (don’t expect Cricket to work outside of the city, nearby suburbs, and adjacent major highways), slower speeds, and a “Fair Access Policy” that throttles your connection to dial-up speeds (or less) once you exceed your monthly allowance, all in return for service priced $20 less than most of the competition. The modem is usually free or deeply discounted, and there is no contract requirement.
But at Cricket’s new pricing, consumers should take a look at Clearwire’s new 4G service, Comcast High Speed 2Go, or Road Runner Mobile instead. Clear’s 4G-only plan offers unlimited access for $40.00 a month without a “Fair Access Policy” throttling your service to dial-up speeds, and much faster service than Cricket can provide. The only downsides are the up front cost of the modem and being sure 4G is available in your area.
Clear, Comcast High Speed 2Go and Road Runner Mobile offer 4G service plans with a fallback option to 3G coverage for about $55 a month. Clear and Comcast do not limit 4G usage, but do limit 3G access to 5GB per month before overlimit fees apply. Road Runner Mobile offers unlimited access to both 3G and 4G service.
Cricket likes to claim it “respeKts your wallet.” Raising prices and reducing usage allowances isn’t exactly a sign of respect.
Tim Conway's "Old Man" character from the Carol Burnett Show would be right at home using the Internet in these areas.
Nick Saint at the Business Insider has been sifting through some of the raw data released last week by the Federal Communications Commission regarding broadband service in the United States. He’s managed to identify the 10 worst counties in America for broadband service based on statistics from 2008. But two of those probably should have never been on the list. More on that later.
Harrison County, Mississippi — A single pond in Harrison County is the only known habitat of the critically endangered dusky gopher frog. It doesn’t have broadband, and neither do most of the residents of this beleaguered part of southern Mississippi. The cities of Gulfport and Biloxi are in Harrison County, an area torn up by hurricanes from Camille to Katrina. Now, the beaches are coated in BP oil. Harrison County can’t get a break. Cable One and AT&T are the primary providers. Cable One’s dreadful service only reaches well-populated areas and AT&T has taken its sweet time expanding DSL service in the area.
Imperial County, California — The nation’s lettuce basket, Imperial County communities live on a very low fiber-optic diet. While the soil is rich for crops, the people who plant and harvest them are not. El Centro, the biggest city, has some broadband available, but with the city having the nation’s highest unemployment rate (27.3 percent), many can’t afford it. Once in farm country, cable doesn’t offer service and DSL is hard to come by.
Corson County, South Dakota — Representative of the pervasive problem of broadband unavailability on Native American lands, a large part of Corson County includes the Standing Rock Indian Reservation. Saint notes the FCC found just 12.5 percent of Native Americans subscribe to broadband service, compared to 56 percent of the rest of us.
Ector County, Texas — Odessa’s hometown America-charm was put on display for all to see on NBC’s Friday Night Lights, which celebrated small town high school football. The reality is less exciting. Like Harrison County, Ector residents are stuck with Cable One, which loves Internet Overcharging schemes and spied on its Alabama broadband customers. Good ole AT&T grudgingly provided DSL, if you could get it, until mid-2009 when U-verse finally started to show up. Now large parts of the county outside of Odessa can’t get that either.
San Juan, Puerto Rico — Usually considered an afterthought by American telecommunications companies, Puerto Rico has long suffered with low quality service. Caribbean Net News: “Puerto Rico’s broadband penetration rate is unacceptable, with less than 40% of households subscribing to broadband services”, said Carlo Marazzi, President of Critical Hub Networks. “While there are many factors at play, broadband in Puerto Rico is simply too expensive and too slow, when compared to the rest of the nation. Broadband Internet service in Puerto Rico is 60% more expensive and 78% slower than the United States national median. In a report published this year by the Communication Workers of America (CWA) which ranked broadband speeds in the 50 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico was ranked in last place (52nd place).
Jasper County, Missouri — Saint noted 18 percent of Jasper County lives below the poverty line, which is not exactly attractive to broadband investment. Jasper County’s broadband needs are barely met by a cable provider, AT&T, and for some, an electric utility operating a Wireless ISP, providing service where cable and DSL don’t go. For Jasper County residents, the challenge can be cost as much as access.
Appomattox County, Virginia — Every student known Appomattox was the last stand of Confederate leader Robert E. Lee during the Civil War. Today, residents there are worked to their last nerve because they can’t easily obtain high speed Internet. There is no DSL service from the phone company and only limited cable service. But at least the county is trying. Let’s let John Spencer, assistant county administrator, tell you in his own words what Appomattox County is doing to deliver broadband for its 14,000 residents:
Bristol Bay Borough, Alaska — The epitome of rural America, large swaths of Alaska are dependent on subsidies paid from the Universal Service Fund for basic telephone service. Outside of large cities, cable television is a theory. Telephone company DSL service and wireless are the predominate broadband technologies in rural, expansive Alaska. For many areas, both are awful. Bristol Bay Borough is known as the “Red Salmon Capital of the World,” if only because there are far more salmon than there are fishermen to catch them. Internet access for many of the area’s 953 residents means a trip to the Martin Monsen Library, which offers free Wi-Fi for limited access. If you want Internet at home, it will cost you plenty:
Wireless Internet Access – Bristol Bay Internet/GCI
$26/month
Up to 56K up/down
1 e-mail address
5 MB e-mail storage
1 GB data throughput
Limit 1 computer
$51/month
Up to 56K up / 256K down
2 e-mail addresses
5 MB storage per address
5 MB of web space
2 GB data throughput
Limit 1 computer
$101/month
Up to 56K up / 256K down
4 e-mail address
5 MB storage per address
10 MB of web space
3 GB data throughput
Limit 3 computers
That is the most expensive and slow “broadband” we’ve ever encountered, and with a usage limit of just 3GB per month, it’s for web browsing and e-mail only.
Saint’s report also noted two other counties that were, at least according to the FCC’s data, among the ten worst in the country — Wake and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. That includes the cities of Charlotte and Raleigh, which clearly have had access to at least 4Mbps service for several years now. Even Saint is skeptical, suspecting incomplete data is perhaps responsible for the two North Carolina counties ending up on the list.
The sequel to this story could be written from a jail cell.
The guilty pleas just keep on coming in a two-year old prosecution of a wireless broadband scheme that never delivered much service, but ripped off taxpayers to the tune of more than two million dollars. This week, the president of Mountain State College, who has been employed there for more than 35 years, owned up to hiding facts from prosecutors in his role as chairman of the board of the now-defunct Sequelle Communications Alliance, Inc.
Alan Michael McPeek of Parkersburg, 63, plead guilty Wednesday to obstruction of justice charges in federal court, admitting he misled a criminal investigation reviewing fraud allegations against the company.
Sequelle, a publicly funded project to establish wireless Internet service in the mid-Ohio Valley region, received a $3.295 million loan in 2002 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, a $600,000 grant from West Virginia’s Development Office and another $400,000 in loans from the Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Council and a bank.
For that funding windfall, the mid-Ohio Valley got several towers ready for wireless antennas, a website that didn’t get updated much beyond the fall of 2000, some software to administer the project, and nothing else.
Instead, federal prosecutors charged some of Sequelle’s officers and several Ohio-based subcontractors of laundering loan and grant funds as seed money and salaries for a new for-profit venture designed to market an “Internet in a box” concept to other rural areas seeking wireless Internet service.
Prosecutors particularly focused on the USDA loan, which required the money “to be used solely for the project specifically described in the application to furnish or improve broadband services in rural areas … in the states of Ohio and West Virginia.”
Like many federal grants and loans, this one prohibited using the money to pay salaries, utilities, and basic office expenses. Prosecutors would later learn Sequelle’s principal founder and former CEO Heidi Ditchendorf Caroline Laughery laundered loan money through a sub-contractor who kicked back at least $250,000 she used as a salary. McPeek’s guilty plea came in part because he knew about it.
Another grant from Ohio was paid on the promise Sequelle would provide at least 45 high paying jobs within three years. That never happened.
Laughery
Worst of all, many of the grant and loan applications asked whether any officer in the company had been convicted of a felony or was a defendant in any criminal case. Laughery answered no to both. Had government officials verified that information they would have discovered Laughery was previously convicted in 1987 on two counts of felony wire fraud — based on her embezzlement of more than $130,000 of customer funds and securities during her employment at Merrill Lynch.
Laughery didn’t want to bring up those bad memories, so she left her Merrill Lynch years off Sequelle’s website documenting her prior experience.
Prosecutors have been successful in bringing those responsible for this caper to justice:
Laughery was sentenced in April to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay $850,000 in restitution.
Sub-contractor R. Scott Truslow plead guilty to conspiring to commit money laundering and is now spending six months under home confinement and ordered to pay nearly $550,000 in restitution.
Charges are still pending against a second sub-contractor.
McPeek faces up to five years in prison when sentenced in October. He was released on a $10,000 unsecured bond pending sentencing.
Laughery’s attorney, Michael Callaghan, claimed in 2008 that the project failed because technology marched ahead of the project.
“All the money that the government is alleging was stolen actually went into the development of Internet (infrastructure),” he told a West Virginia reporter. “My client worked for a year-and-a-half without pay because she believed in this project. The concept was great, but the technology developed faster than the project did. Technology moves fast. Technology businesses fail every day.”
Tapdancing your way around money laundering charges can move fast as well.
[flv]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WTAP Parkersburg McPeek Enters Plea in Sequelle Investigation 6-30-10.flv[/flv]
WTAP-TV Parkersburg has this report on McPeek’s plea. (1 minute)
President Obama signed a memorandum this morning that will free up 500Mhz of government and privately-owned spectrum over the next decade to double the amount of wireless broadband capacity in the United States.
The Obama Administration claims the newly available spectrum will throw a rescue line to overburdened wireless networks that are facing a spectrum crunch. The White House estimates wireless data usage will explode — growing between 20 and 45 times in the next five years.
President Obama:
Few technological developments hold as much potential to enhance America’s economic competitiveness, create jobs, and improve the quality of our lives as wireless high-speed access to the Internet. Innovative new mobile technologies hold the promise for a virtuous cycle — millions of consumers gain faster access to more services at less cost, spurring innovation, and then a new round of consumers benefit from new services. The wireless revolution has already begun with millions of Americans taking advantage of wireless access to the Internet.
Expanded wireless broadband access will trigger the creation of innovative new businesses, provide cost-effective connections in rural areas, increase productivity, improve public safety, and allow for the development of mobile telemedicine, telework, distance learning, and other new applications that will transform Americans’ lives.
In practical terms, the reallocation of spectrum could spark a battle between the current spectrum holders — often government agencies and private UHF television stations — and the government. Parts of the plan will require Congressional approval, a sure-fire guarantee that wireless providers will have to write some more checks to their astroturf and sock puppet friends to help sell the benefits of the plan to a wary Congress.
Since most of the spectrum would likely be sold at auction, the proceeds could deliver the administration a tidy sum to either reduce the federal budget deficit and/or fund broadband initiatives.
But what might seem at first like a win-win might not turn out that way in the end.
We have the following concerns:
Past spectrum auctions have largely benefited incumbent wireless carriers, especially companies like AT&T and Verizon who have the deep pockets that guarantee successful bids at auctions. Both wireless carriers are not actually using all of the spectrum they already acquired in earlier auctions and have essentially warehoused those frequencies, particularly in rural areas, to keep them out of the hands of other companies that could deliver service. FCC requirements that auction winners actually utilize their acquired spectrum have been so lax as to be laughable. Carriers can easily satisfy FCC requirements building only in urban areas and leaving large swaths of the countryside unserved. The FCC must set rules that auction winners use their allotments in both rural and urban areas, or face fines or forfeiture.
Setting aside some frequency blocks for smaller providers and would-be competitors is critical. In today’s mobile wireless marketplace two companies are superpowers and then there is everyone else. Both AT&T and Verizon have the resources to outbid virtually anyone. Allowing blocks of frequencies to be reserved exclusively for new competitors would bolster competition and give consumers more choices. Those frequencies must be sold in a block that is identical nationwide — not leftover spectrum running through several frequency bands.
Providing additional spectrum for wireless broadband isn’t a problem, but with complaints about wireless service providers growing, along with consumers’ bills, now is the time to reform wireless for the benefit of consumers. Let’s make it a “win” for everyone.
[flv width=”640″ height=”500″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Bloomberg Obama Proposes to Double Airwaves for Mobile Web Access 6-28-10.flv[/flv]
Bloomberg News explains the controversy behind the transfer of spectrum from the government and broadcasters to the mobile broadband industry. (2 minutes)
AT&T offers up the common practice of boasting about how much you can do with a usage-limited account, based on the thousands of e-mails you'll never send, the 500 pictures you'll never take, or the one minute YouTube clips you'll never watch. Notice they never seem to include figures for streaming multimedia applications like music, movies, and TV shows or playing more bandwidth-intensive games. To do so would only upset customers further.
AT&T claims that 98 percent of its customers will save money under its new lower-priced usage-limited data plans, but an analyst predicts those savings will vanish for half of AT&T’s customers by 2013, exposing them to steep overlimit penalties.
Independent analyst Chetan Sharma crunched the numbers:
The average customer will consume more than 2 gigabytes of data a month within three years, up from 150 megabytes in 2009. Though AT&T could change its rates in the future, the cost of such data use at current rates is $35 a month. That would make it more costly than the $30 AT&T previously charged for unlimited data use.
“The devices are getting much, much better so the opportunities to multitask are more attractive,” said Sharma, who has written five books on mobile technologies and consulted for companies such as Motorola Inc. and Qualcomm Inc.
It’s not only heavy data users who may be affected, Sharma said. By year’s end, the average AT&T customer will have doubled their data consumption from 2009 to 320 megabytes, according to his estimates. Only 35 percent of AT&T’s smartphone customers use 200 megabytes of data or more, the company said.
Sharma’s forecast that half of AT&T’s smartphone customers will use more than 2 gigabytes of data is “not unreasonable,” said Christopher King, a Stifel Nicolaus & Co. analyst in Baltimore, though he said it’s difficult to predict such trends because they depend on the introduction of new phones, applications and wireless technologies.
AT&T’s new Internet Overcharging scheme has built-in profits as customers increasingly bump into the subjective limits the company imposes on its wireless customers. Many customers have complained the 200 megabyte plan is too small to accommodate anyone but the most casual data user, while others find 2 GB too small to make video viewing more than an occasional treat. Customers who exceed either limit face higher bills:
Customers exceeding 200 MB in a monthly billing cycle face a $15 overlimit penalty, which nets them another 200 megabytes of service;
Users who exceed the 2-gigabyte level will be forced to pay an additional $10 per month for an additional 1 gigabyte of service.
Even King believes AT&T’s limits are too low.
“There’s no way that AT&T is going to maintain their tiered pricing as they do today,” he said. “They’ll have to raise the caps on data usage.”
Be Sure to Read Part One: Astroturf Overload — Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group for an important introduction to what this super-sized industry front group is all about. Members of Broadband for America Red: A company or group actively engaging in anti-consumer lobbying, opposes Net Neutrality, supports Internet Overcharging, belongs to […]
Astroturf: One of the underhanded tactics increasingly being used by telecom companies is “Astroturf lobbying” – creating front groups that try to mimic true grassroots, but that are all about corporate money, not citizen power. Astroturf lobbying is hardly a new approach. Senator Lloyd Bentsen is credited with coining the term in the 1980s to […]
Hong Kong remains bullish on broadband. Despite the economic downturn, City Telecom continues to invest millions in constructing one of Hong Kong’s largest fiber optic broadband networks, providing fiber to the home connections to residents. City Telecom’s HK Broadband service relies on an all-fiber optic network, and has been dubbed “the Verizon FiOS of Hong […]
BendBroadband, a small provider serving central Oregon, breathlessly announced the imminent launch of new higher speed broadband service for its customers after completing an upgrade to DOCSIS 3. Along with the launch announcement came a new logo of a sprinting dog the company attaches its new tagline to: “We’re the local dog. We better be […]
Stop the Cap! reader Rick has been educating me about some of the new-found aggression by Shaw Communications, one of western Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, in expanding its business reach across Canada. Woe to those who get in the way. Novus Entertainment is already familiar with this story. As Stop the Cap! reported previously, Shaw […]
The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, may be forced to consider American broadband policy before defining Net Neutrality and its role in Canadian broadband, according to an article published today in The Globe & Mail. [FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s] proposal – to codify and enforce some […]
In March 2000, two cable magnates sat down for the cable industry equivalent of My Dinner With Andre. Fine wine, beautiful table linens, an exquisite meal, and a Monopoly board with pieces swapped back and forth representing hundreds of thousands of Canadian consumers. Ted Rogers and Jim Shaw drew a line on the western Ontario […]
Just like FairPoint Communications, the Towering Inferno of phone companies haunting New England, Frontier Communications is making a whole lot of promises to state regulators and consumers, if they’ll only support the deal to transfer ownership of phone service from Verizon to them. This time, Frontier is issuing a self-serving press release touting their investment […]
I see it took all of five minutes for George Ou and his friends at Digital Society to be swayed by the tunnel vision myopia of last week’s latest effort to justify Internet Overcharging schemes. Until recently, I’ve always rationalized my distain for smaller usage caps by ignoring the fact that I’m being subsidized by […]
In 2007, we took our first major trip away from western New York in 20 years and spent two weeks an hour away from Calgary, Alberta. After two weeks in Kananaskis Country, Banff, Calgary, and other spots all over southern Alberta, we came away with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Good Alberta […]
A federal appeals court in Washington has struck down, for a second time, a rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission to limit the size of the nation’s largest cable operators to 30% of the nation’s pay television marketplace, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.” The 30% rule, designed to keep no single company from controlling […]
Less than half of Americans surveyed by PC Magazine report they are very satisfied with the broadband speed delivered by their Internet service provider. PC Magazine released a comprehensive study this month on speed, provider satisfaction, and consumer opinions about the state of broadband in their community. The publisher sampled more than 17,000 participants, checking […]