Cox injected this pop up message when customers launched their web browsers over the weekend, notifying them about the e-mail outage. (Courtesy: Broadband Reports forum reader ‘bb44’)

Our friends at Broadband Reports have been tracking Cox’s near-nationwide e-mail outage that left millions of customers without access to their company-supplied accounts over the weekend.

Customers in Rhode Island, Nebraska, Virginia, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, and beyond began noticing the problem on Friday. Only Cox’s customers in the western and mountain states seemed unaffected.

Cox blamed the problem on a “failing server.” In an effort to reduce calls from complaining customers, Cox used a browser injection notification message alerting subscribers whenever they opened their web browsers. Sending e-mail to all affected subscribers was obviously not an option.

Cox customers, including many small businesses that still rely on their Cox-supplied e-mail addresses were very unhappy about the length of the outage.

By Sunday afternoon customers like Bill Roland of Ocala, Fla. were fed up.

“Heads should roll over this one and we should all get a credit on our bills,” Roland wrote on Broadband Reports’ Cox Forum. “I don’t really care when it’s out for 15 minutes in the middle of the night due to a maintenance window, but going on 48 hours with no end is sight is not acceptable.”

Roland would have to wait until early Monday morning for the queued mail held since the outage to begin slowly arriving in his mailbox.

Cox shared this statement about the outage:

As of 6:30 am ET, access to Cox email has been restored to all customers previously affected by the email outage. All customers should now be able to send and receive email messages.

If you lost access to your email during this outage, we have queued your emails received since Friday. You may continue to receive these queued emails over the course of the next several days. These will arrive gradually and may not be delivered in chronological order.

Now that service is restored we are moving forward with replacing email storage platform equipment and implementing measures to prevent a reoccurrence of these issues. We will remain intensely focused on this effort until all queued email messages are successfully delivered. Technical teams continue to be on high alert and monitoring systems closely.

We deeply regret the impact this outage has had on our customers and truly appreciate their patience as all Cox resources continue to be focused on this restoration effort.

Cox customers can call the company and request a courtesy credit for the outage, which the company is providing to those particularly upset by the e-mail loss.

Among those hardest hit: small businesses like those in Providence, RI which are particularly dependent on answering e-mail from customers during the holiday season. Several made their apologies to customers on their websites.

The best solution to this dilemma is to avoid using ISP-supplied e-mail accounts. Cox customers using Gmail or other web-based e-mail providers never realized there was an outage.

“The best reason not to use your ISP e-mail account is that it ties you down with your broadband provider,” writes Cox customers and Stop the Cap! reader Sam Hernandez. “I bought my own domain name for around $7 and I use Gmail to handle everything and have been able to switch providers or move to another city and never have to change my e-mail address. Gmail has proved to be very reliable as well.”

[flv width=”640″ height=”363″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WJAR Providence Cox reports email outages now fixed 12-16-12.flv[/flv]

WJAR in Providence reports Cox’s near-nationwide weekend e-mail outage caused problems for area small businesses during the critically-important holiday season.  (1 minute)

Enjoy arrest and deportation.

If Time Warner Cable was hoping to attract new customers, allowing employees to arrange for their arrest and deportation is probably not the best way to accomplish that.

But that is precisely what happened to a Burlington, N.C., mom who tried to order cable service for her daughter with a fake Social Security number. An off-duty local police officer working part time as a security guard in the cable office overheard the conversation and arranged for the woman’s arrest.

Now 27-year old Lorena Yanez-Mata faces deportation to Mexico because she is in the United States illegally.

Yanez-Mata tried to use her individual taxpayer identification number to order cable service. The cable company rejected that, insisting on a Social Security number. So she arrived at the cable store with a counterfeit card with a random nine digit number.

When the security officer overheard the conversation, Time Warner Cable says he acted on his own initiative to contact local police, who arrested Yanez-Mata as soon as she left.

Yanez-Mata was charged with obtaining property by false pretense because of the phony Social Security number. But her prospects are likely to be more serious when she arrives in a Charlotte immigration court for possible deportation.

Time Warner Cable tried to distance itself from the debacle, claiming it is against their policy to share personal information with law enforcement and the security officer was not following any company procedure or direction. The cable company has no interest in bringing charges against the woman.

The company did not explain what would happen to the security officer who apparently disregarded the cable company’s policies when he choose to share potentially confidential, personal information with authorities. Nor did the company say whether it planned to issue new directives to avoid similar situations in the future.

Although Triad area residents and the local media used the incident to debate the issue of illegal immigration, another question remains: should an off-duty police officer working as a security guard act on private information he overhears and initiate a police investigation contrary to the interests of his employer?

[flv width=”604″ height=”424″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WFMY Greensboro Burlington Mom Faces Deportation After Trying To Get Time Warner Cable 12-12-12.flv[/flv]

WFMY-TV in Greensboro used the story of the Burlington mom to address the larger issue of why people illegally immigrate to the United States. We are wondering how Time Warner plans to handle employees sharing customer information with the authorities. (2 minutes)

Think your wireless service contract ties you down?

More than 500 Canadians filed comments about their wireless service with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission as the telecom regulator wrestles with a proposed code of conduct for Canada’s wireless industry and the contracts they hand customers. Why? Because of language like this from a typical contract with Rogers Communications:

Device Savings Recovery Fee (applicable to term commitment customers only for any new term entered into on or after January 22, 2012): A Device Savings Recovery Fee (DSRF) applies if you have been granted an Economic Inducement (as defined below) upon entering your new term, and if, for any reason, your wireless service or your new term is terminated prior to the end of the term of your Service Agreement (Service Agreement Term). The DSRF is the amount of the economic inducement (which may take the form of a discount, rebate or other benefit granted on the price of your Equipment), as stated in your Service Agreement (Economic Inducement), less the amount obtained by multiplying such Economic Inducement by a fraction representing the number of months elapsed in your Service Agreement Term as compared to the total number of months of your Service Agreement Term (plus applicable taxes). In other words, DSRF = Economic Inducement [Economic Inducement × (# months elapsed in your Service Agreement Term ÷ Total # months in your Service Agreement Term)] + applicable taxes. An Additional Device Savings Recovery Fee (ADSRF) also applies if, for any reason, your wireless data service, or your data plans commitment term (Data Term), is terminated prior to the end of your Data Term. An Additional Device Savings Recovery Fee (ADSRF) also applies if, for any reason, your wireless data service, or your data plans commitment term (Data Term), is terminated prior to the end of your Data Term. The ADSRF is the additional Economic Inducement you received for subscribing to your wireless data service, less the amount obtained by multiplying such Economic Inducement by a fraction representing the number of months elapsed in your Data Term as compared to the total number of months of your Data Term (plus applicable taxes), and applies in addition to the DSRF for termination of your Service Agreement. If you subscribe to a plan combining both voice and data services, both the DSRF and the ADSRF apply, up to the total Economic Inducement.

Despite contract confusion being an issue in the eyes of the CRTC, the overwhelming majority of comments focused on something else that irks Canadians above all else: being held hostage by the industry’s traditional 36-month wireless contract, one year longer than consumers in the United States find common.

“Get rid of the 36 months contract,” wrote one Canadian, noting contract creep is all the rage. “It first started with 12 months, then 24 months, now the standard is 36 months, which is ridiculous!”

Most of the comments came from customers of the chief three providers: Bell, Rogers, and Telus. All three received scorn from customers for uncompetitive, expensive service.

The state of competition in Canada:

Roger offers new plans:
– $55 1000min local, unlimited text, 200MB
– $65 unlimited local/text, 1GB
– $75 unlimited local/text, 2GB
– $95 unlimited canada/text, 5GB

Then Bell offers their new competitive plans:
– $55 1000 min local, unlimited text, 200MB
– $65 unlimited local/text, 1GB
– $75 unlimited local/text, 2GB
– $95 unlimited canada/text, 5GB

Then Telus offers their competitive plans:
– $70 unlimited local/text, 1GB
– $80 unlimited local/text, 3GB
– $100 unlimited canada/text, 5GB

Where is the competition? These plans are all the same.

Also unfamiliar to Americans, the automatically-renewing contract that snags Canadians that forget to cancel with a brand new service commitment complete with a cancellation penalty. Perhaps the most consumer-friendly provinces in Canada are Quebec and Manitoba, which ban certain kinds of termination fees and auto-renewing contracts. Canadians want these bans extended nationwide. The European Union already bans 36 month contracts and made 24 months the maximum. One former resident of the United Kingdom noted the EU also compels providers to offer 12 month contracts for those who want them.

The CRTC may not provide much relief if it remains convinced the marketplace remains competitive.

The agency points out under the Telecommunications Act, the CRTC will only intervene in a market if there is insufficient competition to protect the interests of users.  In the 1990s the CRTC decided to allow market forces to guide the growth of the mobile wireless industry.

The CRTC seems to have already made up its mind on this issue when it announced its proceeding:

In the decision issued on 11 October 2012, the CRTC found that there was competition sufficient to protect the interests of consumers and it did not need to regulate rates.  Although many consumers indicated concerns about wireless rates and the competitiveness of the wireless market, a number of market indicators demonstrate that consumers have a choice of competitive service providers and a range of rates and payment options for mobile wireless services. According to the CRTC’s 2012 Communications Monitoring Report, new entrants in the mobile wireless market continue to increase their market share and coverage. Companies continue to invest in new infrastructure to bring new innovative services to more Canadians. Moreover, the average cost per month for mobile wireless services has remained relatively stable.

The CRTC concluded that competition in the mobile wireless market continues to be sufficient to protect the interests of users with respect to rates and choice of competitive service provider.

That makes it more likely than not the agency will limit itself to ordering wireless carriers to better explain their wireless policies, not force them to change them.

The only relief potentially available outside of canceling service is considering one of several new competitors which offer relaxed terms and better prices to attract customers. So far, only 4% of Canadians have switched to WIND, Mobilicity, Vidéotron, or Public Mobile. Some may be trapped in current contracts with larger companies or are discouraged having to buy new equipment to switch providers. Most providers in Canada, like in the United States, lock phones so they cannot be easily used on another company’s network.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CRTC Cell Phone Contracts 12-12.flv[/flv]

The CRTC used this video to invite consumers to share comments about confusing wireless service contracts. Instead, criticism of tricky term contracts that auto-renew and last three years arrived in buckets. (2 minutes)

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) is fed up with Verizon Communications. The company handles most of the region’s 911 calls and has performed that task poorly in the last few years, argues Connolly.

“The whole purpose of 911 is that when you need it, it works,” Connolly told WUSA-News.

After several high profile 911 failures during significant storm events, Connolly and a few other congressmen are demanding Verizon resolve its 911 problems or face an intervention from the Federal Communications Commission.

The elected officials want Verizon to voluntarily comply, but if they won’t, all suggest it is time for the FCC to strengthen regulations and oversight to assure residents they will be met with a 911 operator when they call instead of a busy signal or nothing at all.

Verizon countered it takes its role in handling calls to 911 seriously, and when an issue arises, the company is quick to investigate, correct and apply any lessons learned across their system.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WUSA Washington Gerry Connolly Va- Democratic Congressman critical of Verizon for its 911 performance 12-6-12.flv[/flv]

WUSA reports Connolly has grown tired of repeated failures with Washington, D.C.’s 911 system, handled by Verizon Communications. He wants the company to make changes to increase the service’s reliability, especially during storms when demand on the 911 system is greatest. (2 minutes)

For the third year in a row, AT&T is celebrating the holidays by telling more than 100 New Haven-area employees they will be spending a lot more time with their families this Christmas, without a job.

In mid-November, AT&T announced it was cutting 100 telephone operators. Now the company is back for more — telling 106 employees, many hard at work cleaning up storm damage from Hurricane Sandy, their services as AT&T technicians are no longer required.

As shell-shocked employees left AT&T’s New Haven headquarters with “early retirement” papers, the local union representing many of the technicians vowed to fight the layoffs.

“Many of the guys losing their jobs are the ones who go out in trucks and restore your service after a storm,” CWA Local 1298 president Bill Henderson told WTNH-TV. Henderson says the next time your U-verse or phone service goes out in Connecticut, you better be very patient because it could take a lot longer for service to be restored.

AT&T says many of the workers involved were no longer needed as consumers move away from traditional landline and wired service in favor of wireless, but Henderson wondered if that were the case, why were many of his workers forced to work mandatory overtime through much of November restoring service after Hurricane Sandy.

State regulators are already reviewing the performance of utility companies that left many residents with extended outages. Some communities said utilities were woefully unprepared to deal with the storm. Now the union wants the state’s telecommunications regulator to review the layoffs to determine if AT&T’s service in the state will decline further. The impact could be much more than an inconvenience to customers.

Off to the unemployment office we go, unless we’re willing to work elsewhere in the state.

“When we had hurricane Irene, it took our state down economically for a week and a half, and we can’t afford to do that going into the future,” Henderson argues. “We have to do better, we can’t do worse.”

An AT&T spokesman denied the company was laying off any worker, and claimed the company is offering employees access to other positions in other parts of Connecticut.

“The affected employees all have a guaranteed job offer that ensures they will be offered another job in Connecticut,” said spokesman Marty Richter. “All employees declared surplus in Connecticut in the last two years have either found other jobs with the company, continued to work in their current job while awaiting a guaranteed job offer, or elected to take a voluntary retirement package.”

Richter suggested some the affected technicians probably won’t be moved too far away.

“It’s likely that many will be offered jobs as U-verse technicians, in which case they could still be pulled in if needed for network restoration in extreme circumstances like a big storm,” Richter said.

AT&T used to employee at least 4,000 operators in the state of Connecticut alone. Today that number is down to less than 100. When telecommunications companies look for “cost savings,” getting rid of workers or slashing salaries and benefits remain favorite targets.

“It seems like they do it every year at this time,” Henderson said. “This is a company that made $13 billion last year and is on pace to make $17 billion this year and just gave a $2 million bonus to its CEO. They’re important jobs to keep. This is a corporation that only cares about the bottom line.”

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WTNH New Haven ATT announces major job cuts 11-30-12.mp4[/flv]

WTNH in New Haven says more than 100 AT&T employees will lose their jobs right before the holidays. It could ultimately affect the quality of your AT&T service, union officials warn.  (2 minutes)