More from the Re-Education camp.  They want to take some time and let us understand their plans, so that we can reject them out of hand all over again later this year.  Except next time, the protests and push back will be even greater than it was this spring.  That’s because we’ll also be educating customers about what tiered pricing will mean for their bill, both now and into the expansive future for the Internet.  Time Warner forgets Rochester Telephone’s disastrous attempt to get rid of flat rate home phone calling back in the 1970s and the firestorm that caused.  This is going to become more or less the same thing.  Even people without computers who don’t understand the Internet do understand one thing: they don’t trust Time Warner as far as they can throw them.  The company already forces channels on customers they don’t want, but have to pay for, and they also know this universal fact of life: cable bills always go up, never down.

So when Time Warner comes a’knocking and says they have a plan to save you money, people will slam the door in their face. Their claims that “they” found a lot of customers could “right-size” their plans when people realized they weren’t using that much is amusing, especially in Rochester where you can find the Road Runner Lite plan on the back of milk cartons bannered “Missing.”  That’s because the company makes it next to impossible for those light users to find the Road Runner Lite plan they already offer.  And when customers learn they can save money and never fear paying overlimit fees on their Internet under the existing plan, you can be sure they won’t be snake oiled into accepting the new one that has overlimit penalties that would make Bank of America blush.

Frontier isn’t fooled either.  Ann Burr, Chairman and General Manager, Frontier Communications of Rochester, might have a problem saying “inconsistency,” but her company is making hay out of the PR nightmare Time Warner put itself in, signing up new customers.

Fun Trivia: Ann Burr should know.  She used to be president of Time Warner’s Rochester division!

“We have a listening process,” says Time Warner spokeswoman Robin Wolfgang.  Yes, and here it is — Customer: “I want to keep the same plan I have right now and not pay three times more for the exact same Internet service I have today.”  Time Warner: “No.”  That about sums it up.

‘There is no reason to protest — we’re listening,’ says Time Warner, according to this report.  The company was responding to planned protests which continued despite the decision by Time Warner to temporarily shelve usage caps and tiered pricing.  That’s because most of those doing the protesting don’t believe for a second that Time Warner is listening to anyone but themselves.  Customers overwhelmingly rejected the “experiment” force-fed on people in four cities, but the company has never been willing to admit it was wrong, and give up on the idea for good.

A long history of endless rate increases, forcing people to pay for channels they don’t want, and a general sense of mistrust has become near-automatic for even under-informed customers.  But when we learn the facts about just how profitable Time Warner Cable’s Road Runner service is, they get hoppin’ mad.

I found it interesting WGHP also mentioned the protests in Rochester.  Melissa is here at least admitting, for the first time, they underestimated the impact of the “experiment.”  They also misunderstand the fact almost nobody wants this.  One of the news outlets needs to bring up the fact that Road Runner Lite is already available for those light users at a substantial discount, without ever worrying about overlimit fees under the tiered rate system they temporarily shelved.

WXII did a follow-up the day after Time Warner announced it was shelving its metered broadband service plan.  It was clear that not everyone believes Time Warner’s plans have been shelved permanently.

A fair report with all sides represented, but the reporter’s estimates about the size of movies was generally inaccurate.  DVD quality/HD movies are far in excess of one gigabyte.  One movie is much more likely to consume at least four gigabytes if you are obtaining a high quality version suitable for display on a television set.  Game play has a wide range of impact on usage.  Some online multiplayer games consume surprisingly small amounts — especially when sending game plays and movements across a network.  Latency is a very bad thing in a fast moving game, after all.  But many game add-ons, updates and enhancements can use a lot more.

The take-away message from this 30 second report is the confirmation that “thousands” of customers protested the cap experiment program.  We had not heard any actual numbers about how many people were in contact with Time Warner about this ordeal, but now we do. It goes into our library.

Local progressive blogger Tom Belknap gets six minutes of airtime on WHAM-TV’s morning show to expand on, and educate viewers about some of the ancillary issues surrounding the Time Warner usage cap experiment.  Belknap, who runs DragonFlyEye, also gets a chance to debunk some of the misunderstandings some people have about the cap issue, and also deals with conservatives who reflexively objected to Senator Charles Schumer’s involvement in the Time Warner debacle.