Tom Maguire

Recently, Stop the Cap! published stories about Verizon’s decision to discontinue traditional wired landline service for approximately 500 customers on Fire Island and offer them a wireless alternative called Voice Link. This is an important change for Verizon and our customers, and we wanted to clarify several points about the service and how Verizon is deploying it.

In places like Fire Island, New York and some communities along the Jersey Shore, such as Mantoloking and Seaside Heights, Verizon evaluated the extent of the damage to its facilities – which in many cases were literally washed away by Super Storm Sandy – and conducted extensive research before deciding the best course of action to take in terms of restoration.

Fire Island is a popular beach community with only a few hundred year-round residents, but the population swells each summer. Verizon’s equipment on the eastern side of the island was not too heavily impacted, so repairs were made and services restored.

On the western side of the Island, however, a large percentage of Verizon’s copper facilities were damaged beyond repair.

We studied the voice traffic on and off the island and where it was originating from on both Verizon’s wireline and wireless networks.  The company discovered that 80 percent of the voice traffic was already wireless.  If other wireless providers were factored in, it is likely that the percentage is closer to 90 percent.  This made it clear that people had already made the decision as to what technology works best. They had abandoned copper long before Sandy.

Where Sandy did the most damage on Fire Island.

Another part of Verizon’s analysis looked at the number of permanent residents on Fire Island, which number about 500, and the costs that Verizon would incur to install and connect new landline facilities there.  It would range from $4.8 million to more than $6 million. A multimillion dollar investment with no guarantee that residents of the island will even subscribe to our services makes no economic sense. In fact, that’s probably why Verizon is the sole provider on the island. None of the companies we compete with in other parts of New York offer services on the island.

Verizon’s commitment is to provide our customers with voice service, and Voice Link is another way that Verizon is using technology to reliably deliver on that commitment for customers. And Voice Link does so by using wireless technology that has been proven effective over the last 20 plus years.

Verizon will maintain the copper network where it makes customer service and business sense to do so.  Please keep in mind that the vast majority of our copper customers have no issues at all with their service; we are only considering the universe of customers where the copper network is not supporting their requirements.  Again, the exception is the storm-impacted areas in the western portion of Fire Island and a few New Jersey Barrier communities where copper facilities were damaged beyond repair.  In these locations Voice Link will be the single voice option available to customers. Verizon will offer these customers the opportunity to use our state-of-the-art, tried and tested wireless network at the same rate (or better) that they pay today.

Here is how Verizon Voice Link works with existing home phones.

Some additional points for clarification:

• The service does offer a variety of popular calling features including Call Waiting and Caller ID with Name.  Some articles mistakenly reported to the contrary;
• Another article cited a Communications Daily piece that incorrectly reported 40,000 people participated in a blind test of Voice Link. Actually, that test group consisted of 20 people;
• Current Voice Link models include a rechargeable battery that offers 36 hours of standby and two hours of voice service. Future devices will work with standard AA batteries, giving customers an easy alternative for replacing batteries and maintaining communications in an extended power outage;
• Although the device is not presently data capable, the team is working to change that. Nevertheless we have always said that it was not Verizon’s original intent to use Voice Link for customers with DSL. If a customer had an issue with their copper and they had DSL, we would repair the copper.  Unfortunately Sandy changed these plans for a handful of customers on Fire Island and the New Jersey Barrier where the copper is beyond repair.

What’s the Deal With Copper?

In areas where Verizon’s fiber and copper network ran side-by-side, Verizon began to ask certain copper customers with a history of trouble to move their service to fiber. In some cases the equipment supporting the copper service was so outdated that we could not even find replacement parts because the equipment had been discontinued. The objective was to improve service quality and customer satisfaction using the best communications network, and the result was clear: the program has been very successful. More than 300,000 customers migrated to Verizon’s fiber-optic network.  These customers enjoy super-reliable, faster fiber at the same rates they were paying all along.

In non-fiber areas, Verizon developed Voice Link to take advantage of wireless technology to address voice customers served on the copper network who have had chronic repairs issues.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Verizon Voice Link Keeps Customers Connected After Hurricane Sandy 5-31-13.flv[/flv]

After Sandy hit, Verizon realized that wireless technology also would be an ideal solution for customers in areas the storm destroyed or severely damaged. It has helped us reconnect hundreds of people and businesses. Don’t take our word for it. See what these customers have to say. (3 minutes)

Tom Maguire is Verizon’s senior vice president of network operations support.

Phillip Dampier

It is no secret that there is an urban-rural broadband divide.

The market-driven, private enterprise broadband landscape delivers the best speeds and service to urban-suburban areas, particularly those in and around large cities, short-changing rural communities.

This is true regardless of the technology: the fastest fiber optic services are delivered in large population centers, and wireless speeds are fastest there as well. But as the National Telecommunications and Information Administration has discovered, the further away you get from these urban sectors, the poorer the service you are likely to get.

The NTIA’s findings present a significant challenge to phone company claims that rural customers would be better served with wireless broadband instead of spending money to support and upgrade landline infrastructure, which supports DSL and is upgradable to fiber optics.

The NTIA finds these rural wireless networks to be severely lacking:

Not only are far fewer rural residents than urban residents able to access 4G wireless services (i.e., at least 6Mbps downstream), but a further divide also exists within rural communities. For wireless download services greater than 6Mbps, Very Rural communities have approximately half the availability rate of Small Towns, and Small Towns have about half the availability rate of Exurbs (10, 18, and 36 percent, respectively).

This represents nothing new. AT&T and Verizon have shortchanged their rural customers with catastrophically slow DSL service (or none at all) for years:

For wireline download service, Very Rural communities also have the least availability of all five areas. Though a rural/urban split continues to be useful in providing generalized information about availability, a five-way classification uncovers a more refined picture of the divide in broadband availability across the nation. For example, at wireline download speeds of 50Mbps, broadband availability varies from 14 percent (Very Rural), 32 percent (Exurban), 35 percent (Small Town), 62 percent (Central City), to 67 percent (Suburban), even though the overall broadband availability was 63 percent in urban areas compared to 23 percent in rural areas. In addition, wireline and wireless broadband availability, particularly at faster speeds, tends to be higher within Central Cities and the Suburbs compared to everywhere else.

Why the disparity? It is a simple case of economics. Wealthy suburbs can afford the ultimate triple play packages, so providers prioritize the best service for these areas, even above less costly to serve urban centers. Rural residents either get no service at all or only basic slow speed DSL. The Return on Investment to improve broadband is inadequate for these companies in rural areas.

Source: NTIA

The same is true with wireless 4G service. Rural areas struggle for access or endure poor reception because fewer towers provide service away from major highways or town centers.

The NTIA observed wireless download speeds of 6Mbps or more were available to 90% of urban residents, but only 18% of small town residents. Wireless upload speeds of 3Mbps or greater were found in only 14% of small towns.

Dee Davis, president, Center for Rural Strategies, based in Whitesburg, Va. said the implications were clear.

“The market’s always going to go to the well-heeled communities,” Davis observed. “It’s going to go to the densest population.”

Folks in rural communities end up paying more for a lower level of service, Davis said.

“That also means that they don’t get the same chance to participate in the economy,” Davis added. “They don’t get to bring their goods and services to market in the same way. They don’t always get to participate.”

The economics of cutting off rural landlines delivers most of the benefits to providers, and assures decades of inferior service to consumers.

Economic market tests, including Return on Investment, that impact rural broadband availability will not disappear if AT&T and Verizon abandon their rural landline networks. While cost savings will be realized once rural wired infrastructure is decommissioned, there is no free market formula that would encourage either provider to pour investment funds into rural service areas. For the same reasons rural customers are broadband-challenged today, their comparatively smaller numbers and economic abilities will continue to fail investment metrics for innovative new services tomorrow.

The primary reason broadband speeds are lower in rural areas is inferior network infrastructure. Providers argue it does not make economic sense to invest in network upgrades to boost speeds for such a small number of customers. While wireless technology can be cheaper to deploy than the upkeep of a deteriorating landline network, it is not cheap or robust enough to deliver comparable broadband speeds now available in urban areas, especially as broadband usage continues to grow.

Verizon’s chief financial officer Fran Shammo admitted as much during remarks at the at JPMorgan Global Technology, Media and Telecom Conference in May:

If you recall, way back I guess about two years ago we did a trial with DirecTV in Erie, Pa., where we did broadband on the side of a house and offered a triple-play, if you will, which consisted of broadband, voice, and linear TV provided by DirecTV.

What we found was people were adoptive to the broadband; but because of the consumption of broadband through that LTE network, it was really detrimental to the spectrum and to the network performance. Because they used so much data, it soaked up so much of the spectrum.

So what we felt was LTE for broadband works in certain rural areas, but you can’t compete LTE broadband in those dense populated areas because you can’t — first of all, you can’t match the speed with a 50-megabit or a 100-megabit delivery between cable and FiOS and U-verse. And you literally don’t have enough spectrum to be able to use that much consumption.

So what we felt was by partnering with the cable companies, and delivering our LTE network with voice and data, and having that hardwired connection into the home was a better financial way to do it than trying to go LTE broadband. Because we just didn’t see where the spectrum could hold up to the volume that would be demanded.

Without rural cable companies to partner with, Verizon’s decision to move rural broadband to wireless guarantees rural Americans will not benefit from ongoing speed and capacity upgrades that are necessary to support the evolving Internet.

Still waiting for Verizon FiOS in New York City? Are you annoyed that your neighbors have impressive broadband speeds from an all-fiber network while you suffer with DSL or cable broadband from Time Warner or Cablevision? Your landlord may be the problem.

While cities upstate clamor for Verizon’s fiber upgrades, FiOS has gone unappreciated and unwanted by more than 40 building owners either blocking the company from entering their properties or ignoring repeated letters from Verizon requesting permission to begin upgrades. In many instances, Verizon has tried to make contact since 2010 with no success. Some building owners want extra compensation (sometimes to the extreme) before they will grant permission. Others don’t want the phone company performing work inside their buildings, period.

Now Verizon is appealing to the New York State Public Service Commission to ask for their intervention.

Verizon has the right to install cable television facilities, regardless of the landlord’s objections, under Section 228 of the New York Public Service Law, which states: “No landlord shall interfere with the installation of cable television facilities upon his property or premises ….”

Verizon has promised it will bear the full cost of the installation of its equipment, wiring, and other facilities to offer the service, as well as indemnify the landlord for any damage caused by the installation work.

In April, Verizon was criticized by New York City public advocate Bill de Blasio for falling behind schedule providing access to FiOS in low-income communities.

“Five years into one of the biggest franchise agreements issued by the city, roughly half of homes still have no access to fiber network connections—most of them concentrated in low-income areas like Upper Manhattan, the South Bronx, Western Queens and Central Brooklyn,” said de Blasio.

The public advocate added:

Under Verizon’s 2008 franchise agreement, all New York City residents are supposed to have access to fiber optic networks by June 2014. As a benchmark, the contract required the company to reach more than three-quarters of City residents by the end of 2012, but according to data released through the New York State Office of Information Technology Services, only half of New York City’s 3.4 million housing units had access to fiber broadband services at year’s end—putting the company far behind schedule. Brooklyn and the Bronx lagged furthest behind, with only 40 percent and 46 percent of household having access to fiber, respectively.

de Blasio

Verizon and the Bloomberg Administration dispute de Blasio’s findings, noting fiber upgrades often depend on surrounding infrastructure. Where overhead wiring predominates, Verizon FiOS is available nearly everywhere in New York City. In other areas, Verizon says it is meeting its obligations and points to landlord impediments for slowing down FiOS expansion.

But de Blasio’s maps of FiOS availability do depict a pattern of preference for FiOS service in areas where higher income residents live. In areas where average annual income is below $20,000 annually, there are obvious service gaps. Neighborhoods like Washington Heights, High Bridge, Astoria, Woodside, Bedford-Stuyvesant and Bushwick have been largely excluded from FiOS to date, according to de Blasio.

Verizon’s franchise agreement with the city only requires the company to make service available to buildings, not necessarily within them. A landlord can delay Verizon’s entry into a building or the company could choose to prioritize some buildings over others for service.

With large sections of New York covered by multiple dwelling units like apartments and condos, some could find themselves without FiOS service for several years, particularly if a property owner decides to make life difficult for the phone company.

Among the latest who have:

On May 24, Verizon notified the PSC the following property owners had complied with their request to conduct a site survey inside their buildings and were requested to be dropped from the list republished above:

• Sama Los Tres LLC – c/o Metropolitan Realty Group
• Lenoxville Associates – c/o Metropolitan Realty Group
• 2816 Roebling Avenue LLC
• East Village Gardens
• 194 Bleecker Street Owners Corp.
• US Manhattan II Housing Corp.
• 40 Renwick Street LLC

Cablevision will maintain unlimited Optimum Online broadband service to all of its customers and will not introduce usage-based pricing, according to Gregg Seibert, chief financial officer.

“I don’t see usage-based billing as something that we have plans for at this time,” Seibert told investors attending this week’s Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Global Telecom and Media Conference in London. “I think it would take a broader industry shift for that type of metered pricing to come in. At this point we don’t see that in the future.”

Cablevision has a long history opposing usage pricing or caps. In 2009, Jim Blackley, Cablevision’s senior vice president of corporate engineering and technology, said usage caps were not in the cable company’s plans:

“We don’t want customers to think about byte caps so that’s not on our horizon,” he said. “We literally don’t want consumers to think about how they’re consuming high-speed services. It’s a pretty powerful drug and we want people to use more and more of it.”

Cablevision’s announcement may also be in response to its biggest competitor. Verizon earlier this year repeated it had no plans for usage-based pricing for FiOS customers either.

Cablevision continues to attract new broadband customers, primarily from customers canceling DSL service but not moving to FiOS.

A Verizon Wireless upgrade that was supposed to fix bugs and introduce multi-screen, multi-window multitasking and new camera and image-related features to the popular Samsung Galaxy S3 instead has killed the phone’s 4G performance and dramatically decreased battery life. There are also reports some Verizon Wireless customers are finding themselves auto-enrolled in an unwanted caller ID with name add-on feature ($2.99/month) that leaves the phone connected to 3G or 4G service even when using Wi-Fi.

It was not an auspicious moment for Big Red, never fast with phone updates, particularly when Sprint customers earlier received a similar upgrade with no ill-effects.

Your editor spent two days last week attempting to mitigate Verizon’s mistakes, including several hours inside multiple Verizon Wireless store locations and talking to their national customer support center. In the end, it resulted in not one, but two factory refurbished phone exchanges and a $20 service credit for data service effectively disabled by a firmware upgrade.

This nightmare has a name: JZO54K.I535VRBMD3 — a software update so plagued with bugs, Verizon reportedly pulled it over the weekend after customers complained it ruined 4G wireless data service, along with the phone’s performance. The 128MB update has been available for about a week for those regularly checking their phones for software updates, and some customers began being prompted to install it last Friday.

So how can you tell if you are affected? Choose Settings -> About Device and check the “Build Number” visible at the bottom of the screen. If it ends in VRBMD3, you may be impacted. Not every customer is reporting problems, which may mean some phones are not affected or the performance degradation has been dismissed as a temporary reception problem or has only subtly affected low-bandwidth applications and has gone unnoticed.

Symptoms

1. Your wireless data signal strength meter on the phone suddenly shows much poorer reception than before the update;
2. Your battery life has declined significantly and the battery is very warm to the touch;
3. You have trouble loading web pages or accessing multimedia content with long buffering pauses or sudden loss of reception in places where signals used to be adequate;
4. Messaging services seem unstable with frequent disconnects;
5. Your phone drops from 4G to 3G service and stays connected at 3G (or less) speeds until you reset the phone;
6. Using “Speed Test” apps result in “Network Communication Issue” errors or extremely long test times with very high ping rates, very slow/inconsistent download speeds, and trouble measuring upload speeds;
7. You find icons for both Wi-Fi and 3G or 4G wireless service at the top of your phone at the same time;
8. You suddenly find your account billed for Caller ID plus Name service at $2.99 a month, despite not requesting this service.

Phillip “Verizon turned my 4G phone into a 1G phone” Dampier

The more of these symptoms you experience, the greater the chance Verizon’s update for the S3 has temporarily left your phone a shadow of its former self.

Verizon officially recognized the wireless connectivity problem May 31 when it released an internal bulletin acknowledging the software update is responsible. The company claims it has since stopped sending it out to S3 owners (we have not been able to confirm this ourselves).

Verizon blames Samsung for the defective update. Samsung blames Verizon, telling customers software upgrades are vetted, approved, and distributed exclusively by Verizon. Customers are left over a barrel until one or both companies assume responsibility and issue corrected firmware, which could take weeks.

Verizon Wireless’ technical support told Stop the Cap! the phone’s firmware is at the heart of the problem, and although it can sometimes get phones to be more tolerant of the software update, no number of factory resets, SIM card refreshes or replacements, or settings changes will fully correct the problem. Many customers can expect continued degraded 4G performance comparable to 3G speeds (or much worse) either because of slowed performance or an unstable connection until a fix is available.

The problem with multiple icons for both Wi-Fi and 3G or 4G service has to do with a single new app Verizon has forced on their customers. “Caller ID plus Name” was added to your app list in the latest update and is responsible for the dual data connections and reported instances of customers being auto-enrolled and billed for the service, even if they never specifically ran the app.

Bloatware is bad enough, but badly performing forced apps are worse. You can permanently disable the offending app and solve the double icon problem with this simple fix:

Enter Settings -> Application Manager, and select the “All” applications tab along the top. Find “Caller ID plus Name” in the list, select it, and you will see a button to “disable” the app. This may not resolve the problem of the app auto-enrolling you for a paid feature that costs $2.99 a month, so watch your bill.

Trouble

Affected customers with degraded service have several options:

1. If your phone is still under warranty, and most Galaxy S3 phones are, you can request a free handset replacement. Since Verizon created the problem, ask for a free shipping upgrade to overnight FedEx delivery. Your refurbished phone will arrive without a battery, SIM card, or back cover. Use the ones included with your original phone and your replacement handset should automatically activate. Immediately after powering up, your phone will offer a series of two or three Verizon firmware updates that you can defer. Until it can be verified Verizon has stopped pushing the defective update to customers, we recommend you avoid performing these firmware updates. If you don’t, and Verizon pushes the defective update to your replacement phone, it will likely perform no better than your original;
2. Request service credit for degraded/lost data service. Remember to also request credit, if applicable, for any Mobile Hotspot option, GPS travel, or other Verizon add-on that depends on a stable data network connection;
3. Indicate your displeasure that Verizon did not more thoroughly test the update before pushing it on customers.

Here are the suggested fixes Verizon may attempt on your phone, but we do not believe they correct the underlying problem — only updated software will:

• Removing the battery and “Refreshing/replacing the SIM card” may help refresh roaming rules or possibly correct a corrupted SIM card. Some customers reported this helped them get back data service they completely lost after the update, so it might help in certain cases, but probably will not correct the unstable 4G connection;
• Clearing the cache and cookies from the web browser is unlikely to have any effect on this problem;
• Changing the Mobile Networks setting to/from “Global” to “LTE/CDMA.” A few customers reported they got back some data service after toggling these options. The default on the Samsung Galaxy S3 running firmware from last fall was (and still remains) Global. We suspect the switch toggles the radio off and on, forcing a reconnect, which can bring back a 4G connection after the phone downshifts to 3G. But we don’t believe this will correct the speed/stability problem;
• A “factory reset” is frankly a waste of time. This will leave your phone with the same defective firmware. If you had symptoms before, you will likely still have them after resetting your phone.

If you are reluctant to part with your phone and avail yourself of any option other than requesting a service credit while Samsung and Verizon point fingers over who is responsible and and when a fix will arrive, you can make life with your phone a bit easier with these tips:

1. Stay on Wi-Fi when possible. Wi-Fi data performance was not affected by this software update;
2. Expect 30-40% reduced battery life. We suspect this (and the hot battery) is caused by the phone trying to deal with unstable 4G service, as if it was in a fringe reception zone. Keep a charger handy;
3. Try and get your phone to downshift to 3G by finding a weak reception spot (like a basement) and hope the phone drops (and remains) on 3G until it is rebooted. It appears 3G data speeds are not affected by the software bug;
4. Expect problems when using high bandwidth applications on Verizon’s LTE 4G service. We found video next to impossible to view on 4G, but audio streaming did seem to perform at lower bit rates.

Expect web browsing on 4G to be problematic on complex web pages, which may load incompletely. Try and do your browsing on mobile versions of websites or wait until you can find Wi-Fi.