Stop the Cap! reader Wayne A. dropped us a line to let us know Comcast has been getting very aggressive in the Denver area, poaching CenturyLink customers with enormous discounts:
My wife and I just accepted a package from Comcast to leave CenturyLink for a package that includes:
Digital Premier HD with DVR
HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, and other premium movie channels
Broadband service at 25/5Mbps
Unlimited Long Distance Digital Phone Service
Comcast’s price? An amazing $109.99/month for the first year, $129.99/month for the second. Wayne says that’s a savings of $90 a month over ordinary Comcast prices, and compared with what he was paying CenturyLink, he will save $912.12 during the first year and around $600 for the second.
What makes Comcast’s pricing so aggressive is the fact they include much faster broadband speed than many other retention or “capture” customer deals. They also throw in free premium movie channels. We’ve seen Time Warner Cable offer triple-play retention deals for less than $90 a month for the first year, but they don’t include movie channels and deliver broadband service at the standard 10/1Mbps speed.
If you are paying Comcast more, it may be time to pick up the phone and threaten to walk unless you can have the same deal. We’ve found dealing with customer retentions to be a real “your results may vary”-experience. Don’t be willing to take the first offer. Don’t be afraid to dismiss weak deals with a non-committal “I’ll think about it” if the price is not right for you. Then call back.
In the last few weeks, we’ve found Time Warner Cable’s best deals still go to customers who actually schedule a service disconnection. Within hours, Time Warner starts calling, looking to “make an offer you cannot refuse.” The retention specialists at Time Warner who reach out to you generally have the most aggressively priced deals. You qualify if you call, schedule a disconnect a week or two out, and wait by the phone. You can keep your service running while company representatives try to convince you to stick with them. Just make sure you answer those unfamiliar Caller ID-calls — it’s probably the cable company. Most will ask why you disconnected. If you answer “price,” the deals start coming.
Unfortunately, there was no way we could take advantage of any of their latest offers, which literally started two hours after disconnecting my late grandmother’s cable service.
It’s a buyer’s market for telecommunications products, so never settle for the regular price when a substantial discount is a phone call away.
Big cable companies are targeting their non-customers, and those current customers who refuse to sign up for triple-play bundles, with some of the most aggressively-priced promotions in years. The two largest, Comcast/Xfinity and Time Warner Cable, have been sending out letters offering dirt cheap $20 Internet service or cable television packages that include DVR service, a second set top box, and hundreds of digital cable channels for $49.99 a month for two years.
Comcast
Comcast promotions vary in different markets, depending on who their competitors are. The best pricing goes to new customers, as a recent promotion sent to suspected DSL customers in their service areas illustrates.
(click to enlarge)
The cable company is pitching 12 months of Xfinity Performance (typically around 12Mbps) for $19.99 a month for the first year for new customers only. Some customers report they can cancel penalty-free at the end of the first year, while others are told Comcast is actually pitching a two-year contract where the price of the service increases to $34.99 a month during the second year (a early cancellation fee pro-rated to less than $50 applies in some areas if you cancel early). This pricing applies to standalone service, which makes it aggressively priced. Most cable providers charge a higher price for Internet-only service. Some customers also report a $25 or more installation fee applies (and in some areas an in-person install is required for new customers). We’ve heard from some readers that successfully qualified for the promotion under the name of a spouse if they have had Comcast service previously. Otherwise, Comcast usually requires customers to be without service for 90 days before they are considered “new customers.”
Customers can try calling 1-877-508-5492 to request this offer: $19.99/Month for 1 year with no additional service required (Code at bottom of letter: LTP79376-0014).
If that number does not work from your calling area, other numbers to try include: 1-877-298-0903 (CA, TX), 1-877-508-5492 (CA, WV), 1-877-494-9166 in NJ (currently pitching 6-month version of this promotion without contract.)
If 12Mbps is not fast enough, ask the representative what promotional pricing exists for faster speeds. Some customers scored 35Mbps service for $10 more per month.
A separate ongoing promotion from Comcast offers Blast Internet service at 25Mbps+ on similar terms. But pricing varies wildly in different markets. Customers in California were able to purchase this promotion for as little as $19.99 a month with a year-long contract, while customers in Chicago were asked to pay $39 for essentially the same service.
Comcast’s promotions list runs several pages, so if you are shot down asking for these promotions, ask about other current offers or hang up and try calling again and asking to speak with someone else. Your results may vary depending on the representative you speak with. Remember Comcast’s 250GB usage cap applies to all residential service plans.
Time Warner Cable
In addition to regular Road Runner standalone Internet service promotions that deliver Standard Service speeds for $29-35 a month for a year, Time Warner has been getting very aggressive trying to win back cord-cutters and those who have left for a competing pay television provider. The cable company has mailed letters to non-cable TV customers in the northeast pitching substantial discounts on cable TV service price-locked (but no commitment term for you) for two years and includes free DVR equipment, DVR service, and a second set top box with digital cable TV for $49.99 a month. They’ll even credit back the cost of any early termination fees charged by another provider over the course of the first year of service.
(click to enlarge)
The promotion is intended primarily for customers who already receive service from another provider, but new customers can call 1-855-364-7797 and ask for the offer without the competing provider early termination fee rebate. If you do receive service from another provider, there are various requirements and steps to follow to qualify for up to $200 in termination fee credits. Visit SwitchtoTWC or call them to learn the details.
Neither of these promotions work for existing Time Warner Cable customers. If you already subscribe, discounts will be offered when you threaten to cancel service. Retention deals from Time Warner Cable can be as aggressively priced as new customer promotions. We have found retention offers made during the initial call to request a service disconnection are often not very aggressive. Most representatives try and pare back your package before starting to offer retention pricing (which gradually gets better the more times you reply, “is that the best you can offer?”)
Our best recommendation is to call and request to cancel service 2-3 weeks from today and wait for a Time Warner Cable retention specialist to call you (answer those mystery caller ID calls — it could be Time Warner). The reps that call you directly often deliver the most aggressive retention deals. If nobody does reach out to you, call Time Warner yourself a few days before the disconnect is scheduled and ask them to make you an offer to rescind your disconnect request. You may find some serious savings taking this approach. If not, you still have time to rescind your disconnect request on your own before the plug gets pulled.
Phillip DampierAugust 17, 2011Consumer News, MediacomComments Off on Mediacom Lost 20,000 Video Customers in the Second Quarter
Mediacom, America’s eighth largest cable company, lost 20,000 video subscribers in the second quarter of 2011, joining a growing parade of cable companies reporting increased cord-cutting by customers who either cannot afford, or don’t need increasingly-costly cable TV service.
The cable operator, which largely serves small cities and suburban areas, has suffered from notoriously poor consumer ratings for several years, and some customers have apparently had enough. Mediacom, which went private earlier this year, provided fewer details about its performance in its first quarter as a private company, but the information it did provide showed attempts to make up the losses with rate increases on remaining customers and increased revenue from phone and broadband sales, and Mediacom’s advertising business.
Three months ending
June 30, 2011
March 31, 2011
June 30, 2010
Basic subscribers
634,000
654,000
677,000
High-speed data subscribers
470,000
469,000
447,000
Phone subscribers
177,000
175,000
168,000
Digital customers
415,000
421,000
394,000
Average monthly revenue per subscriber
$113.75
$109.17
$104.16
The company’s customers in its strongholds in the southeastern and midwestern United States have been impacted hard by declining property values and high unemployment. Impacted consumers are paring back expenses, and while they are keeping phone and broadband service, cable TV is increasingly being dropped.
Earlier conference calls with Mediacom company officials note an increasing number of customers are only being rescued when the company discounts the cost of the service as a customer retention tool. The company has been hard selling its “VIP Pak” — a triple play package of cable TV, phone, and Internet for $90 a month, but it comes with lots of fine print: mandating a 24-month contract, a required subscription to HBO, and gradually increased rates after the first year. Mediacom’s bundled offers lock in customers with two year contracts, but don’t protect them from periodic rate increases, which are automatically applied as implemented.
Customers looking for standalone broadband or a “double-play” will also find high prices, two-year contracts and early termination fees in their future:
Cable TV & Broadband: $79.90 for the first year, $99.90 for the second, with a $240 early termination fee
Cable TV: $49.95 for the first year, $64.95 for the second, with a $240 early termination fee
Broadband Only (12/1Mbps): $49.95 for the first year, $54.95 for the second, with a $240 early termination fee
TDS Telecom, the Madison, Wisc. independent telephone company serving about 1 million landline customers in rural and suburban communities in 30 states, is losing 5.5 percent of those customers every year, as consumers increasingly drop their landline telephone service.
In second quarter financial results reported to investors this week, TDS noted it is increasingly dependent on selling DSL broadband and managed data services to stabilize long term revenues and minimize line losses. Like many independent phone companies, TDS’ largely rural service areas offer the opportunity of delivering broadband service to areas unserved by cable broadband, and unlikely to find robust cell phone or wireless data coverage.
Vicki Villacrez, TDS’ chief financial officer, reports the phone company now has a 60 percent penetration rate for residential landline customers taking DSL service.
TDS is losing more than 5% of their landline customers a year, which limits potential growth.
“High speed data subscribers grew 6% year-on-year.” Villacrez said. “We continue to attract healthy levels of new customers and they are taking higher speed. Over 80% of our data subscribers are taking speeds of three megabits or greater and 16% are taking greater than 10 megabit speeds.”
Because TDS customers are migrating to faster speeds, where available, the company’s average revenue per subscriber has remained stable at $37 per month. That comes from a combination of the higher prices some customers pay for better service minus line losses, customer defections and retention offers delivering discounts to those threatening to switch providers.
TDS is also adopting similar strategies other phone companies are trying to hang onto customers: marketing their own triple play package of voice, broadband, and television service. Like most smaller phone companies, TDS delivers voice and data over their existing copper wire network and relies on a resale arrangement with DISH Network to provide satellite television.
About 26 percent of TDS customers are enrolled in the company’s triple play package, up 2,700 customers in the quarter.
But the company’s cost control measures also signal TDS’ unwillingness to invest noticeably in expanding their DSL footprint to additional customers, or dramatically improve their existing network. The company admits it plans to limit investment in new residential customers, and consolidated cash expenses were down 2.1% for the period, reflecting reduced spending.
Where is TDS willing to invest? In data center assets and future acquisition opportunities. TDS intends to broaden its presence in managed hosting and will continue to explore mergers and acquisition opportunities with other small, independent phone companies.
“We’ve been talking for some time that broadband for us is not just about customer growth… it’s about revenue growth.” — Anthony Thomas, Windstream’s Chief Financial Officer
For the first time in some time, Windstream reported revenue growth during the second quarter of 2011. The independent landline telephone company that last week acquired Rochester-based PAETEC Corporation managed to win new revenue from its business services unit and equipment sales, even as it continues to lose core landline customers, who are disconnecting service in favor of cell phones or cable telephone products.
It added up to a measurable, but meager growth of 0.1 percent for the company year-over-year during the second quarter.
Like many traditional wireline phone companies, Windstream is betting the farm in their largely rural and suburban service areas on selling broadband and maintaining the allegiance of their business customers, challenged in larger cities by increasingly aggressive “Business Class” products from competing cable companies.
Windstream executives responded to questions from Wall Street bankers during their second quarter conference call held last Friday.
While several investment firms were happy to see Windstream manage some revenue growth, several zeroed in on the company’s increased capital expenditures. Windstream reports the company will continue major investments in fiber and broadband services, but not primarily for their residential retail customers. Instead, Windstream hopes to capitalize on the “high margin” business of selling fiber-based cell tower services, primarily to support forthcoming 4G deployments.
Windstream officials faced some hesitancy from Wall Street about the company’s spending during Friday’s conference call, particularly from Bank of America and Goldman Sachs.
Anthony Thomas, chief financial officer for Windstream, defended the investments.
“The most important part of fiber-to-the-tower projects are the initial investments. Those are very high-margin businesses,” Thomas said. “But you have be comfortable with the upfront capital and be patient at recognizing those are 6-to 12-month investment time horizons. But once you start bringing those revenues in, the actual cost of operating a tower is low.”
Wall Street also expressed concerns about consumer broadband traffic growth, but did not broach the subject of usage control measures like usage caps or metered billing. Windstream acknowledged the growth, primarily from online video, and said it had well-equipped data centers to handle the traffic.
Windsteam’s Consumer Strategy: Bundle Customers & Keep Them Away from Cable TV
It's all about the bundle.
Online video may be an asset for Windstream, which is facing increasing challenges retaining landline customers and up-selling them other products like broadband. That competition comes primarily from cable companies, who are targeting Windstream customers with invitations to cut their landline service and bring all of their telecommunications business to cable.
Traditional phone companies have a major weakness in their product bundle: video. Independent phone companies, in particular, are usually reliant on satellite TV partners to support the television component of a traditional “triple play” bundle. Windstream’s network is capable of telephone and slow speed broadband in most areas, but the company’s involvement in video is largely left to a third party satellite-TV provider.
Customers who do not want satellite TV service may be easily attracted to a local cable provider. But as an increasing amount of video viewing is moving online, Windstream may find customers increasingly tolerant of doing their viewing online, reducing the importance of a video package.
Windstream’s strategies to keep customers:
Sell customers on product bundles, now enhanced with online security/antivirus options and on-call technical support for computer-related technical issues;
Pitch Windstream’s Lifetime Price Guarantee, which locks in a single price for basic services, good as long as you remain a customer;
Challenge cable competitors head-on with its “Quitter Campaign,” which tries to convince cable customers to “quit cable” in favor of Windstream;
Offer faster broadband speeds in limited areas to satisfy premium customer demand.
Windstream Tries to Convince Customers the Broadband Speeds It Doesn’t Offer Do Not Matter for Most
Windstream’s efforts at winning over new broadband customers have been waning as of late. One of the primary issues Windstream faces is the cable industry’s effective portrayal of DSL as “yesterday’s” technology, incapable of delivering the broadband speeds consumers crave.
Instead of investing in improved broadband speeds for everyone, Windstream spends its time and efforts trying to convince most customers they don’t need the faster speeds being pitched by most cable companies in the first place.
Windstream tries to convince customers they can make do with less speed (as low as 1.5Mbps), and there is no difference in speed between different providers — both questionable assertions. (4 minutes)
The COO says 3Mbps is Windstream's biggest seller -- their website says something else.
Windstream chief operating officer Brent Whittington says his customers “don’t want to pay for incremental speed,” but is expanding their capacity to offer somewhat faster speeds.
“We still see that long term as [an increased revenue opportunity] because we know the demand is going to be there,” Whittington told investors. “As we’ve rolled it out currently, it’s largely to — from a marketing benefits standpoint to talk about our competitiveness relative to our cable competition, but [consumers] are largely buying at 3Mbps.”
Either Whittington is mistaken, or Windstream’s website is, because it promotes the company’s 6Mbps $44.99 option as its “top seller.” Many of Windstream’s cable competitors charge less for almost twice the speed, which may be another reason why Windstream’s broadband signup numbers are lagging behind.
Finding More Revenue: Universal Service Fund Reform & Business Services
Among the most important components of Windstream’s strategy for future growth are reform efforts underway in Washington to overhaul the Universal Service Fund. Rural, independent phone companies like Windstream have reaped the rewards of this subsidy for years in its rural service areas. But now Washington wants to transform the program away from simply underwriting rural landline phone service and redirect revenues to enhancing broadband access in areas too unprofitable to service today.
Windstream sees the reform as a positive development.
“It focuses USF on high-cost areas,” said Windstream CEO Jeff Gardner. “If you were a customer in a rural area of Windstream versus a customer in a rural area of a small carrier, your subsidy would much be higher, and we would get very little USF for that going forward. In this proposal, USF is really targeted towards those high-cost areas, so we kind of deal with this issue that we refer to as the rural-rural divide.”
Gardner says USF reform will end disparity of access.
“All rural customers are going to have the opportunity to get broadband out to them under this plan,” he said. The more customers paying monthly service fees, the higher the company’s revenues, assuming nothing else changes.
While redirected subsidies may help rural broadband customers, Windstream’s capital investments in expanding their network are going primarily to benefit their business clients, not consumers.
“On the small business side, our service there is very superior to our cable competitors,” said Windstream’s chief financial officer Anthony Thomas. “We’ve made investments in our network to offer VDSL and higher-speed data services. That’s going to be directed predominately toward those small business customers.”
Whittington added most of the company’s efforts at deploying VDSL technology are focused on the company’s small business segment to bring faster speeds to commercial customers. For consumers, Windstream’s efforts are targeted primarily at keeping up with usage demands.
“Like a lot of folks in the industry, we’ve definitely seen increases in network traffic really due to video consumption,” Whittington said. “No question Netflix and other related type services are driving some of that demand. We continue to invest in broadband transport like we have in years past. And the good thing with a lot of things we’ve been doing from just a network perspective like rolling out as I mentioned before, VDSL technology in our larger markets. That’s really all about fiber deployment, which helps solve some of those transport issues. So we feel like we’ve been in good shape there, but it’s certainly something we’ve been very focused on operationally so our broadband customers don’t see a degradation in the quality of their experience.”
Be Sure to Read Part One: Astroturf Overload — Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group for an important introduction to what this super-sized industry front group is all about. Members of Broadband for America Red: A company or group actively engaging in anti-consumer lobbying, opposes Net Neutrality, supports Internet Overcharging, belongs to […]
Astroturf: One of the underhanded tactics increasingly being used by telecom companies is “Astroturf lobbying” – creating front groups that try to mimic true grassroots, but that are all about corporate money, not citizen power. Astroturf lobbying is hardly a new approach. Senator Lloyd Bentsen is credited with coining the term in the 1980s to […]
Hong Kong remains bullish on broadband. Despite the economic downturn, City Telecom continues to invest millions in constructing one of Hong Kong’s largest fiber optic broadband networks, providing fiber to the home connections to residents. City Telecom’s HK Broadband service relies on an all-fiber optic network, and has been dubbed “the Verizon FiOS of Hong […]
BendBroadband, a small provider serving central Oregon, breathlessly announced the imminent launch of new higher speed broadband service for its customers after completing an upgrade to DOCSIS 3. Along with the launch announcement came a new logo of a sprinting dog the company attaches its new tagline to: “We’re the local dog. We better be […]
Stop the Cap! reader Rick has been educating me about some of the new-found aggression by Shaw Communications, one of western Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, in expanding its business reach across Canada. Woe to those who get in the way. Novus Entertainment is already familiar with this story. As Stop the Cap! reported previously, Shaw […]
The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, may be forced to consider American broadband policy before defining Net Neutrality and its role in Canadian broadband, according to an article published today in The Globe & Mail. [FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s] proposal – to codify and enforce some […]
In March 2000, two cable magnates sat down for the cable industry equivalent of My Dinner With Andre. Fine wine, beautiful table linens, an exquisite meal, and a Monopoly board with pieces swapped back and forth representing hundreds of thousands of Canadian consumers. Ted Rogers and Jim Shaw drew a line on the western Ontario […]
Just like FairPoint Communications, the Towering Inferno of phone companies haunting New England, Frontier Communications is making a whole lot of promises to state regulators and consumers, if they’ll only support the deal to transfer ownership of phone service from Verizon to them. This time, Frontier is issuing a self-serving press release touting their investment […]
I see it took all of five minutes for George Ou and his friends at Digital Society to be swayed by the tunnel vision myopia of last week’s latest effort to justify Internet Overcharging schemes. Until recently, I’ve always rationalized my distain for smaller usage caps by ignoring the fact that I’m being subsidized by […]
In 2007, we took our first major trip away from western New York in 20 years and spent two weeks an hour away from Calgary, Alberta. After two weeks in Kananaskis Country, Banff, Calgary, and other spots all over southern Alberta, we came away with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Good Alberta […]
A federal appeals court in Washington has struck down, for a second time, a rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission to limit the size of the nation’s largest cable operators to 30% of the nation’s pay television marketplace, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.” The 30% rule, designed to keep no single company from controlling […]
Less than half of Americans surveyed by PC Magazine report they are very satisfied with the broadband speed delivered by their Internet service provider. PC Magazine released a comprehensive study this month on speed, provider satisfaction, and consumer opinions about the state of broadband in their community. The publisher sampled more than 17,000 participants, checking […]