Wilson, North Carolina - An All America City for the 21st Century

Wilson, North Carolina recognizes the transformation of the economy of North Carolina, as manufacturing moves overseas and new high technology businesses get underway. In the new technology economy, a local community like Wilson cannot afford to be left behind by an incumbent cable and telephone company that bypasses their area, missing out on the latest upgrades and enhancements. So city officials decided enough was enough and floated a bond issue, without using any taxpayer money, to construct their own fiber optic network to service residential and business customers with a state of the art broadband platform.

The result was Greenlight, the most advanced fiber optics system in the area, and it actually saves customers money while providing them with service far beyond what the other guys are selling (and they don’t have usage caps.)

But as we’ll learn in this report from WRAL in Raleigh, Time Warner sniffs at the competition, suggesting the expenses going forward will put the project in an untenable position.  Wouldn’t it be better to shelve it now before you waste a lot of money?  Wilson wonders if this will be the last word from Time Warner on their fiber optic project.  Stay tuned… the picture will get snowier.  A lot snowier.

WRAL did a very good job packing a lot of information from all sides into a two minute package.  I found it interesting WRAL seems to be the only station in the area spending a considerable amount of airtime in their newscasts on the Wilson story, which would soon develop into a major controversy.

[Update 6:22pm EDT — If you are in the Austin area and you have had your service cut off for “over use,” please contact me immediately using the Contact form on the top of your screen.  Thanks!]

First Time Warner (via TWCAlex on Twitter) told customers who fought back the caps that the company was reneging on the DOCSIS upgrade, at least for now, and was taking their toys home with them.

But now the hissy fit might be extending into a usage crackdown in at least one of the “test” cities.  Because the promised “listening tour” of customer concerns is nowhere in sight, and the company has instead relied on a Re-Education campaign involving astroturfing lobbyists and propaganda, StoptheCap! launches a new feature this morning for any and all ISPs who throw tantrums when customers rebel and don’t allow providers to do whatever they want.

HissyFitWatch reports on ISPs who suddenly develop a bad attitude when things just don’t appear to be going their way.

Austin StoptheCap! reader Ryan Howard kicks off our premiere edition with a report that his Road Runner service was cut off yesterday without warning.  According to Ryan, it took four calls to technical support, two visits to the cable store to try two new cable modems (all to no avail), before someone at Time Warner finally told him to call the company’s “Security and Abuse” center.

“I called the number and had to leave a voice mail and about an hour later a Time Warner technician called me back and lectured me for using 44 gigabytes in one week,” Howard wrote.

Howard was then “educated” about his usage.

“According to her, that is more than most people use in a year,” Howard said.

Howard questioned the company representative about what defines an acceptable amount of usage so he doesn’t get cut off again.  He pays extra for Road Runner’s premium Turbo tier, so he already hands more money to Time Warner than average subscribers for his broadband service.

“All she would commit to is less — perhaps half or as quarter as much,” he said.

Time Warner is taking their DOCSIS 3 toys home with them after customers reject Caps 'n Tiers.

Convenient, considering that amounts to 40-60 gigabytes a month, which falls right in line with the now-temporarily-shelved tier pricing.

Ryan felt concerned that the Time Warner representative had such detailed information in front of her about his usage, although the representative reiterated repeatedly that they were not monitoring what he was doing with his account, just how much and when he was using it.

Ryan was upset over the entire ordeal, not only because a Time Warner representative lectured him (and 44 gigabytes, while a considerable amount, is not even close to the terabytes of usage Time Warner usually complains about when they speak about heavy users “abusing” their network), but also because he wasted more than seven hours of his day yesterday making several trips and calls trying to troubleshoot a technical problem that was anything but.

Of course, Time Warner’s own policies for using Road Runner allow them to crackdown on whatever they define represents “abusive use” of their service:

Road Runner Terms of Service — Austin, Texas

The Internet is known as a “shared resource,” and Road Runner accounts operate using these resources. Excessive use or abuse of these shared network resources by one customer may have a negative impact on all other customers. Misuse of network resources in a manner, which impairs network performance, is prohibited by this policy and may result in termination of your account.

You are prohibited from excessive consumption of resources, including CPU time, memory, disk space and session time. You may not use resource-intensive programs, which negatively impact other customers or the performance of Road Runner systems or networks. Road Runner reserves the right to terminate or limit such activities.

Time Warner’s Acceptable Use Policy also allows them to limit and/or throttle service at will:

The ISP Service may not be used to engage in any conduct that interferes with Operator’s ability to provide service to others, including the use of excessive bandwidth.

The ISP Service may not be used in a manner that interferes with Operator’s efficient operation of its facilities, the provision of services or the ability of others to utilize the ISP Service in a reasonable manner. Operator may use various tools and techniques in order to efficiently manage its networks and to ensure compliance with this Acceptable Use Policy (“Network Management Tools”). These may include detecting malicious traffic patterns and preventing the distribution of viruses or other malicious code, limiting the number of peer-to-peer sessions a user can conduct at the same time, limiting the aggregate bandwidth available for certain usage protocols such as peer-to-peer and newsgroups and such other Network Management Tools as Operator may from time to time determine appropriate.

Of course, the company always had these terms and conditions at its disposal to control the “abusers.”  One of the benefits of the DOCSIS 3 upgrade, that they have apparently now taken back, is that it dramatically reduces the possibility that a heavy bandwidth consumer will impact anyone else’s service.  Why put several cities through the ordeal of forced tier pricing experiments, when they’ve always had the power to manage the traffic on their network?  It’s just another reason why we’ve been skeptical about usage caps and forced tier pricing all along.

If Ryan’s experience is an example of what is forthcoming for more customers in the Austin area, we’re concerned.

[Editor’s Note: When the original article below was published, one of our Buffalo readers notified us the clip didn’t match the location, and we accidentally discovered a bug which apparently resulted in a few TV stations using the same video delivery platform getting clips mixed up between them.  My thanks to our reader who wishes to remain anonymous who alerted us to this problem, and allowed us to correct it.  Most of the original article still applies, but I’ve modified the details to match the reality!]

Although Buffalo was spared from any experiments with tiered pricing, they weren’t spared the annual rate hike.  One of the interesting differences between Buffalo and Rochester, which are adjacent to one another, is the competitive situation on the ground.

Buffalo has competition across the telephone, broadband, and television business from Time Warner and Verizon, which has wired a significant portion of Erie county with Verizon’s FiOS fiber to the home service.  The two compete effectively with similar product lines.

Rochester has competition across the telephone and broadband business from Time Warner and Frontier Communications, but the latter is stuck reselling DISH satellite service to provide a competing video package, and also has somewhat slower broadband service.  The two are not equal competitors across the board.

Buffalo, like many Time Warner divisions, offers “price protection agreements” in their territory.  Rochester does not — there are no contracts that commit Time Warner customers to any term of service.  In the Rochester market, the competitive threat from Frontier Communications has been judged so weak, there has never been a reason for Time Warner to bother with them in the Flower City.

Competition explains why one market has them and another does not.  In highly competitive markets, customers are tempted to hop from one provider to the other, and back again, to take advantage of substantial new customer discounts or other incentives.  Marketing costs to provide these discounts and incentives can be substantial, and customers can and do exploit them to save money.

The “price protection agreement,” which is another way of saying a “term commitment contract,” anchors customers with one provider for an extended period (typically one to three years), with a substantial penalty for early cancellation.

In less competitive markets, the dominant provider can avoid using contracts because most customers are reluctant to switch to an inferior product.  It also gives that provider the opportunity to bash the lesser competitors, which often do have contracts, with comparison advertising.  Time Warner Rochester has, attacking Frontier’s bundles for lengthy contract terms and $200-300 penalties if customers try and cancel early.  Clearwire is such a minor player, they exist below the radar.  But they have contracts as well, if you want the lowest price service.

In Buffalo, when Time Warner increased rates, Robin Wolfgang, Public Affairs VP for Buffalo, appeared on WGRZ to explain why rates had increased and also suggested customers hop on a price protection agreement to protect them from price changes during the contract.  During the recent Road Runner tiered pricing controversy, many customers outside of Rochester quickly signed up for these agreements for similar reasons – to avoid tiered Road Runner pricing for a few years longer.

This report from WGRZ has a reporter who sounds very familiar to Rochester residents.  Yes, that’s Dave McKinley who spent 18 years in Rochester broadcasting.  His report covers all of the bases, takes a mildly contrary position about where prices are heading, and lets Time Warner have their say.  I would have liked to see a customer complaining about the rate increases though.

News 14 Carolina or Soviet TV News Circa 1977 - You Decide

Rarely do you encounter a news clip that is so overwhelmingly biased, one-sided, and utterly stunning in its conflict of interest as the one that follows from News 14 Carolina, which resembles a report straight out of Soviet TV’s Vremya newscast, circa 1977.

This “report” consists of a Time Warner-owned newscast anchor reciting Time Warner talking points, and then follows up by interviewing the director of media relations for Time Warner.  No challenges, no follow-ups, just that pasted on smile and bobblehead nod.  Don’t break a sweat with all of that hard reporting there, and I wouldn’t hang around waiting for the Edward R. Murrow Award anytime soon.  At the very end, as a casual aside, viewers are informed the entire report was one giant corporate family affair.

The Greensboro market -is- savvy.  More savvy than Time Warner thought, anyway.  They said no to caps and gas gauges.

But one last question to viewers down there. If you’re getting news from this operation, why?

Are you kidding me?  Time Warner should have paid standard commercial rates for this.  If a reporter or anchor is really not serious about presenting a balanced report or newscast, don’t do one.  This is why people get cynical about broadcast journalism.  An obviously clueless anchor, the very definition of “conflict of interest” reporting, and a blasé disclaimer coming at the end, results in a journalistic train wreck.  The only reason I didn’t put a whole row of thumbs-down here is the possibility that perhaps someone had a gun trained on her under the desk.  Good night and good luck!

Verizon Selling Internet-Phone-TV Package in FiOS Areas for $95 a Month

One of the reasons StoptheCap! always believed Time Warner chose the cities it did for its cap experiment was to steer clear of Verizon, particularly where the company offers its fiber optic service to homes.  Verizon FiOS does not cap Internet usage and has made that well known.

The blowback from Time Warner’s experimental caps wasn’t just limited to the cities “lucky” enough to be chosen.  The story went national, and now competitors are moving in to take advantage of Time Warner’s public relations catastrophe and poach their customers.

Verizon is now offering customers in FiOS territories a bundle of services that are priced well below what Time Warner is charging people in nearby cities where FiOS isn’t.  For $94.99 a month for the first year ($99.99 a month for the second), they are bundling an unlimited digital phone service, a basic cable package with up to 295 channels and a dozen HD channels, and broadband service at 10Mbps down and 2Mbps up!  Oh, and they’ll also give you a $150 rebate in the form of a debit card.  I pay $170 a month to Time Warner in Rochester and don’t even get their digital phone product, and standard Internet service here is 10Mbps down and a silly 384Kbps up.  Ahhh… competition.

And Verizon will, for $10 more, give you 20Mbps down and 5Mbps up, as well as 350 channels, more than 50 in HD.  I have to pay $10 more here and that only gives me “Turbo” Road Runner offering 15Mbps down and 1Mbps up (plus the Powerboost gimmick).  That’s it.

Verizon High Speed Internet DSL Service For $18 A Month

Now you see why Time Warner doesn’t dare try their cap experiment in a community where FiOS is available.  Why would anyone stay a customer?  Heck, even if you wanted to stay with Time Warner for phone and television service, you can buy faster broadband from Verizon on their 10/2 tier for $45 a month, and no caps.

Verizon also gets to target communities where FiOS isn’t yet available, but Time Warner’s threatened caps were, with a guaranteed two year contract-fixed price for DSL comparable to Road Runner Lite for $18 a month. Or they’ll sell their highest DSL tier (7.1Mbps down/768kbps up) for $38 a month and no modem rental fee. No caps there either.

Frontier continues to enjoy smacking Time Warner around for its duplicitous “caps are about you saving money” campaign.  In the Sunday Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, they took another shot at Time Warner’s CEO Glenn Britt for accusing customers of “misunderstanding” their plan, where they try and convince customers that emptying their wallets and handing more money over to Time Warner is somehow a good thing.

Thanks to StoptheCap! reader Bob for sending along the Frontier ad.  Now, if Frontier had not lost the first self-install kit they sent our way (and are supposedly re-shipping express mail to arrive here today), we could have been hooked up by now.