Home » Sinclair Broadcast Group » Recent Articles:

Mass Consolidation of Local TV Stations Likely as Wall Street Applauds Acquisition Frenzy

Phillip Dampier July 2, 2013 Competition, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't 1 Comment

Tribune_Company_logo The company best known for the 10 daily newspapers it publishes, including the Chicago Tribune, the Orlando Sentinel, the Baltimore Sun, and the Los Angeles Times, can’t wait to get out of the newspaper business.

Last December, the Tribune Company, the second largest newspaper publisher in the country, emerged from bankruptcy without its $13 billion debt and old owners. Now in charge: the same Wall Street banks that lent the company billions to go private. Two months after assuming control, Tribune’s new owners hired Evercore Partners and J.P. Morgan to oversee the dumping of Tribune’s newspaper portfolio.

Founded in 1847 with the launch of the Chicago Tribune, 166 years later the Tribune Company was finished with print news, probably for good.

Banker and now owner

Investment bank and now owner

Today’s Tribune, controlled by Oaktree Capital Management, best known for investing in “distressed” companies, JPMorgan Chase, a Wall Street investment firm, and Angelo, Gordon & Co., a hedge fund sponsor best known for helping the U.S. government deal with the toxic assets accumulated by banks that helped trigger The Great Recession, want into the television business instead.

Tribune, which already owned 23 local television stations including flagship WGN in Chicago, bought another 19 Monday in a deal estimated to be worth at least $2.7 billion.

The stations were acquired from Local TV Holdings, itself owned and controlled by Wall Street investment firm Oak Hill Capital Partners, founded by Texas oil billionaire Robert Bass. Oak Hill acquired the television outlets from The New York Times and News Corp., in two prior deals. Tribune won’t pay for the stations outright. It is financing the deal with a $4.1 billion credit line granted by banks including JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup.

The stations involved:

City of License/Market Station Channel
TV (DT)
Network
Huntsville, Ala. WHNT-TV 19 (19) CBS
Fort Smith – Fayetteville, Ark. KFSM-TV 5 (18) CBS
KXNW 34 (34) MyNetworkTV
Denver, Col. KDVR 31 (32) Fox
Fort Collins, Col. KFCT*
(*- satellite of KDVR)
22 (21) Fox
Des Moines, Iowa WHO-TV 13 (13) NBC
Moline, Ill. (Quad Cities) WQAD-TV 8 (38) ABC
Kansas City, Mo. WDAF-TV 4 (34) Fox
St. Louis, Mo. KTVI 2 (43) Fox
High Point – Greensboro –
Winston-Salem, N.C.
WGHP 8 (35) Fox
Cleveland – Akron, Ohio WJW-TV 8 (8) Fox
Oklahoma City, Okla. KFOR-TV 4 (27) NBC
KAUT-TV 43 (40) Independent
Scranton – Wilkes Barre, Penn. WNEP-TV 16 (50) ABC
Memphis, Tenn. WREG-TV 3 (28) CBS
Salt Lake City, Utah KSTU 13 (28) Fox
Norfolk – Portsmouth –
Newport News, Va.
WTKR 3 (40) CBS
WGNT 27 (50) The CW
Richmond, Va. WTVR-TV 6 (25) CBS
Milwaukee, Wisc. WITI 6 (33) Fox

Assuming the deal meets the approval of the Federal Communications Commission, Tribune will control 42 stations in 16 markets, including New York, Los Angeles, and Miami.

kdvrIt expects to pay off the loans and generate returns from the “significant free cash flow” generated by the stations.

Where will that cash flow originate? From pay television subscribers asked to pay a growing amount each year for the formerly “free TV” stations.

“Smaller players feel like they’re losing their way with pay-TV providers and broadcast networks,” Craig Huber, analyst at Huber Research Partners, told USA Today. “They feel like they’re at a disadvantage here unless they size up.”

As cable programming rates continue to increase and subscribers threaten to cut the cord, pay television providers have been more willing to play hardball and kick stations off the cable or satellite dial when they cannot reach a retransmission consent agreement.

With up to 90 percent of a station’s viewership coming from pay television platforms, a lengthy standoff can destroy a station’s primary source of income: advertising revenue.

To protect themselves, television station owners are retaliating by threatening providers with the loss of all of their stations across the country, not just one or two. The resulting subscriber uproar could prove politically difficult and threaten customer relationships with providers. The more stations a company controls, the bigger the threat it can pose to Comcast, DirecTV, AT&T and other national providers.

KTVITribune is not alone bulking up the number of stations they own and control. Last month Gannett nearly doubled its portfolio from 23 to 43 stations with the acquisition of Belo’s TV stations for $1.5 billion in cash and agreeing to cover $715 million in accumulated debt.

Sinclair Broadcast Group, already the largest local TV station owner in the country, has gotten even larger with the purchase of four TV stations owned by Titan TV Broadcast Group. If the deal is approved, Sinclair will own 140 stations in 72 markets. In some cities, Sinclair will nominally own or control up to five local stations.

Sinclair management is well-known for injecting conservative political viewpoints into local newscasts and programming decisions. In 2004, two weeks before the presidential election, Sinclair ordered all of its television stations to air propaganda critical of Democratic candidate John Kerry. Later that year, Sinclair ordered its ABC affiliated stations not to broadcast a “Nightline” episode about soldiers killed in the Iraq war, fearing it would turn the public against the war.

But for most owners, politics has nothing to do with the desire to supersize. It’s a matter of money.

Even smaller station groups are now consolidating. Media General and New Young Broadcasting Holding, are merging their combined 30 stations.

(Image: The Wall Street Journal)

(Image: The Wall Street Journal)

Critics worry the changing landscape of local television will threaten the concept of “local service” stations are required to provide as a condition of their broadcast license. A station owner that lives and works in the community served is becoming an increasing rarity, and the Federal Communications Commission has allowed stations that used to fiercely compete for local news viewers to now “share resources.” Many stations, especially those owned by out of area investment banks, have discontinued local news altogether in cost-savings maneuvers.

“This deal adds to a blizzard of broadcast industry consolidation that is poised to leave America’s media system less local, less diverse and less accountable to the people in these communities,” said Free Press’ Craig Aaron in a statement on the deal. “By the time all these deals are done, a handful of companies could control almost all of the network affiliates in major markets and swing states. Local broadcasts are becoming simulcasts, with the same cookie-cutter content piped in from distant corporate headquarters, once-competitive stations combined into single newsrooms and fewer journalists forced to fill more hours of airtime.”

“The FCC needs to wake up to what’s happening on local TV,” said Aaron. “Wall Street may be overjoyed at this merger mania, but the rest of us should be very worried about having fewer viewpoints on the air and fewer reporters on the beat.”

[flv width=”640″ height=”500″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Former FCC commissioner Michael Copps shares his concerns about media consolidation 2013.mp4[/flv]

Former FCC commissioner Michael Copps shares his concerns about increasing media consolidation and its impact on an informed electorate. (Aired on Carolina Journal Radio May 23, 2013) (1 minute)

Sinclair and Time Warner Cable Agree to Two More Weeks of Talks; No Blackout Tonight

Phillip Dampier December 31, 2010 Consumer News Comments Off on Sinclair and Time Warner Cable Agree to Two More Weeks of Talks; No Blackout Tonight

When the ball overlooking Times Square drops at midnight tonight, Time Warner Cable subscribers won’t have to say goodbye to local stations owned by Sinclair Broadcasting.  The two companies reached an agreement Friday to extend negotiations over programming fees paid by the cable operator until Jan. 14.

While the talks progress, Sinclair-owned stations will continue to be seen on Time Warner with no interruption.

The two companies have been locked in a dispute over programming fees that Sinclair characterizes as a dime’s worth of difference.

Sinclair owns stations in these communities.

Barry Faber, general counsel for Sinclair, said the two are arguing over Sinclair’s request to charge ten cents per month more per subscriber for their stations.

“We intend to continue our good-faith negotiations during this period with the intent of finalizing a longer-term agreement at pricing that reflects the higher cost of programming we are faced with today,” said Barry Faber, executive vice president and general counsel of Sinclair, in a statement released Friday.

The notion Sinclair faces “higher programming costs” is one some industry experts seriously question, considering Sinclair does not have a reputation for being a big spender.

Instead, many believe Sinclair is attempting to earn additional revenue they lost in the advertising downturn, attributable to the Great Recession.

The two companies hope to hammer out a final agreement after the New Year holiday, potentially ending the latest retransmission consent dispute threatening to throw channels and networks off the cable dial.

Use the Time Warner-Sinclair Dispute to YOUR Advantage By Demanding Price Break

While Time Warner Cable and Sinclair Broadcasting duel to the Dec. 31 deadline, some Time Warner Cable customers are using the dispute to their advantage — demanding, and winning price concessions on their cable service.

Time Warner Cable has fielded so many calls about the dispute, it has added a message to its customer call-in lines to share its side of the dispute.

Listen to the announcements Time Warner Cable is using around the country on its customer service lines to address the Sinclair-Time Warner dispute. (7 minutes)
You must remain on this page to hear the clip, or you can download the clip and listen later.

Some customers tired of being put in the middle have decided to take their business elsewhere.  Others are just threatening, which brings forth customer retention deals to keep customers from cutting Time Warner’s cord.

“I scored a one year extension of my new customer deal — $99 a month for every kind of service the cable company offers,” writes Scott from Syracuse, N.Y.  Time Warner Cable is expected to drop WSYT (Fox) and WNYS (MyNetwork TV) late Friday night.  “I told them their rate hike notice was bad enough, but dropping two stations from my lineup without offering me a refund was too much.”

Scott was prepared to switch to Verizon FiOS, but Time Warner offered a price he’ll take for some inconvenience.

“I threw my Time Warner rate hike notice in the trash — it doesn’t apply to me for a year,” Scott says.  “It took ten minutes on the phone with the cable company and now I’ll save hundreds a year.”

In Texas, Time Warner Cable customers trying to exit the cable company for a competitor found the cable company’s term contract harder to walk away from.

“They are playing hardball with me, telling me I’ll have to pay an early termination fee if I switch,” says Stop the Cap! reader Rod who lives in San Antonio.  He’s preparing to say goodbye to KABB (Fox) and KMYS (MyNetwork TV).”

“I told them with their attitude, it would be worth paying the fee to see the back of them,” Rod says.  “Besides, when you tell some of their competitors about the cable company’s exit fees, they sweeten the deal as a sign of goodwill, something I am not getting from the cable company.”

[flv width=”640″ height=”500″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Sinclair TW Dispute 12-30-10.flv[/flv]

Sinclair stations across the country are airing various news reports about the upcoming signal blackout on both Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks, which uses Time Warner to negotiate programming contracts.  Virtually all are biased towards Sinclair’s position, and ignore the fact Time Warner plans to import Fox network programming regardless of what happens.  (25 minutes)

In Rochester and Buffalo, the cable company is willing to extend their $99 triple play promotion to customers threatening to drop service over the Sinclair dispute, especially when customers also mention the company’s recently announced rate hike.

“If the first person you speak with doesn’t offer you a better deal, hang up and call back,” advises Susan, our reader in Amherst, N.Y.  Both she and her mother in Cheektowaga are saving $35 a month for the next year all thanks to Sinclair and Time Warner’s money fight.

One of the stations impacted in the dispute

“We would have never thought about doing this before we started reading Stop the Cap!,” she says. “We had no idea we could get these kind of deals.”

“We’d lose WUTV (Fox) and WNYO (MyNetwork TV), but Time Warner promises all of the Fox network shows will still be aired and losing MyNetwork TV is hardly a loss at all,” Susan shares.  “Just call them and use the word ‘cancel’ and see what they offer.”

Sinclair stations are notorious for running local news operations on the cheap, when they bother to run local news at all.  So many viewers remain blissfully unaware of the dispute because many of the affected Sinclair stations are low-rated afterthoughts.  Of the 35+ impacted stations, fewer than six have serious local news operations, and many of those are in last place in the local ratings.  That’s a point Time Warner Cable had reportedly raised in their negotiations, noting the stations are not worth Sinclair’s asking price.

But the cable operator is also not saying a whole lot about the dispute on their various local news channels.  The company has instead taken out full page advertisements in newspapers alerting viewers to the upcoming signal disruptions and pushing customers to visit the cable operator’s national carriage dispute website: RollOverOrGetTough.com.

[flv width=”640″ height=”500″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Time Warner News Sinclair 12-30-10.flv[/flv]

Time Warner Cable briefly mentioned the dispute between the cable company and Sinclair Broadcasting on a few of their local news channels.  (2 minutes)

[flv width=”480″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WHAM Rochester TW Sinclair Dispute 12-30-10.flv[/flv]

WHAM-TV in Rochester took a third party look at the dispute and explained it to western New York viewers.  Special bonus: A brief interview with Scott Fybush, editor of Northeast Radio Watch who understands western New York media like few others.  (3 minutes)

Breaking News: Sinclair Says Time Warner Cable Ends Talks, Stations Going Dark Friday Night

Phillip Dampier December 29, 2010 Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't 3 Comments

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. today said Time Warner Cable Inc. will no longer hold talks in a programming dispute between the two firms. The stations will no longer be available on Time Warner Cable after December 31st.

According to Sinclair, Time Warner did not accept its latest offer of a monthly $0.10 increase per station, per subscriber.

Officials from Time Warner, however, said the cable company “has at no time told Sinclair that we were terminating negotiations.”

But Time Warner Cable has strengthened its hand in negotiations with its own agreement with the Fox network, which will allow the cable operator to continue carrying all Fox network programming after the local stations are blacked out.

A source at Time Warner Cable tells Stop the Cap! subscribers who have called the cable company to complain have been generally satisfied once they learn the network shows will still be available.

“It may cost viewers some Judge Judy, People’s Court, and a whole mess of program length ads these stations run all night and on weekends, but as long as they still can watch Glee and football, they are fine with it,” says our source.

“As for local news, does anyone watch Sinclair stations for local newscasts?  There are better choices, and viewers already knew that,” our source adds.

Time Warner Cable initially plans to place a chyron on the blacked out stations when network programming is not available, but discussions are underway about replacing that with cable-company acquired programming if the standoff continues for long.

“Time Warner Cable can easily license some older shows and movies and place them on our new ‘Fox’ channel and many viewers might find that more interesting than the stuff Sinclair stations run,” our source said.

The cable operator has experience doing exactly that in many markets, especially when they create channels to support networks like CW or MyNetworkTV that are not aired over the air in many medium-sized cities.  The cable operator could license a number of syndicated shows for free, ranging from talk programs to court shows, and run them during the day.

Stop the Cap! predicts after a few weeks at most, Sinclair will be back at the negotiating table to pound out a deal.  Sinclair stations will face an enormous financial hit from the loss of local advertising revenue, especially considering the majority of viewers still watch their stations over cable.

Stations Impacted

  • AL Birmingham — WTTO (CW)
  • AL Birmingham — WABM (MyNetworkTV)
  • FL Pensacola — WEAR (ABC)
  • FL Tallahassee — WTWC (NBC)
  • FL Tampa — WTTA (MyNetworkTV)
  • KY Lexington — WDKY (Fox)
  • ME Portland — WGME (CBS)
  • MO Girardeau — KBSI (Fox)
  • NC Greensboro — WXLV (ABC)
  • NC Greensboro — WMYV (MyNetworkTV)
  • NC Raleigh — WLFL (CW)
  • NC Raleigh — WRDC (MyNetworkTV)
  • NY Buffalo — WUTV (Fox)
  • NY Buffalo — WNYO (MyNetworkTV)
  • NY Rochester — WUHF (Fox)
  • NY Syracuse — WSYT (Fox)
  • NY Syracuse — WNYS (MyNetworkTV)
  • OH Cincinnati — WSTR (MyNetworkTV)
  • OH Columbus — WSYX (ABC)
  • OH Columbus — WTTE (Fox)
  • OH Dayton — WKEF (ABC)
  • OH Dayton — WRGT (Fox)
  • SC Charleston — WTAT (Fox)
  • SC Charleston — WMMP (MyNetworkTV)
  • PA Pittsburgh — WPGH (Fox)
  • PA Pittsburgh — WPMY (MyNetworkTV)
  • TX San Antonio — KABB (Fox)
  • TX San Antonio — KMYS (MyNetworkTV)
  • VA Norfolk — WTVZ (MyNetworkTV)
  • WI Milwaukee — WVTV (CW)
  • WI Milwaukee — WCGV (MyNetworkTV)
  • WV Charleston — WCHS (ABC)
  • WV Charleston — WVAH (Fox)

Time Warner Yanks WKTV Off Central NY Cable Screens, Replaced With Pennsylvania NBC Station

Phillip Dampier December 16, 2010 Consumer News, Video 5 Comments

It's a three hour drive down Interstate 81 from Utica to Wilkes-Barre.

WKTV-TV Utica is off Time Warner Cable's lineup in parts of central New York this morning.

Viewers across Oneida, Herkimer, and other adjacent central New York counties lost their local NBC station early this morning after another retransmission consent dispute led Time Warner Cable to drop WKTV-TV in Utica, N.Y., from the lineup.

The fact Time Warner dropped a station is hardly unprecedented, but the cable company managed to replace the station almost immediately.  Away went WKTV, in came Nexstar-owned WBRE-TV, an NBC station serving Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, Penn.

This morning, Mohawk Valley viewers woke up to watching local news and weather for the Susquehanna Valley — 187 miles away to the south.

While Time Warner’s apparent agreement with WBRE keeps NBC shows rolling, the loss of local news and weather represents a major blow for area subscribers, many enduring a western and central New York winter that has brought more than 50 inches of snow in just the last two weeks in some areas.

Utica city officials expressed concern about the loss of the local Utica station because important snow emergency alerts were often delivered over the station.

“They might as well have imported a station from Florida, because there is very little in common between Herkimer County, New York and Luzerne County, Pennsylvania,” writes Steve, who lives in Herkimer.  “You would have thought they would have just grabbed an NBC station from Syracuse.”

...replaced with WBRE-TV, a station in Wilkes-Barre, Penn.

Apparently, Time Warner has permission from Nexstar to import the distant signal of the Pennsylvania station for impacted subscribers.  The effective reinstatement of network programming may make it more difficult for WKTV’s owner, Smith Media, to negotiate the station’s return to Time Warner’s lineup anytime soon.  That one NBC affiliate may have granted permission to replace another station during a contract dispute may become a point of contention on the network level.  Traditionally, broadcasters have not been quick to undercut other stations with such carriage agreements.

Smith’s other stations were also affected.  Time Warner dropped WFFF (Fox) AND WVNY (ABC), which serve the Burlington, Vt. market and the CW-affiliated digital sub-channel running alongside WKTV in Utica.  The station owner launched a website to share their position and educate people about how to receive the signals either over-the-air or via satellite.

In nearby Rochester, Time Warner continues to play hardball with Sinclair Broadcasting over a carriage agreement renewal for WUHF-TV.  But Time Warner customers facing the loss of the Fox affiliate will not see any interruption of Fox network programming — the cable company has a separate agreement with the network.  Ironically, Sinclair jointly operates WUHF with Nexstar Broadcasting of Rochester LLC, the owner of WROC-TV, the city’s CBS affiliate.

[flv width=”640″ height=”500″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WKTV Carriage Dispute 12-16-10.flv[/flv]

Time Warner’s replacement of WKTV-TV in Utica with a distant station may be a new tactic in the hardball war over cable-broadcaster carriage agreements.  WKTV ran several stories about how the station’s loss impacts the area.  YNN’s Central NY news station, run by Time Warner Cable, also ran its own story this morning, all of which are covered here.  (9 minutes)

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!