When phone companies like Verizon decide to throw their rural customers under the bus by selling them off, shareholders and executives rake in windfall bonuses, sometimes in the millions. Now a New York assemblyman and a state senator want ratepayers to get a 40 percent cut of the action.
Assemblyman Richard Brodsky (D-Westchester), is the primary sponsor of Assembly Bill A02208 — An Act Requiring the Public Service Commission to Conduct an In-Depth Public Interest Analysis of Proposed Mergers by Telephone Corporations and Other Telecommunications Services Providers. A companion New York Senate Bill, S7263, was introduced by Sen. Brian X. Foley (D-Blue Point/Long Island).
The legislation would compel phone companies engaged in the practice of mergers, acquisitions, and sales to share 40 percent of the proceeds with New York’s landline phone customers.
The legislation came as a result of watching Verizon systematically sell off parts of its phone empire to third party companies like FairPoint Communications, Hawaiian Telcom, and Frontier Communications. More than five million customers have been switched away from Verizon to other companies, most of which have gone bankrupt as a direct result of the sales.
![brodsky](https://stopthecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/brodsky.jpg)
Brodsky
Both Brodsky and Foley don’t want to see New York residents face similar consequences. They are particularly concerned about Verizon’s upstate operations, particularly in rural areas outside of cities like Buffalo, Binghamton, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, and northern New York. In the upstate region, Verizon has constructed fiber to the home service under its FiOS brand in urban and suburban regions where it operates, but has made few changes in the countryside. As Verizon customers from Washington to North Carolina suddenly find themselves served by Frontier, why couldn’t the same thing happen in communities like Sodus in Wayne County, Penn Yan in Yates County, or just about anywhere in northern New York?
Verizon’s business plan has evolved over the last ten years. Company president Ivan Seidenberg previously declared the landline business dead, and the company has turned its attention to delivering fiber-based video, phone and broadband services to the major population centers within its service areas. Because rural customers cost too much to serve with similar packages of services, Verizon has begun selling them off to independent phone companies that still see revenue from copper wire landline service.
Verizon claims it has no plans to sell any of its operations in New York, but Brodsky and Foley want insurance that if they change their mind, no ratepayers in New York will face what happened in northern New England or Hawaii when the companies taking control ended up in Bankruptcy Court.
“It’s a ratepayer protection bill for upstate New York,” Brodsky said.
Brodsky said if Verizon were to sell operations, consumers will not be left with inferior service.
Forcing companies to share proceeds of sales to ratepayers who ultimately indirectly bankroll most of these deals is not unprecedented in New York. Electric and gas utilities are often required to send refunds or issue credits when they sell assets. Ratepayers of Rochester Gas & Electric received several compensation checks after the sale of the Ginna nuclear power plant in Ontario, New York to Constellation Energy Group in 2004.
Verizon could also be compelled to reinvest proceeds earmarked for consumers in the company’s infrastructure, such as paying for broadband improvements or upgrading lines.
The legislation would only impact companies earning more than $200 million in gross annual revenue from New Yorkers. Currently, that means the legislation would only impact Verizon and Frontier Communications.
Not surprisingly, Verizon is vehemently against the proposed legislation and is fighting tooth and nail to kill it in Albany.
![foley](https://stopthecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/foley-201x300.jpg)
Foley
Jim Gerace, president of Verizon’s New York region, told the Albany Times-Union the Brodsky legislation was bad for Verizon and anti-business in general. Gerace predicted companies would not want to do business in New York because they’d fear similar profit-sharing legislation could eventually target them.
“I’m convinced this is going to have a chilling effect on all businesses,” Gerace said. “They’re sending a very dangerous message to all businesses. It just compounds the state’s woes.”
But the Public Service Commission is intrigued by the legislation and is reviewing it. If enacted, it could make a mass sell-off of rural landlines untenable in New York.
A02208 passed the Assembly by a wide margin — 103-34 and is now awaiting final action in the Senate. It narrowly passed the Senate Rules Committee June 16th by a 13-10 vote.
If you want to see the bill passed, consider contacting your New York State senator and asking them to support the immediate passage of S7263. Let them know you do not want phone deals to be cut at your expense, leaving you with a second-class provider. If Verizon wants to sell off your community, they owe consumers a piece of the action. It’s time that phone mergers, acquisitions and sell-offs actually benefit the consumers that ultimately pay for them and live with the results.