Hours before a two-week extension on contract talks was set to expire, Time Warner Cable and Sinclair Broadcasting announced they had a deal to avert the loss of dozens of Sinclair-owned stations on Time Warner Cable.

No terms were disclosed, but industry watchers predicted Sinclair held the weaker hand and probably made some concessions to the cable company, especially on issues related to Time Warner’s focus on expanding cable programming to portable devices and allowing more shows to be “started over” or made available on-demand.

The length of the new agreement was also not disclosed, but many believe a 12-24 month extension was likely.

Time Warner Cable also negotiates programming deals on behalf of Bright House Networks, and a separate, similar agreement was anticipated to be reached sometime this week.

Despite hours of threatening video crawls on several Sinclair-owned stations and full page ads purchased in local newspapers by the cable company, no programming was ultimately impacted by the threatened blackout.

This most recent retransmission consent battle could be among the last if the Federal Communications Commission manages to write new rules to keep customers out of the middle of such disputes.

The FCC plans to consider drafting reforms to current regulations as early as next month.  The Commission seems to be leaning towards the cable, satellite, and phone companies’ view that would leave stations and networks on the cable dial while negotiations are underway, preventing the kinds of blackouts that left suburban New York Cablevision subscribers without access to Fox programming for two weeks in 2010.

When the ball overlooking Times Square drops at midnight tonight, Time Warner Cable subscribers won’t have to say goodbye to local stations owned by Sinclair Broadcasting.  The two companies reached an agreement Friday to extend negotiations over programming fees paid by the cable operator until Jan. 14.

While the talks progress, Sinclair-owned stations will continue to be seen on Time Warner with no interruption.

The two companies have been locked in a dispute over programming fees that Sinclair characterizes as a dime’s worth of difference.

Sinclair owns stations in these communities.

Barry Faber, general counsel for Sinclair, said the two are arguing over Sinclair’s request to charge ten cents per month more per subscriber for their stations.

“We intend to continue our good-faith negotiations during this period with the intent of finalizing a longer-term agreement at pricing that reflects the higher cost of programming we are faced with today,” said Barry Faber, executive vice president and general counsel of Sinclair, in a statement released Friday.

The notion Sinclair faces “higher programming costs” is one some industry experts seriously question, considering Sinclair does not have a reputation for being a big spender.

Instead, many believe Sinclair is attempting to earn additional revenue they lost in the advertising downturn, attributable to the Great Recession.

The two companies hope to hammer out a final agreement after the New Year holiday, potentially ending the latest retransmission consent dispute threatening to throw channels and networks off the cable dial.