[flv width=”490″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/RT ATT Buys Support from Non-Profits 6-10-11.flv[/flv]

It’s a bad day for American television journalism when Russian State Television manages to tell viewers the facts about the merger of AT&T and T-Mobile that American networks ignore.  Russia Today is Moscow’s external television service, and delivers English language news to a global audience.  Public Knowledge’s Art Brodsky gets to tell RT viewers the real facts about dollar-a-holler groups advocating for AT&T,  a story American networks might not want to share with AT&T ad dollars at risk!  (7 minutes)

At the end of business Wednesday, Verizon Wireless will end its unlimited data plans for new customers.  If you are an existing customer, you will be able to retain unlimited data for your smartphone indefinitely, but those considering an upgrade to 4G may want to consider doing so immediately, if you want to have an unlimited 4G tethering plan for your 4G-capable phone.

Verizon Wireless data pricing effective 7/7/2011

New Verizon Wireless Customers: You must buy and activate a 3G/4G-capable phone on Verizon’s network no later than 11:59pm Wednesday evening to qualify for the $29.99 unlimited data plan.  At this point, this means buying a phone from Verizon Wireless’ website or visiting a local store.  If you want the best possible price, we recommend calling Verizon Wireless and negotiating with them directly.  Verizon is often able to match prices from online retailers like Wirefly or Amazon, usually by throwing in service credits for your first month’s invoice.  New 4G customers can score an unlimited tethering add-on plan from Verizon for an additional $30 a month.  That means $29.99 for the data plan plus $30 for the tethering option, but if comes without any usage limits.  After July 6, all those new to tethering will only find one option: $20 for up to 2GB of tethering access.

Existing Verizon Wireless Customers: You will keep your current unlimited smartphone data plan indefinitely, perhaps even after upgrading your phone.  However, if you were interested in tethering on Verizon’s 4G network, consider upgrading to a 4G phone before Thursday to qualify for the $30 unlimited tethering plan, good only for 4G users with an existing tethering relationship with Verizon.  You must select the 4G tethering option before Thursday to qualify.  Call Verizon Wireless at 611 from your handset and make sure they take care of this for you to avoid complications.  An automatic update will be pushed to the Thunderbolt, Charge, and Revolution on July 7 to cut off the Hotspot free ride those customers had been enjoying up until now.  You will have to buy the service if you want to continue using it.  All 3G phones (iPhone, Droid X, etc.) will not see any pricing changes for 3G tethering – it is still $20 a month for up to 2GB of usage, no unlimited options for you.

Other pricing details:

• Verizon customers opting for the $30 for 2GB plan will lose company discounts on their data plan.  You must select a higher-cost data plan if you want to keep any employer discount;
• Verizon is now specifically prohibiting tethering any of their phones without a Verizon add-on tethering option.  This means third-party tethering apps you may have used before now violate your contract with them.

[flv width=”360″ height=”290″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WCPO Cincinnati Verizon ending unlimited data plans 6-24-11.mp4[/flv]

WCPO-TV in Cincinnati covers the imminent funeral for Verizon’s unlimited data plans.  Verizon customers are not happy with the loss.  (2 minutes)

The Competition Bureau has fined Bell Canada $10 million for what it calls the phone company’s misleading pricing for its wireless, broadband, phone, and satellite TV services.  The agency accused Bell of advertising one price for service, but charged customers considerably more after hidden fees were tacked on.  That made it impossible for any customer to actually purchase Bell’s services at their advertised prices.

The fine, the maximum amount that can be levied, was designed to send a message, according to Commissioner Melanie Aitken.

“When a price is offered to consumers, it must be accurate,” Aitken said. “Including a fine-print disclaimer is no license to advertise prices that are not available.”

Since December 2007, Bell routinely advertised product bundles that it claimed were priced at less than $70 a month, but after the hidden fees were calculated, Canadian consumers routinely paid north of $80.

Aitken

Aitken took issue with rental fees for equipment, term contract escape penalties, mandatory “add-ons” that were not included in the advertised price, and hidden “junk fees” designed to look like government-mandated taxes.  They all routinely add at least $10 to most telecommunications bills, even before actual government fees are calculated.

Bell protested the Bureau’s findings, but quickly agreed to pay the fine, modify its advertising, and cover the $100,000 estimated cost of the agency’s investigation.

The Competition Bureau has become a thorn in the side of many major corporate entities in Canada after winning new powers in 2009 to protect consumer interests.  The agency is currently pursuing a $10 million fine against Rogers Communications for “hit piece” advertising misleading consumers about Rogers’ wireless rivals — especially Wind Mobile.

But Rogers is not going quietly as Bell has done, vowing to drag the matter through the courts to void any fines or penalties.

Aitken promises she isn’t necessarily done with telecommunications companies, suggesting any company burying extra costs in the fine print, or subjecting customers to penalty fees for canceling service might be on notice.

Telecommunications companies in Canada have traditionally opposed government agencies that champion consumer protections.  Most notably, Bell, Rogers, and Quebecor Media have all attacked the Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, an independent agency that monitors and assists consumers with issues related to phone and cable companies.  Bell wanted the organization abolished, while Rogers and Quebecor sought to see participation in it made voluntary.

Unfortunately, consumers won’t share in the $10 million fine from Bell.  Those funds will be collected and kept by the Canadian government.

[flv width=”640″ height=”388″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CBC Bell fined 10M over ads 6-28-11.flv[/flv]

CBC covers Bell’s $10 million dollar fine for advertising one price for service, but sending a much higher bill with tacked on hidden fees and surcharges.  (2 minutes)

Nearly every week, phone companies like Frontier Communications are confronted with service outages that turn out to be more than just an errant gunshot that disrupted 911 service for hundreds of residents in Moses Lake, Washington.  When repair crews arrive to find no cabling to repair, they realize it’s yet another case of copper theft — a problem plaguing economically challenged areas across the country.

Unfortunately for phone companies, copper theft remains a misdemeanor in many states, including West Virginia, one of the hardest hit by wire thieves that literally strip phone lines right off the phone poles as they drive by in the dead of night.

Scrap copper wire

An employee with Frontier Communications reported that on June 25 he received reports that the phone lines were out for residents along Paddle Creek Road near Fort Gay, W.V.

It apparently took two days for the employee to discover, on June 27, 800 feet of phone cable had been removed from a wooded area along the road. The value of the cable was estimated at $10,000.  The annoyance value for customers left without basic phone service?  Potentially more.

In St. Albans, nearly 400 Frontier customers were stripped of their landline service Friday when vandals cut a cable in a possible theft attempt.  Frontier said the most vulnerable cables are often in the most remote and rural locations, and this cable qualified, requiring more than a day to repair and restore service.

But the impact of copper theft can be greater than phone service knocked out for a few hundred residents.  In Kanawha County, West Virginia’s Department of Agriculture offices were left idle when the second copper theft in two months left their phone lines dead.

“We’re at a standstill,” said Gus Douglass, commissioner of agriculture. “It’s kind of ridiculous.”

[flv width=”480″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WSAZ Huntington Copper Thieves Dep Ag 6-28-11.mp4[/flv]

WSAZ-TV in Huntington, W.V. covered the second straight outage of phone service for the West Virginia Dept. of Agriculture in two months.  Copper thieves do strike twice in the same place.  (2 minutes)

Frontier has complained that because copper thefts are often treated as a misdemeanor, offenders are skating with a small fine and little or no jail time.  That makes repeat offenses likely, and risks for those just getting into the copper racket low.

Thieves are reselling the stolen copper for money.  Copper has become a hot commodity, and thieves often earn hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, for a night’s work.

Frontier believes strengthening criminal penalties for copper thefts will do more to deter would-be thieves more than installing surveillance equipment.

Kanawha County Prosecutor Mark Plants seems to agree.  His office is now charging offenders under a little-used state code that makes it a felony to disrupt telephone service.  A felony conviction can bring substantial fines and multi-year prison sentences, especially for repeat offenders.

“There is a push […] towards maximizing a prison sentence for all of these criminals,” Plants told WSAZ-TV.

[flv width=”480″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WSAZ Huntington Copper Thieves 6-29-11.mp4[/flv]

WSAZ-TV follows up on the copper theft outage that plagued the West Virginia Dept. of Agriculture with news of an arrest, and a demand for stronger penalties for copper thieves.  (2 minutes)

A Time Warner Cable online customer support employee is out of a job after sexually harassing a Charlotte, N.C. area woman looking for help with her Time Warner Cable account.

“Hello my baby,” was the opening “Bobby” gave to Denise when she began an online chat to learn more about the cable company’s products.  “Yes baby I here to ———- you,” came soon after.

“It is unacceptable,” said Denise’s son Shaun Poland, who didn’t get much of a response from Time Warner until he took the story to a Charlotte-area television station and the cable company’s Facebook page.  “It is sexual harassment.”

Poland’s mother thought it must have been a mistake, but as the comments continued, Poland told her to take a “screen grab” of the online chat.  Despite calls to Time Warner, Poland didn’t hear anything until taking the story public, and to a much wider audience.

Time Warner Cable spokesman Dan Ballister issued a statement denying the online chat agent was a direct employee of Time Warner Cable.  But the agent involved was working for a cable company vendor and had access to Time Warner customer phone numbers and home addresses.

“Within 24 hours of this incident, the agent was no longer supporting Time Warner Cable,” Ballister said.

Poland is still concerned.

“We have a crazy person with access to all of our information saying sexually harassing things,” Poland told the station.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WSOC Charlotte Woman Receives Inappropriate Messages In Time Warner Cable Chat Room 7-1-11.flv[/flv]

Charlotte station WSOC-TV talked with Shaun Poland about his mother’s disturbing experience chatting with Time Warner Cable.  (2 minutes)