Home » Competition »Public Policy & Gov't »Reuters » Currently Reading:

U.S. Federal Appeals Court Deals Setback to FCC Push to Deregulate Media Ownership Rules

Phillip Dampier September 24, 2019 Competition, Public Policy & Gov't, Reuters No Comments

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Communications Commission suffered a setback on Monday in a long-running legal battle when a federal appeals court struck down its latest effort to loosen U.S. media ownership rules.

The Republican-led FCC in 2017 voted to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. It also voted to make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market, and for local stations to jointly sell advertising time and for companies to buy additional radio stations in some markets.

The court in a 2-1 decision Monday told the FCC to take up the issue again, saying the regulator “did not adequately consider the effect its sweeping rule changes will have on ownership of broadcast media by women and racial minorities.”

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement that despite instructions from Congress to review media ownership regulations a majority of federal appeals court judges for 15 years “has taken that authority for themselves, blocking any attempt to modernize these regulations to match the obvious realities of the modern media marketplace.”

Pai added that “there is no evidence or reasoning — newspapers going out of business, broadcast radio struggling, broadcast TV facing stiffer competition than ever — that will persuade them to change their minds.”

The FCC plans to challenge the decision, he added.

Pai

FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, said “over my objection, the FCC has been busy dismantling the values embedded in its ownership policies.” She said the “court rightly sent the FCC’s handiwork back to the agency because the FCC’s analysis was so ‘insubstantial.’”

Judge Anthony Scirica, who dissented from the opinion, said “Rapid technological change had left the framework regulating media ownership ill-suited to the marketplace’s needs. The public interest analysis at the heart of the FCC’s ownership rules is as dynamic as the media landscape.”

Big media companies including Tegna Inc, CBS Corp and Nexstar Media Group Inc cited the 2017 rule change as motivation for considering expansion opportunities.

The FCC is weighing other changes to U.S. media ownership rules. In December, it sought comments on a rule that bars one company from owning two TV stations in the same market except under certain circumstances. The FCC asked if those rules continue “to serve the public interest and remains necessary.”

The FCC is also considering if existing rules that limit the number of local radio stations in a single market should be rescinded, asking if the rule “remains necessary to promote competition, localism, or viewpoint diversity.”

Free Press, an advocacy, group, said the ruling “marks the fourth time this court has rejected the relentless attempts from the FCC and the broadcast industry to weaken media-ownership limits.”

Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Tom Brown

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • RYAN GREENE: "Ziply is also avoiding the usual nightmares customers experience when switching between one company’s systems to another. Frontier’s customers ...
  • James: And yet Contracts are supposed to be "Contracts" why do you think so many people file breach of contract lawsuits each year? These companies still ta...
  • William Humphrey: Sports package is not $5 a month. With other charges it is $10 a month. It is called being deceitful. Just another con job!...
  • JOHN: We were told more people would be able to get ATSC1 and that was just not true no matter what antenna you have most channels were lost for so many peo...
  • Unhappy Customer: Truth...
  • Master of None: That's not a ISP issue. That's a software issue....
  • rhp: What became of the Public Service Commission in New York State? We just get to get taxed for their paychecks and then that's it?...
  • Patricia Johnson: I do! Charging for services not received certainly sounds like a crime....
  • Epiphany: Anyone want to join/start a facebook group calling out Ziply's lies and bad customer service?...
  • Epiphany: Are you sure you haven't already paid and they're saying you pay a month ahead, you already subscribed, no refund. Either way their customers service...
  • Donald: Last week I TRIED to increase our service to include Fox Sports Wisconsin. After talking to three totally incompetent customer service reps, being put...
  • eileen: This started in May of 2019,, I have done everything you mentioned. They even told me that we shouldn't have been able to transfer the account into so...

Your Account:

138
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Stop the Cap!