Despite denials Verizon Communications was interested in selling off more of its wireline network to companies like Frontier Communications, the company’s chief financial officer reminded investors Verizon is willing to sell just about anything if it will return value to its shareholders.
In September, rumors Verizon planned to sell more of its wireline network where the company has not invested in widespread FiOS fiber-to-the-home expansion grew loud enough to draw a response from Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam at the Goldman Sachs 24th annual Communicopia Conference.
“When people ask me, and I know there’s some speculation that we might be interested in selling the wireline properties, I don’t see it in the near-term,” McAdam said.
Today, Shammo seemed to clarify McAdam’s pessimistic attitude about another Verizon landline sell off in the near future.
“We’re extremely happy with the asset portfolio we have right now, but as we always say we continue to look at all things,” Shammo said. “Just like the towers, we said we would not sell the towers and then we got to a great financial position and we sold our towers. If something makes sense [and] we can return value to our shareholders and it’s not a strategic fit we’ll obviously look at that.”
For most of 2014, Verizon denied any interest in selling its portfolio of company-owned wireless cell towers. In February 2015 the company announced it would sell acquisition rights to most of its cell towers to American Tower Corporation for $5.056 billion in cash.
Some analysts believe the early indicators that suggest Verizon is ready to sell include its lack of upgrades in non-FiOS service areas and Verizon’s willingness to walk away from up to $144 million from the second phase of the FCC’s Connect America Fund to expand Internet access to more of Verizon’s rural landline customers.
Verizon’s decision to take a pass on broadband improvement funds infuriated four southern New Jersey counties that claim Verizon has neglected its copper network in the state. As a result of allegedly decreasing investment and interest by Verizon, customers in these areas do not get the same level of phone and broadband service that Verizon customers receive in the northern half of New Jersey.
More than a dozen communities have signed a joint petition sent to the Board of Public Utilities, New Jersey’s telecom regulator, insisting the BPU take whatever measures are needed to preserve the availability of telecommunications services in southern New Jersey. The towns also want the BPU to consider funding sources to help improve broadband service that public officials claim is woefully inadequate. Outside of Verizon FiOS service areas, Verizon offers customers traditional DSL service for Internet access.
The communities:
- Atlantic County: Estell Manor and Weymouth Township.
- Gloucester County: South Harrison Township.
- Salem County: Alloway Township, Lower Alloways Creek, Mannington Township, Township of Pilesgrove, and Upper Pittsgrove Township.
- Cumberland County: Commercial Township, Downe Township, Hopewell Township, Lawrence Township, Maurice River Township, City of Millville, Upper Deerfield Township, and Fairfield Township.
Officials claim Verizon has pushed its wireless alternatives to customers in the region, including its wireless landline replacement. But officials suggest Verizon’s wireless coverage and the quality of its service is not an adequate substitute for wireline service.
Verizon has proposed decommissioning parts of its wireline network in rural service areas and substitute wireless service in the alternative. At issue are the costs to maintain a vast wireline network that reaches a dwindling number of customers. Verizon reminds regulators it has lost large numbers of residential landline customers who have switched to wireless service, making the costs to maintain service for a dwindling number of customers that much greater.
But for many communities, the focus is increasingly on broadband, especially in areas that receive little or no cable service. Telephone companies serving rural communities are surviving landline disconnects by providing broadband service.
For companies like Frontier Communications, CenturyLink, and Windstream, investments in providing broadband service are among their top spending priorities. At larger phone companies like Verizon and AT&T, highly profitable wireless divisions get the most attention and are top spending priorities.
Speaking this morning at the UBS 43rd Annual Global Media and Communications Conference, Shammo told investors Verizon will continue to allocate the majority of its capital allocation around Verizon Wireless to help densify its wireless network. Verizon, Shammo noted, plans further spending cuts for its wired networks next year as FiOS network buildouts start to taper off.
This will make expansion and improvement of Verizon DSL unlikely, and may put further cost pressure on maintaining Verizon’s wireline networks, which could further motivate a sale.
Verizon’s chief financial officer Fran Shammo is likely looking at three alternatives for the future:
- Increase investment in Verizon Communications to further expand FiOS fiber optics;
- Look at cost savings opportunities to improve the books at Verizon Communications, including decommissioning rural landline networks (if Verizon can win regulator approval);
- Consider selling Verizon’s non-core wireline assets in areas where the company has not made a substantial investment in FiOS and refocus attention on serving the dense corridor of customers along the Atlantic seaboard between Washington, D.C. and Boston.
This is a done deal.
Whatever areas Verizon has left they currently serve wireline are still going to be sold off.
New Jersey will be sold off to CenturyLink,
Frontier most likely will get Massachusetts, Rhode Island, the rest of New York, possibly Virginia, Maryland, Delaware and Pennsylvania,
and whatever else is leftover Windstream will get.
I actually expect Frontier would buy it all, but not in one deal. I’ve seen no evidence CenturyLink is interested in anything else post-Qwest, and Windstream is not spending anywhere near enough on their network, much less to buy someone else’s. From listening to Shammo, it sounds like Verizon is waiting for Frontier to digest their latest acquisition and then propose another. What now seems likely is Verizon would keep the seaboard FiOS-enabled cities (Boston, NYC, Philly, DC corridor) and sell off the smaller cities (central/western Mass., upstate New York, most of Penn., central/southern NJ, perhaps all of Maryland and… Read more »
A friend who works for Verizon told me that since CenturyLink already has a presence in New Jersey Phil, so that’s why there’s the rumor they might be interested in acquiring the wireline from Verizon in that state. As far as Windstream, they have a small presence in Boston from what I was told. I agree that they don’t have the money and are taking CAF II funds which they badly need. I’m not convinced Verizon wants any of the wireline. You have extensively reported on the company wanting to completely exit out wired networks within 10 years. Same goes… Read more »