A group of Republican senators are warning the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission he’d better not touch statewide bans on community broadband networks.
In a letter sent to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, Republican Sens. Deb Fisher, Ron Johnson, Ted Cruz, Mike Enzi, John Barrasso, Pat Roberts, Lamar Alexander, John Cornyn, Tom Coburn, Tim Scott and Marco Rubio slammed Wheeler for his willingness to override or ignore state laws co-written by cable and telephone companies that banish municipal broadband from providing any competition.
“The insinuation that the Federal Communications Commission will force taxpayer-funded competition against private broadband providers — against the wishes of the states — is deeply troubling,” said the senators. “Inserting the commission into states’ economic and fiscal affairs in such a cavalier fashion shows a lack of respect for states’ rights,” they said.
Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, Time Warner Cable, and other operators are among the campaign contributors of the nine senators.
Echoing the sentiment of the cable and phone companies, the Republicans called community owned broadband “an unnecessary and risky government liability” and warned Wheeler there would be consequences if he was serious about ignoring the state laws, many enacted with the assistance of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
“State political leaders are accountable to the voters who elect them, and the Commission would be well-advised to respect state sovereignty,” said the senators. “We look forward to your timely response, and we hope you will think critically about the Commission’s role and how it can more appropriately interact with our state authorities.”
Community broadband has largely been the only wired competitor facing off against cable and phone companies. Consumers have a much bigger chance of seeing a municipal provider in their community than Google Fiber or another overbuilder.
“Those are nine senators that moonlight for Comcast and AT&T I won’t be voting for,” says Stop the Cap! reader Tom Resden who shared the story. “Municipal broadband balances a playing field that has favored big cable and phone companies for years. These are the same type of senators that 100 years ago would have opposed municipal power and co-ops, willing to leave people in the dark rather than allow a player that answers only to customers get traction. It’s not a state rights issue when the corporations wrote the legislation their well-funded lackeys in statehouses around the country helped hurry into law. What we are really talking about is the corporate right to suppress competition.”
Any head to head comparison rate tables, to share,with the monthly fee schedules for customers in existing Community Owned Systems providing broadband, cable Tv, and telephone v. commercial providers in nearby communities?
Actually, I just looked at the Chattanooga service website, and if I create a “custom bundle” with the top service for each sect, excluding premium channels and DVRs /”smart networks”, it comes out to around $155. In CT, if I go with Comcast’s top option for each sect, it would be in excess of $450, with a data cap. How I envy them…here’s the site anyways: https://epbfi.com/enroll/packages/#/fi-tv-gold&fi-speed-internet-100&fi-phone-basic On a side note, many people in Texas hate Cruz now. Even military family I have there, who are die-hard Republicans, want to see him gone. Everyone knows to take what he says… Read more »