AT&T today announced it was selling off its residential wireline network in Connecticut to Stamford-based Frontier Communications for $2 billion in a deal that includes an expanded license for U-verse TV that could eventually be available to Frontier customers nationwide.
Frontier will assume control of the Southern New England Telephone Co. (SNET), a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T, and its 2,700 employees and 900,000 telephone lines. Included in the deal is AT&T’s U-verse network in the state and the right to expand U-verse TV into all 27 states where Frontier provides service. The deal comes three years after Frontier paid $8.6 billion in stock and cash to buy landline operations in 14 states from Verizon Communications.
In a Stop the Cap! exclusive story published last year, we reported Frontier was interested in acquiring licensing rights to the U-verse brand to potentially offer its customers a unified product suite of television, broadband, and phone service over a fiber to the neighborhood network. Maggie Wilderotter, CEO of Frontier Communications, told the Wall Street Journal the deal between AT&T and Frontier had been on the table for years waiting to be finalized. With today’s announcement, AT&T New England president Patricia Jacobs acknowledged Frontier will use the U-verse name at a secondary brand for video service. Frontier now relies on satellite reseller agreements to bundle video service into its packages for consumers.
Frontier’s acquisition will give the company hands-on experience with AT&T’s U-verse network in Connecticut and offer a path to bring improved service to Frontier customers elsewhere. Company officials also acknowledged a key reason for the transaction was boosting Frontier’s lagging dividend, a critical part of its share price. By taking on nearly 1,000,000 new customers, Frontier will boost its cash flow, returning some of that new revenue in a higher dividend payout to shareholders. But the company will take on an extra $2 billion in debt to manage higher dividend payouts.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. arranged the financing for the acquisition and Frontier will likely raise about $1.9 billion from debt markets by selling bonds. Frontier already has $8.13 billion in debt on the books, much of it acquiring landlines originally owned by Verizon.
AT&T’s departure from Connecticut was no surprise to analysts. AT&T operates most of its landline network in the midwest, south, and in the state of California. The company has focused primarily on serving business customers and its wireless network in the northeast, not residential landlines. Frontier described the deal as a perfect fit for Connecticut residents, because Frontier specializes in residential phone and broadband service.
“AT&T has been trying to sell its rural wireline businesses for some time,” Gerard Hallaren, an analyst with Janco Partners Inc., told Bloomberg News. “It looks to me like Frontier cherry-picked a nice asset at a nice price from AT&T.”
SNET began operations in 1878 as the District Telephone Company of New Haven and pre-dated the Bell System. The company founded the first exchange and printed the world’s first telephone directory. It remained independent of Bell System ownership until 1998, when SBC Communications (formerly Southwestern Bell) acquired the company. In late 2005, SBC purchased AT&T and AT&T Connecticut was born.
Over the past seven years, AT&T has watched customers decline from more than two million customers to fewer than one million. AT&T introduced U-verse to improve its position in the market to mixed results. The company’s investments in fiber upgrades have not been as profitable as its wireless network, likely leading to today’s sale.
AT&T says it is not leaving Connecticut altogether. The company plans to keep business and wireless customers in the state.
Much of the proceeds from the deal will be invested by AT&T in its wireless network, mostly to help pay for 4G LTE upgrades. The rest will be spent bringing U-verse to more customers in the midwest and southern U.S.
The acquisition faces regulator approval from both the Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice, likely to be forthcoming in the first half of 2014.
Frontier executives promised shareholders the deal will result in $125 million in cost savings over the next three years — code language for layoffs. Some of them are likely to be among the 2,400 workers represented by the Communications Workers of America, which has had a contentious relationship with AT&T Connecticut over job cuts in the past.
The trouble is that FTTN gives the worst of both worlds.
It doesn’t really save any money over FTTH because the remote cabinets are expensive, and it offers inferior service.
This is a great deal for AT&T but a bad one for Frontier.
Not particularily surprising for a couple of reasons. 1. Connecticut supposedly has the most difficult union local in all of AT&T. 2. ATT Connecticut ex SNET was never part of the original Bell system to begin with and has been somewhat independent. 3.Connecticut is a long ways away from AT&T’s other service territories. 4. Frontier happens to be based in Stamford. For this reasons expect easier regulatory approval. Future: A Frontier buyout of Fairpoint New England? Or of CenturyLink New Jersey? Connecticut is a very wealthy and urban state. Does this give Frontier an opening to try to move into… Read more »
On our local OTA TV stations lately, Xfinity/Comcast has been running frequent commercials touting themselves over AT&T U-Verse.
Funny thing is that NO ONE in this TV market of Peoria-Bloomington, Illinois has AT&T U-Verse!
So, Xfinity/Comcast has been wasting their $$$$$, running down a non-competitor!
UNLESS, Frontier is bringing U-Verse here, which I strongly doubt.
Frontier has a hard enough time keeping copper and 3MB DSL going.
They seem afraid to offer anything faster than 3MB DSL.
I think they run saturation advertising for “competitive” internet services just to bamboozle the decision-making class. I see all kinds of ads on cable at the gym that say Comcast will give me $200 if they can’t improve my business internet connection, but no, they won’t give me the $200 because I am not in their service footprint.
They want legislators and investors to think everything is fine, and many of those people will believe what they see on TV.