Home » Consumer News »Online Video » Currently Reading:

Time Warner Entertainment Chief Denigrates Young and Cable-Nevers

Phillip Dampier November 20, 2012 Consumer News, Online Video 6 Comments

Bewkes

What cord-cutting?

The “other” Time Warner — the separate entertainment company no longer affiliated with Time Warner Cable, has a chief executive who regularly downplays the threat of cable customers dropping television service and switching to alternate forms of online viewing.

At a conference in New York, CEO Jeff Bewkes said cord cutters largely fell in two categories:

  1. Low income households who could never afford cable and still can’t;
  2. Wealthy kids who grew up without cable television, still don’t have it now that they are living on their own, but can easily afford “three Starbucks a day” and don’t mind paying just about any price for the cost of content they actually want.

Bewkes cannot understand what people are complaining about when they open their monthly cable bill. After all, he argued, the value of  cable television and broadband have gone up with larger channel packages and speed upgrades without major price hikes.

But Bewkes’ definition of “major” may differ from those in middle class households who cannot afford rate increases that far outpace inflation year after year.

For now, Time Warner signaled it intends to remain loyal to the “all-or-nothing” cable package. That makes the chance of finding their entertainment shows available a-la-carte or online on-demand without a paid subscription pretty poor.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Houle
Paul Houle
11 years ago

I might be in both category (1) and (2) I grew up in in a “poor” family that would never spent the money for cable. Heck, kids made fun of me because my mom tried saving money by sewing me my own clothes! I went to college and fell out of the T.V. habit. When I was in grad school I moved into a house where we had cable, but my future wife and I became very ideological in this time period and one day woke up to the fact that the cable bill meant that “they” had all the… Read more »

AP
AP
11 years ago

I’ve pretty much lived on cable TV since I was born in 1986, from the time I was allowed to watch TV in the late ’80s up to 2009, cable TV was at it’s best. Nickelodeon was a diverse kids channel with live action shows that had actual “plots” and “comedy flare, and even the classic NickToons! Those were the best times of my early childhood. In the late 90’s I was introduced to a new TV channel known as TV Land, that was an EPIC channel! It had everything from Ed Sullivan, Andy Griffith Show to the not-so-known shows… Read more »

David
David
11 years ago

One catagory he forgot, probably the most important. Those that believe in getting what they pay for and don’t appreciate being taken. Nobody likes paying for a large channel package only to find a dozen channels worth viewing. Thankfully those days are slowly coming to an end.

Scott
Scott
11 years ago
Reply to  David

Actually, that’d be a No on “coming to an end”.. Our former FCC Chairman Michael Powell is saying it’s not at all our cable companies fault, that it’s the content producers like the NFL and Disney that are at fault.

https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/20/3670940/michael-powell-fcc-chariman-cable-companies-mercy-contet

Seemed more like a way to deflect blame without any solutions to me.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!