Home » Consumer News »Data Caps »Editorial & Site News »HissyFitWatch »Verizon »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Verizon Wireless’ In-Store Support Hell – Crossed Signals, Mixed Messages, Long Wait

Phillip Dampier July 12, 2012 Consumer News, Data Caps, Editorial & Site News, HissyFitWatch, Verizon, Wireless Broadband 23 Comments

You gotta love Verizon’s $30 upgrade fee to provide customers with the level of service and support they have come to expect. I’d rather deal with “no credit, no refunds, no checks” CricKet.

Verizon Wireless customers pay a $30 “upgrade fee” when purchasing new equipment with a new two-year contract, ostensibly to “provide customers with the level of service and support they have come to expect.”

After losing more than an hour of my life yesterday afternoon inside a Verizon Wireless store, I am here to tell you it isn’t worth it.

For the second time in seven months, Verizon Wireless has taught me they specialize in keeping customers waiting, giving them conflicting information, and proving the employees should be availing themselves of the “Wireless Workshops, online educational tools, and consultations with experts who provide advice and guidance on devices that are more sophisticated than ever.”

The latest nightmare began with an upgrade to Samsung’s Galaxy S3 that arrived with two 4G SIM cards that were initially declared useless-on-arrival. Despite early assurances that a customer service representative should be able to manage the activation of the phones without loss of our coveted unlimited data plan, it turned out a visit to a local Verizon Wireless store was recommended to swap out the 4G SIM cards enclosed in the box as part of a slightly-complicated activation.

Walking into the Pittsford, N.Y. Verizon store brought a feeling of trepidation when I realized my friend “the Verizon Wireless Welcome Kiosk” that I had been signing in at during previous visits was now missing. Instead, the store manager, armed with an Apple iPad, registered me for the inevitable queue of customers waiting for assistance.

“The wait should be around 15 minutes,” the store manager promised.

Nearly 30 minutes later, as I watched what seemed to be the only employee not on break deal with Ms. I-Don’t-Know-and-I-Can’t-Decide, the store manager returned to ask why I bothered to show up in-store to activate phones I could have managed online or by phone.

“Because I was told to,” I explained. “I have two phones that require new SIM cards and special attention to ensure I don’t lose my unlimited data plan.”

“Well, you have to activate them first,” came the reply.

That was news to me, of course, when a Verizon Wireless phone representative an hour earlier warned me specifically not to activate the phones and let a store customer service representative handle everything.

“Please don’t even attempt to activate the phones because I have had customers doing that all day who forfeited their unlimited data plans when they tried,” urged the phone representative. “You need to bring everything to the store and make sure they do it for you because I don’t want you inconvenienced.”

Good intentions, but reality always intrudes.

Phillip “Kill Me Now” Dampier

By now, 35 minutes into my 15-minute wait, several additional frustrated customers trickled in, all with the same phone. One found he couldn’t activate it even when he tried. Another needed his assigned a different number. Again, the store manager insisted the customers activate their phones before approaching a store employee.

As I wearily watched Ms. Indecision -still- taking up the time of the employee that was going to serve me next, I heard other customers casually griping about upgrade fees, the new Share Everything plan, and Verizon’s idea of customer service these days. The consensus: Verizon was shaking down their customers for more cash and also punishing people forced to walk into a store to resolve a problem. Pittsford is one of Rochester’s wealthiest suburbs, and even here customers were tapped out.

I have literally been here before. Back in December, at the same store, a remarkably unhelpful Verizon Wireless employee insisted the problems with my last phone, intermittent they might be, were not his problem if he could not exactly duplicate it while I waited. Since he did not have time to try (but had at least 15 minutes to chat up a young lady that preceded me about his holiday pie-making experiences), I was on my own, just as my warranty was set to expire.

He no longer works there.

As each new customer arrived on this remarkably warmer July day, the store manager warned the wait was growing longer and longer. He didn’t mention the customer -still- at the counter contemplating this or that and holding up the entire free market wireless economy in the process.

At this point, I was advised I could activate my phones by dialing *228 and I’d be all set. Only a year earlier, a Verizon employee told me 4G LTE customers should burn their fingers with a cigarette lighter if they ever felt the urge to try, because it would “scramble the SIM card forever.” True or false, I felt burned already.

I decided instead to call Verizon Wireless customer service, ironically, from inside the Verizon Wireless store that was supposed to be giving me “the level of service and support I have come to expect.”

“Due to (incredibly) high call volumes, your wait (is likely to be until the snow flies before someone will pick up your call).”

I then realize there are two other customers doing precisely the same thing I am, which probably explained those high call volumes.

Mr. Store Manager returned to ask if I had activated my phones yet. I explained I could not get through, but was bemused to notice the phones had now powered up with messages indicating they were in the process of activating themselves.

An hour into my 15 minute wait…

“That’s because you had your phones turned on,” came the odd explanation. “You have to turn the phones off before you call customer service.”

“I don’t think so, I seem to recall my Samsung Droid Charge activated itself in a similar fashion,” I replied.

“No, that isn’t how it works.”

Two minutes later, the phones activated themselves. I’m not certain I’ll ever know exactly why, especially after being told I had dud 4G SIM cards. But I also found it ironic that even a confused customer like myself, now dying in my personal Verizon hell, seemed to know more than the people working there, and I didn’t even take that Wireless Workshop.

Regardless, I was elated that stage of my trial had come to an end. Now I only had to have an employee swap those SIM cards out to assign the phones to the proper phone numbers. Then I could escape my excellent customer experience for good.

But there was Ms. Should-I-or-Shouldn’t-I, still tying up the growing line (the wait had now grown to perhaps an hour for customers entering the store… at their own risk.)

Suddenly, an employee miraculously returned from break and I was finally helped.

“You want insurance on these phone, right?”

“No.”

“But you have 14 days to change your mind.”

“No.”

“Which phone do you want on which number.”

“Since the phones are precisely the same, it does not matter to me.”

Those were the days.

Long pause.

The employee kept dropping below the counter to deal with an interminable number of snake-long thermal cash-register-like receipts that kept spitting out of the printer whenever he did anything on the slowly-responding computer.

After another 15 minutes, the new 4G SIM cards were in.

“Now let me show you some of the cool new features on your phone, but first enter your name and password.”

I compromised by entering my name and password but suggested we skip the training course. Besides, my personal lease renting space inside the store (and my new 2-year contract) was likely to expire before I would finally get out of there.

“We have some nice new cases to show you to protect your phones.”

“No thanks.” Now I am questioning why I bought the phones in the first place.

“Okay, now it is time to restore your apps.”

Kill me now.

As soon as the phones were up and running, back into the boxes they went, and polite thank-yous were delivered to all concerned. I then busted out of the store, more than an hour after my promised 15-minute wait, like a prisoner escaping Attica. Sure I realize I am not “free at last,” stuck on a new contract with Verizon for another two years, but I can do my time standing on my head so long as I can avoid ever dealing with another Verizon Wireless store… and keep my unlimited data.

They should pay me $30 to go through upgrading anything with them. Oh wait, just a year or so ago they did — $100 as part of Verizon’s long-gone “New Every Two” program… exorcised right along with their budget-minded voice calling options, unlimited data, and text plans suitable for the occasional text here and there. In their place, the all-new, super exciting $90 Share Everything plan… including $50 for a “generous” 1GB data allowance.

Thanks Verizon Wireless!

0 0 votes
Article Rating
23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lou Grinzo
Lou Grinzo
12 years ago

None of this surprises me, frankly. The notion of “good customer service”, in the old fashioned sense of that phrase, has either totally evaporated or been relegated to extremely high-end retailers or brothels. When my wife and I recently had to replace our ancient-by-2012-standards phone because of a hardware failure, we decided to completely skip the smart phone route, and get a Casio Ravine 2. But when we shopped in the Verizon store in Henrietta (also a Rochester ‘burb for those not familiar with The Flower City), even that process was painfully slow. And the price they quoted us, including… Read more »

Aaron
Aaron
12 years ago

It’s funny, I read these horror stories from people who are extremely dissatisfied with the level of support they receive, and I wonder, how do these folks show their dissatisfaction to a company that overcharges for service yet provides such horrible support? They enter a new 2 year agreement? That oughtta show ’em that you mean business! 😉 The only message Verizon gets out of this is “our customers must not be too unhappy, because they keep coming back for more” so really you are just making the problem worse for yourselves and the rest of Verizon’s slave….er, customers. Why… Read more »

Scott
Scott
12 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

The answer is pretty simple, for most people when 80+% of the wireless market is controlled by Verizon and AT&T.. your choice is either worse customer service or even more abysmal customer service and cellular coverage. The entire consumer market isn’t so dumb that nobody hasn’t considered alternatives, if there was a viable quality wireless provider with good customer service it would provide a good choice, but not a market dominated by two providers that have an almost 10 yr lead squeezing customers for all they’ve got then using those funds to further consolidate and protect their comfy duopoly while… Read more »

Tim
Tim
12 years ago
Reply to  Scott

Go prepaid. I went prepaid and it feels good not being tied down in a contract for 2 years. In my area, we went with Cricket and their $55/month Android plan (unlimited call, text, and data). Got my Sprint EVO 3D flashed for Cricket and it works perfectly on their network. Total bill for 2 phones, $112 w/ tax compared to ~$170 before tax with Verizon or AT&T. The kicker, they have the same coverage as Verizon in my area, as Verizon uses their towers, and where we usually travel they have coverage. @Aaron Totally agree with ya there. If… Read more »

Aaron
Aaron
12 years ago
Reply to  Scott

I understand that the two “big” providers is what most people think are the only options, but how did they get so big? People paid them. How do you expect a competitor to have a chance if you ignore what little competition there is and continue to give your money to the big guys? Little guys need money to grow their networks and cover more areas or improve speeds. If 20% of Verizon’s/AT&T’s customers all left and got plans through Straight Talk or Cricket or Sprint or T-Mobile or someone else, don’t you think that perhaps the big guys would… Read more »

Tim
Tim
12 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

@phillip How did people ever live without cell phone coverage to begin with? 🙂 I find it surprising that people have to have that coverage when we did without cell phones for so long. Phillip you do realize that Cricket have roaming agreements with Sprint and Verizon, just to name a few? They offer Nationwide coverage now through those roaming agreements, which cost you nothing extra. Just can’t rack up the majority of your minutes/data roaming just like any other carrier out there. So your little countryside trip would be covered bud. 🙂 Guess what, you can even flash Verizon… Read more »

Tim
Tim
12 years ago

That must be your area then. Mine the signal strength is great. The old lady had to take a trip to a rural part of SC and she says she still has good signal (iPhone 4s). I have gotten 2.21Mbps on Cricket’s 3G in some parts of town and usually get 1.2-1.5Mbps at the house.

Anyway there has to be a prepaid provider that has better rural coverage up there that you are overlooking. Those postpaid plans are getting out of control. Verizon is already trying to get rid of the unlimited plans. .

Frank
Frank
12 years ago

Verizon’s the most reliable for overall connectivity. Thing is…they every so often don’t get their billing right. 9Gb of data in 12 hours is the *theoretical* maximum for the 3G link I am currently using. There’s no way in HELL that I wouldn’t have noticed it happening and cut the f*cker off- and there’s no way in HELL that I could have even done it (At work, girlfriend was off looking for housing possibilities…all machines except for one was OFF. Machine in question was a Linux box…so, no virii, etc.) Sorry, not buying your BS- and I used to work… Read more »

|Rob
|Rob
12 years ago

His choice would be AT&T. A company much worse than Verizon.

This is what happens when we have a corrupt political system that allows huge corporations to buy off and own our politicians. Do you think Congress is going to give the FCC teeth so they can properly regulate the wireless industry and break up the duopoly? It will never happen as long as AT&T and Verizon can legally donate (legal bribe) any member of Congress. Essentially Congress works for AT&T and Verizon. Senators and Congressmen are employees of big telecom.

Aaron
Aaron
12 years ago
Reply to  |Rob

“His choice would be AT&T.”

Or Sprint or T-Mobile or Straight Talk or Cricket…I know, perhaps you would have to make a slight sacrifice with the network’s capabilities, but at least you wouldn’t be feeding the beast that bites your hand!

Is the political system corrupt? Certainly. Perhaps if the huge corporations had less money to pay politicians they would lose some of their edge. Again, solution seems to be stop giving them money, not continue to give them more money to keep the cycle going…

Frank
Frank
12 years ago
Reply to  Aaron

Heh… People KEEP talking about those players. As if they had the same coverage that Verizon does. Keep dreaming. Some people travel. Most of those are a joke when it comes to that. Sprint’s unlimited data access is great…until you need it in a market they don’t care about or are a distant third or fourth. Cricket? Good God…you’ve NEVER apparently tried them for data, have you? Network’s “reliable” but they don’t seem to have a solid handle on billing. At. All. Don’t know about Straight Talk, but I’m suspecting they might be adequate for voice- but with a smartphone… Read more »

Tim
Tim
12 years ago
Reply to  Frank

Cricket works great in my area and I get really good 3G speeds, which is all I need really on a phone. I will grant you that they may not have the best coverage elsewhere though but for the most part they serve my needs just as good as Verizon could.

If you ask me, it is crazy to pay for the postpaid plans. The prepaid options out there are just as good if not better.

Aaron
Aaron
12 years ago
Reply to  Frank

“There’s a REASON the ‘big two’ are that way-” Yes, and one reason is silly misconceptions like “I strongly suspect they’re [Straight Talk] little better than the other wanna-be players in the space.” You see, Straight Talk rents the same networks used by Verizon/AT&T/etc. Like the coverage you get from Verizon? Do some research, get the right phone and you’ll be using that same network you had when you were a Verizon customer, except with Straight Talk you’ll get unlimited talk, text & data for $45/month. And again, how can a smaller competitor grow their network to expand coverage or… Read more »

jim
jim
12 years ago

After reading this article and all your complaints I seriously understand why verizon and all companies charge these fees. You people are complete idiots including the guy who wrote this article. So if I dont ask you if you want insurance then break your phone you can come blame the rep for not asking if you want it. The reason a rep double checks everything is cause customer are jerks and think the companies owe them the world because they pay 100 dollars a month to a company thats cost billions to operate correctly. Same with accesories. If the rep… Read more »

jim
jim
12 years ago

Obviously you have no clue what your talking about and like most bloggers on the net do no research as well. Third party companies provide the insurance not the wireless companies and the sales rep do not get paid for selling insurance. They simply offer it to help you if you are irresponsible and break your phone. You say the assecories are over priced how do you know this. Do you make the accesories or are you comparing these accesories to the ones you can get at the dollar store that are known for ruining batteries and chargings parts. Or… Read more »

Lou Grinzo
Lou Grinzo
12 years ago

There you go again, Phillip, resorting to facts and logic again. I mean, you do realize that this is the Internet, where such things are frowned upon, right? On a slightly more sane note, there simply is no way for companies like Verizon to justify their practices and pricing except for them to say, “We do it because we can.” As I pointed out at the top of these comments, I bought a basic phone, and the price difference between buying it at Best Buy vs. in a Verizon store was $100 ($180 vs. $80). I don’t know who should… Read more »

Roger
Roger
12 years ago
Reply to  jim

A. Paragraphs are your friend.

B. There might be good information or comments in there but I stopped reading when you went for the personal attacks. You sound like you should be working for Fox News.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!