Home » Broadband Speed »Charter Spectrum »Community Networks »Competition »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »TDS Telecom » Currently Reading:

Minnesota’s War on Broadband: Competition Killing Bill Introduced in Legislature

Sen. Linda Runbeck, a dues-paying member of ALEC, a corporate funded pressure group that advocates for legislation advantageous to ALEC's corporate sponsors.

Rural Minnesota is facing a full frontal assault on community broadband, courtesy of a state representative so proud of her involvement in a corporate front group, she’s actually a dues-paying member.

State Sen. Linda Runbeck (R-Circle Pines) introduced HF 2695, a bill to prohibit publicly-owned broadband systems:

A bill for an act relating to telecommunications; prohibiting publicly owned broadband systems; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 237.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. [237.201] PUBLICLY OWNED BROADBAND SYSTEM; PROHIBITION.

(a) Notwithstanding section 475.58, subdivision 1, other state law, county ordinance, or any authority granted in a home rule charter, a city or a county may not use tax revenues raised within its jurisdiction or issue debt to construct, acquire, own, or operate, in whole or in part, a system to deliver broadband service.

(b) Notwithstanding sections 123A.21, 123B.61 to 123B.63, 125B.26, and 475.58, subdivision 1, no school district or service cooperative may use state revenues, tax revenues raised within its jurisdiction, or issue debt to construct, acquire, own, or operate, in whole or in part, a system to deliver broadband service.

(c) For the purposes of this section, “broadband service” means a service that allows subscribers to access information from the Internet by means of a physical, terrestrial, non-mobile, or fixed wireless technology.

(d) This section applies to a system to deliver broadband service whose construction begins after the effective date of this section, but does not apply to:

  1. the city of Minneapolis, St. Paul, or Duluth; or
  2. the maintenance or repair of a system delivering broadband service whose initial construction began before the effective date of this section, provided that the geographical area in which the system delivers broadband service is not expanded as a result of the maintenance or repair.

EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.

The public broadband option delivers the most bang for the buck, which is why some providers want to see it banned.

Runbeck is a dues-paying member of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a secretive corporate front group that lobbies lawmakers to introduce business-friendly legislation, often on the state level.  Runbeck told the Minnesota Independent via email that she paid $100 for a two-year membership in the organization, and says she’s never used ALEC’s “model legislation,” bills that are sometimes written by corporate members of the group and that pop up in state capitols across the country.

But Runbeck’s sudden interest in banning community broadband coincides with similar efforts in states like Georgia and South Carolina backed by big cable and phone companies.  Runbeck’s bill would directly target rural Minnesota, where broadband is the least robust, while exempting Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth (and incumbent phone and cable companies) from the bill’s provisions.  Runbeck’s bill also constrains existing public broadband services from expanding, an important matter for providers still rolling out service to additional neighborhoods in their communities.

Community broadband is already hampered in Minnesota by laws that make such projects difficult to approve and build.  When projects do break ground, incumbent providers do everything possible to throw up roadblocks to delay or abort the progress being made.  In Monticello, TDS Telecom filed nuisance suits against that city’s public broadband network before finally deciding to upgrade service themselves.  Mediacom and Charter, two major Minnesota cable operators, have objected to public broadband projects that don’t even serve communities they’ve wired.

When the networks are in operation, providers like Charter work to undercut them by selling service at prices so low, they’re predatory.  But when competitors are driven out, prices rise… quickly.

 Runbeck’s $100 membership in ALEC is paying dividends, if you are a big incumbent cable or phone company. Consumers will pay much more than that if broadband competition is curtailed.

 

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
digitlman
Guest
digitlman

Sickening.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Lee: If their equipment can not reach the download speed they sold you that is fraud. No it will not be a constant speed that matches what they sold, but i...
  • Lee: If the TV packages disappear the price of the streaming services will increase. The people who produce the content will not willingly sell for less....
  • Ann Warner: Is altice service available for tracphone users in Beaufort County?...
  • Rick: I don't think I have ever run into a more poorly run company. A single phone line cost $110 per month - far more than most alternatives. VM stoppe...
  • Anthony: I ordered mine and I have my own modem and router. Got it yesterday....
  • beverly: I've tried to stay a Frontier customer, but they just don't want to have me. They've done nothing to keep me, they promised a discount because we have...
  • Janeth: Eventhough they still will not refund you the money. They gave me a bogus tracking number for a refund. They are a scam....
  • Paratroop: I worked for them for nearly 20 years then the merger took place. Took me just 2 years to figure out I gots to go. Now this crap is stupid. I took ...
  • Fred Jones: I wonder who is going to be transmitting 4K OTA TV. I can't find any info that any of the 4 major networks have any plans for this....
  • Armando Trevino: Sir, your company is not focused on customer service. Rude people. I keep receiving documents in Spanish even though I am an American Veteran who o...
  • Jerrdale: Looks to me like P.T. Barnum was correct. All these complaints, yet I found this site by researching before spending money. People, never, ever believ...
  • T.B.Told: After Frontier dumped yet again 10 more channels Starz/Encore we decided our contract was null& void. We were promised a credit which we never saw...

Your Account: