Roku CEO Anthony Wood told a cable trade publication he is not worried that providers will kill the market for his online video set-top box with Internet Overcharging schemes.
Wood told Multichannel News the broadband industry faces enough competition to prevent one or both traditional providers from implementing usage caps and metered pricing for broadband service.
“What we see from a practical point of view in the marketplace is that there’s enough competition from cable, telcos and wireless so that in every market there’s an unlimited option — and the price is competitive,” he said. “Unlimited sells — it’s just a good marketing strategy.”
Wood may want to inform broadband providers of that, because several American phone and cable companies are experimenting with slapping usage limits on their customers, making his web-streaming set top box an expensive proposition. For customers of Frontier Communications in Elk Grove, Calif., using too much Roku could mean broadband bills as high as $300 a month.
With some HD movies consuming 2-4 gigabytes per title, some companies experimenting with usage limits as low as 5GB per month would make online video the primary culprit for consumers blowing through their monthly usage allowance. After one bill with overlimit fees arrives, the Roku box will be the first thing to go.
Netflix, a major investor in the Roku box, could see its plans to shift to online distribution of its massive DVD rental business stymied by large phone and cable providers, many of whom see Netflix and other online video services as competitors who use their broadband service to send movies to consumers. Some cable and phone companies contend Roku, Netflix, and other online video streamers are freeloaders — using their networks “for free” and demanding additional compensation to keep carrying their content.
Wood discloses another reason why cable and phone companies could potentially adopt a hostile position towards his 100-employee operation — “cord cutting.”
Wood told Multichannel News about 12% of Roku customers say they have canceled cable or satellite TV after buying the set-top while another 12% said they reduced their service level.
The cable industry is trying to retain customers by putting an increasing amount of cable content online for subscribers who maintain their cable-TV package. Roku gives subscribers one more reason to downgrade or cancel service, a problem that could be stopped with an Internet Overcharging scheme that makes using the product an expensive proposition.
Some Roku watchers believe Wood is making a mistake underestimating the telecom industry’s willingness to protect its turf.
Two years ago Roku VP Tim Twerdahl said the company was not worried about Comcast’s 250GB download cap. But since then, other providers have proposed far lower caps.
Roku is best known for letting Netflix subscribers stream the video rental firm’s online titles direct to television sets. But Roku also delivers access to Hulu, Amazon video, and a growing number of new “channels” delivering classic movies, music/music videos, news, and user-created programming.
The company offers three set-top models: HD ($60), which delivers up to 720p video; XD ($80), which adds support for up to 1080p and 802.11n Wi-Fi; and the XDS ($99), which offers dual-band 802.11n and component video and optical audio outputs. The top model occasionally sells for as little as $79.99 when on sale from Amazon.com or direct from the manufacturer.
[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Introducing Roku.mp4[/flv]
A brief video introduction to Roku. (1 minute)
Netflix must allow users to select the “Quality Level” that they want for each film. If I am under a bandwidth cap, I should be able to select “Very Low” quality, and watch a film in under 250MB. At least then, I can control the amount of data that I use.
Someone needs to tell Mr. Wood that his cheese is moving.
“there’s enough competition from cable, telcos and wireless so that in every market there’s an unlimited option — and the price is competitive”
Oh, well I’m glad HE knows all about this this, I’ve been looking for MONTHS for another broadband provider in my area besides Comcrap and there’s NOTHING!
Also wait until we see what’s happening in Canada right now. Not only are there NO unlimited internet providers, it’s illegal.
Keep in mind Mr. Wood’s statement is sadly being directed towards to Wall Street only to keep the company stock price from dropping. Netflix has always had their head in the sand about the state of internet service competition and unlimited access in the US. Anyone with half a brain on Wall Street should be dumping their stock as there’s no way a Netflix customer is going to choose their limited streaming service over having to face a $100, $200, or $300 bill once surprise overages get tacked on their metered service. I wish I could have more faith in… Read more »