Texas Broadband Mapgate: Ag Commissioner Under Fire for Financial Ties to Connected Nation’s Backers
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples in under fire for choosing Connected Nation, a telecom industry-financed mapping group, to draw broadband availability maps for Texas. Connected Nation has close financial and organizational ties to the nation’s largest telecommunications companies, several of which have also contributed heavily to Staples re-election campaign.
Critics contend Staples should have never chosen Connected Nation for the project, especially when two of its biggest backers — AT&T and Verizon, both made substantial campaign contributions towards his re-election. Staples also owns small amounts of stock in both companies, according to a report published yesterday in the Dallas Morning News.
The Texas mapping project has been condemned by smaller Internet service providers for leaving them off the map altogether while providing plenty of details about large phone and cable company offerings. For consumers shopping for broadband service, who is on the map may have a considerable influence over which provider they pick.
“They hit the big guys,” James Breeden, founder of LiveAir Networks, which covers rural parts of Central Texas told the Morning News. “I didn’t even know they were putting together a broadband map until I saw it on the news and went ‘Oh.’ Then I logged in and went, ‘Oh, really!’ ”
He said he couldn’t find his company or two nearby providers on the map. Some areas didn’t show the correct distributor. Others named one when none existed. “The map is just off. It’s not technically accurate,” he said.
As Stop the Cap! reported earlier, maps produced by Connected Nation are notorious for favoring the telecommunications companies that back the mapping group, in addition to being just plain inaccurate. But more importantly, their maps downplay broadband availability problems and conveniently serve the industry’s position that America doesn’t have a broadband problem. Connected Nation maintains tight control over the raw data, citing provider confidentiality agreements. That makes reviewing the data for accuracy impossible.
“It’s a scandal, a total scandal,” Art Brodsky, communications director of Public Knowledge, a public interest group that follows digital culture said in the Morning News piece. A longtime critic of Connected Nation, Brodsky has tracked the nonprofit since Kentucky officials accused it of overestimating broadband availability several years ago. The agency that grew into Connection Nation started there in 2001.
Brodsky said nondisclosure agreements make it difficult to see who really benefits from the mapping process.
The controversy has become campaign fodder for Democratic Ag Commissioner candidate Hank Gilbert, who has been bashing Staples in the press for spending taxpayer money to produce maps that benefit his campaign more than the people of Texas.
“Staples and … [the Agriculture Department] are willing to let a bid go to a company with such close ties to the telecom industry,” said Vince Leibowitz, Gilbert’s campaign manager. “That means they’re not doing their job as a consumer protection agency.”
Other groups given the opportunity to apply either were not given enough advance warning, or simply never heard anything back from the state.
Five other organizations responded to the Agriculture Department’s request for proposals. Luisa Handem of the Austin nonprofit Rural Mobile & Broadband Alliance said her group never heard back.
“We didn’t think the process was transparent,” she said. “We’re not even sure they looked at our application.”
The Agriculture Department restricted the opportunity to nonprofits, based on its interpretation of federal law. The agency told the University of Texas at Austin it could apply, but officials didn’t think they could complete the proposal in a month. The Agriculture Department said the federal government set the timeline.
Go wireless if u can. I’m goin Clear even though I know it’s Sprint’s network… Anything to get away from the cable company ball and chain. I consider myself fortunate to live in a place that offers a high speed wireless connection.
Like I said the minute I saw the maps, these suckers are flawed. On one hand, I’m un-enthused enough about our local WISP that I don’t think they should show up on the map, however I feel for :LiveAir and the like; that particular company offers 3 Mbps symmetric service for $30 per month if you pay up front for your wireless radio…lots of places in TX can’t even get 3 Mbps up, so that’s actually pretty awesome. But they don’t show up on the map…wonder why.