Home » Broadband "Shortage" »Broadband Speed »Competition »Data Caps »Editorial & Site News »Google Fiber & Wireless »Video » Currently Reading:

If Your Provider Won’t Give You Real Fiber Optic Service, Google Might – Think Big With a Gig – Nominate Your Community

Google plans to offer up to 1Gbps service on its direct to the home fiber network

Google has announced it is doing something about anemic, overpriced, and poorly supported broadband service in the United States.  It’s going to start providing service itself.

In a move that is sure to drive providers crazy, Google is looking for your nominations for communities that are stuck in broadband backwaters, desperate for an upgrade.  With so many suffering from “good enough for you” broadband speeds, threats of “inevitable” Internet Overcharging schemes like usage limits and consumption billing, or customer support that involves reaching more busy signals than helpful assistance, they won’t have to beg for nominations.

Google is planning to launch an experiment that we hope will make Internet access better and faster for everyone. We plan to test ultra-high speed broadband networks in one or more trial locations across the country. Our networks will deliver Internet speeds more than 100 times faster than what most Americans have access to today over 1 gigabit per second, fiber-to-the-home connections. We’ll offer service at a competitive price to at least 50,000 and potentially up to 500,000 people.

From now until March 26th, we’re asking interested municipalities to provide us with information about their communities through a Request for information (RFI), which we’ll use to determine where to build our network.

I can think of a few cities that were victimized by providers in 2009 who have little chance of seeing true fiber optic service any other way.  Rochester, New York, the Triad region of North Carolina, parts of San Antonio and Austin bypassed by Grande Communications’ fiber network, are all among them.  Rochester has the dubious distinction of being stuck with two providers itching to slap usage limits and consumption billing on their customers – Frontier and Time Warner Cable.  Since Verizon FiOS is popping up all over the rest of New York State, residents in the Flower City concerned about being left behind might want to make their voices heard.

Google plans to deliver 1Gbps… that’s a Gigabit — 1,000Mbps service to its fiber customers at a “competitive price.”

While some in the industry consider such speeds irrelevant to the majority of consumers, Google thinks otherwise:

In the same way that the transition from dial-up to broadband made possible the emergence of online video and countless other applications, ultra high-speed bandwidth will drive more innovation – in high-definition video, remote data storage, real-time multimedia collaboration, and others that we cannot yet imagine. It will enable new consumer applications, as well as medical, educational, and other services that can benefit communities. If the Internet has taught us anything, it’s that the most important innovations are often those we least expect.

What’s in it for Google?  Targeted advertising, guaranteed open networks, an improved broadband platform on which Google can develop new broadband applications, and calling out providers’ high profit, slow speed broadband schemes are all part of the fringe benefits.

For providers and their friends who have regularly attacked Google for “using their networks for free,” Google’s fiber experiment deflates providers’ hollow rhetoric, and could finally provide a warning shot on behalf of overcharged, frustrated consumers that the days of rationed broadband service at top dollar pricing may soon be over.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Google Think Big With a Gig Announcement.flv[/flv]

Google released this video announcing their Think Big With a Gig campaign (1 minute)

This isn’t Google’s first experience with being an Internet Service Provider.  The company has experimented with free Google Wi-Fi service in its hometown of Mountain View, California since 2006.

[Update 2:30pm EST: FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski applauded Google’s experiment: “Big broadband creates big opportunities,” he said in a statement. “This significant trial will provide an American testbed for the next generation of innovative, high-speed Internet apps, devices and services.”

The Washington Post has a source that claims Google “doesn’t currently have plans to expand beyond the initial tests but will evaluate as the tests progress.”  That could mean the experiment also serves a public policy purpose to re-emphasize Google’s support for Net Neutrality, and to deflate lobbyist rhetoric about Google’s support for those policies being more a case of their own self-interest and less about the public good.  If Google can run its networks with open access, they essentially put their money where their public policy mouth is.]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TM
TM
14 years ago

Rochester would be a perfect place to try this. We have no real choice currently between providers. IF offered to residents her I bet so many would take it so fast TWC’s head would be spinning long after the last customer handed in their modem. it would be a real wake up call.

Paul
Paul
14 years ago
Reply to  TM

Agreed; Phillip any chance in using your connections to see if we can’t get our locals to start dropping Rochester out there as a viable test subject?? 🙂

Matt
Matt
14 years ago

I left a voice mail and emailed David Mayor, the Chief Information Officer of the City of Rochester informing him of the program. I encourage everyone who lives in Rochester, or is part of the Rochester family in some way to do the same in hopes of pushing him to take a stab at getting Rochester some Google juice.

[email protected]
585-428-7026

Rob
Rob
14 years ago

Sounds like a great idea. I would love Monroe county to be a test market! Doubt that will happen. I wonder who I should write.

Ian L
14 years ago

As for Republicans, they’ll be all over this if they have half a brain…it’s a private company after all. I think Google is partially doing this to show that private entities really can offer high-end services, they just aren’t at this point. Show that they can offer the services and public entities don’t have to step in, causing regulation which Google dooesn’t particularly want.

Dan
Dan
14 years ago
Reply to  Ian L

“If they have half a brain…”

Giving them a lot of credit…

me
me
14 years ago
Reply to  Dan

You are giving both sides too much credit this is politicians we are talking about here…

Smith6612
Smith6612
14 years ago

Just as a heads up Phil, in the line: “Google plans to deliver 1Gbps… that’s a Gigabyte — 1,000Mbps service to its fiber customers at a “competitive price.”

Gigabyte needs to be changed to Gigabit 🙂

Sounds like a good project Google is doing here though. Hope it goes towards someplace that would really use 1Gbps of connectivity. Rochester would be a nice spot. Shows both Time Warner and Frontier what’s the boss 😛

PreventCAPS
PreventCAPS
14 years ago

I would love to see Rochester on the list. We have many universities (RIT, UR) and big corporations (Kodack, Xerox) and the benefit woudl be great! However, we in Rochester forget that being able to get DSL at 7Mbps from Frontier is like gold for those areas that barely get 384k from their provider, if DSL is at all available. On paper, we have two broadband providers offering advertised speeds in excess of 5Mbps and that’s a heck of a lot better than many other places.

Stew
Stew
14 years ago

I vote Beaumont Texas area. Time warner and ATT colluded to put in cap limits. Google would cause a mass exodus from them both.

Jason
Jason
14 years ago

Sad thing is it’s taken this long for a company to get the initiative to try this, what we really need is a national plan to roll this type of service out to every community in the United States until we can hit that 90-95% coverage at a fair price and an open connection available to other potential service providers.

Then Google can laugh the next time the Cable Co’s or AT&T makes noise about wanting to charge access fees for carrying google traffic and they come up with 4x the fees for providing transit to the last mile.

wildcat293
wildcat293
14 years ago

I nominated Rochester, I hope others also show their support!

Rash
Rash
14 years ago

Great, so 1 gbps would also mean you would need to have a relatively new computer to support the hight speed lan network and also if you need to go wireless, you may need the wireless lan adaptor. Cool stuff from google

Smith6612
Smith6612
14 years ago
Reply to  Rash

You’d need a Gigabit NIC and a half-decent CPU to even use Gigabit speeds. Gigabit has theoretically less overhead than Fast Ethernet has on it so it isn’t as CPU intensive so to speak. It’ll be more of an issue with one PC trying to download that fast. Not even my gaming machine which has some really fast spinning drives in a RAID array will handle the write speeds for long. Downloading at 128MB/s (if you can ever find a server that will go that fast) would fill up my 8GB of RAM like crazy while the drives try to… Read more »

Tim
Tim
14 years ago
Reply to  Smith6612

Yea Gigabit NIC’s are pretty common nowadays so it wouldn’t be a problem. My mainboard has two of them. The bottleneck is like you mentioned, your storage medium speed. Having a fast drive will help a lot, RAM drive or a good SSD. A couple of guys with 1Gb connections posted their download speed off of their Usenet provider. The original poster got 356.1 Mbps/44.5 MBps with a RAM drive and another got 377Mb. This is with 256 SSL on, which adds a little overhead, and there are probably slight limitations with Newsbin at those speeds as one of the… Read more »

Bob in Illinois
Bob in Illinois
14 years ago

Thru this process, Google will accumulate a FREE, large database of US broadband speeds from thousands of communities and individuals.

Will be curious how much info that Google will share, after the RFI deadline, on how many responses that they had.

Mark
Mark
14 years ago

I think we would be an excellent community to give this a try. With verizon not wanting to bring fiber to Rochester, its like we are the red headed step child of New York when it comes to the internet. Here is a link to the blog that also gives a little more info:

https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/think-big-with-gig-our-experimental.html

I also reached out to David Mayor and 13wham.

Matt
Matt
14 years ago

Whoever gets the call, please let everyone else know how it went.

PreventCAPS
PreventCAPS
14 years ago

I read todays D&C article (http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20100212/NEWS01/2120347/Will-Google-make-Rochester-s-Internet-connection-faster?&referrer=NEWSFRONTCAROUSEL) and find it amusing that Frontier is downplaying the impact this could have and that TWC had no comment… —— A Frontier spokeswoman Thursday said Google has a poor track record of following through on such proposals and that creating a fiber-optic network from scratch would be enormously expensive. However, she said, Frontier would be willing to talk about leasing space on its existing network. “If Google built its own network, we estimate it would cost $5,000 per household,” said Ann Burr, chairman and general manager of Frontier Communications of Rochester. She said most… Read more »

Tim
Tim
14 years ago
Reply to  PreventCAPS

I think Google has probably already hammered out the details of how to deploy a fiber network or else they wouldn’t be doing this. If it wasn’t cost feasible, they wouldn’t even go past step 1. Google, IMO, have people that can think “out-of-the-box”. I hope they succeed with this because it would be a veritable slap in the face for the existing ISP’s. Also, they talked about leasing out the network to others so this could be a way for them to recoup costs, I would think. And I hate to tell her, that if Americans had that kind… Read more »

Paul
Paul
14 years ago
Reply to  PreventCAPS

Statements like this from Burr are the reason why Frontier still has their heads buried deeply in their nether-regions and refuse to get off from DSL… Some of the copper lines their network is running off from were laid when the phone was a new concept.

blarg now I feel ill…

Smith6612
Smith6612
14 years ago
Reply to  PreventCAPS

The real question is: Does Frontier even have the BACKBONE capacity for such a service? I don’t know how much capacity their backbone and peering points have to work with but I do know that their routing to New Jersey tends to get Jittery and sometimes latency plugged some nights (20ms extra latency than normal).

David Mandery
David Mandery
14 years ago

This would be totally awesome, if Rochester could get this. Even if just certain communities in Rochester. I’d want to move to that community in Rochester, if it isn’t where I currently live. Also if another city gets selected, I wonder how many people would want to move to that city, just for the 1gigabit Internet connection. There are so many things one could do with that kind of connection. Friends that you have on the same network would basically be on your “LAN”, speed wise. Imagine, sharing HD video between households, distributed Media Center HD recordings (enabling sharing TV… Read more »

Cloud Windfoot Omega
Cloud Windfoot Omega
14 years ago

wish they would also come to Canada for testing too, would be the best. unfortunately that wont happen now will it *sigh* Internet dark ages has hit us now.

Rob
Rob
14 years ago

It looks like Ontario county jumped on the bandwagon leaving us poor Monroe county folks in the dust. I’m pissed!!

http://www.13wham.com/news/local/story/Ontario-County-Pushes-for-Ultra-Fast-Google/sGwKwwCqWUyzAqnsVTNVQQ.cspx

Kamaal Ahsan Majeed
Kamaal Ahsan Majeed
14 years ago

Come to NW Houston, please please please! All we have here is Comcast and U-Verse. : )

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!