[Editor’s Note: The fast-changing news on the Time Warner metered usage plan and its temporary demise did not allow sufficient time to present a full history of media coverage of this issue across all of the affected areas. For historical documentation, and in case of any potential resumption of this type of plan, I feel it is important to have this material archived here for future reference. Some of the information in this news report may no longer be applicable.]
“Sorry to burst people’s bubble.”
Five words I’ll bet Time Warner’s Regional Communications Vice President Jim Gordon wished he could take back. Before the eventual “shelving” of the rationing plan (temporarily in our view), you could really begin to sense the growing frustration from the company about the fact they had created a public relations nightmare for themselves with a tiering system that no customer clamored for, and most adamantly opposed. But those five words, which seemed to dismiss concerns of customers, was actually a major turning point in this battle. That evening’s news report on Rochester’s most popular newscast caused a mad dash as constituents called and e-mailed the area’s congressional delegation, as well as state and local officials, complaining about the “dismissive attitude” many came away with from Time Warner. It also brought an avalanche of e-mails here from customers claiming that was the last straw and they were switching providers.
The anchor found the use of the gas gauge concept interesting. So do we. It’s a great reminder of what people in this country went through last year when insufficient competition and the quest for extreme profits sent pricing into the stratosphere. The OPEC of the Internet is an apt term to describe operators trying to meter their way to even fatter profits.
![thumbs-up3 thumbs-up3](https://stopthecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/thumbs-up3.jpg)
Not rated. This was not aired. It’s an extended interview for the web. It does offer some excellent insight into the talking points and philosophy the company was using locally to push this plan on consumers. “Why Rochester… the great news is” turned out not to be the sort of framing most people here were impressed with. The speed issue for lower usage customers is not that important. It is for the “power users” who are punitively capped at ludicrously low proposed tiers. The answers don’t get any better beyond that, especially the nonsense about companies “failing” when not preparing for the future. This from a company with a broadband product that is highly profitable, added 11% more customers in 2008 and decreased investment in its network infrastructure by the same percentage to serve those customers. You can rebut them yourself in the comments section. The plan that Rochester overwhelmingly thought was right for us is the one we have right now.
I am confident that we will win this war, maybe not today but eventually,
The future of cable TV is dead TWC is going to have to realize that sooner or later;
And i want this now please
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/technology/20adobe.html?_r=1&ref=business
This goes hand in hand with something I posted in one other comments section here. Internet TV is only a couple years away if that long. TWC is worried about the lost revenue that will mean for them.
It is so sad. I could burn up a gig in minutes. Show me the hard numbers, Tell me where the net will be a year from now, Tell me how it is not going to affect us, Tell me anything except the canned script your reading from.
What was the point of Chuck Schumer’s visit? I mean TWC had no intent of stopping or even putting there plans on hold. Everything is still going to roll out as planned.
How are you so sure that this is true ?
North Carolina TW officials are making lots of noise that they fully intend to bring back the caps by fall after the “education campaign.” There is a question whether this city will endure them again, but that doesn’t matter to this site’s mission. Caps anywhere are bad.
They can take their education campaign and stick it. Has your dsl equipment arrived yet Phil ? I am seriously thinking about making my one year commitment to Frontier very soon.
Nope… still nothing. Not sure what is going on with them. The installed version would have been in by the 14th.
Sadly I’ve found that my area, (Ogden) doesn’t even offer Frontier DSL, (they don’t service my area,) so I’m SOL as it were… I can either go TW or Earthlink… which would likely follow TW’s line with the caps…. gravy…
That is unfortunate Paul R. I am closer to pulling the trigger and ordering DSL. After trying it here in Webster last year I had discovered that it offered very decent speed in our location. We mainly had started having trouble with some latency issues, but I suspect that by now ( one year later ) that Frontier may have addressed that issue. ( at least one of their senior techs had told me back then that they were going to implement solutions, but it may take a shortly while to do that )
Same here, I was thinking of downgrading from turbo before all this started to save a few bucks. Now after all this I’m thinking of going with Earthlink and if they start using caps I’ll switch Verizon DSL.
Paul I can tell you a story that will make you laugh. For more then a year Frontier had a green distribution box (what ever you call those things) at the corner. I could throw a stone and hit it yet for a very long time I was considered out of range. We are talking like a 100 feet. I thought it was funny, Phil thought it was funny but it is the truth.
Really this is ridiculous, why would I care if my bill DOESN’T change? They have been saying that people who use LESS, would be paying less, this is not the case, right now hes saying, people who use LESS will pay the same, and people who use more will pay MORE. This is bullshit, and really the reporter should have called him out on his spinning of the words. Time Warners stance was that the current price model wasn’t fair, but if your bill doesn’t change then whats the fuss about? Time Warner really needs to hire some people who… Read more »
When i watched the 2nd video towards the end, why does it sound like this clown said that we will need to pay more for dosis 3 when it’s available. From my understanding the Telecos and cable companies were requeired by law to upgrade to dosis 3. Another thing that seems odd is shouldn’t they upgrade everyone to dosis 3 anyways as it has a much higher bandwidth distrubution compaired to dosis 2. I don’t know it just doesn ‘t add up for me. I’m on the 10/1Mb package with RR which if the caps come to L.A. Calif. i… Read more »
I wondered when someone would notice the bizarre description of DOCSIS 3 he gave. The presumption is that DOCSIS 3 upgrades would occur across the network. Modems would need to be exchanged to take advantage of the different technology, but eventually, the older DOCSIS system would be mothballed.
Broadband service is unregulated, so no law mandates that a system operator upgrade their network, unless it’s part of the franchise agreement signed between the local community and your cable company.
the US is already paying more. with lower speeds then the rest of the world. and now they want to charge more. WTF!!!