Home » Video » Currently Reading:

Unintended Consequences? How Usage Caps Can Take Away A Fundamental Right to Communicate for Deaf Americans

Phillip Dampier April 20, 2009 Video No Comments

[Editor’s Note: The fast-changing news on the Time Warner metered usage plan and its temporary demise did not allow sufficient time to present a full history of media coverage of this issue across all of the affected areas. For historical documentation, and in case of any potential resumption of this type of plan, I feel it is important to have this material archived here for future reference. Some of the information in this news report may no longer be applicable.]

Although Time Warner has temporarily shelved the caps they were intending to dump on us this summer, there is every indication the caps will be back by the fall, if company officials have any say in the matter.  But usage caps to solve network bandwidth issues have plenty of unintended consequences.  In Rochester, the enormous deaf community is at significant risk of losing access to a vital, affordable way of communicating.  What the hearing community may take for granted as a convenient extra is, for those who need to communicate in other ways, a fundamental rights issue.

Sometimes the unintended consequences of a public us vs. them campaign, pitting active vs. casual broadband users, have unintended casualties.

WHAM-TV in Rochester picked up this important story before the cap plan was shelved, for now.

thumbs-up4A very important angle to this story, particularly for the enormous deaf community in Rochester.  It sheds light on videophone technology, which allows members of the deaf population to sign, using a broadband connection.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!