Yesterday, Stop the Cap! raised the issue of how exactly Frontier Communications can offer access to the various “extras” the company offers to broadband customers all while limiting them to 5GB of consumption.

A number of readers have shared exactly the same concerns, not only with us, but the company as well.

It is interesting watching our concerns here get answered with shifting policies and vague promises over there, both on the Frontier website and  in replies to customer inquiries.   Unfortunately, they keep digging the hole they’ve gotten themselves into deeper and deeper with every passing day.

Intentionally or not, Frontier has now stepped on the landmine of the Net Neutrality debate.

Stop the Cap! reader William received a reply from Frontier that was  remarkable for its less-than-certain tone, and the latest company line:

I can certainly understand your frustration and confusion on who’s
statement’s to follow.

Unfortunately at the present all we know is what we have been told about the situation and that is that we (Frontier) are reserving the right to charge or terminate service for those that exceed the cap.

Currently feedback such as yours is being recorded and passed on to those that are in charge of this proposed change.

The email your received is correct, we are not currently enforcing this policy and we have been informed that, at the present, the plan is to start the enforcement part of the policy in December or January. Again that is the current time table we have been made aware of.

I do know that we have been made aware that certain activities such as carbonite backup and other services we offer can be excluded from the bandwidth usage. I wish I could offer more information with regards to the plan, unfortunately what was/is published is what there is to know at the present. We are passing all feedback to higher levels and it is possible the plan may change before it goes live so to speak.

I know the above does not answer all your questions, unfortunately since the plan is not finalized I can only offer what information I know to be accurate at the present.

There are several points raised in this reply.

First, it’s clear that those contacting Frontier’s support team should recognize the support personnel  are absolutely not responsible for the corporate policy decisions being made by management in Connecticut.   It is patently obvious to a lot of readers who have heard back from Frontier that there is no great enthusiasm for a usage cap  among a lot of folks working for the company.   We have always tried to draw a strong line between those responsible for these usage caps – upper management, and the employees who are stuck having to implement them.   We have nothing but good things to say about the support people who are in a tough position on this issue.

Second, our own sources have confirmed the timetable outlined in this reply from Frontier’s support personnel.   And again, that is entirely a management decision.

Frontier Steps on Net Neutrality Landmine As It Digs the PR Hole Deeper and Deeper Over a 5GB Usage Cap. (Slowpoke used by permission, copyright 2006, Jen Sorensen - Visit http://www.slowpokecomics.com.)

Third, Frontier’s newest acknowledgement that they are considering excluding their preferred partners from the usage cap now opens the can of worms over the Net Neutrality issue.

Certain telecommunications companies have been attempting to change the Internet as we know it today.   Currently, every online service has an equal shot on the network.   But some companies want to change the playing field, by offering selected partners “enhanced” access to customers, faster data networks, and more prominent placement, either by paying a higher fee or entering into a partnership with an Internet Service Provider (ISP).

A “preferred partner” quickly becomes the cream rising to the top, not based on their merits, but rather by their deep pockets and willingness to pay their way to  number one.   Better yet, such partnerships allow both companies to reap the  rewards  gained from driving  more  subscribers to the content they wish to promote, and enjoying the enhanced  advertising revenue which often accompanies such services.

More alarming are efforts to manipulate customers by penalizing them for accessing non-preferred content, and a  usage cap or bandwidth limitation on those services that lack  a  preferred partner  agreement is a great way to accomplish that.

This doesn’t just manipulate the playing field, it destroys it, giving enormous advantages to a select few.

Such agreements will  devastate a lot of start-up companies that have brought the most creative and revolutionary new services to the Net.   Virtually all of these companies would not exist without reaching out to  investors for initial financing.   In a world without Net Neutrality, inevitably one of the questions that will be asked is whether or not that start-up has any “preferred relationship” with a bandwidth provider.   If that company does not, questions will be raised about the viability of that venture, especially if usage caps and bandwidth limits are widespread.   And once an agreement is made, how does someone new break through?   Under these conditions, expect a number of investors to simply take a walk.

Stop the Cap! has  previously raised questions about ISP’s making an end run around Net Neutrality by imposing  caps but exempting content  or services accessed from that provider’s  web portal.   That has always been our  prediction, but until today, there has not been a real world example of that practice in action or imminent.

Now, Frontier Communications is poised to prove us right once again by potentially giving cap-free, preferential treatment to their partners, but sticking it to  every other video content provider or  online backup service where the 5GB cap will apply.

Ask yourself: Would you use an online service that consumed significant bandwidth that was subject to a usage cap or one that was exempted from it?   Is this what you are paying for every month – to be told what services and sites to visit and effectively penalizing you for choosing to make up your own mind?

It’s just one more reason why usage caps are an incredibly bad idea, and one that actually invites government scrutiny, if not direct oversight.   It’s an issue we intend to raise with our elected officials.   I’m certain Frontier Communications had no intention of being a poster child for the issue of Net Neutrality, but as we’ve seen time and time again in the short time Stop the Cap! has been online, there is a fundamental disconnect by upper management in understanding the implications and consequences of what they thought would simply be a great way to enhance profits and reduce “excessive usage.”

We have completed a software upgrade which should help improve the viewing experience for those still using Internet Explorer 6.   It also should have corrected a few minor formatting issues for certain browsers.

In other site developments:

1. I have cleaned up our categories and tags.   As the site grows larger, readers will find it easier to locate articles about their specific ISP or issues that impact them the most.   The Categories tab on the left of your screen will grow as articles appear relating to other service providers or broadband platforms.   When you click the category name, all articles regarding that category will be displayed to you in date order.   The tags and categories are also more uniform and standardized.
2. Our first wave of comment spam began about 24 hours ago so we enabled some spam prevention tools which should purge most of it before it becomes visible.   If you use our Comment feature, which is available on every article here through a link just below the headline, please note that occasionally legitimate comments may be held up until they are approved by me.   In most cases, doing things like putting more than two links in a comment or using key phrases or words which might be commonly used in spam may get the comment placed in the “waiting approval queue.”   Please allow a few hours for me to get that comment approved.   We do not censor legitimate comments, even if they disagree with the author (or other comments).   But please be respectful and avoid personal attacks on other people here.
3. The latest comments  across all of our articles  can now be seen  on the left side of your screen just below the list of recent articles.   I would prefer to see more of the actual comments displayed instead of just the subjects, so  look for an improvement soon.
4. Traffic on this site has grown dramatically since we went live at the end of July, and there has been some site drag because of the intense interest in this subject.   If you’re new, welcome aboard.   If you’re a regular reader, it’s greatly appreciated.   We will be moving to a new server shortly to provide a better experience for our thousands of readers.
5. If you experience any problems accessing or viewing the site,  find an error, or have any comments or suggestions, please use the Contact link at the top of the page and let us know!   Your news tips, story ideas, and ongoing participation really make this a better site for everyone.

Thanks again for the tremendous support and your steadfast opposition to usage caps and bandwidth limits.   Together we can continue to send a strong message to any provider that takes  customers for granted and attempts to manipulate the facts  to justify charging  more money for less service.   Keep up the fight!

Free Press, a media reform group, issued a damning report (Adobe Reader required)  Friday about efforts by the broadband industry to introduce metered or capped Internet access plans, accusing the industry of engaging in scare tactics and making an end run around the Net Neutrality debate.

“Consumers should not have to choose between secret and arbitrary blocking and the very unreasonable practice of metering,” said S. Derek Turner, research director of Free Press and author of the policy brief. “That is a false choice, one most providers don’t even consider necessary or practical. These scare tactics shouldn’t deter anyone from pursuing the policies we need to preserve a free and open Internet.”

Among the conclusions of the brief:

• It is a false choice to suggest that since Internet service providers cannot arbitrarily block online content, they will be forced to meter. There are a whole host of other non-discriminatory options available to providers that are more effective at managing congestion.
• Talk of metering is not new and has nothing to do with the FCC’s laudable decision to prohibit providers from blocking applications. Cox has had bandwidth caps in place since 2003 but was still caught blocking applications. Time Warner floated plans to meter as early as 2002.
• Metering is the wrong solution for Internet users. History shows that consumers strongly prefer simple, flat-rate pricing to metering. They do not want to look over their shoulder and face surprise higher monthly bills. This is likely to encourage all subscribers — not just high-bandwidth users — to curb their Internet use.
• Metering is bad business for Internet service providers. Not only does it decrease Internet use, it discourages the development of and demand for new and innovative applications that give the Internet its value. ISPs that meter are likely to see a subscription drop that hurts their bottom line.
• Congestion should be treated as a short-term problem, while continued investments are made to keep pace with demand. Offering simplicity and abundance is the best outcome for users, providers and the future of the Internet.

Stop the Cap! applauds Free Press for joining an increasing number of industry watchdog groups and consumers vehemently opposed to price-gouging usage caps and highly arbitrary caps on Internet access.   In the United States, broadband providers attempting to drum up attention for a so-called “bandwidth crisis” have proposed usage limitations ranging from 5GB per month to 250GB per month, with each proposal considered “effective” at controlling usage.

So many features that Frontier associates with your DSL account become largely useless with the imposition of a 5GB cap on monthly usage, as many have you have written to share.

Rural, among others reminds us that Frontier’s ESPN360 service provides Frontier customers with live streaming of up to 10 simultaneous game streams.   Partnering ISPs like Frontier offer access with no subscription fee, so their customers can use their broadband connections to watch some great sporting events.

With Frontier’s newly planned 5GB usage cap, ESPN360 becomes ESPN5, because it won’t take long to hit your usage cap with this service, which streams at speeds starting at 768kbps!

The HD Web: Akamai's plan to help meet the demands of HD quality video online are easily threatened by draconian broadband usage caps, such as the one planned by Frontier Communications.

Even more devastating, points out reader Tom, is Frontier’s partnership with Dish Network, which offers customers an HD Digital Video Recorder.

“This HD DVR also allows Dish Online for PPV which is content downloaded through the broadband connection,” Tom writes.

“Ironically though, should you sign up for their phone/internet/dish offer, you would quickly reach the cap if you used the PPV service,” he adds.

It’s not just HD content from Dish that is threatened with a 5GB usage cap.    Akamai, an industry leader in content distribution, has launched a cutting edge demonstration site for the kinds of broadband video content that will be commonplace in the next few years, most of which consume between 7.5mbps for 720p content, 13.5mbps per second for 1080i content.    For an average high definition quality movie, that is the equivalent of consuming  5-9GB for just one film!

Given these encoding rates, a typical half-hour television show encoded for TV quality at 4-6 megabits per second results in a file size of approximately 450 Megabytes, and 2.25 Gigabytes for HD quality. A two-hour feature film encoded for DVD quality would result in a 5.4 Gigabyte file, and for HD quality would result in a file size of approximately 9 Gigabytes. — “Akamai White Paper – Highly Distributed Computing is Key to Quality on The HD Web”

Try visiting the HDWeb website with your Frontier DSL service.   These are precisely the kinds of applications that are coming to broadband homes across America,  but Frontier has made the decision for you – these just are not for you.   So much for wanting to deliver the Internet experience their customers want.   With a 5GB cap, these services are strictly off-limits you bandwidth piggy.

William has discovered another ironically named service from Frontier that becomes effectively useless with a 5GB usage cap: Frontier’s Peace of Mind add-on includes an “unlimited backup” solution that will store your precious files on their servers, so they can be recovered in case your hard drive crashes.   But if you are backing up more than  5GB of files, there will be no peace for you.   And, to frost this cake, they say you can use the service on up to five PC’s in your household!

“How can they offer to back up 5 PC’s with only 5 gigs of bandwidth?” he asks.

“One 200 gigabyte hard drive will take 40 months to back up at that rate and take more than  6 1/2 years if I need to recover [all of my] data,” he said.

Anyway you slice your monthly allotment of 5GB, just using the services Frontier itself markets to its customers  guarantees more and more customers will exceed their cap, potentially by huge amounts.   And for families taking advantage of Frontier’s advice for a shared home network, once you bring the rest of the family to your Internet connection, what happens the day the FedEx delivery guy brings you your Internet bill in a box, just loaded with overage fees.   Are you prepared for Internet Bill Sticker Shock?   If you thought that text message-loaded cell phone bill was bad news to the family budget, wait until you discover the kind of Peace of Mind a 5GB usage cap provides a family of four.

[Update: The company has now suggested it may exempt its own partners from any usage caps or limits, but this has not yet been formalized.]

Earlier this week, it actually looked as if Frontier might actually be listening to their customers.   They two-stepped around the threatening exceed 5GB at your peril language in their Acceptable Use Policy by having the delightful marketing people soothe your fears with promises not to cut anyone off or charge anyone extra… for now.

I don’t expect them to change their minds just because we think it’s a good idea.   Customers are calling to cancel or threaten to do so, particularly in Rochester as we spread the word.   Time Warner is signing up a lot of new customers locally this week as folks exit Frontier.   But in other Frontier service areas, it’s apparently still the best kept secret in town and there hasn’t been too much pushback… yet.   That’s not too surprising considering there is really no pressing reason to ever go to the Frontier website, so how would anyone know?

While folks in the call centers are being told Frontier is pulling back on the idea of a cap, for now, that’s not what management is thinking.

Indeed in their minds, it’s not the 5GB cap that’s the problem, it was only the way it was introduced to their customers which caused all of the problems. Has Frontier hired Michael Brown, former head of FEMA?   Who are these people and why are they still drinking the Kool-Aid?

The game plan is still set – find friendly media to tell the story of the fictional “bandwidth crisis,” send mailers home inside phone bills, try and pass the cap off as an idea that Time Warner and Comcast are already contemplating (so it’s all their fault?), and that there is unfairness in the world without a usage cap, as someone down the street steals your bandwidth and doesn’t want to pay his fair share for it.

If Frontier has a game plan, than so shall Stop the Cap!

We have spent a lot of time and attention on Rochester, and we encourage people in the Flower City to continue sending the message that usage caps are not acceptable, and take your business elsewhere.   But now it’s time for us to spread the word to other communities stuck  with Frontier Communications.   If you are living in a Frontier service area outside of Rochester, the time has come to organize and get evangelical about usage caps.   Please either reply with a public comment or send me a private message on our Contact form letting me you want to be part of the Frontier Truth Squad.   Then, we can begin to identify local community forums in which we can spread the message of the 5GB usage cap.   Let’s get it in the local media, spread it around town, and  educate customers about the real facts and their alternatives.   Then let’s help them get signed up somewhere else, and say goodbye to an ISP that still seriously contemplates a 5GB usage cap on their customers even after the negative customer reaction and publicity they are receiving.

There is still time for Frontier to repent and restore its good reputation as an honorable alternative to whatever cable has to sell, but time, and customers, are running out.   Dump the cap.