Home » Broadband Speed »CenturyLink »Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't »Qwest »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

CenturyLink Broadband in Former Qwest Country is a Mess: Slow Speeds, Customers Leaving

Phillip Dampier September 7, 2016 Broadband Speed, CenturyLink, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Qwest, Rural Broadband 4 Comments

molassesOnly half of CenturyLink’s customers in well-populated areas formerly served by Qwest can buy broadband service at 40Mbps or higher, while rural customers fare considerably worse with less than 25% able to get High Speed Internet at those speeds.

Customers have noticed and at least 65,000 canceled their broadband service with the phone company in the second quarter of this year, most presumably switching to their area’s cable operator.

“CenturyLink is by far the most abysmal telephone company I’ve ever had to deal with and I’m 63 years old,” shares Glen Canby in Arizona. Canby is a retired telephone company engineer that spent 40 years with a larger phone company serving the midwestern U.S.  “Their reviews online echo my own experiences, which have ranged from being quoted one price while being billed another, being locked into a term contract you didn’t ask for, and getting only a fraction of the speed they claim to sell.”

Canby is counted as one of CenturyLink’s 40Mbps-qualified customers, yet he actually receives less than 6Mbps service.

But that isn’t what CenturyLink tells the Federal Communications Commission. In a semi-annual broadband deployment report, the company claimed 51 percent of their customers in urban and suburban former Qwest service areas can subscribe to 40Mbps DSL or higher. But whether a customer is “qualified” to buy 40Mbps service is not the same as actually getting the speeds the company markets.

CenturyLinkCenturyLink attempts to cover their claims with fine print attached to their FCC submission: “The numbers shown in this chart reflect the percentages of households served by DSLAMs that are capable of providing the specified broadband speeds.” (A DSLAM is a network device typically used to extend faster DSL speeds to customers by reducing the amount of copper wiring between the telephone company’s central office and the customer’s home. Customers in a neighborhood typically share space on a DSLAM, in effect sharing a single connection back to the phone company.)

“That’s clever of them, because of course the DSLAM is just one link in the chain that ends with the ‘last mile’ between that equipment and my home, and that is where CenturyLink’s phone plant is at its weakest,” Canby writes. “I spent 20 years at a phone company dealing with last-mile DSL speed issues, so they cannot fool me.”

Canby blames the condition of CenturyLink’s infrastructure between the DSLAM serving him and his home for the problems, as well as overselling DSL service by packing too many customers onto a single DSLAM.

“It might be 40Mbps service at the remote end, but it drops to around 6Mbps on a good day by the time it reaches my house,” Canby complains. “Once the sun goes down, the speed drops to 3Mbps, which is a classic case of overselling to me because too many people are trying to share one connection at the same time. It has been this way since 2008 according to my neighbors.”

Back then, phone service was provided by Qwest, the former Baby Bell providing service in 14 sparsely populated western U.S. states — Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Qwest was acquired by CenturyLink in 2011.

centurylink report

CenturyLink has promised to improve broadband speeds for former Qwest customers, but much of what counts as progress has been in more urban areas, while rural customers continue to languish. The company admits just 21.9 percent of rural households can get 40Mbps service. Only 47.6% can buy 12Mbps, 61.3% can get 5Mbps, and 83% can subscribe to 1.5Mbps. That leaves 17% of former Qwest customers with no broadband options at all. CenturyLink did not break out the percentage of customers that meet the FCC’s 25Mbps minimum speed definition of broadband.

“This is why CenturyLink loses customers to cable operators who have no problems trying to deliver internet access over their network, because it was built to support more bandwidth,” Canby shares. “They can usually deliver the same internet speed to customers no matter how far out they live while phone companies deal with a network built for making phone calls, not data.”

Company officials recognize they could do better and have promised investors another 2.5 million customers will be able to reach 40Mbps by the end of 2017. By the end of the year after that, CenturyLink hopes to reach 85% of customers with VDSL2, bonding, and vectoring technology to achieve 40Mbps service for most customers in their top 25 markets. But rural customers are likely to left waiting longer because of the costs to upgrade Qwest’s copper-based network, especially in smaller states like Idaho, the Dakotas and Wyoming.

“The only answer is cable or fiber broadband, and if you live in a small community it could be years before CenturyLink gets around to you,” Canby writes. “If it’s the same story all over town, I’d start advocating for a community-owned fiber network and not sit around and wait for CenturyLink to act, especially if there is no cable company in town.”

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. Dan says:

    Telcos often have no idea what they can actually offer because the DSLAM and B-RAS congestion metrics are collected at a higher geographical level than the echo traces for DSL qualification. Why they let their engineering teams get away with these shortcomings is another matter. But the copper scrap price per pound is probably a sensible way of valuing their non-fiber outside plant until telcos’ engineering and marketing teams learn how to share information.

  2. LG says:

    Count me as one of the fleeing customers. The best connection I can get from them is 25Mbps down 1.7 up. I pay a “promotional” price of $47, and the regular price is $84 / month. I chose this underwhelming service to begin with over Comcast, because I heard about Comcast setting bandwidth caps and wanted nothing to do with it. I called CenturyLink and asked for a few bits of info.. 1) What is the REAL price.. NOT promotions. I told them I didn’t want to argue about price every 6 months. ANSWER: “Our monthly price for the 25Mb/s plan is $47”. And that’s not a promotional price? It’s the permanent one? ANSWER: “Yes”. These were lies. I got the $86 bill 6 months later. 2) (and this is the most important) .. Is there a bandwidth or download CAP? ANSWER: “No, there is no cap. It’s unlimited” (the woman actually told me that I’d get speeds above the 25.. that she had a friend who was getting 60-70Mb/s!) LIES, and.. LIES. It’s throttled right at 25, and besides metering on my own I have a “White Box” attatches being monitored by something called “SamKnows” / FCC thing, so I am certain. Now I hear there is indeed a cap.. 250Gb! 250Gb? Are they CRAZY? I’m the only one using this service and I regularly top 400Gb on my PC alone, never mind the Xbox. There’s an irony here in the fact Comcast had to increase their cap to 1Tb, and in most areas (including mine), there is none at all. So the ONLY reason I chose this ugly service is that I didn’t want a cap.. and they just took the ONLY reason away.

    I moved to southern Florida 2 years ago from Boston. Back there I had 150 down 20 up for $50 / month from a company called RCN. I loved it. Especially since there was also NO CAP!

  3. Joe says:

    Last time I checked, I could only get 3 Mbps down, I’m in a suburb of Houston, TX. I’m forced to use Comcast, which I can at least get promo deals for, but it’s like pulling teeth to do so.

  4. DSL-Hell says:

    CenturyLink is the most horrible ISP I’ve ever had to suffer with. And Comcast isn’t any better. As of 2017, in my area, the fastest D/L speed I can get is 7Mbps DSL from CenturyLink. Comcast doesn’t even bother to compete with a broadband service. If I didn’t know better, I’d swear they are colluding with each other. My only other option is Satellite, which is a joke due to the latency that is quite literally astronomical.

    Of course, knowing all this, CenturyLink gets away with imposing a hefty premium for sub-standard service levels. I am easily paying double what my friends just 12 miles away pay, and they get speeds that are 5+ times what I am getting.

    Then there is all the other shady CenturyLink practices. Like the mystery changes, where you have to call them several times to have the charges removed and credits issued, and then bills that start going up $1 a month every month, for months on end, without any notice and for no apparent reason, other than the fact that I am stuck in their captive audience.

    But, I bet someday that a class action lawsuit for all this is REALLY going to hurt!

Search This Site:


Recent Comments:

  • A: I got notice for price hike from Nov 2017, this is 3rd time price hike since 2015...
  • Roger: Better get your tin foil hat tuned up, Dave. The idea behind the ACA was a noble one. The idea of mandatory health insurance was to build the pool o...
  • Limboaz: What!? No mention of anti-trust hawk Paul Weiss being nominated to head the FTC? He needs to break up the tech behemoths, like Comcrap, Slime Warner, ...
  • Dave: How long before democrats force households to buy cable so they can get “real news”? If they could force us to buy health insurance, then why would th...
  • JayS: Will these price hikes attract over-builders, like Google, to fire-up the trenching machine again? Insight the likes of AT&T, Verizon, T-mobile, S...
  • George: It's a good thing Charter was allowed to buy up Time Warner, or else we'd still have $15/mo cable internet service packages available... If you're no...
  • EJ: Trump and Pia are a blessing in disguise you will see. As long as someone somewhere can muster a decent Bernie type person we only have three more yea...
  • Dale: In our area suddenlink just downgraded the 200mbps from unlimited data to a 350gb data cap. I don't know if this is only for new customers or existing...
  • Larry Gall: This has become far, far too important a resource for the likes of these jerks to control (in it's entirety). The jerks I'm referring to are the Holl...
  • Matt: Until an operator has the guts to give true à la carte options to the customer the trend is just going to continue. Everyone I know who has cut the c...
  • EJ: They better do it while the getting is good. Raise your price and be put on the radar for unfair rate increases. Attempt to sell that you NEED to incr...
  • FredH: If no one saw this coming - they were idiots. Next come the data caps for everyone....

Your Account:

%d bloggers like this: