Home » Broadband Speed »Community Networks »Competition »Consumer News »Google Fiber & Wireless »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

Newest Google Fiber Cities Rely on Pre-Existing Fiber Networks; Is Google Cost-Cutting?

google fiberTwo of Google Fiber’s newest fiber cities will only get the gigabit fiber-to-the-home service because someone else already laid the fiber.

In the last week, residents of San Francisco and Huntsville, Ala. were told they were next in line for Google Fiber service. But instead of proposing to build a citywide fiber network for all residents, Google will rely almost entirely on pre-existing fiber networks they will use to reach customers.

In San Francisco, only an unspecified portion of the metro area will qualify for Google Fiber, namely certain apartments, condos, and subsidized housing units already served by a fiber optic connection. Single family homes and apartments not currently connected to fiber may never qualify for Google’s service.

A Google Fiber executive seemed to signal Google may be taking a harder look at the cost of building fiber service, and future expansion may rely on renting space on someone else’s cable.

“To date, we’ve focused mostly on building fiber-optic networks from scratch,” said Michael Slinger, Google Fiber’s business operations director. “Now, as Google Fiber grows, we’re looking for more ways to serve cities of different shapes and sizes.”

That suddenly makes existing municipal and private dark fiber networks very attractive and in demand. Many municipalities have underused institutional fiber networks that serve anchor institutions, public safety, and government offices. Public access is often limited to non-existent. The prospect of Google paying to use those networks to reach more customers may prove attractive to cash-strapped cities. Private fiber overbuilders and those with excess capacity may also find a new revenue stream renting space to the search engine giant. In Huntsville, Google will have non-exclusive access to the city’s publicly owned fiber network. Any competitor could technically offer their services over the same network.

Competitors and analysts seemed ready to dismiss Google’s latest expansion announcements. Diffusion Group analyst Joel Espelien told the San Jose Mercury News Google Fiber’s plans to wire affordable housing in San Francisco was nothing more than “pure PR.” He’s unimpressed with Google Fiber generally, dismissing it as “Costco Internet,” delivering bulk sized connections at prices most consumers are unaccustomed to paying for Internet access.

“It’s both cheap and it isn’t cheap,” Espelien said. “It kind of depends on your point of view.”

Google’s reasons to offer service to only a few locations in San Francisco are clearly pegged to the costs of wiring the entire city.

“We considered a number of factors, including the city’s rolling hills, miles of coastline, and historic neighborhoods,” Google said in a blog post. All of those features that tourists love to see are also expensive because of costly engineering efforts to hide the cables from view to stay within zoning regulations.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Houle
Paul Houle
8 years ago

Goggle renaming itself to alphabet is a sign of weakness, not a sign of strength. There is something culturally unsustainable about a search engine getting 80-90% of the traffic. It is a huge concentration of power, particularly from the viewpoint of European and other governments outside the U.S. and over time Google is going to be hemmed in with regulators. Back in the 90’s there was a story that no VC would fund a business that went up against Microsoft, and also that the technology press treated Microsoft with kid gloves because Microsoft was just a major advertisers. Well, since… Read more »

tacitus
tacitus
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul Houle

Goggle renaming itself to alphabet is a sign of weakness, not a sign of strength. If the only evidence you have is what’s in the rest of your comment, then you have a very weak case indeed. There is something culturally unsustainable about a search engine getting 80-90% of the traffic. It is a huge concentration of power, particularly from the viewpoint of European and other governments outside the U.S. and over time Google is going to be hemmed in with regulators. I agree that Google has an inordinate amount of power when it comes to searches, but there is… Read more »

77785797
77785797
8 years ago

Google is just using the Dark Fiber to quickly Expand the Google Fiber Service. Why Build out the whole city from Scratch when you can expand whats already there.

tacitus
tacitus
8 years ago

He’s unimpressed with Google Fiber generally, dismissing it as “Costco Internet,” delivering bulk sized connections at prices most consumers are unaccustomed to paying for Internet access.

Seriously? Most consumers are paying at least $70 per month for high-speed broadband for a fraction of the speed Google Fiber provides. If he’s looking at the initial offer prices, then he’s being disingenuous because many customers do not bother to negotiate when their offer is over. Here in Austin, the full price for 50/5 TWC cable is close to $75, including equipment fees.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!