" /> Combined Comcast/Time Warner Cable Would Serve 91% of Latino Households | Stop the Cap!

Home » Comcast/Xfinity »Competition »Public Policy & Gov't »Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Combined Comcast/Time Warner Cable Would Serve 91% of Latino Households

Phillip Dampier April 29, 2014 Comcast/Xfinity, Competition, Public Policy & Gov't, Time Warner Cable No Comments

UnivisionThe head of the country’s largest Spanish-language television network Univision said on Monday that Comcast’s proposed purchase of Time Warner Cable could be “bad for Hispanic audiences.”

Univision President Randy Falco told Wall Street analysts that the combined cable company would serve 91 percent of all Latino households and be the dominant distributor of multichannel programming in 19 of the 20 largest Spanish-language television markets.

“We are hoping at the very least there is that scrutiny and potentially much tougher restrictions added to the existing [Comcast-NBCUniversal] consent decree that will protect Comcast competitors such as Univision who are serving minority communities in particular,” said Falco.

Although Falco did not directly oppose the merger, he did express concern that Comcast would not treat independent Spanish language networks like Univision as well as NBCUniversal-owned Telemundo network. Falco noted Comcast has refused to carry Univision’s sports network. Time Warner Cable does.

“Either Comcast doesn’t understand that soccer is a passion point for Hispanics or they don’t support competitors who have competing services,” Falco said. “My fear is that the latter is the case and this type of anti-competitive conduct would continue.”

Falco is among the first media executives to publicly criticize the merger. Critics of the deal say programmers are keeping quiet fearing future retaliation from Comcast.

 

 

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • bones: To the three leading Republicans.....Here's your sign!...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Wireless 20/20 has a report out that shows TCO over 5 years for wireless is 13% capex and 87% opex. Biz models are clearly messed up. Especially whe...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Over $7,000 per average triple play subscriber. Wonder if the revenues that drive that valuation will get easily disrupted by IP over the next 5-10 y...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): What are the annual franchise fees the city makes off of Comcast?...
  • Milan in Austin: I used this strategy to get $10 off my TWC Extreme Internet service for the next 12 months! A retention specialist called and offered me the current p...
  • Diana Allen: Windstream is a POS and they don't give a crap about their customers because they know we don't have another choice up here in the mountains. Believe ...
  • Tahseen Chowdhury: I tried the twitter method with Facebook. I use MagicJack for phone service and I pay 30 dollars a year. I use Netflix and an Antenna to watch local n...
  • Scott: This merger would be a huge waste of money, there's no way they can leverage DirectTV to effectively bundle and compete with the Cable CO's or Fiber t...
  • Paul Houle: Maybe someday people in Washington are going to wake up to how mad Americans are about broadband disinvestment...
  • A,: If this happened, it would solve the network neutrality issue. Every town that was getting throttled would get a municipal ISP, and they wouldn't t...
  • digitlman: I would say that they are all clueless, but as you said, it is more like they are being paid by Big Telecom to oppose NN....
  • BobInIllinois: Funny that AT&T thinks that they can bundle their service with DirecTV. In Illinois, AT&T's hardwire phone areas are mostly in large popu...

Your Account: