Home » Consumer News »Cox »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Online Video »Video » Currently Reading:

Cox Testing TV Over Broadband, But It Eats Your Monthly Internet Usage Allowance

Phillip Dampier July 3, 2013 Consumer News, Cox, Editorial & Site News, Internet Overcharging, Online Video, Video 1 Comment

flare-logoCox Communications has found a new way to target cord-cutters and sell television service to its broadband-only customers reluctant to sign up for traditional cable television.

flareWatch is a new IPTV service delivered over Cox’s broadband service. For $34.99 a month, customers participating in a market trial in Orange County, Calif. receive 97 channels.  About one-third are local over the air stations from the Los Angeles area, one-third top cable networks, and the rest a mixture of ethnic, home shopping, and public service networks. Expensive sports channels like ESPN are included, but most secondary cable networks typically found only on digital tiers are not. Premium movie channels like HBO are also not available.

The service is powered by Fanhattan’s IPTV set-top box. Cox offers up to three “Fan TV” devices to customers for $99.99 each.

xopop

flareWatch’s channel lineup in Orange County, Calif.

The service is only sold to customers with Preferred tier (or higher) broadband service and is being marketed to customers who have already turned down Cox cable television.

What Cox reserves for the fine print is an admission the use of the service counts against your monthly broadband usage allowance. Preferred customers are now capped at 250GB of usage per month. While occasional viewing may not put many customers over Cox’s usage caps, forgetting to switch off the Fan TV set-top box(es) when done watching certainly might. flareWatch also includes another usage eater — a cloud-based DVR service. Cox does not strictly enforce its usage caps and does not currently impose any overlimit fees, but could do so in the future.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Cox FlareWatch 7-13.mp4

Cox’s brief promotional video introducing flareWatch. (1 minute)

Cool... usage capped.

Cool… usage capped.

Cox spokesman Todd Smith described the introduction of flareWatch as a “small trial,” and that “customer feedback will determine if we proceed with future plans.”

The service is clearly intended to target young adults that are turning down traditional cable television packages. Most of those are avid broadband subscribers, so introducing a “lite” cable television package could be a way Cox can boost the average revenue received from this type of customer. It may also serve as a retention tool when customers call to disconnect cable television service.

The MSO is selling flareWatch at five Cox Solutions stores in Irvine, Lake Forest, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Laguna Niguel.

Customers (and those who might be) can share their thoughts with Cox about flareWatch by e-mailing [email protected] and/or [email protected] Stop the Cap! encourages readers to tell Cox to ditch its usage cap, and point out the current cap on your Cox broadband usage is a great reason not to even consider the service.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/The Verge Fan TV revealed is this the set-top box weve been waiting for 5-30-13.flv

The Verge got a closer look at the technology powering flareWatch back in May. Fan TV could be among the first set-top boxes to achieve “cool” status. Unfortunately, technical innovation collides with old school cable company usage caps, which might deter a lot of Cox’s broadband customers from using the service.  (4 minutes)

Share

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. FrankM says:

    Cox spokesman Todd Smith needs to be told that 97 channels is not a “lite” TV subscription. And $35/month is not acceptable. Neither is the requirement that the customer needs a certain internet service tier.

    The need to compete on price with the Netflix, Amazon, Redbox , and Hulu subscribers. There should be smaller channel packages offered at no more than $8.99 a month.

    Broadcast channels should be an optional, separate package. If you are a cord cutter, you likely know what channels are available for FREE.







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • residential movers NJ: Hey this is kind of of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I'm starting a blog s...
  • Phillip Dampier: Hi, I was unable to get permission to share the report, but in response to your inquiry, I can share their reply that they are using "cash flow margin...
  • Theresa Bailey: Either Mr. Doda is lying, or there is a lack of consistency in following procedure among the Bright House representatives. When I signed up for B...
  • Jim Livermore: Another great report, Phillip. While extortion might be a little strong, it is a response to the 6-strike noise by a third party offering a middleman...
  • txpatriot: Phillip: do you have a link to the E&Y report? The reason I ask is because you refer to EBITDA margin as "cash flow margin". I know what EBI...
  • DeanInNC: I live in a suburb of Winston-Salem where I can get TWC or Windstream. Windstream employees flat out tell people "we suck" as I have to deal with the...
  • Amy: Called today - spoke to a super friendly, easy-to-understand rep in the retentions dept. I was looking at $175 a month plus taxes/fees with my package...
  • Floyd Murphy: I live in rural Oklahoma and have had windstream for three years. No competition means that while paying for three megs and running at kbps and latenc...
  • Martin: This worked really well! i talked them down to $67 on the u300 $30 for the home phone and $37 for the 45mbps internet now im paying $134 a month inste...
  • nicky: This is a total lie to justify increases in data usage. With all of the tech stuff? Only 25 as an average? Right. total bs. What is the avera...
  • Paul Houle: Remember that Kentucky is part of the Appalachian region of the U.S. which is where wireless technology goes to die. That part of the country is cr...
  • Limboaz: You see, the thing is, any money spent by Comcast on customer service is money they can't spend on gobbling up even bigger chunks of the TV, Internet ...

Your Account: