Home » Broadband Speed »Community Networks »Competition »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »Windstream » Currently Reading:

Georgia’s Rural Towns Up in Arms Over Anti-Community Broadband Bill Pushed by Windstream

Windstream is reportedly behind the latest effort to ban community broadband networks in Georgia.

Rural communities across Georgia are upset about a new piece of legislation ghost-written by Windstream Communications that would keep broadband a strictly private affair in the Peach State.

House Bill 282, introduced by Rep. Mark Hamilton (R-Cumming) would prohibit publicly owned broadband networks from being built anywhere an incumbent provider delivers at least 1.5Mbps “broadband” in the state.

Sources familiar with the legislation say Windstream, a phone company primarily serving smaller communities, is the primary force behind the bill now before a legislative committee. When news of the bill came to light earlier this week, consumers and local communities began to push back with state legislators. A planned hearing on the bill has been temporarily pushed back until next week.

The legislation would effectively tie the hands of municipalities that have waited more than a decade for AT&T, Windstream, CenturyLink and other phone companies to bring DSL broadband to rural Georgia.

While not proposing a total ban on public broadband, the bill’s requirement that service be denied to a customer in a “census block” where at least one home can receive slow speed DSL makes building such networks nearly impossible.

gamuniThe Georgia Municipal Association notes local governments in small towns and cities, already strapped for resources, would have to prove to the Georgia Public Service Commission that each census block a community wants to serve has no existing broadband service (census blocks are the smallest geographic area the Census Bureau uses for data collection.)

There are 291,086 census blocks in Georgia, making such a review difficult at best.

For communities that have already built public broadband networks, the bill brings more bad news. Under its terms, existing networks would not be allowed to expand anywhere any other provider delivers even a modicum of “high speed” 1.5Mbps Internet access. With many community networks built out in stages to minimize initial financial outlays, H.B. 282 could ruin the economic cost recovery models under which existing networks were financed and built, potentially risking bondholders.

Rep. Hamilton does not seem to care about them or whether rural Georgia gets Internet access or not. He answers to a higher calling: Windstream’s lobbyists.

gacompThe final report of Gov. Nathan Deal’s Competitive Initiative found rural Georgia at a disadvantage simply because many communities cannot get broadband service. Several regions in Georgia called on Deal’s office to help improve inadequate broadband infrastructure.

Instead, Hamilton’s bill would turn over Georgia’s broadband needs to phone company “Return on Investment” formulas that guarantee large sections of rural Georgia will remain unserved, with other areas left underserved. The bill itself defines suitable broadband at just 1.5Mbps, deemed inadequate by the Federal Communications Commission for today’s broadband user.

The bill’s defenders told The Telegraph the bill was designed to “close off an opportunity for government waste.” The bill also closes off an opportunity for better broadband and competition in Georgia.

“The fundamental question is rather simple: does Georgia want local leaders to determine the economic and investment strategies for their communities or do we want those decisions to be made solely on the business plans of companies based outside of the state,” asked the Georgia Municipal Association.

Georgia residents can contact the House Energy, Utilities & Telecommunications Subcommittee members and tell them to reject H.B. 282. Local municipalities seeking further information about this legislation should contact the Institute for Local Self-Reliance for additional information and guidance.

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. James Cieloha says:

    My own opinions and my own theories about broadband in Georgia can be found at the bottom at:

    http://stopthecap.com/2013/02/12/anti-competition-1-5mbps-is-good-enough-for-you-broadband-bill-before-georgia-legislators/

  2. Jack says:

    Windstream needs to be whiped off the planet. They provide not even a fraction of what they promise on their internet. They should be sued and every corporate pig there needs to be hanged.

  3. Jack says:

    Windstream needs to be wiped off the planet. They provide not even a fraction of what they promise on their internet. They should be sued and every corporate pig there needs to be hanged.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • timegrrl: Going to one of their centers isn't any better... They have the rudest people working in customer service you could ever imagine. You walk in and rece...
  • Ralph Chastain: I wish that our states cared. People say that our country is too big. We have 50 states for a reason. Wireless Broadband will never be the future with...
  • Steve Vreeland: Bill, read the fine print. If you go over your plan allotment, you get throttled on t mobile. the highest data plan on t mobile is 13GB/month befo...
  • Bill Ding: Clear has been a good deal until I caught them throttling me back, and called the executive resolution line with a Fox News Reporter on the line and t...
  • Steve Vreeland: I use T-mobile It is unlimited but it throttles at a particular point (I think mine is at 3000 MB). As far as I can tell all they offer is a 'mobile...
  • yvonne: How can you stream HD tv for free????...
  • Adam: Our bill went from $92/month for Triple Play (15/1 internet, standard cable, and nationwide phone service) to $128/month after our 2 year promotional ...
  • BobInIllinois: Phil, After working in IT for over 30 years, I don't understand why Frontier management likes to acquire so many different and disparate systems fr...
  • Jim Livermore: Are the soon to be acquired Verizon territories any different than the ones previously purchased, installation/support/billing wise? What conversion a...
  • Joe V: The more I read about Frontier, the more I'm really afraid of what will happen when they finally integrate the recent Verizon purchases of California,...
  • Phillip Dampier: I can't reveal my source except to say it isn't a customer. Frontier's inability to straighten out its website to manage basic order-taking functi...
  • Jim Livermore: Phil, Was your source a residential or business customer? Potential or existing? In what market? And why is online ordering such a big deal in any...

Your Account: