Home » Broadband "Shortage" »Internet Overcharging »Online Video »Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Time Warner Cable/Netflix Spat Costs Viewers Super HD/3D Streaming Options

Phillip Dampier January 17, 2013 Broadband "Shortage", Internet Overcharging, Online Video, Time Warner Cable 4 Comments

Netflix has introduced 3D and Super HD viewing — an improved version of 1080p streamed content — but if you are a Time Warner Cable broadband customer, you will not be able to watch.

Netflix is distributing its highest definition content over its Open Connect CDN network, which minimizes the geographic distance and number of connections between viewers and Netflix’s streaming servers. ISPs can join Netflix Open Connect either by free peering at common Internet exchanges, or save even more in transit costs by putting free storage appliances supplied by Netflix in or near their network.

“OpenConnect provides Netflix data at no cost to the location the ISP desires and doesn’t seek preferential treatment,” Netflix tells GigaOm. “We hope Time Warner will join the many major ISPs around the world who are participating in Open Connect to reduce costs, minimize congestion and improve data delivery to enhance the consumer experience.”

So far, Time Warner Cable has chosen not to participate and accused Netflix of discriminating against its customers.

“While they call it ‘Open Connect,’ Netflix is actually closing off access to some of its content while seeking unprecedented preferential treatment from ISPs,” Time Warner Cable said in a statement to Multichannel News. “We believe it is wrong for Netflix to withhold any content formats from our subscribers and the subscribers of many other ISPs. Time Warner Cable’s network is more than capable of delivering this content to Netflix subscribers today.”

ISP participation in the Netflix Open Connect CDN has proven limited thus far in the United States. Cablevision is the only major cable operator signed on to the content delivery platform. Frontier, Google Fiber and Clearwire also participate. Abroad, Virgin Media, British Telecom, Telmex and Telus also participate.

Netflix’s decision to limit its best streams to participants may be an attempt to force ISPs to take its content delivery network more seriously and enlist subscribers in a push to get additional ISPs on board. By bringing its most watched content directly to ISP’s, the company is attempting to blunt provider arguments for data caps and other viewing limits because the cost to distribute content within a provider’s internal network is negligible.

The necessary hardware powering the Netflix Open Connect CDN is less than you might think. The single device powering Open Connect is easily rack mountable and consists of:

Netflix's Open Connect CDN hardware

Netflix’s Open Connect CDN hardware

Chassis TST custom 1x
Motherboard Supermicro X9SCM-F 1x
Processor Intel E3-1260L 1x
Memory 8GB ECC 1333MHz 4x
Hard Drive Hitachi Deskstar 5K3000 3TB 36x
Hard Drive (alternate) Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB 36x
Solid State Drive Crucial m4 512GB 2x
Controller LSI SAS 9201-16i 16 port 2x
Network card Supermicro AOC-STGN-i2S 1x
Redundant Power Supply Unit (AC/DC options) Zippy MRW-5600V4V/DMRW-5600V4V 1x
Misc. 2U active CPU Heatsink, SATA Cables, NIC optics

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. GP Spector says:

    So, let me get this straight. For Time Warner to gain access to this new stream, all they have to do is upgrade their equipment and that just involves buying the box shown above? What’s the problem? When I wanted to view HD, I had to get a new TV and when I wanted to watch more channels, I had to get a new Cable Box.

    Now they know how we, as customers feel. They showed no sympathy to the customers and I show none to them. If they want it, upgrade. That box looks to cheap to say no to. They can afford to buy that 1 box a lot easier then we could and that 1 box would make a lot of their customers a lot happier. It’s sad when the shoe is on the other foot. LOL

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Rick: Hmmm...reminds me of cable tv when it first started. Marketed as paid for service because it was ad free, until they became a big enough monopoly to ...
  • d0764: If they go after ATT for this then I sure as hell expect them to go after straight talk which does the same thing. Hell straight talk is very corrupt ...
  • Me: I live in ottawa and on oct 22 some of my channels disappeared. Without any warning. Not too happy. Had to order the adapter. Could of saved some time...
  • vzappeal ebook: Attractive portion of content. I simply stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital tto say that I acquiree actually loved accoint your blog po...
  • William: I seem to be in the same situation. These are a few of the points I demand a solution to. Many of my clients have been paying for DSL Max though t...
  • finest food: Wonderful site you have here but I was wondering if you knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics discussed in this article? I'd real...
  • diet pills work: Very good blog you have here but I was curious about if you knew of any message boards that cover the same topics talked about here? I'd really love ...
  • body boost: Hello, this weekend is good in favor of me, because this point in time i am reading this fantastic educational article here at my house....
  • Michael: I had U300 & 24mpgs (Max Turbo) internet. I called - spoke to a nice lady, who tried to rebundle me with a home line - not interested. I was alrea...
  • Kate: My 2 year contract expired in September and the bill jumped $50.00 for a bundle of voice, internet, and tv. I compared packages with competitors f...
  • AC: I have this distinct feeling that nothing will change since they pretty much never lift a finger and the revolving door bureaucracy will keep milking ...
  • Jim Livermore: I don't watch enough on YouTube to really notice, but the option to pay for an ad-free experience would be nice. I have noticed Hulu+ is lowering the ...

Your Account: