Home » Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

West Virginia’s Broadband Fiasco Continues; Half Promised Fiber Won’t Get It

Phillip Dampier January 7, 2013 Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Rural Broadband 1 Comment
wv broadband

Critics of the broadband stimulus project question why the state spent money on unnecessary equipment and failed to identify anchor institutions that already had adequate service.

Another round of miscalculations by project managers overseeing a $126.3 million federal broadband stimulus grant nearing expiration will cost nearly half of West Virginia’s anchor institutions their promised fiber broadband connections.

As a consolation prize, state officials are promising those left out will receive new routers paid for by federal taxpayers whether the institutions want them or not.

As the deadline nears for West Virginia to finish spending their 2010 federal broadband grant, the state has been on a spending spree. Just last week, officials designated 175 new sites as “community anchor institutions” qualified for upgraded Internet service. But the Charleston Gazette found just seven of them will receive fiber broadband upgrades. The rest are getting expensive routers that the state has been trying to unload for nearly two years or new routers the state will spend additional grant funds to purchase.

Among the top vendors paid with grant funds: Frontier Communications, which provides connectivity, and Verizon Communications, the company that supplied the overpowered routers.

“Due to the amount of time required for environmental assessments and fiber builds, we determined that we would limit most of the additional sites to ‘router-only’ so that we could complete the build on time,” Diane Holley-Brown, a spokeswoman for the state Office of Technology told the newspaper.

The state defended its decision to scale back on fiber upgrades pointing out many of the institutions targeted already had the service. That left the state scurrying to find new projects for unspent grant funds.

The state’s latest award of Internet routers is separate from the earlier revelation West Virginia had over-purchased equipment that either proved unnecessary or duplicated equipment already installed.

Eric Eyre's watchdog reporting in the Charleston Gazette over how the state's $100+ million broadband grant has been spent has triggered a federal and state investigation.

Eric Eyre’s watchdog reporting in the Charleston Gazette over how the state’s $100+ million broadband grant has been spent has triggered a federal and state investigation.

In 2011, then Gov. Joe Manchin promised that federal broadband stimulus funding would provide fiber connectivity to 1,064 schools, libraries, public safety and health care institutions. When the project funding expires at the end of January, only 639 institutions will be slated to receive fiber upgrades.

Schools are among the hardest hit institutions. At least 60 percent of those promised upgraded Internet service will only receive a new router instead.

The project has remained under scrutiny since the Gazette revealed $24 million of the grant was spent on 1,064 Cisco routers that were never intended for use at many of the institutions targeted to receive them. Hundreds of the $20,000+ routers were stored, unused, in state buildings for at least two years waiting for a new home.

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Inspector General and West Virginia Legislative Auditor are reviewing the router purchase.

When the grant expires West Virginia officials have made it clear those institutions left without fiber upgrades should not hold their breath waiting for the state to pick up where the federal government left off. The reason? The grant money is nearly gone and the state is not interested in financing additional upgrades.

Share

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. James says:

    This is like building water towers in the desert with no water available…. Complete waste and fraud. Someone should go to jail?







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • James R Curry: It's funny that even as the value of their promotional bundles dwindles, the frequency and desperation of the sales calls that I receive from them is ...
  • Ken R: Stopping people from shopping around seems a little communist! cable is no different than paying for anything else car's.TV's Computers, Cellphones, w...
  • Twizted: Oh its wanted 3.1 Docsis speeds for sure; the problem is big content providers and their pricing schemes are the number one major obstacle along with ...
  • James R Bivins: Your right other countries are leaven the usa behind.When usa please companies and leaves the customers behind.And charter is getting faster,but leavi...
  • James: He was amazing as FCC chair and you are right, he was building his resume, each group he talked to would think they were his key focus....cable won th...
  • James R Bivins: Everytime I see ad saying,they want new customers.They don't know how to get them.They talk expandion,that means update services,that should be update...
  • Andrew Madigan: I wonder what that does to the "private" wifi network. If they're sharing an antenna I bet the private network gets to fight the public network for wi...
  • Phillip Dampier: I have been looking and running into "proprietary battery" blockades. I don't believe the battery was created specifically for this device, but I do s...
  • Phillip Dampier: I can't imagine a firmware update could not correct this, but you are right you need a replacement for now because who knows exactly when that update ...
  • Phillip Dampier: The SIM card change may help restore some connectivity, but it does not resolve the degraded 4G performance. Run some speed tests. If you are in the 1...
  • Bill K: Sorry, here is the image link: http://postimg.org/image/fwpd7ttgz/...
  • Bill K: Here is a screen grab of the battery from the FCC ID submission. I am also interested in an alternate source, $35 is a bit expensive. Thank you for an...

Your Account: