Home » Cablevision »Consumer News » Currently Reading:

Union Helps Sandy Victims Secure Cablevision Refunds; Lawsuit Threatened In Response

Phillip Dampier November 27, 2012 Cablevision, Consumer News No Comments

Union members of the Communications Workers of America, unhappy that customers are not going to receive automatic service credits for the extensive outages caused by Hurricane Sandy, are robocalling possible Cablevision customers to help them secure refunds.

In response, Cablevision’s lawyers threatened to sue the union, claiming they were engaged in “deceptive and illegal” practices, and accused the union of stealing customer records.

Cablevision is one of the few holdouts that require customers to personally request service credits for outages caused by the October storm. Most providers in the hardest hit areas have issued automatic blanket credits for affected customers. Companies requiring customers to contact a customer service representative to request credit are assured many will not, either because of long hold times, other matters taking precedence, or simply because customers forget to ask.

Union officials say the robocalled numbers were gathered from publicly available phone records in the affected areas and did not come from Cablevision’s customer database. Cablevision also objected to the suggestion the union was calling “on behalf” of the cable company — a charge also denied by the union.

“We are just calling people in the affected area to let them know they are eligible for a refund and help them get it if they are entitled to it,” CWA organizer Tim Dubnau told the New York Daily News.

Callers who are interested in pursuing a claim are transferred by the union direct to Cablevision customer service for assistance.

Cablevision and the CWA have been at odds ever since the union began attempting to organize workers in Brooklyn and the Bronx.

The cable company is also facing a $250 million lawsuit filed separately on behalf of subscribers Irwin Bard, a retired businessman from Oyster Bay, N.Y. and his son Jeffery, a lawyer from Huntington.

 

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Dawson Fiberhood: fjfdybvfgj, I want to agree with you about the customer service, but I just can't. First of all, Google is notoriously hard to get ahold of and second...
  • Tom M: 5/1 in SE Austin for free will be a godsend to the low income households in that area. People in Austin (me included) are very happy TWC is finally ge...
  • Oscar@SA: Come over to San Antonio, we have bacon!! \o/...
  • The Kin: I would gladly pay $70 for G.fiber. My DSL here in KY is only a 1.5 down and I pay 67 a month for it. With some of the bills I've seen when working fo...
  • fjfdybvfgj: Don't know how ATTs service can be considered competitive knowing that it has a data cap and that you won't ever see the gigabit speed. Hell even thou...
  • Austintx: Yay! we'll be able to order next month... But, no telling when installation will be. One thing still needs to be said, though; 5/5 (or 5/1-ugh!)Mbp...
  • fjfdybvfgj: Its a good thing that the merger will never be accepted as its heavily against the public interest and no politician would want to commit political su...
  • fjfdybvfgj: I remember when I lived in Maryland and Comcast tried to say that nothing over 10mbps existed and that it was top of the line for $150/month. I moved ...
  • ROGER: I manage my father and my accounts for Uverse and recently was informed our fully loaded rates (includes all taxes and rentals) for u300 and Max inter...
  • BobInIllinois: This is really funny! In our area, back in 2008 when Comcast took over from Insight cable a few years back, Comcast started closing their service...
  • Jen: John did your service ever get better? Mine just started throttling about a month ago and they are telling me the tower that worked best for me is off...
  • Mike Queen: Where do I sign up? I'm in Lewis County. I complain, they offer to disconnect me. I need the Internet to work as well. I've paid for high speed for...

Your Account: