Home » AT&T »Charter »Comcast/Xfinity »Competition » Currently Reading:

Competition? Comcast Announces It Will Sell Ads on Behalf of AT&T U-verse

Phillip Dampier October 29, 2012 AT&T, Charter, Comcast/Xfinity, Competition No Comments

In another sign competition between cable and phone companies may not be as robust as they would have you believe, Comcast last week announced a deal to sell local advertising on behalf of AT&T U-verse.

Under the agreement, Comcast’s Spotlight ad sales division will now sell local advertising slots on behalf of AT&T’s U-verse in cities where both companies provide service.

Comcast says the agreement will cover 21 cities, including:

  • Atlanta
  • Champaign-Springfield-Decatur (Ill.)
  • Chicago
  • Detroit
  • Flint-Saginaw-Bay City (Mich.)
  • Fresno-Visalia (Calif.)
  • Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-Battle Creek (Mich.)
  • Hartford-New Haven (Conn.)
  • Houston
  • Indianapolis
  • Jackson, Miss.
  • Jacksonville (Fla.)
  • Lansing (Mich.)
  • Little Rock-Pine Bluff (Ark.)
  • Memphis
  • Miami-Ft. Lauderdale
  • Monterey-Salinas (Calif.)
  • Nashville
  • Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto (Calif.)
  • San Francisco
  • West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce (Fla.)

This leaves Comcast with a lock on local ad sales for both its own cable and AT&T’s U-verse systems. Most major cable networks offer their affiliates opportunities to insert local commercials during certain advertising breaks. The ad insertions provide a lucrative revenue stream for pay television providers, which can target viewers of specific cable networks or run the same messages across hundreds of cable channels.

The deal will save AT&T from having to hire additional employees to handle local ad sales and will let advertisers cover one or both systems in a single ad buy.

But critics wonder if Comcast cooperating this closely with AT&T is good for competition.

The deal is not unprecedented, however. AT&T has also partnered with Charter Cable to cross market local ad sales in cities where U-verse and Charter compete head to head.

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Danny Lampley: "As we’ve reported before, Tom Wheeler has said almost nothing on his blog about consumer interests . . . ." Expecting a bit much aren't we? After ...
  • Phillip Dampier: I received information from our friends in North Carolina: AT&T has already won the right to redline customers in states like N.C. where they have a s...
  • elfonblog: And I certainly have a problem with that. AT&T is suggesting that they *deserve* the same deal. And they don't. Always playing the victim. Poor, p...
  • txpatriot: The NY PSC partially approved the VZ Tariff filing; you can find the Order and press release on this page: http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Matte...
  • txpatriot: AT&T is saying that if google is allowed to redline, then AT&T s/b allowed to redline....
  • Damaeus: Joshua Taylor says: >>> [SNIP]--- Get rid of your internet, save your money and READ. Who cares about AT&T and the Internet? ---[SNIP]...
  • Scott: Get 1GB of metered data transfer free with every $100.00 spent!!...
  • Tim: The fact that Erie, PA was chosen as an example is quite intriguing because Erie unlike Buffalo or Pittsburgh is a totally Fios-less market. Of course...
  • Ralph: The tv ads featuring "Frank " have been running quite a bit lately. I think Frontier chose an animal as their spokesman because no human being wanted...
  • elfonblog: Right right. AT&T wants us to think that it's diligently elbowing into municipalities that Google has bullied into relaxing their regulations. ...
  • Scott: Our internet and the majority of those lines were built with hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, the majority of it being ripped off via creativ...
  • Jim Donahue: In the long term fiber is less expensive than the old copper network. The problem is that it doesn't provide enough of a margin versus wireless wh...

Your Account: