" /> Charter Communications Adding $200 Upfront “Activation Fee” for 100Mbps Broadband | Stop the Cap!

Home » Charter »Consumer News »Internet Overcharging » Currently Reading:

Charter Communications Adding $200 Upfront “Activation Fee” for 100Mbps Broadband

Phillip Dampier October 10, 2012 Charter, Consumer News, Internet Overcharging 1 Comment

An insider at Charter Communications has told Broadband Reports it plans to introduce a $200 “activation fee” for customers choosing 100Mbps broadband from the cable provider.

“Ultra is a premium service which results in higher incremental network investments, equipment costs, and other operating expenses,” the company tells Karl Bode. “In an effort to maintain reasonable monthly recurring service fees, we have implemented a higher installation fee for Ultra customers.”

The new fee is scheduled to begin Oct. 16.

In July, Charter simplified its broadband tiers, leaving customers with two choices: 30Mbps (250GB limit) for $50 a month or 100Mbps (500GB limit) for $110 a month. The company eliminated modem rental charges at that time.

 

Share

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. Scott says:

    Surely Charter is joking… It wasn’t that long ago Verizon was paying new customers $500 with a gift card plus a $95/mo triple play package to sign-up for service, or throwing in a free $300+ XBOX 360 plus service discounts. From what I can tell those deals are still going too, even AT&T doing $50, $125, and $200 cash back offers for u-verse.

    Charter thinks they can make customers cough up $200 to signup for the privilege of paying a hefty $110/mo 100Mbit “best effort” METERED residential cable connection? They better be running Fiber to the customers home to justify that ridiculous fee.







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • care.petmeds.co.uk: And... let me take twitter followers buy real the white-hot one, we're gonna go for the black outer luminescence. And what else is it will light u...
  • Milan in Austin: The Austin, TX TWC broadband upgrade should be completed in June. I'm really looking forward to it. Considering that the Google Fiber (vaporware) exp...
  • Liz: "Some states have accepted AT&T’s deal only to find their residents’ phone bills rapidly increasing with no corresponding improvement in service."...
  • Dean Martin: I live in the mountains of California. At first, I had Hughes. It barely ever worked and cost a LOT! Then I heard about Wildblue, switched and was hap...
  • William Elliot: Proposing legislation to prevent small companies from offering web service is not only greedy and evil, it's against free interprise. AT&T with ...
  • ICYNDICEY: This company sucks dick!...
  • Bob: You have a serious problem. It's the fact that you're in L.A. You see, Californians are the suckers of America. You pay more for everything and get...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Paul, there are tons of ironies and tragedies in this topic; even dating back 70 and 100 years ago. But perhaps the bigger one is the impact on the a...
  • Paul Houle: If broadcasters get what they are asking for it could be the beginning of the end for OTA TV. Broadcasters get licenses to provide a public service...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Phil, I thought this was an appeal by the Broadcasters to overturn a lower court ruling in favor of Aereo. No? They just need a draw, or 4-4, to win...
  • txpatriot: Phillip I was shocked as you by WaPo's support of the merger. Personally, I support the merger, but I was very surprised by the WaPo editorial....
  • JayS: I wish you had selected a better example than Bloomberg v. CNBC channel placement. Business Tv is on, in my office, all day long. Bloomberg Tv is...

Your Account: