Home » Bell (Canada) »Canada »Competition »Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't »Video » Currently Reading:

Say No to Bell Canada: One Buyout Too Many for Canadian Competition

Earlier this year, Bell Canada announced a blockbuster $3.38 billion offer to buy Astral Media, Inc. It is just the latest rush towards media concentration in Canada as the country’s largest cable and phone companies acquire a growing number of television networks, cable services, radio and broadcast television outlets, magazines, and other media.

Bell Canada already owns CTV – a major broadcast network, and TSN sports. Now it is back for more — Astral Media, the company that owns HBO Canada, The Movie Network, Family, Viewers Choice and lots more.

If this deal wins approval, one company will control 37.6% of TV viewing in Canada, more than twice the amount of its largest competitor. It means Bell will be able to set rates for some of Canada’s most popular cable networks and shows — putting competitors at a major disadvantage and forcing you to pay more to watch.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Say No to Bell Canada.flv

Say No to Bell’s ad campaign fighting Bell Canada’s attempt to buy Astral Media.  (1 minute)

The federal government has to approve this deal, and a growing number of competing media companies, consumer groups, and politicians are coming together to oppose it.

Stop the Cap! believes Bell Canada owns too much already, and has repeatedly demonstrated that when it flexes its marketplace muscle, consumers pay more for less service. Add your voice against this deal by submitting a letter to Canada’s Ministers of Heritage and Industry, the Competition Bureau, the CRTC and your Member of Parliament and visiting the other opposition websites noted below.

No company needs to own and control 79 TV channels, 107 radio stations and more than 100 major Canadian news, entertainment, and cultural websites.

Even smaller Canadian cable companies fear this deal. Cogeco Cable, Eastlink, and Quebecor (parent company of Vidéotron), have joined forces to launch saynotobell.ca, a website to help consumers fight back. Quebec-based consumer group Option consommateurs has its own online petition in French, and Openmedia’s Stop the Takeover Coalition includes a range of pro-consumer forces opposed to the deal:

  • OpenMedia.ca
  • the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
  • the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC)
  • Canada Without Poverty and the CWP Advocacy Network,
  • the Canadian Media Guild (which represents over 6,000 media workers, including those from CBC, Reuters, the Canadian Press, and Shaw Media),
  • the Consumers’ Association of Canada,
  • the Council of Canadians (Canada’s largest citizens’ group),
  • the Council of Senior Citizens’ Organizations of British Columbia (COSCO),
  • Union des consommateurs.

Some of the arguments against the deal to consider:

  • Bell Canada’s TV audience share would be 50% greater than the share of any TV network in the US, Japan, UK, Australia, France, and Russia. It would allow one corporation to control the programming (including news) on a scale not seen outside of countries like Italy, Brazil, and Mexico. When politicians have that much control of the media, they use it to influence viewers. Would Bell do any different?
  • Bell can set the rates, terms, and bundling requirements for popular cable programming and services. They have already shown a willingness to tell independent ISPs they must set usage limits on their customers just as Bell does already. What would stop them from insisting you subscribe to more services in order to watch the programming you want?
  • Mergers=job losses and cost cutting to pay for inflated bonuses and “cost savings” to help finance these blockbuster deals. Without competition, original Canadian productions can be slashed to the bone or canceled altogether. Why deliver quality when you can limit viewers’ alternative choices instead?
  • America allowed media consolidation in radio and television and turned vibrant local stations into corporate money-machines at the expense of local news, original shows, and local content. How many radio stations in the United States now operate like automated electronic jukeboxes? How many local TV newscasts signed off for good to “save money.” Can Canadian local news, weather, and informational programming survive Bell’s ax? If it happened in the United States, it can happen in Canada too.

Ensure diversity by disconnecting this Bell deal permanently, and tell your elected leaders to stop allowing endless media consolidation.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Globe and Mail How much of a competition threat is Bells Astral deal 8-24-12.flv

The Globe and Mail considers the issue of Bell’s takeover bid for Astral Media. How will it affect Canadian consumers? (2 minutes)

Share

Currently there are 8 comments on this Article:

  1. elle de francia says:

    no to bell canada

  2. Mr Mervyn Palmer says:

    Ater a lot of reeeeely bad experiences with “Bells” so called service centre,
    I came to the conclusion that i should NOT contribute to a company that willfully refused to recognize that the person ( or people that use AND PAY ) for the none existant (what THEY call service)…….. I got tired of paying for a service that i was NOT GETTING !! Now they want to control and CHARGE (money)for and have a monopoly on the WHOLE Works !!

    Hey People !!!!
    Do not let them take over ASTRAL MEDIA , !!!
    Like you i am tired of paying for a service that is not there !!
    Respectfully M.Palmer B.C.
    Canada

  3. Densie says:

    Bell Canada will just keep over charging and will not give a damned if you are late with a payment, and if you pay them late they will cut you off…Bell is only there for the bucks…heck the staff doesnt even speak english as a first language…i got rid of bell and saved over 250 a month…Dont let them take Astral Media….you know that once they get the monopoly there will be no stopping them

    Respectfully a former bell user of over 20 years (yeah they wouldnt even take that time frame into consideration for anything

    Denise La Rochelle
    Ontario

  4. The more I see the way Bell operates, the more they remind me of the typically anti-consumer attitudes of AT&T in the States.

    Media concentration is a major problem in Canada these days, and I urge my friends up north to not repeat the enormous mistakes we made with the 1996 Telecom Act which allowed a handful of corporations to swallow up hundreds (and thousands) of radio and TV outlets.

    To cover the debt they incurred from the buying frenzy, thousands of jobs were lost and the quality of programming suffered enormously because of “necessary budget cuts.” A number of local stations dumped their local newscasts altogether, others crammed themselves full with program-length ads, and radio stations turned into automated shadows of their earlier selves.

    And they wonder why Americans are learning to love on-demand options like Netflix and online streaming music over the trash corporate media shovels at us with 25 minutes of ads per hour.

    Has there been a deal recently that the CRTC doesn’t like? A decade or so ago you couldn’t even change the format of your radio station without a regulatory review. Now you can buy and sell radio stations on a whim. And what formats they do offer — like Cogeco’s ridiculous 50,000 watt former sports powerhouse CKAC, which today runs nothing but traffic reports for Montreal… seriously. (And Cogeco wanted 940 AM for an English language version of the same thing.)

    There’s a great use for a 50kw station….

    The CRTC has become a telecom trade association, not a regulator.

  5. So I have been power-walking while listening to the CRTC hearings this week over the Bell-Astral deal (lots of videos and multimedia forthcoming on Stop the Cap! so be sure to check out our home page later today).

    Does anyone else think this surprise announcement of a Netflix-type service for Canada is just one big Distract-O-Matic “look over here at the shiny keys” tactic to try and get this deal by regulators?

    BNN has been covering this as if it is a done deal, and considering the track record of the CRTC, which has turned letting the foxes guard the hen house into an art form, I’m not sure BNN (also owned by Bell) is wrong.

  6. Leslie Thomas says:

    Bell Canada has no compation for people as someone said they are just in it for the
    money I quite Bell years ago I JUST SAY NOOOOO !!!!!







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Antonina: Hello There. I found your weblog the usage of msn. That is a really smartly written article....
  • Vyacheslav: I relish, lead to I found exactly what I used to be taking a look for....
  • Daria: I’ll complain that you have copied materials from yet another supply...
  • Bogdan: It is the best time to make some plans for the long run and it is time to be happy. I have learn this put up and if I may I want to suggest you some f...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Phil, first, suggest 3 people you think are more qualified and we'll do an objective analysis. Second, are you aware of the personal expense Mr. Wh...
  • Anfisa: As I web-site possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling great , appreciate it for your efforts....
  • Danny Lampley: "As we’ve reported before, Tom Wheeler has said almost nothing on his blog about consumer interests . . . ." Expecting a bit much aren't we? After ...
  • Phillip Dampier: I received information from our friends in North Carolina: AT&T has already won the right to redline customers in states like N.C. where they have a s...
  • elfonblog: And I certainly have a problem with that. AT&T is suggesting that they *deserve* the same deal. And they don't. Always playing the victim. Poor, p...
  • txpatriot: The NY PSC partially approved the VZ Tariff filing; you can find the Order and press release on this page: http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Matte...
  • txpatriot: AT&T is saying that if google is allowed to redline, then AT&T s/b allowed to redline....
  • Damaeus: Joshua Taylor says: >>> [SNIP]--- Get rid of your internet, save your money and READ. Who cares about AT&T and the Internet? ---[SNIP]...

Your Account: