" /> AT&T Agrees to Stop Cramming Unauthorized Charges on Phone Bills | Stop the Cap!

Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

AT&T Agrees to Stop Cramming Unauthorized Charges on Phone Bills

Phillip Dampier April 4, 2012 AT&T, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't 4 Comments

AT&T has joined Verizon in a groundbreaking decision to stop allowing bogus charges on customer’s phone bills.

Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) publicly thanked AT&T for joining with Verizon to stop the fraudulent fees, which a recent Senate investigation found netted at least $10 billion over the last five years.

“AT&T made the right decision to end cramming by August,” Rockefeller said. “While the decisions of AT&T and Verizon are a step in the right direction, I still believe we need to pass a bill that bans this abusive practice once and for all.”

Rockefeller

Phone companies have been reluctant to stop third-party billing because it represents lucrative revenue for companies that have watched their landline customers disconnect and disappear.

“According to financial information my staff has reviewed, telephone companies earn a dollar or two every time they place a third-party charge on their customers’ bills,” Rockefeller said. “Do the math. That’s well over a billion dollars in profit over the past decade.”

AT&T suggested the cramming problem was overblown, but relented anyway.

“We currently receive cramming complaints for only about one out of every thousand bills that contain third-party charges,” said Michael Balmoris, an AT&T spokesman, in a statement to MSNBC.  “However, due to continued concern over the possibility of unauthorized charges, we have decided to take this additional step and eliminate third-party billing for most types of services.”

In late March, Verizon notified its billing partners it would cease third-party billing by the end of 2012.

Share

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. Earl says:

    Quote: “Phone companies have been reluctant to stop third-party billing because it represents lucrative revenue for companies that have watched their landline customers disconnect and disappear.”
    Those “Phone companies” like AT$T have brought that upon themselves with deregulation that they pushed for, because the quality of service on those landlines becomes intolerable and the the ever increasing cost surpasses the wireless bill.
    Quote: “AT&T suggested the cramming problem was overblown, but relented anyway.”
    Yeah, who would want to give that up? they collect their cut and someone else takes the heat.

  2. Ben says:

    Are they going to stop the $2 per kilobyte ghost data charges? I still have to maintain data blocks on 4 of my lines which have an Family Messaging Plan because if I don’t I’ll be slammed with miscellaneous $2 charges. So, I end up paying for features I can no longer use like MMS and IM!

  3. Earl says:

    Apparently this practice is a lot worse than AT$T would lead us to believe (why am I not surprised?), and they allow it to happen. And when caught, they try appease customers with a partial refund. Until they are threatened with lose of a customer or lawsuit, then a full refund is given.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/your-money/cellphone-cramming-gets-a-second-look.html

  4. Baxter says:

    idk if its because our account is old (2001) or what but everytime we had a prob with this, we called them and they credited us for it, even if it was for 3 months or so, they didnt really mind, most of it was just my little brother doin stupid stuff on the phone but either way ive known this to be a prob with others that have younger accounts







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • JayS: With the change to digital Tv and the advent of 'sub-channels', the rule about not owning more than two stations in a given Tv market has me confused....
  • The Kin: That's all fine and dandy, Paul except for the fact that cable companies have enough in profits to easily coat the US in fiber and then some. The cabl...
  • Dave Hancock: Fat chance. Perhaps the government will force "a-la carte", but the providers (ESPN, etc) will continue to insist that they be carried by the most po...
  • Terry Hall: I was told I would get a $200 rebate and was sent $100. I've been given 5 different numbers to call, all with long wait times. The last number I was g...
  • JoeinIllinois: At some point, won't the cable companies press ESPN , the Regional Sports Networks, NHL network, NBA network, MLB network, NBC Sports Net, regional NC...
  • Paul Houle: The big issue with Fiber is that it has high costs to set up, not so much because the hardware is expensive, but because you have to either dig up t...
  • Scott: Perfectly example of why I still don't subscribe to cable or satellite. The only channel I *might* watch out of that entire lineup is Comedy Central....
  • James Cieloha: CableOne, Service Electric, GCI, Buckeye and other NCTC members are being forced by Viacom to add the Epix movie channels in order to carry the cable ...
  • Dave Hancock: I don't know where AP lives, but in MOST areas of the country MOST people do not have any choice for High Speed Internet (15mbps or above) - it is the...
  • tacitus: That doesn't sound right. Are you in some sort of contract? Where in the country is this?...
  • AP: Good luck cutting cable if you live in an area that has one cable, internet, and phone company like I do. If you want internet or phone with the cable...
  • Dave Hancock: Soon the rest of the cable companies will follow Verizon's lead and start limiting the input bandwidth to their systems (ex: Netflix) to discourage su...

Your Account: